Abstract

Efficient delivery of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) to a non-aqueous-phase liquid (NAPL) target zone located above the water table requires an understanding of their transport and binding characteristics. In this investigation, NPs coated with a tunable amphiphilic copolymer were employed in a series of experiments using a 1.4-m-long lysimeter. A crude oil zone was emplaced in the lysimeter to evaluate NP binding capabilities to a representative NAPL. Experimental observations were supported by a reactive transport model. NPs coated with a polymer concentration that promotes enhanced binding to crude oil were successfully delivered and retained in the NAPL zone at concentrations about three times higher than elsewhere in the lysimeter and consistent with the distribution of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Model simulations were able to reproduce the observed asymmetrical NP breakthrough curves and retention profile. The estimated attachment rate coefficient was two orders of magnitude higher for the NAPL zone than elsewhere, supporting the observed preferential binding to the crude oil. Depth-dependent straining was used in the model to capture the NP retention observed near the top of the lysimeter, presumably due to film straining caused by the increased capillary pressure. In addition to the reversible attachment and straining mechanisms, model simulations also indicated that loss of aqueous NP mass was required deeper in the lysimeter to provide a reasonable fit to the observed NP data. Due to increased contact with sediments, the polymer structure that coats the NPs may be slowly removed, leading to aggregation and reduced mobility because of physical trapping. Findings of this study revealed that despite the demonstrated targeted binding capability of these NPs in unsaturated systems, their delivery to a target NAPL zone distant from an injection location may be a challenge due to possible aggregation over longer travel distances and thus an important design consideration.

Practical Applications

Soil and groundwater contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons is a global issue due to the harm it causes to the environment and human health. Hence, developing novel in situ technologies is necessary due to limitations associated with ex situ remediation. One emerging technology called nanoremediation involves injecting nanosize particles into the impacted area to interact with contaminants effectively due to their small size and large surface area. By modifying their surface, particles can transport through soil and stick to specific contaminants, which is called targeted delivery. To better understand this technology, it should be studied under conditions similar to those in the field. Hence, we investigated targeted delivery of engineered nanoparticles in a large 1.4-m-long column packed with natural soil, representative of the unsaturated zone above a shallow aquifer. Our findings demonstrated preferential nanoparticle attachment to the crude oil–impacted sediment which provides the foundation to advance the use of these nanoparticles as a treatment agent and increases treatment efficiency. However, the noted increase in nanoparticle retention over longer travel distances is suggestive of their stability issues in unsaturated porous media, which may pose a limitation for the delivery of these NPs to a target zone distal from the injection location.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that supports the findings presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The 1DUSAT model can be found online at https://uwaterloo.ca/scholar/nthomson/models.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Chevron Energy Technology Company. We thank Terry Ridgway and Mark Sobon for their help with the construction of the lysimeter system, and Felipe Solano, Shirley Chatten, Ralph Dickhout, and Mark Merlau for their technical assistance. Electron microscopy was performed at the Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy (supported by NSERC and other government agencies).

