Case Studies
Dec 19, 2022

Evaluating Design-Level Designation of Owner-Provided Data for Transportation Design-Build Projects Based on Case Studies

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

One of the unique aspects of the design-build contracting method is that the owner provides a partially completed design for prospective design-builder teams to interpret for complete design and construction of the project. The data provided by the owner include studies, reports, as-built plans, design data, and other documents. The level of design development varies across projects and state transportation departments. Existing research on this topic relies heavily on varying design completion levels, which can be projected as completion percentages, but fails to establish an industry standard of how to recognize the design level, or percent complete, of a project in advance of the 100% design. There is a gap in the research that requires examination of case studies and identification of the data provided by the owner at the corresponding levels of design. This research examines data provided by the owner, state department of transportation agencies, on large design-build transportation projects from six case studies. The first research outcome compares actual documents provided by the DOT at the request for proposal stage of bidding with what their design-build manuals recommend being provided by the DOT. The second research outcome identifies seven additional categories, specific to the DOT-provided design documents, and examines the similarities and differences in drawing files in the six case studies. The final outcome is to provide DOTs with a comprehensive list that gives them the ability to provide sufficient and adequate information to the prospective bidders on design-build projects in an effort to mitigate future disputes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Works Cited

Alameri, R., and B. Esmaeili. 2021. “Progressive design-build delivery method: Assessment of project performance.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.1950242.
Alaska DOT & PF Manual for Design-Build Project Development. 2005. Guidebook for design-build highway project development. Juneau, AK: State of Alaska DOT and Public Facilities.
Brogan, E., B. Shrestha, C. M. Clevenger, and P. P. Shrestha. 2022. “State transportation agencies’ current practices in providing design information for design-build projects during procurement.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (1): 03721004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000521.
Christodoulou, S. 2010. “Bid mark-up selection using artificial neural networks and an entropy metric.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 17 (4): 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011056600.
DBIA (Design-Build Institute of America). 2016. “Design-build done right: Transportation sector.” Accessed April 1, 2016. https://www.dbia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Best-Practices-Transportation.pdf.
Gad, G. M., S. A. Adamtey, and D. D. Gransberg. 2015. “Trends in quality management approaches to design–build transportation projects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2504 (1): 87–92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-11.
Gad, G. M., B. Davis, P. P. Shrestha, and P. Harder. 2019. “Lessons learned from progressive design-build implementation on airport projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 04519020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000320.
Gransberg, D. D., and R. F. Barton. 2007. “Analysis of federal design-build request for proposal evaluation criteria.” J. Manage. Eng. 23 (2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(105).
Gransberg, D. D. X., and M. C. Loulakis. 2012. Geotechnical information practices in design-build projects. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research ProgramTransportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.17226/22793.
Liu, B., T. Huo, Q. Shen, Z. Yang, J. Meng, and B. Xue. 2015. “Which owner characteristics are key factors affecting project delivery system decision making? Empirical analysis based on the rough set theory.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (4): 05014018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000298.
Loulakia, M., D. Tran, J. Njord, R. Parkinson, and G. Henk. 2016. Review of WSDOT’s implementation of design-build project delivery, task 2: Best practices in design-build project delivery. Philadelphia, PA: Hill International.
Loulakis, M. C., and L. P. McLaughlin. 2005. “Design/build exposure: ‘Implied’ duties: EBSCOhost.” Accessed November 9, 2019. https://web-b-ebscohost-com.aurarialibrary.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=c65a6053-9d07-40fc-9c65-14833959bff4%40pdc-v-sessmgr03.
Molenaar, K., D. Gransberg, S. Scott, D. Down, and R. Ellis. 2005. Recommended AASHTO design-build procurement guide. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Molenaar, K. R., and D. D. Gransberg. 2021. “Design-builder selection for small highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 17 (4): 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:4(214).
Pham, D.-H., D.-H. Ly, N.-K. Tran, Y.-H. Ahn, and H. Jang. 2021. “Developing a risk management process for general contractors in the bidding stage for design–build projects in Vietnam.” Buildings 11 (11): 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110542.
Tran, D. Q., C. M. Harper, K. R. Molenaar, N. F. Haddad, and M. M. Scholfield. 2013. “Project delivery selection matrix for highway design and construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2347 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2347-01.
Xia, B., K. Molenaar, A. Chan, M. Skitmore, and J. Zuo. 2013. “Determining optimal proportion of design in design-build request for proposals.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000643.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 2May 2023

History

Received: Jun 2, 2022
Accepted: Oct 4, 2022
Published online: Dec 19, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Canditate, Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer, Denver, CO 80204 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-2539. Email: [email protected]
Caroline M. Clevenger, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-8447 [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer, Denver, CO 80204. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-8447. Email: [email protected]
Lance VanDemark, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Vice President, Vertex Companies, LLC, 2420 W. 26th Ave., Denver, CO 80211. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share