Abstract

For the last 4 decades, concrete bridges have benefited from larger diameter prestressing strands, which have increased from 13 to 15 mm in diameter and are now the standard in the US. The largest commercially available strands in the US are 7-wire–18-mm-diameter strands, but they are not used as often despite researchers finding that they can provide longer spans and lighter structures. This research seeks to experimentally benchmark the bond of 28.6-mm-diameter grade 1780 prestressing strands to normal-weight concrete and mortar for the first time. The large-block pullout test (LBPT), the North American strand producer test (NASP), and concentrically reinforced prism (CRP) pullout test were conducted to quantify the pullout force of these strands when they were embedded in concrete as well as to determine an experimental reference value. The results showed that the strands exhibit adequate bonding to the concrete when implementing the LBPT, NASP, and CRP tests to evaluate them in combination with extrapolated values from the literature using a ratio of strand diameters. Furthermore, CRP tests indicated that the transfer length would likely be approximately 1,200 mm and the development length between 1,800 and 2,400 mm for 58-MPa concrete. It was also determined that due to their much larger surface area, the bond stress of these large-diameter strands was lower than that of 13-, 15-, and 18-mm-diameter strands for similar case scenarios of bond evaluation or transfer length estimation using prisms. However, there is limited information for comparison, and the testing program presented is the only one of its kind for this strand size.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by The Mountain-Plains Consortium (MPC)-University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation (Grant No. DTRT13-G-UTC28).

