Technical Papers
Oct 9, 2023

Structural and Microbial Dynamics Analyses of MABR Biofilms

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 12

Abstract

Membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) technology is currently garnering wide acceptance as a wastewater treatment technology due to process and operational advantages that have accrued during many years of investigation, but despite these achievements, the challenge of biofilm thickness control still persists. This work was therefore designed to expand the current knowledge of MABR operations, particularly with respect to biofilm thickness management and reactor performance stability. Biofilm thickness was controlled with intermittent washing of the membrane bundle based on a bulk dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration set-point of 0.2  mg/L. This nonaggressive membrane cleaning mechanism subdued biofilm sloughing, but maintained biofilm erosion, which supported the development of a multifunctional biofilm with the thickness and microbial activity adequate to stabilize reactor performance over 185 days. Applied in the treatment of municipal wastewater, the MABR demonstrated average organic carbon and ammonia nitrogen (NH4+N) removal efficiencies of 92%±2% and 100%±7.8%, respectively. The total inorganic nitrogen removal reached 84%±5% at mean surface loading rates of 10%±0.7  gCOD/m2/d and 0.93±0.07  gN/m2/d within a hydraulic retention time of 2.5 h and with minimal reactor down time. The average biofilm density determined at the end of the study was 17.6  g/L, while the biofilm thickness determined to be 0.49 mm. A 16S rRNA analysis of the MABR microbial population at each stage indicated that a microbial community with sufficient biodiversity and relative abundance for stable reactor performance was sustained. Demonstrating that intermittent membrane cleaning with water effectively stabilized the MABR biofilm thickness, reduced process upsets, and maintained high performance at high substrate loading.

Practical Applications

The current drive for energy neutrality, drastic reduction in energy costs, and increasingly stringent wastewater discharge rules has led to the quest for the development of energy efficient and effective wastewater treatment technologies. MABR is one of these developing technologies. Compared to traditional biological wastewater treatment methods, MABRs offer improved performance with regards to the removal of pollutants from wastewater and energy efficiency. MABR is a biofilm-based technology, whose success depends on the biofilm thickness. Moreover, a biofilm with adequate thickness is required to maintain the diversity and abundance of the microbial community required for high and stable performance over extended operational periods. But, the effective control of biofilm thickness remains a lingering challenge in the application of MABR technology. In practice, biofilm thickness control is commonly accomplished by promoting biofilm detachment using air bubbles. However, several studies have reported performance upsets and performance lag that can sometimes last up to several months following each biofilm detachment episode due to substantial biofilm loss. This study recommends a biofilm thickness management protocol that involves gentle detachment of loosely bound biofilms through nonaggressive cleaning and cleaning episodes initiated when a set operating condition is attained.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from the NSERC Discovery project and the Canada Research Chair (CRC) in Future Community Water Services (Liu, Y.).

