Abstract

Engagement is fundamental for organizations in complex projects’ ecologies (e.g., space, nuclear, telecommunication) to enact value for their end-users. However, the existing knowledge on this empirical subject has two significant shortcomings. First, while the narrative about project value suffices to explain how a project enacts value for its stakeholders, it falls short of unfolding the enacted value of a complex project for its end-users from a broader economic and societal perspective. Second, while literature effectively explains project stakeholder engagement practices, the role played by other elements of a complex project’ ecology in shaping the engagement practices with end-users remains largely underexplored. This paper aims to explain how organizations in complex projects’ ecologies engage with their end-users to enact the value of complex projects. Leveraging a qualitative and inductive approach, we conducted 31 open interviews with managers of organizations in the European space project ecology, and their end-users. Drawing on a grounded theory approach, we identified four classes of engagement practices. (1) “Personal for value espoused,” adopted by space managers to espouse the value of complex space projects to end-user managers. (2) “Personal for value expected,” adopted by space managers to be engaged by end-user managers and understand their value expectation. (3) “Personal for value enacted,” reinforcing personal relationships and enacting the value of complex space projects over time. (4) “Nonpersonal” engagement practices, adopted by organizations in the complex project ecology toward their end-users. We contribute to the literature on value and engagement by showing that: (1) value enactment occurs through personal engagement and is not only impersonal; (2) form of value (i.e., espoused, expected, and enacted) shapes the engagement of managers and organizations in the complex project ecologies toward their end-users; and (3) a project ecology perspective enhances the understanding of the value of complex projects for end-users.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editor and the three anonymous reviewers for their precious feedback. We are thankful to Jere Lehtinen and Francesco Maddaloni, whose suggestions at the early stage of the paper were fundamental in shaping its conceptualization. We would also like to thank Miia Martinsuo for the feedback received at EURAM22 regarding the value of complex projects.

References

Aaltonen, K., and J. Kujala. 2016. “Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (8): 1537–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.009.
Aaltonen, K., J. Kujala, L. Havela, and G. Savage. 2016. “Stakeholder dynamics during the project front-end: The case of nuclear waste repository projects.” Project Manage. J. 46 (6): 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21549.
Aaltonen, K., J. Kujala, P. Lehtonen, and I. Ruuska. 2010. “A stakeholder network perspective on unexpected events and their management in international projects.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 3 (4): 564–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011076055.
Adner, R. 2017. “Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy.” J. Manage. 43 (1): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451.
Agrawal, A., M. Fischer, and V. Singh. 2022. “Digital twin: From concept to practice.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 06022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001034.
Airbus. 2017. Press release: Eni to utilize earth observation satellite data and services provided by Planetek Italia and Airbus. Taufkirchen, Germany: Airbus Defence & Space.
Ansar, A., and B. Flyvbjerg. 2022. A platform approach to space exploration. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review.
Aramali, V., G. E. Gibson, M. El Asmar, and N. Cho. 2021. “Earned value management system state of practice: Identifying critical subprocesses, challenges, and environment factors of a high-performing EVMS.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000925.
Aramali, V., H. Sanboskani, G. E. Gibson, M. El Asmar, and N. Cho. 2022. “Forward-looking state-of-the-art review on earned value management systems: The disconnect between Academia and industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 03122001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001019.
Aspeteg, J., and A. Bergek. 2020. “The value creation of diffusion intermediaries: Brokering mechanisms and trade-offs in solar and wind power in Sweden.” J. Cleaner Prod. 251 (Jun): 119640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119640.
Bahadorestani, A., J. T. Karlsen, and N. M. Farimani. 2020. “Novel approach to satisfying stakeholders in megaprojects: Balancing mutual values.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (2): 04019047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000734.
Bell, E., A. Bryman, and B. Harley. 2011. Business research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bondy, K., and A. Charles. 2020. “Mitigating stakeholder marginalisation with the relational self.” J. Bus. Ethics 165 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4085-x.
Bowman, C., and V. Ambrosini. 2000. “Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy.” Br. J. Manage. 11 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00147.
Bundy, J., R. M. Vogel, and M. A. Zachary. 2018. “Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders.” Strategic Manage. J. 39 (2): 476–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2736.