References

Arezoumandi, M., K. B. Looney, and J. S. Volz. 2020. “Bond performance of prestressing strand in self-consolidating concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 232 (Jan): 117125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117125.
ASTM. 2007. Standard specification for portland cement. ASTM C150-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for evaluating bond of seven-wire steel prestressing strand. ASTM A1081/A1081M-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM C1437-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens). ASTM C109/109M-16a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018a. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM C33/C33M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018b. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018c. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM A370-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test methods for testing multi-wire steel prestressing strand. ASTM A1061/A1061M-20ae1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for evaluating bond of seven-wire steel prestressing strand. ASTM A1081/A1081M-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Banaeipour, A. 2023. “Development of large high-strength reinforcing bars with standard hooks and heads.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Kansas Univ.
Carroll, J. C., T. E. Cousins, and C. L. Roberts-Wollmann. 2017. “The use of grade 300 prestressing strand in pretensioned, prestressed concrete beams.” PCI J. 62 (1): 49–65. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij62.1-01.
Den Uijl, J. 1998. “Connection between concrete properties and bond of prestressing strand.” In Proc., Challenges for Concrete in the Next Millenium: Proc. of the XIII FIP Congress, 129–130. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Federation internationale de la precontrainte.
Den Uijl, J. A. 1992. “Bond and splitting action of prestressing strand.” In Proc., Bond in Concrete, 2/79–2/88. Riga, Latvia: Riga Technical Univ.
FIB (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2000. Bond of reinforcement in concrete. fib. Lausanne, Switzerland: FIB.
Gilbert, R. I., N. C. Mickleborough, and G. Ranzi. 2016. Design of prestressed concrete to AS3600-2009. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Girgis, A. F. M., and C. Y. Tuan. 2005. “Bond strength and transfer length of pretensioned bridge girders cast with self-consolidating concrete.” PCI J. 50 (6): 72–87. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11012005.72.87.
Guyon, Y. F. 1953. Prestressed concrete. New York: Wiley.
Hanson, N. W., and P. H. Kaar. 1959. “Flexural bond tests of pretensioned prestressed beams.” ACI J. Proc. 55 (1): 783–802. https://doi.org/10.14359/11389.
He, Z.-Q., W. Zhuo, Y. Jiang, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, and Z. J. Ma. 2020. “Transverse post-tensioning in long-span concrete box-girder bridges: Refined modeling and alternative system.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (3): 04020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001528.
Hoyer, E., and E. Friedrich. 1939. “Beitrag zur frage der haftspannung in eisenbetonbauteilen.” Beton Eisen 50 (9): 717–736.
Janney, J. R. 1954. “Nature of bond in pre-tensioned prestressed concrete.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 50 (55): 717–736. https://doi.org/10.14359/11790.
Jiang, X., J. Cabage, Y. Jing, Z. J. Ma, and E. G. Burdette. 2017. “Effect of embedment length on bond of 18 mm (0.7 in.) strand by pullout test.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (3): 707. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689442.
JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard). 2014. Steel wires and strands for prestressed concrete. JIS G 3536:2014. Tokyo: Japanese Standards Association.
Jokela, J., and R. Tepfers. 1982. “Bond of bundled prestressing steel strands.” Nord. Concr. Res. 1 (1): 1–19.
Logan, D. R. 1997. “Acceptance criteria for bond quality of strand for pretensioned prestressed concrete applications.” PCI J. 42 (2): 52–90. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011997.52.90.
Marshall, G. 1949. “End anchorage and bond stress in prestressed concrete.” Mag. Concr. Res. 1 (3): 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1949.1.3.123.
Martí, J. R., P. Serna, M. A. Fernández, and P. Miguel. 2002. “Procedimiento de ensayo ‘ECADA’ para la caracterización de la capacidad adherente de las armaduras pretesas al hormigón.” In Proc., VIII Congreso Nacional de Propiedades Mecánicas de Sólidos. Valencia, Spain: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Martí-Vargas, J. R., M. A. Fernández-Prada, C. A. Arbeláez, P. Serna-Ros, and P. F. Miguel-Sosa. 2006. “Transfer and development lengths of concentrically prestressed concrete.” PCI J. 51 (5): 74. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012006.74.85.
Martí-Vargas, J. R., E. García-Taengua, and P. Serna. 2013. “Influence of concrete composition on anchorage bond behavior of prestressing reinforcement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 48 (Nov): 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.102.
Morcous, G., A. Hatami, M. Maguire, K. Hanna, and M. K. Tadros. 2012. “Mechanical and bond properties of 18-mm- (0.7-in.-) diameter prestressing strands.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 24 (6): 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000424.
Moustafa, S. 1974. Pull-out strength of strand and lifting loops. Tacoma, WA: Concrete Technology Associates.
Naito, C., F. Cetisli, and T. Tate. 2015. “A method for quality assurance of seven-wire strand bond in portland cement concrete.” PCI J. 60 (4): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012015.69.84.
Osborn, A., M. Lanier, and N. Hawkins. 2021. “Bond of prestressing strand to concrete.” PCI J. 66 (1): 28–48. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij66.1-04.
Oshima, K., S. Tanaka, S. Nakaue, M. Nishino, Y. Matsubara, and M. Yamada. 2016. “Highly durable ultra-high strength prestressing strand system with large diameter.” SEI Tech. Rev. 82 (Apr): 89–95.
Peterman, R. J. 2009. “A simple quality assurance test for strand bond.” PCI J. 54 (2): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012009.143.161.
Polydorou, T. 2014. “Determination of acceptance criteria for prestressing strand in pre-tensioned applications.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kansas State Univ.
Polydorou, T., K. A. Riding, and R. J. Peterman. 2016. “Interlaboratory study of the standard test method for evaluating bond of seven-wire steel prestressing strand.” PCI J. 61 (4): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij61.4-01.
Pozo-Lora, F. F., S. Al-Rubaye, and M. Maguire. 2021. “Parametric study of pre-tensioned girders reinforced with 19-wire 1-1/8” diameter prestressing strands.” In Proc., 2021 PCI Convention—Innovations in Precast Concrete Components, 1–15. Chicago: Precast Concrete Institute.
Ramirez, J. A., and B. W. Russell. 2008. Transfer, development, and splice length for strand/reinforcement in high-strength concrete. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Riding, K. A., R. J. Peterman, and T. Polydorou. 2016. “Establishment of minimum acceptance criterion for strand bond as measured by ASTM A1081.” PCI J. 61 (3): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij61.3-02.
Rose, D. R., and B. W. Russell. 1997. “Investigation of standardized tests to measure the bond performance of prestressing strand.” PCI J. 42 (4): 56–80. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011997.56.80.
Russell, B. W. 2006. Evaluation of test methods in assessing bond quality of prestressing strands. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State Univ.
Russell, B. W., and M. D. Brown. 2004. Evaluation of test methods in assessing bond quality of prestressing strands. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State Univ.
Russell, B. W., and G. A. Paulsgrove. 1999. Evaluation of test methods in assessing bond quality of prestressing strands. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State Univ.
Tassi, G., G. Balazs, and I. Bodi. 1988. “Bond properties of prestressing strands.” In Proc., FIP Symp., 121–128. Cambridge, UK: Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte.
Tate, T., and C. Naito. 2005. Evaluation of bond mechanics in prestressed concrete applications. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36Issue 11November 2024

History

Received: Nov 2, 2023
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Sep 3, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 3, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, Omaha, NE 68182 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-2380. Email: [email protected]
Marc Maguire, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln, Omaha, NE 68182. Email: [email protected]
Andrew D. Sorensen, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-2021 [email protected]
Associate Professor of Architectural Engineering, Dept. of Multidisciplinary Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 3125 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-2021. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1599-8304. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-6132. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share