References

Anh-Vu, N., L. Yun-Je, K. Masumi, and C. Visvanathan. 2022. “Effects of membrane relaxation rate on performance of pilot-scale membrane aerated biofilm reactors treating domestic wastewater.” Environ. Res. 211 (Aug): 113003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113003.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: APHA, American Water Work Association, Water Environment Federation.
Awolusi, O. O., S. K. S. Kumari, and F. Bux. 2015. “Ecophysiology of nitrifying communities in membrane bioreactors.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12 (Feb): 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0551-x.
Bassin, J. P., R. Kleerebezem, A. S. Rosado, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, and M. Dezotti. 2012. “Effect of different operational conditions on biofilm development, nitrification, and nitrifying microbial population in moving-bed biofilm reactors.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (3): 1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203356z.
Bunse, P., L. Orschler, S. Agrawal, and S. Lackner. 2020. “Membrane aerated biofilm reactors for mainstream partial nitritation/anammox: Experiences using real municipal wastewater.” Water Res. X 9 (Dec): 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100066.
Callahan, B. J., P. J. McMurdie, M. J. Rosen, A. W. Han, A. J. A. Johnson, and S. P. Holmes. 2016. “DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.” Nat. Methods 13 (7): 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869.
Casey, E., B. Glennon, and G. Hamer. 2000. “Biofilm development in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor: Effect of flow velocity on performance.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 67 (4): 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000220)67:4%3C476::AID-BIT11%3E3.0.CO;2-2.
Chen, R., S. Cao, L. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. 2022. “NOB suppression strategies in a mainstream membrane aerated biofilm reactor under exceptionally low lumen pressure.” Chemosphere 290 (Mar): 133386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133386.
Côté, P., J. Peeters, N. Adams, Y. Hong, Z. Long, and J. Ireland. 2015. “A new membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for low energy wastewater treatment: Pilot results.” In Proc., Water Environment Federation, 4226–4239. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation.
Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A., and M. Zielińska. 2016. “Bacterial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment systems.” World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32 (Mar): 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2012-9.
Czieborowski, M., A. Hübenthal, A. Poehlein, I. Vogt, and B. Philipp. 2020. “Genetic and physiological analysis of biofilm formation on different plastic surfaces by Sphingomonas sp. strain S2M10 reveals an essential function of sphingan biosynthesis.” Microbiology 166 (10): 918–935. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000961.
da Silva, T. S., T. Matsumoto, M. L. dos Anjos, and L. L. Albertin. 2018. “Organic matter removal in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor.” J. Environ. Eng. 144 (8): 04018057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001393.
Dodds, W. K. K., and E. B. Welch. 2000. “Establishing nutrient criteria in streams.” J. North Am. Benthological Soc. 19 (1): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468291.
Egli, K., C. Langer, H.-R. Siegrist, A. J. Zehnder, M. Wagner, and J. R. van der Meer. 2003. “Community analysis of ammonia and nitrite oxidizers during start-up of nitritation reactors.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 (6): 3213–3222.
Fitzgerald, C. M., P. Camejo, J. Z. Oshlag, and D. R. Noguera. 2015. “Ammonia-oxidizing microbial communities in reactors with efficient nitrification at low-dissolved oxygen.” Water Res. 70 (Mar): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.041.
Frølund, B., R. Palmgren, K. Keiding, and P. H. Nielsen. 1996. “Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin.” Water Res. 30 (8): 1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00323-1.
Gilbert, E. M., S. Agrawal, F. Brunner, T. Schwartz, H. Horn, and S. Lackner. 2014. “Response of different Nitrospira species to anoxic periods depends on operational DO.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (5): 2934–2941. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404992g.
Gong, Z., F. Yang, S. Liu, H. Bao, S. Hu, and K. Furukawa. 2007. “Feasibility of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal based on Anammox.” Chemosphere 69 (5): 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.023.
Hall-Stoodley, L., J. W. Costerton, and P. Stoodley. 2004. “Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases.” Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2 (2): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro821.
He, H., B. M. Wagner, A. L. Carlson, C. Yang, and G. T. Daigger. 2021. “Recent progress using membrane aerated biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment.” Water Sci. Technol. 84 (9): 2131–2157. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.443.