Cao, T., G. Locatelli, N. Smith, and L. Zhang. 2021. “A shared leadership framework based on boundary spanners in megaprojects.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 14 (5): 1065–1092. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2020-0090.
Chesbrough, H., C. Lettl, and T. Ritter. 2018. “Value creation and value capture in open innovation.” J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 35 (6): 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12471.
Chinyio, E. A., and A. Akintoye. 2008. “Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 26 (6): 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802078310.
Choi, J. O., B. K. Shrestha, Y. H. Kwak, and J. S. Shane. 2020. “Innovative technologies and management approaches for facility design standardization and modularization of capital projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000805.
Clarysse, B., M. Wright, J. Bruneel, and A. Mahajan. 2014. “Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems.” Res. Policy 43 (7): 1164–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014.
Copernicus Relays. 2020. Copernicus factsheet. Göttingen, Germany: Copernicus.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.” Qual. Sociol. 13 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. New York: SAGE.
Coyne, I. T. 1997. “Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries?” J. Adv. Nurs. 26 (3): 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x.
De Silva, M., L. Gokhberg, D. Meissner, and M. Russo. 2021. “Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation.” Technovation 104 (Sep): 102268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102268.
De Silva, M., J. Howells, and M. Meyer. 2018. “Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge—Based practices and internal value creation.” Res. Policy 47 (1): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011.
Di Maddaloni, F., and K. Davis. 2017. “The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: Rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (8): 1537–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.011.
Eissa, R., M. S. Eid, and E. Elbeltagi. 2021. “Conceptual profit allocation framework for construction joint ventures: Shapley value approach.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (3): 04021016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000911.
El-Gohary, N. M., H. Osman, and T. E. El-Diraby. 2006. “Stakeholder management for public private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (7): 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.009.
Eskerod, P., M. Huemann, and G. Savage. 2015. “Project stakeholder management-past and present.” Project Manage. J. 46 (6): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21555.
Esnaashary Esfahani, M., C. Rausch, C. Haas, and B. T. Adey. 2020. “Prioritizing preproject planning activities using value of information analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000822.
ESPI (European Space Policy Institute). 2019. Evolution of the role of space agencies. Vienna, Austria: ESPI.
Evan, W. M., and R. E. Freeman. 1993. “A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism.” In Ethical theory and business, edited by T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie, 4th ed., 75–93. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
Freeman, R. E., J. Kujala, S. Sachs, and C. Stutz. 2017. “Stakeholder engagement: Practicing the ideas of stakeholder theory.” Issues Bus. Ethics 46 (Jun): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_1.
Gao, N., Y. Chen, W. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Addressing project complexity: The role of contractual functions.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000613.
Gaur, S., and A. Tawalare. 2022. “Investigating the role of BIM in stakeholder management: Evidence from a metro-rail project.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 05021013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000979.
Gawer, A., and M. A. Cusumano. 2014. “Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation: Platforms and innovation.” J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 31 (3): 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105.
Gil, N. A., and Y. Fu. 2021. “Megaproject performance, value creation, and value distribution: An organizational governance perspective.” Acad. Manage. Discoveries 8 (2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0029.
Grabher, G. 2002. “The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talents and teams.” Reg. Stud. 36 (3): 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220122052.
Grabher, G. 2004. “Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies.” Organ. Stud. 25 (9): 1491–1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604047996.
Grabher, G., and O. Ibert. 2011. “Project ecologies: A contextual view on temporary organizations.” In The Oxford handbook of project management, edited by P. W. G. Morris, J. Pinto, and J. Söderlund. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199563142.003.0008.
Grabher, G., O. Ibert, and S. Flohr. 2009. “The Neglected king: The customer in the new knowledge ecology of innovation.” Econ. Geogr. 84 (3): 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00365.x.
Greenwood, M. 2007. “Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility.” J. Bus. Ethics 74 (4): 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y.
Gunduz, M., A. A. Aly, and T. El Mekkawy. 2022. “Value engineering factors with an impact on design management performance of construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 04022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001026.
Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman. 1977. “The population ecology of organizations.” Am. J. Sociol. 82 (5): 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424.
Harrison, J. S., and A. C. Wicks. 2013. “Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance.” Bus. Ethics Q. 23 (1): 97–124. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314.
