Technical Papers
Aug 4, 2023

Automated Testing Apparatus for Ceramic Membrane Filtration of High-Strength Industrial Wastewater

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 10

Abstract

A common problem in laboratory-scale membrane research is that the testing methods in the laboratory are often quite different than industrial applications due to the limitations of manual experimental setups. Here, an automated membrane filtration apparatus was built in the lab to solve this problem by allowing long-term filtration, frequent backwash and clean-in-place (CIP), and high-accuracy operation. The filtration system achieves different cleaning strategies for both theoretical research and practical water and wastewater scale-up experiments. The embedded control algorithms achieve operational accuracy in terms of maintaining flux or transmembrane pressure (TMP) at their desired set points. A flux-step function enables operators to measure critical flux automatically. The filtration system handles a variety of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes in crossflow or dead-end mode with backwash integration, CIP capability, and aeration scouring. Synthetic and raw rendering wastewater were applied to test the apparatus in the lab and in the field, respectively. The control algorithms successfully dampened oscillations using custom calibration curves. Three backwash-CIP strategies were tested with both wastewater types. The first was time-triggered backwash and cycle number–triggered CIP, which resulted in stable and reliable operation but required close operator control and thus was not fully automated. The second strategy was time-triggered backwash with TMP-triggered CIP, which responded quickly to water quality fluctuations and achieved full automation, but the TMP target had to be carefully set to enhance the efficiency of CIP. The third strategy was target–TMP backwash with duration-triggered CIP, which can achieve the most advanced and flexible filtration system, though setting up this level of automation complexity in the field was challenging. Both backwash and CIP frequencies responded to real-time performance automatically. Ultimately, the automated lab-scale filtration apparatus operated similarly to full-scale systems, which should help fill the gap between laboratory research and scale-up of industrial applications.

Practical Applications

Laboratory membrane filtration research is usually different than industrial applications because lab workers are limited in their ability to perform all the steps that are done at full scale. An automated filtration system can solve the problem by performing continuous monitoring and control without user intervention. This paper provides detailed information about building and operating an automated filtration apparatus. The apparatus can perform experiments in the lab or the field where water quality fluctuates. All the important steps are included automatically: filtration, backwash, and CIP. This article discusses how to adjust the timing and the triggering of each step for optimal performance. Other functions, like an algorithm to easily determine critical flux, are also described. This should allow other researchers to build similar systems, thus making more laboratory work directly relevant to full-scale applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Fats and Proteins Research Foundation (FPRF) for funding through the Animal Co-Products Research & Education Center (ACREC), Annel Greene, director. This material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2230696. We thank Meiden America and Inopor for providing us the ceramic membranes; we also thank Brian Fraser and Noriaki Kanamori from Meiden for technical support. We thank the staff from a rendering wastewater plant for allowing and helping us to test our system at their facility.

