Experimental Investigation on the Compressive Behavior of Rubber–Sand Mixtures under Repeated Loading–Unloading
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 7
Abstract
Due to the behavior of low-density and high-energy absorption efficiency, rubber materials are now being extensively applied to solve geotechnical problems. In order to ensure the rational and economical use of rubber sand mixtures in geotechnical engineering, it is necessary to systematically study the compression behavior of rubber sand mixtures, especially under repeated loading–unloading mode. In this study, three series tests, including one-dimensional compression tests and repeated loading–unloading tests, were conducted on rubber sand mixtures with various rubber contents. The development of the void ratio, compression coefficient, elastic strain, and plastic strain of the mixtures under different load modes was investigated. Results showed that compared to pure sand, rubber sand mixtures exhibited different compression deformation behavior. The rubber content had a significant impact on the compression behavior of rubber sand mixtures. The compression behavior of the rubber sand mixture changed from low to high compressibility when the rubber content was greater than 10%. Also, with the increase of rubber content from 0% to 20%, the ratio between elastic and plastic strain of the mixtures increased from to . When subjected to loading and unloading cycles within a large stress range (0–1,600 kPa), the rubber sand mixture underwent significant elastic strain, and plastic strain gradually accumulated with the number of cycles. When the repeated loading and unloading test started at a certain initial pressure (800–1,600 kPa), the elastic deformation of the rubber sand mixture decreased to a smaller level and did not change significantly with the number of cycles. At this point, plastic strain mainly occurred in the first cycle, and almost no plastic strain occurred in subsequent cycles. Rubber content below 10% has lower compressibility and is a recommended rubber content (RC) value for use in engineering. In addition, setting a certain initial pressure is an effective method to reduce the elastic strain of mixtures and improve the accumulation of plastic strain in engineering applications.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The work presented in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51978532 and the Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department under Grant No. Y202248888. The financial support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Abdullah, W., A. Ashkanani, W. Eid, R. Al-Fares, and M. AlKhamis. 2022. “Evaluation of sand–tire crumb mixtures as lightweight fill materials.” Geomech. Geoeng. 18 (3): 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.2024897.
Asadi, M., K. Thoeni, and A. Mahboubi. 2018. “An experimental and numerical study on the compressive behavior of sand–rubber particle mixtures.” Comput. Geotech. 104 (Dec): 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.08.006.
Benessalah, I., A. Arab, M. Sadek, and R. Bouferra. 2018. “Laboratory study on the compressibility of sand–rubber mixtures under one dimensional consolidation loading conditions.” Granular Matter 21 (1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-018-0860-8.
Br, M., A. Boominathan, and S. Banerjee. 2019. “Engineering properties of sand–rubber tire shred mixtures.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 15 (9): 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1617479.
Christ, M., J. B. Park, and S. S. Hong. 2010. “Laboratory observation of the response of a buried pipeline to freezing rubber–sand backfill.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 22 (9): 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000090.
Christ, M., and J.-B. Park. 2010. “Laboratory determination of strength properties of frozen rubber–sand mixtures.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 60 (2): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.08.013.
Cui, M.-J., J.-J. Zheng, B. K. Dahal, H.-J. Lai, Z.-F. Huang, and C.-C. Wu. 2021. “Effect of waste rubber particles on the shear behaviour of bio-cemented calcareous sand.” Acta Geotech. 16 (5): 1429–1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01176-y.
Das, S., and D. Bhowmik. 2020. “Dynamic behaviour of sand–crumbed rubber mixture at low strain level.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 38 (6): 6611–6622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01458-4.
Duda, A., and T. W. Siwowski. 2021. “Stability and settlement analysis of a lightweight embankment filled with waste tyre bales over soft ground.” Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 9 (4): 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-021-00184-5.
Fonseca, J., A. Riaz, J. Bernal-Sanchez, D. Barreto, J. McDougall, M. Miranda-Manzanares, A. Marinelli, and V. Dimitriadi. 2019. “Particle–scale interactions and energy dissipation mechanisms in sand–rubber mixtures.” Géotech. Lett. 9 (4): 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00221.
Fu, R., M. R. Coop, and X. Q. Li. 2017. “Influence of particle type on the mechanics of sand–rubber mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001680.
Ghazavi, M., and M. Kavandi. 2022. “Shear modulus and damping characteristics of uniform and layered sand–rubber grain mixtures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 162 (Nov): 107412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107412.
Han, D. D., Z. J. Zhou, J. T. Lei, M. G. Lin, and H. C. Zhan. 2022. “Field experimental study for layered compactness of subgrade based on dimensional analysis.” Geomech. Eng. 29 (5): 583–598. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.29.5.583.
Hardin, B. O. 1985. “Crushing of soil particles.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (10): 1177–1192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:10(1177).
Hodgson, I. F., S. P. Beales, and M. J. Curd. 2012. “Use of tyre bales as lightweight fill for the A421 improvements scheme near Bedford, UK.” Geol. Soc. London, Eng. Geol. Spec. Publications 26 (1): 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1144/EGSP26.12.
Kang, X., and B. Bate. 2016. “Shear wave velocity and its anisotropy of polymer modified high-volume class-F fly ash–kaolinite mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (12): 04016068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001562.
Khalaj, O., R. Zakeri, S. N. M. Tafreshi, B. Mašek, and C. Štadler. 2021. “The experimental investigation of the repeated-loading behaviour of the sand-rubber-mixture (SRM).” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 906 (1): 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/906/1/012045.
Kim, H. K., and J. C. Santamarina. 2008. “Sand–rubber mixtures (large rubber chips).” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (10): 1457–1466. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-070.
