Technical Papers
Apr 17, 2024

Compressibility and Durability Characteristics of Protein-Based Biopolymer-Amended Organic Soil

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 7

Abstract

The current study investigated the efficacy of a protein-based biopolymer called casein for the modification of the primary and secondary compressibility characteristics and ability to resist sustained moisture attack in organic soils. The dry mixing method was adopted for the tests with dosages of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4% added as a percentage of the dry weight of the soil. Incremental consolidation tests indicated that the compressibility reduced with the inclusion of casein, leading to lower void ratios with an increase in consolidation pressure and casein concentration. The primary compression index (Cc) and secondary compression index (Cα) were reduced by 85% and 67%, respectively, for a 2% casein-soil mix at a consolidation pressure of 100 kPa. The compression ratio (Cα/Cc) for the 2% treated soil fell outside the range of 0.01, similar to organic soils with fibrous materials. The permeability was reduced with an increase in casein concentration up to 2% (1010  m/s) but exhibited a rise at 4% due to the formation of effective flow paths by the formation of inter-aggregate voids. At extended curing periods, the fiber formations contributed to the strength gain in amended soils. However, the successive wetting and drying (w-d) cycles led to fiber detachment and reduced the resistance to moisture attack leading to collapse. The 2%-amended casein-soil mix proved to be most suitable in terms of reduced compressibility and sustained the highest number of w-d cycles. The findings from the current study support the inclusion of casein for short-term applications. The use of this novel material in the ground improvement industry will aid in waste management and recycling, and it can act as a replacement for unsustainable chemical stabilizers such as cement and lime.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Institute of Technology, Warangal, and TKM College of Engineering for supporting this research work with all the required facilities. The authors also thank the reviewers for the constructive comments which helped the cause of the manuscript.

