Technical Papers
Aug 5, 2024

Waste Paint as Admixture for Glass Fiber–Reinforced Concrete Building Façades

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 10

Abstract

Building façade elements should have aesthetically pleasing geometrical shapes made up of sustainable materials with energy-efficient designs. The low mass-to-high strength ratio of glass fiber–reinforced concrete (GFRC) has the potential to be adopted as a façade material and has been used in the manufacturing of façade elements. The workability of GFRC mixes is comparatively low; therefore, commercial polymer admixtures are used to improve it. The application of commercial polymers may reduce the fire resistance of GFRC mixes due to their easy combustibility. This study investigated the possible application of waste paint to completely replace commercial polymer admixtures in GFRC. It explored the optimum dosage of waste paint to achieve the required strength of a GFRC mix to be used as a façade material. First, characterization of the waste paint was carried out using its rheological properties and solid content, which were compared with commercially available polymer and paint. Subsequently, the effect of different dosages of waste paint (i.e., 0.5%, 1%, and 2% by mass) on the workability and mechanical properties of GFRC mixes (e.g., compressive and flexural strength) was evaluated. Water absorption and porosity were also evaluated. Finally, the combustibility of GFRC mixes with waste paint was evaluated to qualitatively assess fire performance when compared with polymer GFRC mixes. The experimental results demonstrated that the addition of waste paint to the GFRC mixes improved workability. Furthermore, the mixes with a waste paint dosage of less than 1% showed no significant variation in compressive strength compared with the commercial polymer mix. However, the mix with 1% waste paint enhanced flexural strength by 34% whereas a further increase in waste paint content was observed to reduce flexural capacity due to an increase in porosity. Finally, the fire performance of the mixes showed that waste paint is a noncombustible material and can be used as a potential substitute for polymer admixtures in façade applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Australian Research Council Grants DP210101680 and LE170100168 for the work reported in this paper. Further, the authors are greatly thankful to the staff of Digital construction and Smart structures laboratories of Swinburne University of Technology for their support throughout the work.