Lee, C., H. Shin, and J.-S. Lee. 2014. “Behavior of sand-rubber particle mixtures: Experimental observations and numerical simulations.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 38 (16): 1651–1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2264.
Lee, J. S., J. Dodds, and J. C. Santamarina. 2007. “Behavior of rigid-soft particle mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (2): 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(179).
Li, W., C. Y. Kwok, C. S. Sandeep, and K. Senetakis. 2019. “Sand type effect on the behaviour of sand-granulated rubber mixtures: Integrated study from micro- to macro-scales.” Powder Technol. 342 (Jan): 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.10.025.
Li, Y., Z. Lin, B. Li, L. He, and J. Gong. 2021. “Effects of gradation and grain crushing on the liquefaction resistance of calcareous sand.” Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 7 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-020-00190-w.
Liu, F. Y., J. Fu, J. Wang, Z. Y. Gao, H. Z. Li, and J. T. Li. 2022. “Effect of the particle size ratio on macro- and mesoscopic shear characteristics of the geogrid-reinforced rubber and sand mixture interface.” Geotext. Geomembr. 50 (4): 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.04.002.
Liu, L., G. Cai, and S. Liu. 2018. “Compression properties and micro-mechanisms of rubber–sand particle mixtures considering grain breakage.” Constr. Build. Mater. 187 (Oct): 1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.051.
Liu, X., C. Tian, and H. Lan. 2020. “Laboratory investigation of the mechanical properties of a rubber–calcareous sand mixture: The effect of rubber content.” Appl. Sci. 10 (18): 6583. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186583.
Livingston, B., and N. Ravichandran. 2017. “Properties of shredded roof membrane–sand mixture and its application as retaining wall backfill under static and earthquake loads.” Recycling 2 (2): 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling2020008.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China) and SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation). 2019. Standard for geotechnical testing method. GB/T 50123-2019. Beijing: MOHURD.
Neaz Sheikh, M., M. S. Mashiri, J. S. Vinod, and H.-H. Tsang. 2013. “Shear and compressibility behavior of sand–tire crumb mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (10): 1366–1374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000696.
Oikonomou, N., and S. Mavridou. 2009. “The use of waste tyre rubber in civil engineering works.” In Sustainability of construction materials, 213–238. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Senetakis, K., and A. Anastasiadis. 2015. “Effects of state of test sample, specimen geometry and sample preparation on dynamic properties of rubber–sand mixtures.” Geosynth. Int. 22 (4): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.15.00013.
Tatliosz, N., C. H. Benson, and T. B. Edil. 1997. Effect of fines on mechanical properties of soil–tire chip mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Tian, Y., and K. Senetakis. 2022. “Influence of creep and sand type on the compression behavior of sand-rubber composites.” Int. J. Geomech. 22 (8): 17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002491.
Tunnicliffe, L. B., and J. J. C. Busfield. 2017. “Reinforcement of rubber and filler network dynamics at small strains.” In Designing of elastomer nanocomposites: From theory to applications, edited by K. W. Stockelhuber, A. Das, and M. Kluppel, 71–102. Berlin: Springer.
Wang, J., D. Feng, L. Guo, H. T. Fu, Y. Q. Cai, T. Y. Wu, and L. Shi. 2019. “Anisotropic and noncoaxial behavior of -consolidated soft clays under stress paths with principal stress rotation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (9): 04019036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002103.
Wang, X.-Z., Y.-Y. Jiao, R. Wang, M.-J. Hu, Q.-S. Meng, and F.-Y. Tan. 2011. “Engineering characteristics of the calcareous sand in Nansha Islands, South China Sea.” Eng. Geol. 120 (1–4): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.03.011.
Wang, Y. K., Y. F. Gao, B. Li, H. Y. Fang, F. M. Wang, L. Guo, and F. Zhang. 2017. “One-way cyclic deformation behavior of natural soft clay under continuous principal stress rotation.” Soils Found. 57 (6): 1002–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.027.
Wu, Y., N. Li, X. Wang, J. Cui, Y. Chen, Y. Wu, and H. Yamamoto. 2021. “Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior and particle crushing of calcareous sand retrieved from South China Sea.” Eng. Geol. 280 (Jan): 105932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105932.
Xia, Z., R.-P. Chen, and X. Kang. 2019. “Laboratory characterization and modelling of the thermal-mechanical properties of binary soil mixtures.” Soils Found. 59 (6): 2167–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.11.013.
Xiong, W., and Y. Li. 2013. “Seismic isolation using granulated tire–soil mixtures for less-developed regions: Experimental validation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (14): 2187–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2315.
Yoon, S., M. Prezzi, N. Z. Siddiki, and B. Kim. 2006. “Construction of a test embankment using a sand–tire shred mixture as fill material.” Waste Manage. 26 (9): 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.009.
Zhang, T., G. Cai, and W. Duan. 2018. “Strength and microstructure characteristics of the recycled rubber tire–sand mixtures as lightweight backfill.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 25 (4): 3872–3883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0742-3.
Zhang, T., G. Cai, S. Liu, and W. Duan. 2016. “Laboratory observation of engineering properties and deformation mechanisms of cemented rubber–sand mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 120 (Sep): 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.123.
Zhang, X., G. Yang, X. Wang, and H. Cao. 2023. “Compaction quality inspection and uniformity analysis of soil-rock mixed subgrade.” Sustainability 15 (7): 5890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075809.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36 • Issue 7 • July 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 28, 2023
Accepted: Dec 29, 2023
Published online: Apr 26, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 26, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Compressive strength
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Foundation construction
- Foundations
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials characterization
- Materials engineering
- Mixtures
- Rubber
- Sand (material)
- Soil compression
- Soil dynamics
- Soil mechanics
- Soil mixing
- Strain
- Strength of materials
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.