Heffernan, B., A. Shrivastava, D. Toniolo, M. Semmens, and E. Syron. 2017. “Operation of a large scale membrane aerated biofilm reactor for the treatment of municipal wastewater.” In Proc., Water Environment Federation, 285–297. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation.
Hoa, P. T., L. Nair, and C. Visvanathan. 2003. “The effect of nutrients on extracellular polymeric substance production and its influence on sludge properties.” Water SA 29 (4): 437–442. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v29i4.5050.
Houweling, D., and G. T. Daigger. 2019. Intensifying activated sludge using media-supported biofilms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hu, X.-B., K. Xu, Z. Wang, L.-L. Ding, and H.-Q. Ren. 2013. “Characteristics of biofilm attaching to carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor used to treat vitamin C wastewater.” Scanning 35 (5): 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21064.
Hwang, J. H., N. Cicek, and J. A. Oleszkiewicz. 2009. “Membrane biofilm reactors for nitrogen removal: State-of-the-art and research needs.” Water Sci. Technol. 60 (11): 2739–2747. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.698.
Iorhemen, O. T., S. Ukaigwe, H. Dang, and Y. Liu. 2022. “Phosphorus removal from aerobic granular sludge: Proliferation of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) under different feeding strategies.” Processes 10 (7): 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071399.
Janczewski, L., and A. Trusek-Holownia. 2016. “Biofilm-based membrane reactors–selected aspects of the application and microbial layer control.” Desalin. Water Treat. 57 (48–49): 22909–22916. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1117822.
Kelly, J. J., M. G. London, A. R. McCormick, M. Rojas, J. W. Scott, and T. J. Hoellein. 2021. “Wastewater treatment alters microbial colonization of microplastics.” PLoS One 16 (1): e0244443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244443.
Khalid, S., M. Shahid, N. Natasha, I. Bibi, T. Sarwar, A. H. Shah, and N. K. Niazi. 2018. “A review of environmental contamination and health risk assessment of wastewater use for crop irrigation with a focus on low and high-income countries.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (5): 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050895.
Krishna, K. B., A. Sathasivan, and M. P. Ginige. 2013. “Microbial community changes with decaying chloramine residuals in a lab-scale system.” Water Res. 47 (13): 4666–4679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.035.
LaPara, T. M., A. C. Cole, J. W. Shanahan, and M. J. Semmens. 2006. “The effects of organic carbon, ammoniacal-nitrogen, and oxygen partial pressure on the stratification of membrane-aerated biofilms.” J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33 (4): 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-005-0052-5.
Li, X., et al. 2023. “Development and application of membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR)—A review.” Water 15 (3): 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030436.
Liang, Z., W. Li, S. Yang, and P. Du. 2010. “Extraction and structural characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), pellets in autotrophic nitrifying biofilm and activated sludge.” Chemosphere 81 (5): 626–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.043.
Lin, J., P. Zhang, G. Li, J. Yin, J. Li, and X. Zhao. 2016. “Effect of COD/N ratio on nitrogen removal in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor.” Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 113 (Sep): 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.01.009.
Liu, G., and J. Wang. 2013. “Long-term low DO enriches and shifts nitrifier community in activated sludge.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (10): 5109–5117. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304647y.
Luo, Y.-H., R. Chen, L.-L. Wen, F. Meng, Y. Zhang, C.-Y. Lai, B. E. Rittmann, H.-P. Zhao, and P. Zheng. 2015. “Complete perchlorate reduction using methane as the sole electron donor and carbon source.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (4): 2341–2349. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504990m.
Ma, Y., A. Piscedda, A. D. L. C. Veras, C. Domingo-Félez, and B. F. Smets. 2022. “Intermittent aeration to regulate microbial activities in membrane-aerated biofilm reactors: Energy-efficient nitrogen removal and low nitrous oxide emission.” Chem. Eng. J. 433 (Apr): 133630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133630.
Martin, K. J., and R. Nerenberg. 2012. “The membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) for water and wastewater treatment: Principles, applications, and recent developments.” Bioresour. Technol. 122 (Oct): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.110.
McCarty, P. L., J. Bae, and J. Kim. 2011. “Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer—Can this be achieved?” Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (17): 7100–7106. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2014264.
McDonald, D., M. N. Price, J. Goodrich, E. P. Nawrocki, T. Z. DeSantis, A. Probst, G. L. Andersen, R. Knight, and P. Hugenholtz. 2012. “An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea.” ISME J. 6 (3): 610–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.139.