References

AASHTO. 2022. Standard method of test for determination of organic content in soils by loss on ignition. AASHTO T 267. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Almajed, A., M. A. Lateef, A. A. B. Moghal, and K. Lemboye. 2021. “State-of-the-art review of the applicability and challenges of microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) and enzyme-induced calcite precipitation (EICP) techniques for geotechnical and geoenvironmental applications.” Crystals 11 (4): 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11040370.
Al-Shamrani, M. A., and A. W. Dhowian. 1996. “Characterization of secondary compression behavior of Sabkha soils.” Eng. Geol. 48 (1–2): 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)81912-6.
Anandha Kumar, S., E. R. Sujatha, A. Pugazhendi, and M. T. Jamal. 2023. “Guar gum-stabilized soil: A clean, sustainable and economic alternative liner material for landfills.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 25 (2): 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02032-z.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for one-dimensional swell or collapse of soils. ASTM D4546-14e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016a. Standard test method for UCS of cohesive soil. ASTM D2166-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016b. Standard test methods for wetting and drying compacted soil-cement mixtures. ASTM D559/D559M-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17el. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis. ASTM D7928. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM D4972-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12400 ft-lbf=ft3 (600 kN-m=m3)). ASTM D698-12e2. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Basu, D., A. Misra, and A. J. Puppala. 2015. “Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: Perspectives and review.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (1): 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0120.
Berry, P. L., and B. Vickers. 1975. “Consolidation of fibrous peat.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101 (8): 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000183.
Biju, M. S., and D. N. Arnepalli. 2020. “Effect of biopolymers on the permeability of sand-bentonite mixtures.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 12 (5): 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.02.004.
Cabalar, A. F., M. H. Awraheem, and M. M. Khalaf. 2018. “Geotechnical properties of a low-plasticity clay with biopolymer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (8): 04018170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002380.
Cabalar, A. F., M. Wiszniewski, and Z. Skutnik. 2017. “Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on the permeability, odometer, unconfined compressive and triaxial shear behavior of a sand.” Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 54 (5): 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-017-9481-1.
Chang, I., J. Im, and G. C. Cho. 2016. “Geotechnical engineering behaviors of gellan gum biopolymer treated sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (10): 1658–1670. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0475.
Chang, I., J. Im, M. K. Chung, and G. C. Cho. 2018. “Bovine casein as a new soil strengthening binder from dairy wastes.” Constr. Build. Mater. 160 (Jan): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.009.
Chang, I., J. Im, S. W. Lee, and G. C. Cho. 2017. “Strength durability of gellan gum biopolymer-treated Korean sand with cyclic wetting and drying.” Constr. Build. Mater. 143 (Jul): 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.061.
Chang, I., A. K. Prasidhi, J. Im, and G. C. Cho. 2015. “Soil strengthening using thermo-gelation biopolymers.” Constr. Build. Mater. 77 (Feb): 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.116.
Chittoori, B. C. S., A. J. Puppala, and A. Pedarla. 2018. “Addressing clay mineralogy effects on the performance of chemically stabilized expansive soils subjected to seasonal wetting and drying.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (1): 04017097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001796.
Duraisamy, Y., B. B. K. Huat, and A. A. Aziz. 2007. “Engineering properties of compressibility behavior of tropical peat soil.” Am. J. Appl. Sci. 4 (10): 768–773. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2007.768.773.
Duraisamy, Y., B. B. K. Huat, and R. Muniandy. 2009. “Compressibility behavior of fibrous peat reinforced with cement columns.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 27 (5): 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9262-3.
Edil, T. B., and X. Wang. 2000. “Shear strength and Ko of peats and organic soils.” In Geotechnics of highwater content materials, edited by T. B. Edil and P. J. Fox, 209–225. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2011. Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and prevention. Rome: FAO.
Fatehi, H., S. M. Abtahi, H. Hashemolhosseini, and S. M. Hejazi. 2018. “A novel study on using protein-based biopolymers in soil strengthening.” Constr. Build. Mater. 167 (Apr): 813–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.028.
Fatehi, H., D. E. Ong, J. Yu, and I. Chang. 2023. “The effects of particle size distribution and moisture variation on mechanical strength of biopolymer-treated soil.” Polymers 15 (6): 1549. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061549.
Ghasemzadeh, H., F. Modiri, and E. Darvishan. 2022. “A novel clean biopolymer-based additive to improve mechanical and microstructural properties of clayey soil.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 24 (3): 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02234-5.
Gotsmy, M., Y. Escalona, C. Oostenbrink, and D. Petrov. 2021. “Exploring the structure and dynamics of proteins in soil organic matter.” Proteins 89 (8): 925–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26070.
Gowthaman, S., M. Yamamoto, K. Nakashima, V. Ivanov, and S. Kawasaki. 2021. “Calcium phosphate biocement using bone meal and acid urease: An eco-friendly approach for soil improvement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 319 (Oct): 128782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128782.
Hamed, M., H. Canakci, and R. N. Georgees. 2021. “Experimental investigation on the primary and secondary consolidation behaviors of organic soil under different water contents.” Arab. J. Geosci. 14 (24): 2865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09231-4.
Hampton, M. B., and T. B. Edil. 1998. “Strength gain of organic ground with cement-type binders.” In Soil improvement for big digs (GSP 81), 135–148. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hamza, M., Z. Nie, M. Aziz, N. Ijaz, Z. Ijaz, and Z. U. Rehman. 2022. “Strengthening potential of xanthan gum biopolymer in stabilizing weak subgrade soil.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 24 (9): 2719–2738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02347-5.
Janz, M., and S. E. Johansson. 2002. The function of different binding agents in deep stabilization. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre.
Kannan, G., B. C. O’Kelly, and E. R. Sujatha. 2023. “Geotechnical investigation of low-plasticity organic soil treated with nano-calcium carbonate.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 15 (2): 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.05.004.
