Impact of Altering the Bid Selection Method to Below-Average Method: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach
Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39, Issue 3
Abstract
Numerous research proposed alternative selection methods to compensate for the drawbacks of the lowest qualified bidder (LQB) approach, including the below-average-bidder (BAB) method. While previous work has been carried out to simulate contractors’ behavior when altering the bid selection method, the literature lacks a tool that investigates how long it will take for both public and private owners to adopt the newly proposed alternative bid selection approach. To this end, this paper presents an agent-based model (ABM) that simulates the different bidding processes and tracks the impact on the owners’ utilities of switching from LQB to BAB. The ABM simulates the contractors’ learning behaviors to optimize their bidding strategies and markups throughout transitioning from LQB to BAB. Meanwhile, the ABM accounts for the owners’ utilities from using both selection methods and their preferences in utilizing one over the other using social learning. The findings of this research are validated by experts’ insights through a questionnaire survey. The model is tested against the ratio of public to private projects to provide insights into the owners’ decision-making processes and the potential market dynamics due to the proposed changes. One of the main findings of this research is that the ratio of public to private projects has a significant impact on the adoption of an alternative bid selection method. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing an approach to quantify market perturbations, the expected equilibrium, and how long the market might need to restabilize using BAB as the main selection method. Ultimately, the proposed approach would aid policymakers in understanding the impact of alternating the bid selection method, and adequately plan for the transition. In addition, the utilized methodology can be used in other managerial domains that require simulating different what-if scenarios.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Ahmed, M. O., I. H. El-adaway, K. T. Coatney, and M. S. Eid. 2016. “Construction bidding and the winner’s curse: Game theory approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001058.
Alhazmi, T., and R. Mccaffer. 2000. “Project procurement system selection model.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 126 (3): 176–184.
Araya, F., K. M. Faust, and J. A. Kaminsky. 2021. “Agent-based model of hosting communities’ perceptions of water and wastewater infrastructure during the German refugee crisis.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000938.
Assaad, R., M. O. Ahmed, I. H. El-adaway, A. Elsayegh, and V. S. Siddhardh Nadendla. 2021. “Comparing the impact of learning in bidding decision-making processes using algorithmic game theory.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (1): 04020099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000867.
Awwad, R. 2016. “Evolutionary simulation of contractors’ learning and behavior under two bid-tendering approaches.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (2): 04015041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000400.
Awwad, R., and M. Ammoury. 2019. “Owner’s perspective on evolution of bid prices under various price-driven bid selection methods.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 33 (2): 04018061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000803.
Awwad, R., S. Asgari, and A. Kandil. 2015. “Developing a virtual laboratory for construction bidding environment using agent-based modeling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (6): 04014105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000440.
Bonabeau, E. 2002. “Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems.” Supplement, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (S3): 7280–7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082080899.
Borshchev, A., and A. Filippov. 2004. “From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: Reasons, techniques, tools.” In Proc., 22nd Int. Conf. of the System Dynamics Society. Albany, NY: System Dynamics Society.
Chang, W. S., B. Chen, and T. C. Salmon. 2014. “An investigation of the average bid mechanism for procurement auctions.” Manage. Sci. 61 (6): 1237–1254. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1893.
Cheaitou, A., R. Larbi, and B. Al Housani. 2018. “Decision making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 68 (Dec): 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.007.
Cheng, R., and Y. Jin. 2015. “A social learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for scalable optimization.” Inf. Sci. 291 (Jan): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.039.
Dalkvist, T., C. J. Topping, and V. E. Forbes. 2009. “Population-level impacts of pesticide-induced chronic effects on individuals depend more on ecology than toxicology.” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 72 (6): 1663–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.10.002.
Decarolis, F. 2018. “Comparing public procurement auctions.” Int. Econ. Rev. 59 (2): 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12274.
Decarolis, F., and C. Giorgiantonio. 2015. “Local public procurement regulations: The case of Italy.” Int. Rev. Law Econ. 43 (Aug): 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.08.004.
Decarolis, F., C. Giorgiantonio, and V. Giovanniello. 2010. The awarding of public works in Italy: An analysis of the mechanisms for the selection of contractors. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
Eid, M. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2017a. “Integrating the social vulnerability of host communities and the objective functions of associated stakeholders during disaster recovery processes using agent-based modeling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (5): 04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000680.
Eid, M. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2017b. “Sustainable disaster recovery decision-making support tool: Integrating economic vulnerability into the objective functions of the associated stakeholders.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (2): 04016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000487.
Eid, M. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2018. “Decision-making framework for holistic sustainable disaster recovery: Agent-based approach for decreasing vulnerabilities of the associated communities.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (3): 04018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000427.
El-adaway, I. H., C. Sims, M. S. Eid, Y. Liu, and G. G. Ali. 2020. “Preliminary attempt toward better understanding the impact of distributed energy generation: An agent-based computational economics approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (1): 04020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000527.