Mielczarek, A. T., H. T. T. Nguyen, J. L. Nielsen, and P. H. Nielsen. 2013. “Population dynamics of bacteria involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal in Danish wastewater treatment plants.” Water Res. 47 (4): 1529–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.003.
Mota, C., J. Ridenoure, J. Cheng, and F. L. de los Reyes III. 2005. “High levels of nitrifying bacteria in intermittently aerated reactors treating high ammonia wastewater.” FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 54 (3): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2005.05.001.
Nerenberg, R. 2016. “The membrane-biofilm reactor (MBfR) as a counter-diffusional biofilm process.” Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 38 (Apr): 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.015.
Peeters, J., Z. Long, D. Houweling, P. Côté, G. T. Daigger, and S. Snowling. 2017. “Nutrient removal intensification with MABR–developing a process model supported by piloting.” In Proc., Nutrient Removal and Recovery Symp. 2017. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation.
Pellicer-Nàcher, C., S. Franck, A. Gülay, M. Ruscalleda, A. Terada, W. A. Al-Soud, M. A. Hansen, S. J. Sørensen, and B. F. Smets. 2014. “Sequentially aerated membrane biofilm reactors for autotrophic nitrogen removal: Microbial community composition and dynamics.” Microb. Biotechnol. 7 (1): 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12079.
Pellicer-Nàcher, C., and B. F. Smets. 2014. “Structure, composition, and strength of nitrifying membrane-aerated biofilms.” Water Res. 57 (Jun): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.026.
Pérez-Calleja, P., E. Clements, and R. Nerenberg. 2022. “Enhancing ammonium oxidation fluxes and nitritation efficiencies in MABRs: A modeling study.” Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 8 (2): 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EW00337B.
Picioreanu, C., M. C. M. Van Loosdrecht, and J. J. Heijnen. 2001. “Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 72 (2): 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0290(20000120)72:2%3C205::AID-BIT9%3E3.0.CO;2-L.
Pierce, J., and C. H. Suelter. 1977. “An evaluation of the Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 dye-binding method for quantitative protein determination.” Anal. Biochem. 81 (2): 478–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(77)90723-0.
Rout, P. R., M. K. Shahid, R. R. Dash, P. Bhunia, D. Liu, S. Varjani, T. C. Zhang, and R. Y. Surampalli. 2021. “Nutrient removal from domestic wastewater: A comprehensive review on conventional and advanced technologies.” J. Environ. Manage. 296 (Oct): 113246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113246.
Sanchez-Huerta, C., L. Fortunato, T. Leiknes, and P.-Y. Hong. 2022. “Influence of biofilm thickness on the removal of thirteen different organic micropollutants via a membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR).” J. Hazard. Mater. 432 (Jun): 128698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128698.
Semmens, M. J., K. Dahm, J. Shanahan, and A. Christianson. 2003. “COD and nitrogen removal by biofilms growing on gas permeable membranes.” Water Res. 37 (18): 4343–4350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00416-0.
Semmens, M. J., and J. Shanahan. 2005. Membrane technology: Pilot studies of membrane-aerated bioreactors, final report. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation.
Shaowei, H., Y. Fenglin, S. Cui, J. Zhang, and W. Tonghua. 2008. “Simultaneous removal of COD and nitrogen using a novel carbon-membrane aerated biofilm reactor.” J. Environ. Sci. 20 (2): 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60022-4.
Shi, Y., J. Huang, G. Zeng, Y. Gu, Y. Chen, Y. Hu, B. Tang, J. Zhou, Y. Yang, and L. Shi. 2017. “Exploiting extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) controlling strategies for performance enhancement of biological wastewater treatments: An overview.” Chemosphere 180 (Aug): 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.042.
Shinoda, Y., Y. Sakai, H. Uenishi, Y. Uchihashi, A. Hiraishi, H. Yukawa, H. Yurimoto, and N. Kato. 2004. “Aerobic and anaerobic toluene degradation by a newly isolated denitrifying bacterium, Thauera sp. strain DNT-1.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 (3): 1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.3.1385-1392.2004.
Siriweera, W. B. S., L. Yun-Je, K. Masumi, and C. Visvanathan. 2021. “Organic matter and total nitrogen removal from wastewater using a pilot-scale membrane-aerated biofilm reactor.” Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 15 (Sep): 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100817.
Stricker, A. E., H. Lossing, J. H. Gibson, Y. Hong, and J. C. Urbanic. 2011. “Pilot scale testing of a new configuration of the membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) to treat high-strength industrial sewage.” Water Environ. Res. 83 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143009X12487095236991.
Suarez, C., M. Piculell, O. Modin, S. Langenheder, F. Persson, and M. Hermansson. 2019. “Thickness determines microbial community structure and function in nitrifying biofilms via deterministic assembly.” Sci. Rep. 9 (1): 5110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41542-1.
Sun, Z., Y. Li, M. Li, N. Wang, J. Liu, H. Guo, and B. Li. 2022. “Steel pickling rinse wastewater treatment by two-stage MABR system: Reactor performance, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and microbial community.” Chemosphere 299 (Jul): 134402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134402.