Hart, S. L. 1971. “Axiology—Theory of values.” Philos. Phenomenological Res. 32 (1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2105883.
Hedborg, S., P.-E. Eriksson, and T. K. Gustavsson. 2020. “Organisational routines in multi-project contexts: Coordinating in an urban development project ecology.” Int. J. Project Manage. 38 (7): 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.003.
Hedborg, S., and T. Gustavsson Karrbom. 2020. “Developing a neighbourhood: Exploring construction projects from a project ecology perspective.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 38 (10): 964–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1805479.
Jick, T. D. 1979. “Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.” Administrative Sci. Q. 24 (4): 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366.
Johnson, G., K. Scholes, and R. Whittington. 2008. Exploring corporate strategy: Text and cases. London: Pearson.
Kahn, W. A. 1990. “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work.” Acad. Manage. J. 33 (4): 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287.
Khan, A., M. Waris, S. Panigrahi, M. R. Sajid, and F. Rana. 2021. “Improving the performance of public sector infrastructure projects: Role of project governance and stakeholder management.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (2): 04020112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000886.
Kincheloe, J. L. 2005. Critical constructivism primer. Lausanne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Laursen, M. 2018. “Project networks as constellations for value creation.” Project Manage. J. 49 (2): 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281804900204.
Le, C., M. W. Yaw, H. D. Jeong, and K. Choi. 2021. “Comprehensive evaluation of influential factors on public roadway project contract time.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000932.
Lee, K.-T., J.-W. Jekal, and J.-H. Kim. 2023. “Client briefing for introducing value management to establish daycare center guidelines for the Republic of Korea.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (3): 04023011. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5090.
Lehtimaki, H., and J. Kujala. 2017. “Framing dynamically changing firm–stakeholder relationships in an international dispute over a foreign investment: A discursive analysis approach.” Bus. Soc. 56 (3): 487–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315570611.
Lehtinen, J., and K. Aaltonen. 2020. “Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: Opening the black box.” Int. J. Project Manage. 38 (2): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.001.
Lehtinen, J., K. Aaltonen, and R. Rajala. 2019. “Stakeholder management in complex product systems: Practices and rationales for engagement and disengagement.” Ind. Mark. Manage. 79 (Nov): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.08.011.
Lepak, D. P., K. G. Smith, and M. S. Taylor. 2007. “Introduction to special topic forum value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 32 (1): 180–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464011.
Li, J., W. Xiong, C. B. Casady, B. Liu, and F. Wang. 2023. “Advancing urban sustainability through public-private partnerships: Case study of the Gu’An new industry city in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (1): 05022016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001103.
Li, Y., Y. Lu, Q. Cui, and Y. Han. 2019. “Organizational behavior in megaprojects: Integrative review and directions for future research.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (4): 04019009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000691.
Lu, Y., B. Liu, and Y. Li. 2021. “Collaboration networks and bidding competitiveness in megaprojects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (6): 04021064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000961.
Maak, T. 2007. “Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital.” J. Bus. Ethics 74 (4): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5.
Martinsuo, M. 2020. “The management of values in project business: Adjusting beliefs to transform project practices and outcomes.” Project Manage. J. 51 (4): 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820927890.
Martinsuo, M., L. Vuorinen, and C. Killen. 2019. “Lifecycle-oriented framing of value at the front end of infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 12 (3): 617–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0172.
Mcvea, J. F., and R. E. Freeman. 2005. “A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management how focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together.” J. Manage. Inq. 14 (1): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492604270799.
Miles, S. 2017. “Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions.” J. Bus. Ethics 142 (3): 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2741-y.
Mir, R., and A. Watson. 2001. “Critical realism and constructivism in strategy research: Toward a synthesis.” Strategic Manage. J. 22 (12): 1169–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.200.
Missonier, S., and S. Loufrani-Fedida. 2014. “Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (7): 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.010.
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 (4): 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105.
Momeni, K., and M. Martinsuo. 2019. “Going downstream in a project-based firm: Integration of distributors in the delivery of complex systems.” Int. J. Project Manage. 37 (1): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.09.007.
Moore, J. F. 1993. “Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 71 (3): 75–86.
Morrow, S. L., and M. L. Smith. 1995. “Constructions of survival and coping by women who have survived childhood sexual abuse.” J. Couns. Psychol. 42 (1): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.1.24.
