Case Studies
Nov 14, 2022

Avoiding Contract Termination: Perspectives on Essential Skills in Road Project Negotiations

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Naturally, negotiations can settle any issue between contractual parties, such as one party seeking to terminate a relationship. This study acquires perspectives on the critical components of construction negotiations and effective negotiation skills using a qualitative approach derived from evaluating case study project documents and key informant interviews, covering various perspectives on negotiation skills needed in the Malaysian context. The findings established preparation as a critical component. Negotiation is not necessarily time consuming, but negotiation preparation requires careful attention. A negotiation map was created to demonstrate the perspectives on key negotiation skills and strategies. Construction negotiation is primarily driven by constant soft skills: communication, leadership, and problem solving to deal with the subject of negotiations that are identified as contractual issues, technical issues, design-related issues, and obstacles on the site. Technical competencies are typically teachable, whereas soft skills, such as effective communication, are valuable and should be strengthened. These skills are the foundation for building trust, explaining clear direction, and improving performance in a construction negotiation.

Practical Applications

In the case study, the contractor requested to discharge the contract due to the consequences of default by the government, which included land acquisition issues. Several events (including the application for mutual termination) sparked negotiations in resolving project-related issues and agreeing on the project’s execution. The government was determined to succeed in the negotiations to avoid the retendering process, delayed completion, and a negative reputation. The negotiations were successful when the contractor agreed to uphold their contractual duties. This study discusses perspectives on the crucial component of construction negotiations, negotiation skills, and specific skills needed for negotiation in Malaysian construction. The authors believe that acknowledging the value of negotiation skills is an essential context for research. All interviewees gave their perspectives on the skills required for better negotiation outcomes in the case study and the future (not limited to termination issues).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the management and professional team at the Ministry of Works and Public Works Department for information on the case study.

References

List of Cases

Attorney General of Singapore v. Wong Wai Cheng Trading and Union Contractors LR 165 (1980).
Kerajaan Malaysia (Jabatan Kerja Raya) v. Hanaz Sdn. Bhd., 1 MLJ 45 (2021).
Sunshine Fleet Sdn Bhd v. Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia & Anor (GM Healthcare Sdn Bhd & Anor, third parties), 2018, 7 MLJ 530 (2018).

List of Statutes

Contract Act 1950 (Act 136), International Law Book Services (ILBS), Petaling Jaya, Malaysia (2021).