Syron, E., and E. Casey. 2008. “Membrane-aerated biofilms for high rate biotreatment: Performance appraisal, engineering principles, scale-up, and development requirements.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (6): 1833–1844. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0719428.
Syron, E., M. J. Semmens, and E. Casey. 2015. “Performance analysis of a pilot-scale membrane aerated biofilm reactor for the treatment of landfill leachate.” Chem. Eng. J. 273 (Aug): 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.043.
Taşkan, B., H. Hasar, and C.-H. Lee. 2020. “Effective biofilm control in a membrane biofilm reactor using a quenching bacterium (Rhodococcus sp. BH4).” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 117 (4): 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27259.
Tay, J.-H., Q.-S. Liu, and Y. Liu. 2002. “Aerobic granulation in sequential sludge blanket reactor.” Water Sci. Technol. 46 (4–5): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0540.
Terada, A., K. Hibiya, J. Nagai, S. Tsuneda, and A. Hirata. 2003. “Nitrogen removal characteristics and biofilm analysis of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor applicable to high-strength nitrogenous wastewater treatment.” J. Biosci. Bioeng. 95 (2): 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(03)80124-X.
Terada, A., S. Lackner, K. Kristensen, and B. F. Smets. 2010. “Inoculum effects on community composition and nitritation performance of autotrophic nitrifying biofilm reactors with counter-diffusion geometry.” Environ. Microbiol. 12 (10): 2858–2872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02267.x.
Tian, H.-L., J.-Y. Zhao, H.-Y. Zhang, C.-Q. Chi, B.-A. Li, and X.-L. Wu. 2015. “Bacterial community shift along with the changes in operational conditions in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99 (Apr): 3279–3290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6204-7.
Ukaigwe, S., Y. Zhou, M. Shaheen, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Municipal wastewater treatment using a membrane aerated biofilm reactor.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 17 (2): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.21.00025.
Wagner, B. M., G. T. Daigger, and N. G. Love. 2022. “Assessing membrane aerated biofilm reactor configurations in mainstream anammox applications.” Water Sci. Technol. 85 (3): 943–960. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.013.
Wang, J., J. Liang, L. Sun, J. Shen, and M. Wang. 2021. “Achieving reliable partial nitrification and anammox process using polyvinyl alcohol gel beads to treat low-strength ammonia wastewater.” Bioresour. Technol. 324 (Mar): 124669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124669.
Werner, J. J., O. Koren, P. Hugenholtz, T. Z. DeSantis, W. A. Walters, J. G. Caporaso, L. T. Angenent, R. Knight, and R. E. Ley. 2012. “Impact of training sets on classification of high-throughput bacterial 16s rRNA gene surveys.” ISME J. 6 (1): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.82.
Wu, G., and Q. Yin. 2020. “Microbial niche nexus sustaining biological wastewater treatment.” npj Clean Water 3 (1): 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-00080-4.
Wu, Y., Z. Wu, H. Chu, J. Li, H. H. Ngo, W. Guo, N. Zhang, and H. Zhang. 2019. “Comparison study on the performance of two different gas-permeable membranes used in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor.” Sci. Total Environ. 658 (Mar): 1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.121.
Yin, Q., Y. Sun, B. Li, Z. Feng, and G. Wu. 2022. “The r/K selection theory and its application in biological wastewater treatment processes.” Sci. Total Environ. 824 (Jun): 153836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153836.
Zhang, B., Q. Yu, G. Yan, H. Zhu, X. Y. Xu, and L. Zhu. 2018. “Seasonal bacterial community succession in four typical wastewater treatment plants: Correlations between core microbes and process performance.” Sci. Rep. 8 (1): 4566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22683-1.
Zhou, Y., R. Li, B. Guo, S. Xia, Y. Liu, and B. E. Rittmann. 2022. “The influent COD/N ratio controlled the linear alkylbenzene sulfonate biodegradation and extracellular polymeric substances accumulation in an oxygen-based membrane biofilm reactor.” J. Hazard. Mater. 422 (Jan): 126862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126862.
Zhou, Y., R. Li, B. Guo, L. Zhang, X. Zou, S. Xia, and Y. Liu. 2020. “Greywater treatment using an oxygen-based membrane biofilm reactor: Formation of dynamic multifunctional biofilm for organics and nitrogen removal.” Chem. Eng. J. 386 (Apr): 123989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123989.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 12December 2023

History

Received: May 12, 2023
Accepted: Aug 23, 2023
Published online: Oct 9, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 9, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Sandra Ukaigwe
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9.
Yingdi Zhang
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9.
Korris Lee
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5058-8373. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share