References

Adamczyk, Z., B. Siwek, M. Zembala, and P. Belouschek. 1994. “Kinetics of localized adsorption of colloid particles.” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 48 (C): 151–280.
Addai-Mensah, J. 2007. “Enhanced flocculation and dewatering of clay mineral dispersions.” Powder Technol. 179 (1–2): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.11.008.
ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422-63. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Ball, W. P., C. Buehler, T. C. Harmon, D. M. Mackay, and P. V. Roberts. 1990. “Characterization of a sandy aquifer material at the grain scale.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 5 (3): 253–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(90)90040-N.
Bishop, E. J., D. E. Fowler, J. M. Skluzacek, E. Seibel, and T. E. Mallouk. 2010. “Anionic homopolymers efficiently target zerovalent iron particles to hydrophobic contaminants in sand columns.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (23): 9069–9074. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1017398.
Bradford, S. A., J. Šimůnek, M. Bettahar, M. T. Van Genuchten, and S. R. Yates. 2003. “Modeling colloid attachment, straining, and exclusion in saturated porous media.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (10): 2242–2250. https://doi.org/10.1021/es025899u.
Bradford, S. A., S. Torkzaban, and J. Šimůnek. 2011. “Modeling colloid transport and retention in saturated porous media under unfavorable attachment conditions.” Water Resour. Res. 47 (10): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010812.
Bradford, S. A., S. R. Yates, M. Bettahar, and J. Šimůnek. 2002. “Physical factors affecting the transport and fate of colloids in saturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 38 (12): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001340.
Celia, M. A., E. T. Bouloutas, and R. L. Zarba. 1990. “A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation.” Water Resour. Res. 26 (7): 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i007p01483.
Cherrey, K. D., M. Flury, and J. B. Harsh. 2003. “Nitrate and colloid transport through coarse Hanford sediments under steady state, variably saturated flow.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (6): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001944.
Degenkolb, L., U. Dippon, S. Pabst, and S. Klitzke. 2019. “Transport and retention of differently coated CeO2 nanoparticles in saturated sediment columns under laboratory and near-natural conditions.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 (16): 15905–15919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04965-x.
Elliott, D. W., and W. X. Zhang. 2001. “Field assessment of nanoscale bimetallic particles for groundwater treatment.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (24): 4922–4926. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0108584.
Gao, B., J. E. Saiers, and J. Ryan. 2006. “Pore-scale mechanisms of colloid deposition and mobilization during steady and transient flow through unsaturated granular media.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004233.
Hoggan, J. L., D. A. Sabatini, and T. C. G. Kibbey. 2016. “Transport and retention of TiO2 and polystyrene nanoparticles during drainage from tall heterogeneous layered columns.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 194 (Nov): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.10.003.
Jaberi, N., S. Linley, N. R. Thomson, K. McVey, K. Sra, and F. X. Gu. 2022. “Transport and targeted binding of Pluronic-coated nanoparticles in unsaturated porous media.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 249 (Aug): 104046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104046.
Jin, C., T. Glawdel, C. L. Ren, and M. B. Emelko. 2015. “Non-linear, non-monotonic effect of nano-scale roughness on particle deposition in absence of an energy barrier: Experiments and modeling.” Sci. Rep. 5 (Dec): 1–14.
Jin, C., W. Zhao, S. D. Normani, P. Zhao, and M. B. Emelko. 2017. “Synergies of media surface roughness and ionic strength on particle deposition during filtration.” Water Res. 114 (May): 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.010.
Karn, B., T. Kuiken, and M. Otto. 2009. “Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: A review of the benefits and potential risks.” Environ. Health Perspect. 117 (12): 1813–1831. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900793.
Kumahor, S. K., G. H. de Rooij, S. Schlüter, and H.-J. Vogel. 2015. “Water flow and solute transport in unsaturated sand-a comprehensive experimental approach.” Vadose Zone J. 14 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2014.08.0105.
Li, T., C. Shen, S. Wu, C. Jin, and S. A. Bradford. 2020. “Synergies of surface roughness and hydration on colloid detachment in saturated porous media: Column and atomic force microscopy studies.” Water Res. 183 (Sep): 116068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116068.
Liang, Y., S. A. Bradford, J. Šimůnek, M. Heggen, H. Vereecken, and E. Klumpp. 2013a. “Retention and remobilization of stabilized silver nanoparticles in an undisturbed loamy sand soil.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (21): 12229–12237. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402046u.
Liang, Y., S. A. Bradford, J. Šimůnek, H. Vereecken, and E. Klumpp. 2013b. “Sensitivity of the transport and retention of stabilized silver nanoparticles to physicochemical factors.” Water Res. 47 (7): 2572–2582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.025.
Linley, S. 2019. Polymeric coatings for targeted nanoparticle delivery to subsurface contaminants. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Univ. of Waterloo.
Linley, S., A. Holmes, T. Leshuk, W. Nafo, N. R. Thomson, A. Al-Mayah, K. McVey, K. Sra, and F. X. Gu. 2019. “Targeted nanoparticle binding & detection in petroleum hydrocarbon impacted porous media.” Chemosphere 215 (Jan): 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.046.
Linley, S., A. Mellage, N. R. Thomson, P. Van Cappellen, and F. Rezanezhad. 2021. “Spatiotemporal geo-electrical sensing of a Pluronic-coated cobalt ferrite nanoparticle slug in natural sand flow-through columns.” Sci. Total Environ. 769 (May): 144522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144522.
Linley, S., N. R. Thomson, K. McVey, K. Sra, and F. X. Gu. 2020a. “Factors affecting pluronic-coated iron oxide nanoparticle binding to petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted sediments.” Chemosphere 254 (Sep): 126732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126732.
Linley, S., N. R. Thomson, K. McVey, K. Sra, and F. X. Gu. 2020b. “Influence of Pluronic coating formulation on iron oxide nanoparticle transport in natural and oil-impacted sandy aquifer media.” Can. J. Chem. Eng. 98 (3): 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23650.