Works Cited

Ade-Ojo, O. C., J. A. Akinola, B. T. Arijeloye, and O. S. Gabriel. 2017. “Implication of construction contract termination for infrastructural development in Ekiti state local government areas, Nigeria.” FUTY J. Environ. 11 (1): 32–40.
Arnold, K. A., and C. E. Connelly. 2013. “Transformational leadership and psychological well-being.” In The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of leadership, change, and organizational development, edited by H. S. Leonard, R. Lewis, A. M. Freedman, and J. Passmore, 175–194. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326404.ch9.
Barrett, N. 2020. “Coronavirus and construction contracts.” Constr. Law J. 31: 5.
Cakmak, P. I. 2021. “The stakeholders’ perspective on the factors contributing to construction disputes.” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. (Apr). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-06-2020-0050.
Caverley, N., B. Cunningham, and L. Mitchell. 2006. “Reflections on public sector-based integrative collective bargaining.” Employee Relat. 28 (1): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450610633064.
Cheung, S. O., and P. T. Chow. 2011. “Withdrawal in construction project dispute negotiation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000388.
Cheung, S. O., and T. W. Yiu. 2006. “Are construction disputes inevitable?” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53 (3): 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.877445.
Cheung, S. O., L. Zhu, and K. I. Yu. 2022. “The value of apology in construction dispute negotiation.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 22 (10): 1910–1923. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1744797.
Chow, P. T., S. O. Cheung, and T. W. Yiu. 2012. “A cusp catastrophe model of withdrawal in construction project dispute negotiation.” Autom. Constr. 22 (3): 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.12.006.
Cleverly-Thompson, S. 2018. “Teaching storytelling as a leadership practice.” J. Leadersh. Educ. 17 (1): 132–140. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I1/A1.
Dionne, S. D., F. J. Yammarino, L. E. Atwater, and W. D. Spangler. 2004. “Transformational leadership and team performance.” J. Organ. Change Manage. 17 (2): 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410530601.
El-Sayegh, S., I. Ahmad, M. Aljanabi, R. Herzallah, S. Metry, and O. El-Ashwal. 2020. “Construction disputes in the UAE: Causes and resolution methods.” Buildings 10 (10): 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100171.
Entrusty Group. 2008. “Is determination of employment and termination of contract the same in meaning and implications?” Master Builders J. 96–103.
Fells, R. E., and L. K. Savery. 1984. “Leadership as a productive strategy in negotiation.” Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 5 (1): 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb053544.
Fernandez, A. A., and G. P. Shaw. 2020. “Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The coronavirus and COVID-19.” J. Leadersh. Stud. 14 (1): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21684.
FIDIC (International Federation of Consulting Engineers). 1999. Construction contract. 1st ed. Geneva: International Federation of Consulting Engineers.
Fisher, T. S., F. Kirk, J. DeDonato, S. Fornaciari, and J. Welch. 2005. “Top ten most important clauses of a construction contract.” Def. Couns. J. 72: 250.
Hagner, M. 2014. Engineering, procurement and construction contracts for large scale projects: A practical guide to EPC contracting and claim management. Essen/Germany: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
Idrus, A., M. A. Mahmoud, M. S. Ahmad, A. Yahya, and H. Husen. 2018. “A negotiation algorithm for decision-making in the construction domain.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 115–123. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62410-5_14.
Jiang, Z., S. C. Henneberg, and P. Naudé. 2010. “Exploring trust vis-à-vis reliance in business relationships.” Marketing Intell. Plan. 28 (6): 706–722. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501011078110.
JKR. 2010. PWD Form 203A (REV.1/2010). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia.
Khanzadi, M., Z. Turskis, G. G. Amiri, and A. Chalekaee. 2017. “A model of discrete zero-sum two-person matrix games with grey numbers to solve dispute resolution problems in construction.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (6): 824–846. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1323005.
Kisi, K. P., N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel. 2020. “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373.
Kong, D. T., and J. Yao. 2019. “Advancing the scientific understanding of trust and culture in negotiations.” Negotiation Conflict Manage. Res. 12 (2): 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12147.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. 1997. “Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 4 (2): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021042.
Ling, F. Y. Y., and H. B. T. Tran. 2012. “Ingredients to engender trust in construction project teams in Vietnam.” Constr. Innovation 12 (1): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171211197490.
Lu, S. C., D. T. Kong, D. L. Ferrin, and K. T. Dirks. 2017. “What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research.” J. Trust Res. 7 (1): 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241.
Lu, W., L. Zhang, and Y. Fu. 2016. “Improving subjective value in construction claim negotiations: Role of behavioral primers.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (4): 05016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000428.
Marzouk, M., L. El-Mesteckawi, and M. El-Said. 2011. “Dispute resolution aided tool for construction projects in Egypt/Ginčų sprendimo pagalbos priemonė statybos projektams Egipte.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (1): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.554165.
Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An integrative model of organizational trust.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 (3): 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
Meijers, S. J., A. G. Dorée, and H. Boes. 2014. “Increased cooperation through immediate post contractual negotiation.” J. Public Procurement 14 (4): 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-04-2014-B005.
Mintu-Wimsatt, A., and R. J. Calantone. 1996. “Exploring factors that affect negotiators’ problem-solving orientation.” J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 11 (6): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629610151307.
MOF (Ministry of Finance). 2020. Pindaan Pekeliling Perbendaharaan PK 4.1 Pentadbiran Kontrak Perolehan Kerajaan Secara Am.
Murnighan, J. K., and M. H. Bazerman. 1990. “A perspective on negotiation research in accounting and auditing.” Acc. Rev. 65 (3): 642–657.
Nauta, A., and K. Sanders. 2000. “Interdepartmental negotiation behavior in manufacturing organizations.” Int. J. Conflict Manage. 11 (2): 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022838.
Omar, A. S., and E. Teo. 2008. “Coping with termination.” Master Builders J. 76–78.
Potter, E. M., T. Egbelakin, R. Phipps, and B. Balaei. 2018. “Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behaviours of construction project managers.” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 23 (1): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-01-2017-0004.
Preuss, M., and P. van der Wijst. 2017. “A phase-specific analysis of negotiation styles.” J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 32 (4): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2016-0010.
Ramchurn, S. D., C. Sierra, L. Godo, and N. R. Jennings. 2007. “Negotiating using rewards.” Artif. Intell. 171 (10–15): 805–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.014.
Sánchez-García, J. Y., and C. López-Hernández. 2020. “Applying system dynamics to a negotiation diagram.” In Strategy, power and CSR: Practices and challenges in organizational management, edited by S. García-Álvarez and C. Atristain-Suárez, 85–99. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Schweitzer, M. E., J. C. Hershey, and E. T. Bradlow. 2006. “Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 101 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.005.
Urbanavičienė, V., A. Kaklauskas, and E. K. Zavadskas. 2009. “The conceptual model of construction and real estate negotiation.” Int. J. Strategies Property Manage. 13 (1): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-715X.2009.13.53-70.
Weiss, A. P. C. 2017. “Negotiation: How to be effective.” J. Hand Surg. Am. 42 (1): 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.10.009.
Yiu, T. W., S. O. Cheung, and C. L. Lok. 2015. “A fuzzy fault tree framework of construction dispute negotiation failure.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 62 (2): 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2407369.
Yiu, T. W., and Y. N. Chung. 2014. “Face-saving tactics as an aid to construction negotiation in Hong Kong.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 21 (6): 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2013-0049.
Yiu, T. W., and H. K. Lee. 2011. “How do personality traits affect construction dispute negotiation? Study of big five personality model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (3): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000271.
Zohar, I. 2015. “‘The art of negotiation’ leadership skills required for negotiation in time of crisis.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 209 (Dec): 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.285.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Feb 28, 2022
Accepted: Sep 2, 2022
Published online: Nov 14, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 14, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-6309. Email: [email protected]
Mohd Saidin Misnan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share