Kannan, G., and E. R. Sujatha. 2023. “Crustacean polysaccharides for the geotechnical enhancement of organic silt: A clean and green alternative.” Carbohydr. Polym. 299 (Jan): 120227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120227.
Khanday, S. A., D. Ahongshangbam, and M. Hussain. 2022. “Durability of peat stabilized with RHA-based geopolymer formed by adding pure alumina.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 8 (5): 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00399-7.
Kumar, M. A., A. A. B. Moghal, K. V. Vydehi, and A. Almajed. 2023. “Embodied energy in the production of guar and xanthan biopolymers and their cross-linking effect in enhancing the geotechnical properties of cohesive soil.” Buildings 13 (9): 2304. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092304.
Latifi, N., S. Horpibulsuk, C. L. Meehan, M. Z. Abd Majid, M. M. Tahir, and E. T. Mohamad. 2017. “Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer—An environmentally friendly soil stabilizer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (2): 04016204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001706.
Maclean, D. J., and P. T. Sherwood. 1962. “Study of the occurrence and effects of organic matter in relation to the stabilization of soils with cement.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 269–275. Berlin: Springer.
Mesri, G. 1973. “Coefficient of secondary compression.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 99 (1): 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001840.
Mesri, G., and M. Ajlouni. 2007. “Engineering properties of fibrous peats.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7): 850–866. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(850).
Mesri, G., and A. Castro. 1987. “Cα/Cc concept and k0 during secondary compression.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (3): 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:3(230).
Mesri, G., and P. M. Godlewski. 1977. “Time- and stress-compressibility interrelationship.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (5): 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000421.
Mesri, G., T. D. Stark, M. A. Ajlouni, and C. S. Chen. 1997. “Secondary compression of peat with or without surcharging.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (5): 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(411).
Moghal, A. A. B., R. M. Rasheed, and S. A. S. Mohammed. 2023. “Sorptive and desorptive response of divalent heavy metal ions from EICP-treated plastic fines.” Ind. Geotech. J. 53 (2): 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00638-8.
Pokharel, B., and S. Siddiqua. 2021. “Understanding the effect of pulp mill flyash on strength, compressibility, and microstructure of organic soil.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (11): 04021209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002172.
Ptiček Siročić, A., L. Kratofil Krehula, Z. Katančić, and Z. Hrnjak-Murgić. 2016. “Characterization of casein fractions—Comparison of commercial casein and casein extracted from cow’s milk.” Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 30 (4): 501–509. https://doi.org/10.15255/CABEQ.2015.2311.
Rajasekaran, G., S. Essaku, and P. K. Mathews. 1994. “Physico-chemical and mineralogical studies on Cochin marine clays.” Ocean Eng. 21 (8): 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(94)90052-3.
Rasheed, R. M., and A. A. B. Moghal. 2022. “Critical appraisal of the behavioral geo-mechanisms of peats/organic soils.” Arab. J. Geosci. 15 (12): 1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10396-9.
Rasheed, R. M., A. A. B. Moghal, S. S. R. Jannepally, A. U. Rehman, and B. C. S. Chittoori. 2023a. “Shrinkage and consolidation characteristics of chitosan-amended soft soil—A sustainable alternate landfill liner material.” Buildings 13 (9): 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092230.
Rasheed, R. M., A. A. B. Moghal, S. Rambabu, and A. Almajed. 2023b. “Sustainable assessment and carbon footprint analysis of polysaccharide biopolymer-amended soft soil as an alternate material to canal lining.” Front. Environ. Sci. 11: 1214988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1214988.
Ryder, K., M. A. Ali, A. Carne, and J. Billakanti. 2017. “The potential use of dairy by-products for the production of nonfood biomaterials.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (8): 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1322875.
Safdar, M. U., M. Mavroulidou, M. J. Gunn, D. Purchase, C. Gray, I. Payne, and J. Garelick. 2022. “Towards the development of sustainable ground improvement techniques—Biocementation study of an organic soil.” Circ. Econ. Sustainability 2 (4): 1589–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00071-8.
Santagata, M. A., T. J. Bobet, and J. Hwang. 2008. “One-dimensional compression behavior of a soil with high organic matter content.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(1).
Shillaber, C. M., J. K. Mitchell, and J. E. Dove. 2016. “Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. I: Definitions and background.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 04015083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001410.
Smitha, S., and A. Sachan. 2016. “Use of agar biopolymer to improve the shear strength behavior of Sabarmati sand.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 10 (4): 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1152674.
Soldo, A., and M. Miletic. 2022. “Durability against wetting-drying cycles of sustainable biopolymer-treated soil.” Polymers 14 (19): 4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194247.
Suganya, K., and P. V. Sivapullaiah. 2020. “Compressibility of remolded and cement-treated Kuttanad soil.” Soil Found. 60 (3): 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.07.006.
Tastan, E. O., C. H. Benson, T. B. Edil, and A. H. Aydilek. 2011. “Stabilization of organic soils with fly ash.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (9): 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000502.
Vishweshwaran, M., and E. R. Sujatha. 2023. “Geotechnical investigation of gelatin biopolymer on cohesive soils.” Sustainability 15 (3): 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032041.
Vydehi, K. V., and A. A. B. Moghal. 2022. “Effect of biopolymeric stabilization on the strength and compressibility characteristics of cohesive soil.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 34 (2): 04021428. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004068.
Vydehi, K. V., A. A. B. Moghal, and B. M. Basha. 2022. “Reliability-based design optimization of biopolymer-amended soil as an alternative landfill liner material.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 26 (3): 04022011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000697.
Wu, Z., Y. Deng, Y. Cui, A. Zhou, Q. Feng, and H. Xue. 2019. “Experimental study on creep behavior in oedometer tests of reconstituted soft clays.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (3): 04018198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001357.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 36Issue 7July 2024

History

Received: Jul 9, 2023
Accepted: Dec 12, 2023
Published online: Apr 17, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 17, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, TKM College of Engineering, Kollam, Kerala 691005, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6504-3517. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, Telangana 506004, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-7102. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share