Louie, S. M., J. M. Gorham, E. A. McGivney, J. Liu, K. B. Gregory, and V. A. Hackley. 2016. “Photochemical transformations of thiolated polyethylene glycol coatings on gold nanoparticles.” Environ. Sci. Nano 3 (5): 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6en00141f.
Matott, L. S. 2017. Ostrich: An optimization software tool, documentation and user’s guide, version 1.6. Buffalo, NY: State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
McCarthy, J. F., and L. D. McKay. 2004. “Colloid transport in the subsurface: Past, present, and future challenges.” Vadose Zone J. 3 (2): 326–337. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0326.
Mitropoulou, P. N., V. I. Syngouna, and C. V. Chrysikopoulos. 2013. “Transport of colloids in unsaturated packed columns: Role of ionic strength and sand grain size.” Chem. Eng. J. 232 (Oct): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.093.
Morales, V. L., B. Gao, and T. S. Steenhuis. 2009. “Grain surface-roughness effects on colloidal retention in the vadose zone.” Vadose Zone J. 8 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0171.
O’Carroll, D., B. Sleep, M. Krol, H. Boparai, and C. Kocur. 2013. “Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation.” Adv. Water Resour. 51 (Jan): 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.005.
Padilla, I. Y., T. C. J. Yeh, and M. H. Conklin. 1999. “The effect of water content on solute transport in unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (11): 3303–3313. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900171.
Petosa, A. R., D. P. Jaisi, I. R. Quevedo, M. Elimelech, and N. Tufenkji. 2010. “Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: Role of physicochemical interactions.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (17): 6532–6549. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100598h.
Phenrat, T., F. Fagerlund, T. Illangasekare, G. V. Lowry, and R. D. Tilton. 2011. “Polymer-modified Fe 0 nanoparticles target entrapped NAPL in two dimensional porous media: Effect of particle concentration, NAPL saturation, and injection strategy.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (14): 6102–6109. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200577n.
Prédélus, D., L. Lassabatere, C. Louis, H. Gehan, T. Brichart, T. Winiarski, and R. Angulo-Jaramillo. 2017. “Nanoparticle transport in water-unsaturated porous media: Effects of solution ionic strength and flowrate.” J. Nanopart. Res. 19 (3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3755-4.
Rahmatpour, S., M. R. Mosaddeghi, M. Shirvani, and J. Šimůnek. 2018. “Transport of silver nanoparticles in intact columns of calcareous soils: The role of flow conditions and soil texture.” Geoderma 322 (Jul): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.016.
Raychoudhury, T., N. Tufenkji, and S. Ghoshal. 2012. “Aggregation and deposition kinetics of carboxymethyl cellulose-modified zero-valent iron nanoparticles in porous media.” Water Res. 46 (6): 1735–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.045.
Saleh, N., T. Phenrat, K. Sirk, B. Dufour, J. Ok, T. Sarbu, K. Matyjaszewski, R. D. Tilton, and G. V. Lowry. 2005. “Adsorbed triblock copolymers deliver reactive iron nanoparticles to the oil/water interface.” Nano Lett. 5 (12): 2489–2494. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0518268.
Saleh, N., K. Sirk, Y. Liu, T. Phenrat, B. Dufour, K. Matyjaszewski, R. D. Tilton, and G. V. Lowry. 2007. “Surface modifications enhance nanoiron transport and NAPL targeting in saturated porous media.” Environ. Eng. Sci. 24 (1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.24.45.
Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples).” Biometrika 52 (3/4): 591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709.
Šimůnek, J., and M. T. van Genuchten. 2008. “Modeling nonequilibrium flow and transport processes using HYDRUS.” Vadose Zone J. 7 (2): 782–797. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0074.
Thomson, N. R. 2019. 1DUSAT: A flexible one-dimensional unsaturated flow and solute transport model. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Univ. of Waterloo.
Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. “Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004723.
Torkzaban, S., S. A. Bradford, M. T. van Genuchten, and S. L. Walker. 2008. “Colloid transport in unsaturated porous media: The role of water content and ionic strength on particle straining.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 96 (1–4): 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.10.006.
Tufenkji, N., and M. Elimelech. 2004. “Deviation from the classical colloid filtration theory in the presence of repulsive DLVO interactions.” Langmuir 20 (25): 10818–10828. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0486638.
USEPA. 1996. Method 3050B: Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils, revision 2. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
Wan, J., and J. L. Wilson. 1994. “Colloid transport in unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 30 (4): 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR03017.
Yao, K. M., M. T. Habibian, and C. R. O’Melia. 1971. “Water and waste water filtration: Concepts and applications.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 5 (11): 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1021/es60058a005.
Yecheskel, Y., I. Dror, and B. Berkowitz. 2018. “Silver nanoparticle (Ag-NP) retention and release in partially saturated soil: Column experiments and modeling.” Environ. Sci. Nano 5 (2): 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7en00990a.
Zhang, W., V. L. Morales, M. E. Cakmak, A. E. Salvucci, L. D. Geohring, A. G. Hay, J. Y. Parlange, and T. S. Steenhuis. 2010. “Colloid transport and retention in unsaturated porous media: Effect of colloid input concentration.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (13): 4965–4972. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100272f.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Nov 25, 2022
Accepted: Mar 11, 2023
Published online: Jun 17, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 17, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-7066. Email: [email protected]
Stuart Linley, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Yusuf Hamied Dept. of Chemistry, Univ. of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd., Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-4106. Email: [email protected]
Kevin McVey, Ph.D. [email protected]
HES Technical Specialist, Chevron Environmental Management and Real Estate Company, 1500 Louisiana St., Houston, TX 77002. Email: [email protected]
Lead Environmental Engineer, Chevron Technical Center, 1400 Smith St., Houston, TX 77002. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-4697. Email: [email protected]
Frank X. Gu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Applied Science, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share