Frameworks for Standard Cases of Unmanned Aerial Systems in the Construction Industry
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 1
Abstract
Uncertainty in the homologation of drone legislation for nations has resulted from the argument over whether to control developing technology. In the field of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) there is a lack of clarity in stablishing the policies. The intricacies involved in assessing risk probabilities, such as weight, altitude, commercial purpose, involvement of personnel, and other relevant variables, prompt countries to establish legislative frameworks for their UAS policies. This is driven by the recognition that homogeneity in certain application forms of UAS is achieved or discovered at varying rates. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the ontologies that regulate UAS by utilizing standard operational cases or ideal application scenarios. Practices that fall outside of these established frameworks should be subject to ethical evaluation for regulation in the field of construction. A longitudinal study was used to observe the policy changes, evolution of the technology, applications, and trends. In addition, 28 interviews and 30 surveys were conducted involving policy makers, practitioners, service providers, and academics in the Dominican Republic to identify their position in the adequate process of adopting UAS. The findings indicate that policy implications involve various aspects, including building information modeling (BIM), aviation safety, technical inspection manuals, and the urban design of cities. These policies govern the types and capabilities of UAS adopted by construction companies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available for the sake of privacy for the research participants.
References
References
Achuthan, K., N. Hay, M. Aliyari, and Y. Z. Ayele. 2021. “A digital information model framework for UAS-enabled bridge inspection.” Energies 14 (6017): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196017.
Alamouri, A., A. Lampert, and M. Gerke. 2021. “An exploratory investigation of UAS regulations in Europe and the impact on effective use and economic potential.” Drones 5 (63): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030063.
Alsayed, A., M. R. Nabawy, and F. Arvin. 2022. Autonomous aerial mapping using a swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles, 1–7. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Álvares, J. S., D. B. Costa, and R. R. S. D. Melo. 2018. “Exploratory study of using unmanned aerial system imagery for construction site 3D mapping.” Constr. Innovation 18 (3): 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-05-2017-0049.
Bello, S. A., L. O. Oyedele, O. O. Akinade, M. Bilal, J. M. D. Delgado, L. A. Akanbi, A. O. Ajayi, and H. A. Owolabi. 2021. “Cloud computing in construction industry: Use cases, benefits and challenges.” Autom. Constr. 122 (Feb): 103441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103441.
Botín-Sanabria, D. M., A. S. Mihaita, R. E. Peimbert-García, M. A. Ramírez-Moreno, R. A. Ramírez-Mendoza, and J. D. J. Lozoya-Santos. 2022. “Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review.” Remote Sens. 14 (6): 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335.
CAA (Civil Aviation Authority). 2023. “Civil aviation authority—The UK’s aviation regulator.” Accessed February 11, 2023. https://www.caa.co.uk.
Cunliffe, A. M., K. Anderson, L. DeBell, and J. P. Duffy. 2017. “A UK civil aviation authority (CAA)-approved operations manual for safe deployment of lightweight drones in research.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 38 (8–10): 2737–2744. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1286059.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2022. “Federal Aviation Administration.” Accessed July 10, 2022. https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/become_a_drone_pilot.
Gheisari, M., D. B. Costa, and J. Irizarry. 2020. “Unmanned aerial system applications in construction.” In Construction 4.0: An innovation platform for the built environment, edited by M. R. J. I. Anil Sawhney, 264–288. New York: Routledge.
Ham, Y., K. K. Han, J. J. Lin, and M. Golparvar-Fard. 2016. “Visual monitoring of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A review of related works.” Visualization Eng. 4 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-015-0029-z.
Herrmann, M. 2020. “Construction-related waivers to the small unmanned aircraft systems rule in the United States.” In Collaboration and integration in construction, engineering, management and technology, edited by S. H. Ahmed, 1–10. New York: Springer.
Hildmann, H., and E. Kovacs. 2019. “Review: Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as Mobile Sensing Platforms (MSPs) for disaster response, civil security and public safety.” Drones 3 (59): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3030059.
Huang, C., Y.-C. Chen, and J. Harris. 2021. “Regulatory compliance and socio-demographic analyses of civil unmanned aircraft systems users.” Technol. Soc. 65 (1015778): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101578.
Jarus. 2019. “Joint authorities for rulemaking on unmanned systems.” Accessed June 4, 2019. https://jarus-rpas.org/publications/.
Lee, D., S. H. Lee, N. Masoud, M. S. Krishnan, and V. C. Li. 2021. “Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 127 (Jul): 103688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103688.
Li, Y., and C. Liu. 2019. “Applications of multirotor drone technologies in construction management.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 19 (5): 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452101.
Mohtich, F. E., M. El-Ayachi, S. Bensiali, A. Idri, and I. Ait Hou. 2022. “Deep learning approach applied to drone imagery for real estate tax assessment: Case of the tax on Unbuilt Land Kenitra-Morocco.” In Proc., Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 121–127. Bonn, Germany: Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst.