Obradović, T., B. Vlačić, and M. Dabić. 2021. “Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda.” Technovation 102 (Apr): 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2022. OECD handbook on measuring the space economy. 2nd ed. Paris: OECD.
Oh, H. J., S. Chang, and B. Ashuri. 2023. “Patterns of skill sets for multiskilled laborers based on construction job advertisements using web scraping and text analytics.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (3): 04023009. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5243.
Palinkas, L. A. 2014. “Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research.” J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 43 (6): 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.910791.
Paravano, A., G. Locatelli, and P. Trucco. 2023. “What is value in the new space economy? The end-users’ perspective on satellite data and solutions.” Acta Astronaut. 2023 (May): 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.05.001.
Park, J. H., H. Jung, C. H. Lim, and T. Chang. 2020. “The economic impact analysis of satellite development and its application in Korea.” Acta Astronaut. 177 (Jun): 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.031.
Patton, M. Q. 2014. Qualitative research\evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. New York: SAGE.
Perry, R. B. 2013. General theory of value: Its meaning and basic principles construed in terms of interest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer. 2011. “Creating shared value.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 89 (1–2): 17.
Sachs, S., and J. Kujala. 2021. “Stakeholder engagement in management studies: Current and future debates.” In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sachs, S., and J. Kujala. 2022. “Stakeholder engagement in humanizing business.” In Humanizing business: What humanities can say to business, edited by M. Dion, R. E. Freeman, and S. D. Dmytriyev, 559–572. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_37.
Saldaña, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
Sandal Stjerne, I., J. Söderlund, and D. Minbaeva. 2018. “Crossing times: Temporal boundary-spanning practices in interorganizational projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 37 (2): 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.09.004.
Saunders, B., J. Kitzinger, and C. Kitzinger. 2015. “Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice.” Qual. Res. 15 (5): 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550439.
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2009. Research methods for business students. London: Pearson Education.
Signori, S. 2017. “From ‘Managing for stakeholders’ to ‘Managing with stakeholders’: When stakeholders can help rescue a company.” Issues Bus. Ethics 46 (Jun): 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_8.
Söderlund, J. 2004. “On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (8): 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.011.
Storbacka, K., R. J. Brodie, T. Böhmann, P. P. Maglio, and S. Nenonen. 2016. “Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation.” J. Bus. Res. 69 (8): 3008–3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.034.
Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1994. “Grounded theory methodology: An overview.” In Handbook of qualitative research, 273–285. London: SAGE.
Swanson, R., and V. Sakhrani. 2020. “Appropriating the value of flexibility in PPP megaproject design.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 05020010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000770.
Tariq, S., and X. Zhang. 2021. “Socioeconomic, macroeconomic, and sociopolitical issues in water PPP failures.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000947.
Turner, R., and R. Zolin. 2012. “Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames.” Project Manage. J. 43 (5): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21289.
Vegas-Fernández, F. 2022. “Project risk costs: Estimation overruns caused when using only expected value for contingency calculations.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (5): 04022037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001064.
Vidmar, M. 2021. “Enablers, equippers, shapers and movers: A typology of innovation intermediaries’ interventions and the development of an emergent innovation system.” Acta Astronaut. 179 (Feb): 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.10.011.
Vuorinen, L., and M. Martinsuo. 2019. “Value-oriented stakeholder influence on infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 37 (5): 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.003.
Yang, J., G. Q. Shen, L. Bourne, C. Man-Fong Ho, and X. Xue. 2011. “A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (2): 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.521759.
Zerjav, V. 2021. “Why do business organizations participate in projects? Toward a typology of project value domains.” Project Manage. J. 52 (3): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211001663.
Zubair, M. U., and X. Zhang. 2022. “Investigation and improvements of the existing best-value selection criteria for elevator maintenance contractors.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 04021083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000987.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 3May 2024

History

Received: May 31, 2023
Accepted: Oct 26, 2023
Published online: Jan 25, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 25, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Politecnico di Milano, School of Management, Via Lambruschini 4, Milano 20156, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-3712. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Politecnico di Milano, School of Management, Via Lambruschini 4, Milano 20156, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9986-2249. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Politecnico di Milano, School of Management, Via Lambruschini 4, Milano 20156, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-8538. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share