References

Abdalla, L. B., K. Ghafor, and A. Mohammed. 2019. “Testing and modeling the young age compressive strength for high workability concrete modified with PCE polymers.” Results Mater. 1 (Aug): 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2019.100004.
Almesfer, N., C. Haigh, and J. Ingham. 2012. “Waste paint as an admixture in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (5): 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.02.001.
Almesfer, N., and J. Ingham. 2014. “Effect of waste latex paint on concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 46 (May): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.10.017.
Amed, B., and N. Kabay. 2019. “Glass fibre reinforced precast concrete containing high content pozzolanic materials.” Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 37 (2): 675–686.
Arunothayan, A. R., B. Nematollahi, K. H. Khayat, A. Ramesh, and J. G. Sanjayan. 2023. “Rheological characterization of ultra-high performance concrete for 3D printing.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 136 (Mar): 104854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104854.
AS (Australian Standards). 1994. Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures: Combustibility test for materials. AS-1530.1. Sydney, NSW, Australia: AS.
AS (Australian Standards). 2010. General purpose and blended cements. AS-3972. Sydney, NSW, Australia: AS.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM-C1437. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2008. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars. ASTM-C109. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Auckland Regional Council. 2003. The Auckland region hazardous waste programme: Annual report July 2002 to June 2003. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Regional Council.
Bernstad, A., J. la Cour Jansen, and H. Aspegren. 2011. “Property-close source separation of hazardous waste and waste electrical and electronic equipment—A Swedish case study.” Waste Manage. 31 (3): 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.011.
Bonner, M., and G. Rein. 2018. “Flammability and multi-objective performance of building façades: Towards optimum design.” Int. J. High-Rise Build. 7 (4): 363–374.
Bui, D.-K., T. N. Nguyen, A. Ghazlan, N.-T. Ngo, and T. D. Ngo. 2020. “Enhancing building energy efficiency by adaptive façade: A computational optimization approach.” Appl. Energy 265 (May): 114797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114797.
Clay, S., D. Gibson, and J. Ward. 2007. “Sustainability Victoria: Influencing resource use, towards zero waste and sustainable production and consumption.” J. Cleaner Prod. 15 (8–9): 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.06.021.
Correia, J. R., F. A. Branco, and J. G. Ferreira. 2010. “The effect of different passive fire protection systems on the fire reaction properties of GFRP pultruded profiles for civil construction.” Composites, Part A 41 (3): 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.002.
Earth-Tec Canada, City of London–Environmental Services, CBM, Ashwarren Engineering and Univ. of Western Ontario. 2001. Waste latex paint re-use project, final report, 17. London: City of London’s Environmental Services Dept.
Enfedaque, A., D. Cendón, F. Gálvez, and V. Sánchez-Gálvez. 2011. “Failure and impact behavior of facade panels made of glass fiber reinforced cement (GRC).” Eng. Fail. Anal. 18 (7): 1652–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.01.004.
Feys, D., J. E. Wallevik, A. Yahia, K. H. Khayat, and O. H. Wallevik. 2013. “Extension of the Reiner–Riwlin equation to determine modified Bingham parameters measured in coaxial cylinders rheometers.” Mater. Struct. 46 (1): 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9902-6.
Gavriil, K., R. Guseinov, J. Pérez, D. Pellis, P. Henderson, F. Rist, H. Pottmann, and B. Bickel. 2020. “Computational design of cold bent glass façades.” ACM Trans. Graphics 39 (6): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3414685.3417843.
Gendebien, A., A. Leavens, K. Blackmore, A. Godley, and K. Lewin. 2002. Study on hazardous household waste with a main emphasis on hazardous chemicals. Brussels: European Commission–Directorate General Environment.
GFRC Association 2006. Specification for the manufacture, curing and testing of GRC products. Blackwater, UK: GFRC Association.
Godfrey, C. 2008. “The reuse of latex paint as a polymeric admixture in concrete.” MEng Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bath.
Greiner, T., V. Velva, and A. Phipps. 2004. A background report for the national dialogue on paint product stewardship, 12–13. Lowell, MA: Product Stewardship Institute, Univ. of Massachusetts/Lowell.
Henriksen, T., S. Lo, and U. Knaack. 2015. “An innovative approach to manufacture thin-walled glass fibre reinforced concrete for tomorrow’s architectural building envelopes with complex geometries.” J. Build. Eng. 4 (Dec): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.09.006.
Herzog, T., R. Krippner, and W. Lang. 2012. Facade construction manual. Washington, DC: Walter de Gruyter.
Ihara, T., A. Gustavsen, and B. P. Jelle. 2015. “Effect of facade components on energy efficiency in office buildings.” Appl. Energy 158 (Mar): 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.074.
Ismail, M., B. Muhammad, J. M. Yatim, A. H. Noruzman, and Y. W. Soon. 2011. “Behavior of concrete with polymer additive at fresh and hardened states.” Procedia Eng. 14 (May): 2230–2237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.281.