Morgenthal, G., N. Hallermann, J. Kersten, J. Taraben, P. Debus, M. Helmrich, and V. Rodehorst. 2019. “Framework for automated UAS-based structural condition assessment of bridges.” Autom. Constr. 97 (Jan): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.006.
Mueller, E. R., P. H. Kopardekar, and K. H. Goodrich. 2017. Enabling airspace integration for high-density on-demand mobility operations, 1–5. Denver: Aerospace Research Central.
Ojha, A., S. Shakerian, M. Habibnezhad, H. Jebelli, S. Lee, and M. S. Fardhosseini. 2020. “Feasibility of using physiological signals from a wearable biosensor to monitor dehydration of construction workers.” In Proc., Creative Construction e-Conf. 2020, 20–28. Budapest, Műegyetem: Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics.
Onososen, A. O., I. Musonda, D. Onatayo, M. M. Tjebane, A. B. Saka, and R. K. Fagbenro. 2023. “Impediments to construction site digitalisation using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).” Drones 7 (1): 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7010045.
Ramsewak, D., N. S. Mohammed, and N. Sookram. 2022. “Unoccupied aerial systems: A review of regulatory and legislative frameworks in the Caribbean.” Drones 6 (170): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6070170.
Rashid, A. A., S. A. Khan, S. G. Al-Ghamdi, and M. Koç. 2020. “Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment.” Autom. Constr. 118 (Oct): 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268.
Reinhardt, D., et al. 2020. “CoBuilt 4.0: Investigating the potential of collaborative robotics for subject matter experts.” Int. J. Archit. Comput. 18 (4): 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120948742.
Reynoso Vanderhorst, H., D. Heesom, S. Suresh, S. Renukappa, and K. Burnham. 2020. “Application of UAS and revit for pipeline design.” In Proc., Creative Construction e-Conf. 2020, 2–7. Budapest, Műegyetem: Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics.
Reynoso Vanderhorst, H., D. Heesom, S. Suresh, S. Renukappa, and K. Burnham. 2022. “Barriers and cost model of implementing unmanned aerial system (UAS) services in a decentralised system: Case of the Dominican Republic.” Constr. Innovation 23 (4): 1471–4175. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-08-2021-0155.
Sidani, A., F. M. Dinis, J. Duarte, L. Sanhudo, D. Calvetti, J. S. Baptista, J. P. Martins, and A. Soeiro. 2021. “Recent tools and techniques of BIM-based augmented reality: A systematic review.” J. Build. Eng. 42 (Oct): 102500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102500.
Simić, V., D. Lazarević, and M. Dobrodolac. 2021. “Picture fuzzy WASPAS method for selecting last-mile delivery mode: A case study of Belgrade.” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 13 (43): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00501-6.
Stępień-Załucka, B. 2022. “Drones, real estate video surveillance, and neighbourhood right to privacy—The potential area of normative impact from the perspective of the polish law.” J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 106 (14): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01693-2.
Su, T., H. Li, and Y. An. 2021. “A BIM and machine learning integration framework for automated property valuation.” J. Build. Eng. 44 (Dec): 102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102636.
Uryasheva, A., M. Kulbeda, N. Rodichenko, and D. Tsetserukou. 2019. “DroneGraffiti: Autonomous multi-UAV spray painting.” In Proc., Los Angeles, California, SIGGRAPH ’19: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conf., 1–2. Turin, Italy: Istituto Superiore Mario Boella.
Vanderhorst, H. R., S. Suresh, S. Renukappa, and D. Heesom. 2021. “Strategic framework of unmanned aerial systems integration in the disaster management public organisations of the Dominican Republic.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 56 (Apr): 102088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102088.
Wang, J., Y. Liu, S. Niu, and H. Song. 2021. “Lightweight blockchain assisted secure routing of swarm UAS networking.” Comput. Commun. 161 (Jan): 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.11.008.
White, S. M., M. Schaefer, P. Barfield, R. Cantrell, and G. J. Watson. 2022. “Cost benefit analysis of survey methods for assessing intertidal sediment disturbance: A bait collection case study.” J. Environ. Manage. 306 (Mar): 114386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114386.
Wu, J., X. Wang, Y. Dang, and Z. Lv. 2022. “Digital twins and artificial intelligence in transportation infrastructure: Classification, application, and future research directions.” Comput. Electr. Eng. 101 (Jul): 107983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107983.
Yildizel, S. A., and G. Calis. 2019. “Unmanned aerial vehicles for civil engineering: Current practises and regulations.” Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 16 (Aug): 925–932. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.565499.
Zhou, Z., J. Irizarry, and Y. Lu. 2018. “A multidimensional framework for unmanned aerial system applications in construction project management.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000597.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 26, 2022
Accepted: Aug 27, 2023
Published online: Oct 28, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 28, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Architectural engineering
- Building codes
- Building design
- Building information modeling
- Building management
- Business management
- Case studies
- Construction engineering
- Construction industry
- Construction management
- Design (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Government
- Inspection
- Legislation
- Methodology (by type)
- Organizations
- Practice and Profession
- Research methods (by type)
- Standards and codes
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.