Elsayegh, A., C. H. Dagli, and I. H. El-adaway. 2020. “An agent-based model to study competitive construction bidding and the winner’s curse.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 168: 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.278.
Epstein, J. M. 2002. “Modeling civil violence: An agent-based computational approach.” Supplement, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (S3): 7243–7250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092080199.
Erfani, A., K. Zhang, and Q. Cui. 2021. “TAB bid irregularity: Data-driven model and its application.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000958.
Hatush, Z., and M. Skitmoret. 1998. “Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model.” Build. Environ. 33 (2–3): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4.
Henriod, E. E., and J. M. Lantran. 1988. Trends in contracting practice for civil works. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ioannou, P. G., and R. E. Awwad. 2010. “Below-average bidding method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000202.
Ioannou, P. G., and S.-S. Leu. 1993. “Average-bid method—A competitive bidding strategy.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 199 (1): 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:1(131).
Kedir, N. S., M. Raoufi, and A. R. Fayek. 2020. “Fuzzy agent-based multicriteria decision-making model for analyzing construction crew performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000815.
Klügl, F., and A. L. C. Bazzan. 2012. “Agent-based modeling and simulation.” AI Mag. 33 (3): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3126/jie.v10i1.10888.
Kumar Shrestha, S. 2014. “Average bid method: An alternative to low bid method in public sector construction procurement in Nepal.” J. Inst. Eng. 10 (1): 125–129. https://doi.org/10.3126/jie.v10i1.10888.
Lambropoulos, S. 2007. “The use of time and cost utility for construction contract award under European Union Legislation.” Build. Environ. 42 (1): 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.002.
Lee, J.-S. 2022. “Simulating competitive bidding in construction collusive bidding cases.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (5): 04022050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001081.
Macy, M. W., and R. Willer. 2002. “From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling.” Ann. Rev. Sociol. 28 (1): 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117.
Mahdavi, A., and M. Hastak. 2014. “Quantitative analysis of bidding strategies: A hybrid agent based-system dynamics approach.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2014, 1129–1138. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Maidstone, R. 2012. Discrete event simulation, system dynamics and agent based simulation: Discussion and comparison. Manchester, UK: Univ. of Manchester.
Marzouk, M., and I. al Daour. 2018. “Planning labor evacuation for construction sites using BIM and agent-based simulation.” Saf. Sci. 109 (Nov): 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.023.
Nguyen, P. H. D., B. C. Lines, and D. Q. Tran. 2018. “Best-value procurement in design-bid-build construction projects: Empirical analysis of selection outcomes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (10): 04018093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001550.
Puri, D., and S. Tiwari. 2014. “Evaluating the criteria for contractors’ selection and bid evaluation.” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent. 3 (71): 44–48.
Rand, W., and R. T. Rust. 2011. “Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor.” Int. J. Res. Marketing 28 (3): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002.
Raoufi, M., and A. Robinson Fayek. 2018. “Fuzzy agent-based modeling of construction crew motivation and performance.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (5): 04018035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000777.
Salama, M., H. A. el Aziz, H. el Sawah, and A. el Samadony. 2006. “Investigating the criteria for contractors’ selection and bid evaluation in Egypt.” In Proc., 22nd Annual ARCOM Conf., 531–540. Birmingham, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Sawhney, A., H. Bashford, K. Walsh, and A. R. Mulky. 2003. “Agent-based modeling and simulation in construction.” In Proc., 2003 Winter Simulation Conf., 1541–1547. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Schöttle, A., and P. Arroyo. 2017. “Comparison of weighting-rating-calculating, best value, and choosing by advantages for bidder selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 05017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001342.
Shrestha, S. K. 2014. “Average bid method: An alternative to low bid method in public sector construction procurement in Nepal.” J. Inst. Eng. 10 (1): 125–129. https://doi.org/10.3126/jie.v10i1.10888.
Wang, Y., H. Hao, and C. Wang. 2022. “Preparing urban curbside for increasing mobility-on-demand using data-driven agent-based simulation: Case study of city of Gainesville, Florida.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 05022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001021.
Yang, J. B., and W. C. Wang. 2003. “Contractor selection by the most advantageous tendering approach in Taiwan.” J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 26 (3): 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2003.9670792.
Yu, W.-d., K.-W. Wang, and M. T. Wang. 2013. “Pricing strategy for best value tender.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000635.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39 • Issue 3 • May 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 20, 2022
Accepted: Nov 21, 2022
Published online: Jan 19, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Yasser Jezzini, Rayan H. Assaad, Modeling the Impact of Low-Carbon Procurement on Bidding Dynamics, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5997, 40, 4, (2024).
- Rita Awwad, Mohamed S. Eid, Amr Mekki, An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Evaluating Dynamic Risk Behavior in Competitive Bidding, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485262.110, (1076-1086), (2024).