Kirkpatrick, D., D. Hakim, and J. Glanz. 2017. “Why Grenfell Tower burned: Regulators put cost before safety.” The New York Times, June 24, 2017.
Levitzke, P. V. 2020. “The development of a circular economy in Australia.” In Circular economy: Global perspective, 25–42. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1052-6_2.
Liu, Z., Q. Cui, and Q. Li. 2015. “Properties of GRC modified by emulsion.” In Proc., GRCA 2015 Congress, 19–21. Hampton, UK: International Glassfibre Reinforced Concrete Association.
Majumdar, A., B. Singh, and J. West. 1987. “Properties of GRC modified by styrene-butadiene rubber latex.” Composites 18 (1): 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(87)90009-7.
Mohammed, A., M. Nehdi, and A. Adawi. 2008. “Recycling waste latex paint in concrete with added value.” ACI Mater. J. 105 (4): 367. https://doi.org/10.14359/19898.
Morgan, A. B., and J. W. Gilman. 2013. “An overview of flame retardancy of polymeric materials: Application, technology, and future directions.” Fire Mater. 37 (4): 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2128.
Mouritz, A., and Z. Mathys. 2001. “Post-fire mechanical properties of glass-reinforced polyester composites.” Compos. Sci. Technol. 61 (4): 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00204-9.
Muthukrishnan, S., S. Ramakrishnan, and J. Sanjayan. 2022. “Set on demand geopolymer using print head mixing for 3D concrete printing.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 128 (Mar): 104451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104451.
Mwasha, A., C. Mwasha, and A. Archers. 2009. Preservation of historic building frontages: Problems and general recommendations for Caribbean environment. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Nehdi, M., and J. Sumner. 2003. “Recycling waste latex paint in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (6): 857–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01084-0.
Nguyen, K. T., P. Weerasinghe, P. Mendis, and T. Ngo. 2016a. “Performance of modern building façades in fire: A comprehensive review.” Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 16 (Mar): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.16212.
Nguyen, Q., T. Ngo, P. Tran, P. Mendis, M. Zobec, and L. Aye. 2016b. “Fire performance of prefabricated modular units using organoclay/glass fibre reinforced polymer composite.” Constr. Build. Mater. 129 (Mar): 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.100.
NPCA (National Precast Concrete Association). 2006. Design, manufacture and installation of glass reinforced concrete (GRC). Glenelg, Australia: NPCA.
Pavlidou, S., and C. Papaspyrides. 2008. “A review on polymer–layered silicate nanocomposites.” Prog. Polym. Sci. 33 (12): 1119–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008.
Rajeev, P., A. Ramesh, S. Navaratnam, and J. Sanjayan. 2023. “Using fibre recovered from face mask waste to improve printability in 3D concrete printing.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 139 (Jun): 105047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105047.
Ramesh, A., P. Rajeev, and J. Sanjayan. 2024. “Bond-slip behaviour of textile-reinforcement in 3D printed concrete.” J. Build. Eng. 86: 108873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108873.
Remmler, T. 2017. Optimizing rheology for paint and coating applications. Malvern, Worcestershire: Malvern Instruments.
Schreck, J. G. 2016. “How a common building material turned a Dubai hotel fire into an inferno.” Accessed October 9, 2023. https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/01/19/how-a-common-building-material-turned-a-dubai-hotel-fire-into-an-inferno.html.
Soroushian, P., A. Tlili, M. Yohena, and B. L. Tilsen. 1993. “Durability characteristics of polymer-modified glass fiber reinforced concrete.” Mater. J. 90 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.14359/4037.
West, J., R. De Vekey, and A. Majumdar. 1985. “Acrylic-polymer modified GRC.” Composites 16 (1): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(85)90656-1.
Whittingstall, P. 2011. “Paint evaluation using rheology.” TA Instruments Publication Rh059. Accessed July 28, 2023. http://www.tainstruments.com/library_download.aspx.
Yuen, A. C. Y., T. B. Y. Chen, A. Li, I. M. De Cachinho Cordeiro, L. Liu, H. Liu, A. L. P. Lo, Q. N. Chan, and G. H. Yeoh. 2021. “Evaluating the fire risk associated with cladding panels: An overview of fire incidents, policies, and future perspective in fire standards.” Fire Mater. 45 (5): 663–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2973.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Sep 12, 2023
Accepted: Mar 25, 2024
Published online: Aug 5, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dushan Fernando [email protected]
Master’s Student, Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure and Digital Construction, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure and Digital Construction, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-8656. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure and Digital Construction, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2850-9500. Email: [email protected]
Jay Sanjayan [email protected]
Professor, Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure and Digital Construction, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share