References

Abboah-Afari, E., and B. H. Kiepper. 2012. “Membrane filtration of poultry processing wastewater: I. Pre-DAF (dissolved air flotation).” Appl. Eng. Agric. 28 (2): 231–236. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41335.
Al-Mutairi, N. Z., F. A. Al-Sharifi, and S. B. Al-Shammari. 2008. “Evaluation study of a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant including contact-assisted activated sludge and DAF.” Desalination 225 (1–3): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.04.094.
Avula, R. Y., H. M. Nelson, and R. K. Singh. 2009. “Recycling of poultry process wastewater by ultrafiltration.” Innovative Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 10 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2008.08.005.
Barati, N., M. M. Husein, and J. Azaiez. 2021. “Modifying ceramic membranes with in situ grown iron oxide nanoparticles and their use for oily water treatment.” J. Membr. Sci. 617 (Jan): 118641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118641.
Bustillo-Lecompte, C. F., and M. Mehrvar. 2015. “Slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics, treatment, and management in the meat processing industry: A review on trends and advances.” J. Environ. Manage. 161 (Sep): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.008.
Chang, Q., J. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Liang, X. Zhang, S. Cerneaux, X. Wang, Z. Zhu, and Y. Dong. 2014. “Application of ceramic microfiltration membrane modified by nano-TiO2 coating in separation of a stable oil-in-water emulsion.” J. Membr. Sci. 456 (Apr): 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.029.
Cheryan, M., and N. Rajagopalan. 1998. “Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction.” J. Membr. Sci. 151 (1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00190-2.
Cho, B. D., and A. G. Fane. 2002. “Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical flux operation of a membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2): 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00321-6.
Clech, P. L., B. Jefferson, I. S. Chang, and S. J. Judd. 2003. “Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci. 227 (1–2): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.021.
Çulfaz, P. Z., M. Haddad, M. Wessling, and R. G. H. Lammertink. 2011. “Fouling behavior of microstructured hollow fibers in cross-flow filtrations: Critical flux determination and direct visual observation of particle deposition.” J. Membr. Sci. 372 (1–2): 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.002.
Defrance, L., and M. Y. Jaffrin. 1999. “Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: Application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment.” J. Membr. Sci. 152 (2): 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00220-8.
Ersahin, M. E., H. Ozgun, Y. Tao, and J. B. van Lier. 2014. “Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors.” Water Res. 48 (Jan): 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.054.
Ezugbe, E. O., and S. Rathilal. 2020. “Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: A review.” Membranes 10 (5): 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050089.
Field, R. W., and G. K. Pearce. 2011. “Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications.” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 164 (1–2): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.008.
Goswami, K. P., and G. Pugazhenthi. 2020. “Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using tubular microfiltration membrane with fly ash as key precursor.” J. Water Process Eng. 37 (Oct): 101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101361.
Huang, S., R. H. A. Ras, and X. Tian. 2018. “Antifouling membranes for oily wastewater treatment: Interplay between wetting and membrane fouling.” Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 36 (Jul): 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2018.02.002.
Huang, X., C.-H. Wei, and K.-C. Yu. 2008. “Mechanism of membrane fouling control by suspended carriers in a submerged membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci. 309 (1–2): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.069.
Hube, S., M. Eskafi, K. F. Hrafnkelsdóttir, B. Bjarnadóttir, M. Á. Bjarnadóttir, S. Axelsdóttir, and B. Wu. 2019. “Direct membrane filtration for wastewater treatment and resource recovery: A review.” Sci. Total Environ. 710 (Mar): 136375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136375.
Johns, M. R. 1995. “Developments in wastewater treatment in the meat processing industry: A review.” Bioresour. Technol. 54 (3): 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00140-9.
Kim, J., and F. A. DiGiano. 2006. “Defining critical flux in submerged membranes: Influence of length-distributed flux.” J. Membr. Sci. 280 (1–2): 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.040.
Kwon, D. Y., and S. Vigneswaran. 1998. “Influence of particle size and surface charge on critical flux of crossflow microfiltration.” Water Sci. Technol. 38 (4–5): 481–488. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1998.0701.
Lo, Y. M., D. Cao, S. Argin-Soysal, J. Wang, and T.-S. Hahm. 2005. “Recovery of protein from poultry processing wastewater using membrane ultrafiltration.” Bioresour. Technol. 96 (6): 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.026.
Marshall, A. D., P. A. Munro, and G. Trägårdh. 1993. “The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: A literature review.” Desalination 91 (1): 65–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(93)80047-Q.
Maximous, N., G. Nakhla, and W. Wan. 2009. “Comparative assessment of hydrophobic and hydrophilic membrane fouling in wastewater applications.” J. Membr. Sci. 339 (1–2): 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.034.
Mohammad, A. W., C. Y. Ng, Y. P. Lim, and G. H. Ng. 2012. “Ultrafiltration in food processing industry: Review on application, membrane fouling, and fouling control.” Food Bioprocess Technol. 5 (4): 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0806-9.
Monclús, H., G. Ferrero, G. Buttiglieri, J. Comas, and I. Rodriguez-Roda. 2011. “Online monitoring of membrane fouling in submerged MBRs.” Desalination 277 (1–3): 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.055.
Mutamim, N. S. A., Z. Z. Noor, M. A. A. Hassan, and G. Olsson. 2012. “Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: A performance review.” Desalination 305 (Nov): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.033.
Mutamim, N. S. A., Z. Z. Noor, M. A. A. Hassan, A. Yuniarto, and G. Olsson. 2013. “Membrane bioreactor: Applications and limitations in treating high strength industrial wastewater.” Chem. Eng. J. 225 (Jun): 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.131.
Racar, M., D. Dolar, A. Špehar, and K. Košutić. 2017a. “Application of UF/NF/RO membranes for treatment and reuse of rendering plant wastewater.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 105 (Jan): 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.11.015.
Racar, M., D. Dolar, A. Špehar, A. Kraš, and K. Košutić. 2017b. “Optimization of coagulation with ferric chloride as a pretreatment for fouling reduction during nanofiltration of rendering plant secondary effluent.” Chemosphere 181 (Aug): 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.108.
Tummons, E., H. Qi, H. J. Tanudjaja, C. A. Hejase, J. W. Chew, and V. V. Tarabara. 2020. “Membrane fouling by emulsified oil: A review.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 248 (Oct): 116919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116919.
Van der Marel, P., A. Zwijnenburg, A. Kemperman, M. Wessling, H. Temmink, and W. van der Meer. 2009. “An improved flux-step method to determine the critical flux and the critical flux for irreversibility in a membrane bioreactor.” J. Membr. Sci. 332 (1–2): 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.046.
Vera, L., E. González, O. Díaz, and S. Delgado. 2014. “Performance of a tertiary submerged membrane bioreactor operated at supra-critical fluxes.” J. Membr. Sci. 457 (May): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.027.
Vera, L., E. González, I. Ruigómez, J. Gómez, and S. Delgado. 2015. “Analysis of backwashing efficiency in dead-end hollow-fibre ultrafiltration of anaerobic suspensions.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (21): 16600–16609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4857-0.
Wandera, D., and S. M. Husson. 2013. “Assessment of fouling-resistant membranes for additive-free treatment of high-strength wastewaters.” Desalination 309 (Jan): 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.013.
Wang, Z., J. Ma, C. Y. Tang, K. Kimura, Q. Wang, and X. Han. 2014. “Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: A review.” J. Membr. Sci. 468 (Oct): 276–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.060.
Wu, Z., Z. Wang, S. Huang, S. Mai, C. Yang, X. Wang, and Z. Zhou. 2008. “Effects of various factors on critical flux in submerged membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (1): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.016.
Yordanov, D. 2010. “Preliminary study of the efficiency of ultrafiltration treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater.” Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 16 (6): 700–704.
Zhou, J., D. Wandera, and S. M. Husson. 2015. “Mechanisms and control of fouling during ultrafiltration of high strength wastewater without pretreatment.” J. Membr. Sci. 488 (Aug): 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.018.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 10October 2023

History

Received: Feb 18, 2023
Accepted: Jun 4, 2023
Published online: Aug 4, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 4, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29625. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8640-5700. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29625 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-783X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share