Technical Papers
Jul 18, 2024

Considering Monitoring Well Bias in the Delineation of Benzene Plume Lengths

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

Underground storage tanks (USTs) primarily store and dispense fuel products (petroleum hydrocarbons) such as gasoline and diesel as well as some hazardous substances. When a release occurs from an UST, it must be cleaned up and remediated as necessary. As part of the site characterization process, monitoring wells are installed to measure petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations, such as benzene, to help site managers make decisions on remediation strategies and effectiveness, determine site status, and whether sites pose a risk to local receptors—with implications to human health and the environment. Previous studies have used various approaches to estimate benzene plume lengths using these monitoring well data. Examining one state’s large database of monitoring well data from leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup sites, and through statistical and spatial analysis, we find that studies that used existing monitoring well data may have underestimated plume lengths. Our study identified elevated benzene concentrations at the boundaries of monitoring well extents, including at the leading edge of plumes. For example, in 3,495 LUST sites, 83% exceeded a selected threshold concentration of 5  ug/L in a monitoring well at the site boundary, and 76% of sites exceeded 5  ug/L at the monitoring well furthest from a defined source, the point used to delineate length. Of the total 17,816 monitoring wells that delineated UST site boundaries, 47% had concentrations exceeding 5  ug/L. These data analyses and results are done over the lifetime of a monitored UST site, not targeted over time periods when decisions are being rendered. However, results suggest that studies to date using existing monitoring well data may have underestimated plume lengths and extents. Furthermore, results suggest monitoring wells in combination with other site information, such as modeling, should be used to guide site managers in their decisions regarding leaked UST products, the area and extent of contamination, risks to receptors, and remedial approaches.

Practical Applications

USTs, which store fuel at locations such as gas stations, are known to leak fuel products into soil and groundwater. Fuel products contain petroleum hydrocarbons like benzene, a cancer-causing chemical. Previous studies that have attempted to identify the maximum distance benzene plumes travel have been hampered by a bias in available data—specifically, that monitoring wells are often not placed at far enough distances to be able to map a plume to concentrations below concerning levels. This paper identifies this bias and provides insight into how it may be considered in the future to more effectively map plumes and identify potential biases that can lead to inconclusive results related to plume behavior. While traditional physics-based models remain useful, they can be augmented with data-driven models to more accurately estimate plume extents, especially when real-world data are lacking.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All analysis, statistics, and spatial analyses were completed using R version 4.1.2. All code used in this research, as well as additional exploratory analyses, are publicly available in Murray (2023).

Acknowledgments

All analysis, statistics and spatial analyses were completed using R version 4.1.2. All California LUST data were obtained from the California Water Board’s GeoTracker public portal (SWRCB 2024). The authors would thank Dr. John McKernan for his thoughtful review of the manuscript and assistance in preparing it for publication.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency or the California State Water Resources Control Board. This document, and the research described within, was not supported by EPA funding.

References

California Water Boards. 2022. “GeoTracker.” Accessed January 15, 2022. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/data_download_by_county.
Connor, J. A., R. Kamath, K. L. Walker, and T. E. McHugh. 2015. “Review of quantitative surveys of the length and stability of MTBE, TBA, and benzene plumes in groundwater at UST sites.” Groundwater 53 (2): 195–206.
Federal Register. 1988. “Underground storage tanks, 40 CFR Part 280.” Accessed February 27, 2023. https://archives.federalregister.gov/issue_slice/1988/9/23/37077-37247.pdf#page=6.
Happel, A. M. 1998. An evaluation of MTBE impacts to California groundwater resources. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1987. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: An updating of IARC monographs volumes 1 to 42. Lyon, France: IARC.
Kamath, R., J. Connor, T. McHugh, A. Nemir, M. Le, and A. Ryan. 2012. “Use of long-term monitoring data to evaluate benzene, MTBE, and TBA plume behavior in groundwater at retail gasoline sites.” J. Environ. Eng. 138 (4): 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000488.
Lovelace, R., and R. Ellison. 2018. “stplanr: A package for transport planning.” R J. 10 (2): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-053.
Mace, R. E., and W.-J. Choi. 1998. “Petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water: Prevention, detection, and restoration.” In Proc., 1998 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water—Prevention, Detection, and Remediation. Westerville, OH: National Ground Water Association.
Murray. 2023. “Considering monitoring well bias in the delineation of benzene plume lengths.” Accessed December 6, 2022. https://github.com/USEPA/ORD_Plume_Paper.
O’Reilly, K., C. Espino Devine, N. Sihota, and K. North. 2016. “An empirical evaluation of the influence of ethanol on natural attenuation of gasoline constituents.” Groundwater Monit. Rem. 36 (3): 62–72.
O’Reilly, K., M. Lahvis, G. DeVaull, and A. Deines. 2021. “A comparative plume study of DRO, GRO, benzene, and MTBE: Implications for risk management.” Groundwater Monit. Rem. 41 (3): 58–64.
Pebesma, E. 2018. “Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data.” R J. 10 (1): 439–446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009.
R Core Team. 2021. A language and environment for statistical computing. Glendale, CA: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reid, J. B., H. J. Reisinger, P. G. Bartholomae, J. C. Gray, and A. S. Hullman. 1999. Comparative MTBE versus benzene plume behavior. Marietta, GA: Integrated Science & Technology.
Rice, D. W., R. D. Grose, J. C. Michaelson, B. Dooher, D. H. MacQueen, S. J. Cullen, and M. A. Marino. 1995. Leaking underground fuel tank (LUFT) historical case analyses. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Rifai, H., and W. Rixey. 2004. “Characterizing the intrinsic remediation of MTBE at field sites.” https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract_id/5882/report/F.
RStudio Team. 2020. RStudio: Integrated development environment. Boston, MA: RStudio.
Shapiro, A. M., and F. D. Day-Lewis. 2022. “Reframing groundwater hydrology as a data-driven science.” Groundwater 60 (4): 455–456.
Shih, T., Y. Rong, T. Harmon, and M. Suffet. 2004. “Evaluation of the impact of fuel hydrocarbons and oxygenates on groundwater resources.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (1): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0304650.
SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board). 2024. “Download ESI data.” Accessed June 17, 2021. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/data_download_by_county.
USEPA. 2022. “Semiannual report of UST performance measures.” Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-11/ca-22-34.pdf.
Wickham, H., M. Averick, J. Bryan, W. Chang, L. McGowan, R. Francois, and M. Kuhn. 2019. “Welcome to the tidyverse.” J. Open Source Software 4 (43): 1686.
Wilson, B. H. 2003a. “Comparison of plume lengths for MTBE and BTEX at 212 South Carolina sites.” In MBTE remediation handbook, edited by E. E. Moyer and P. T. Kostecki, 635–638. Amherst, MA: Amherst Scientific Publishers.
Wilson, J. T. 2003b. “Fate and transport of MTBE and other gasoline components.” In MTBE remediation handbook, 19–61. Boston: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Oct 4, 2023
Accepted: Mar 15, 2024
Published online: Jul 18, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Geographer, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, 26 Martin Luther King Dr. W, Cincinnati, OH 45244; Dept. of Geography, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3220, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-6206. Email: [email protected]
Alex Hall
Geographer, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, 26 Martin Luther King Dr. W, Cincinnati, OH 45244.
Diego Riveros-Iregui
Bowman & Gordon Gray Distinguished Professor of Geography, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3220, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share