Management of Disputes Related to Contractor’s Liability: Differing Site Conditions in Design–Build Projects
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 4
Abstract
The design-build (DB) procurement method, commonly used in construction, often faces disputes over claims related to differing site conditions (DSC), which are unforeseen and unpredictable risks encountered during the construction process. Thus, this research aims to manage the contractual disputes related to the contractor’s liability under DSC in DB projects. An extensive literature survey, followed by three case studies, a document review, and expert interviews, helped gather information. DB contractors’ nonperformance of DSC precautions, such as verifying employer-provided data and conducting thorough site investigations before bidding, can primarily be attributed to negligence, unawareness, and constraints in terms of cost and time for conducting comprehensive site investigations. Effective DSC dispute management involves contractual parameters like evaluation techniques and risk responsibilities and technical aspects such as detailed site investigations and expert analysis of potential risks. Win-win DSC dispute management benefits employer and contractor.
Practical Applications
This research is based on managing disputes related to DSC, focusing on the contractor’s liability and its impact on design-build projects. The finding reveals the contractor’s liability and the level of fulfilment of the contractor’s liability for DSC, common disputes under the contractor’s liability for DSC and suitable contractual and technical parameters to manage the disputes, underscoring the importance of managing DSC disputes in practical scenarios. This study is beneficial to industry professionals to systematically handle the disputes related to DSC in DB contracts, offering a new perspective on dispute management. Construction industry practitioners can leverage these findings to dispute management, enhancing sustainability in their works. The study provides actionable recommendations for construction industry practitioners. By integrating these research outcomes, stakeholders can overcome challenges in DSCs, contributing to more informed and effective practices in dispute management. This study advances our understanding of managing disputes related to the contractor’s liability in differing site conditions in design-build projects. It highlights its practical relevance, offering a foundation for further innovation and application in real-world contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Works Cited
Amadi, A. I., and A. K. Chijioke. 2020. “Economic sustainability of transportation infrastructure procurement: The differing site condition clause debate as an underlying environmental trigger to cost overruns.” J. Constr. Eng. Technol. Manage. 10 (1): 11–20.
Amarasekara, W. D., B. Perera, and M. Rodrigo. 2018. “Impact of differing site conditions on construction projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000257.
Beltrão, L. M., and M. T. Carvalho. 2018. “Prioritizing construction risks using fuzzy AHP in Brazilian public enterprises.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 05018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001606.
Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document analysis as a qualitative research method.” Qual. Res. J. 9 (2): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Chesser, D., E. Sibley, and R. Essex. 2022. Avoiding and resolving disputes in underground construction. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chu, J. M. 2000. “Differing site conditions: Whose risk are they?” Constr. Lawyer 20: 5.
Code of Federal Regulations. 2005. Federal acquisition regulation. Washington, DC: General Services Administration, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Cushman, R. F., J. D. Carter, D. F. Coppi, and P. J. Gorman. 2000. Proving and pricing construction claims. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen.
Dief, M. A., A. Metwally, and A. Elsayed. 2020. “Construction claims mitigation in design and build contracts.” PM World J. 9 (8): 1–14.
Dwyre, E. M., Z. Batchko, and R. J. Castelli. 2010. “Geotechnical baseline reports for foundation projects.” In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in analysis, modeling & design, 2012–2021. Reston, VA: ASCE.
El-Adaway, I. H., R. A. Vance, and I. S. Abotaleb. 2019. “Understanding extension of time under different standard design-build forms of contract.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000331.
El–Sayegh, S., L. Romdhane, and S. Manjikian. 2020. “A critical review of 3D printing in construction: Benefits, challenges, and risks.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 20 (Jun): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w.
Feldman, S. W., and W. N. Keyes. 2011. Feldman and Keyes’ government contracts in a nutshell. 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic.
Gashahun, A. D. 2020. “Assessment on impact of covid-19 on Ethiopian construction industry.” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comput. 10 (7): 26889–26894.
Gill, P., E. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick. 2008. “Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups.” Br. Dent. J. 204 (6): 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
Gillham, B. 2000. Case study research methods. London: Bloomsbury.
Gransberg, D. D., K. W. McLain, and M. C. Loulakis. 2016. Geotechnical risk in design-build projects. Reston, VA: ASCE Geo-Institute.
Hanna, A. S., J. R. Swanson, and D. G. Aoun. 2014. “Proper risk allocation during construction: Differing site conditions.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 6 (4): 04514003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000146.
Hannan, E. A., and M. S. Maloney. 1990. “What’s different about differing site condition claims.” Def. Counsel J. 57 (57): 304.
Hardjomuljadi, S., and H. Sulistio. 2021. “The most influencing factors on the causes of construction claims and disputes in the EPC contract model of infrastructure projects in Indonesia.” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. 11 (Aug): 80–91.
Jensen, D. A. 2002. “Analysis of a Type I differing condition claim: An empirical study to determine which proof element is most frequently disputed and which party interest most often prevails.” J. Constr. Educ. 7 (1): 31–44.
Johannesson, P., and E. Perjons. 2014. An introduction to design science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Khalef, R., I. H. El-adaway, R. Assaad, and N. Kieta. 2020. “Contract risk management: A comparative study of risk allocation in exculpatory clauses and their legal treatment.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (1): 04520036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000430.
Kondracki, N. L., N. S. Wellman, and D. R. Amundson. 2002. “Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education.” J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 34 (4): 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3.
Li, H. B., S. C. Qi, H. Chen, H. M. Liao, Y. F. Cui, and J. W. Zhou. 2019. “Mass movement and formation process analysis of the two sequential landslide dam events in Jinsha River, Southwest China.” Landslides 16 (11): 2247–2258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01254-z.
Mahfouz, T., S. Davlyatov, and A. Kandil. 2013. “Analysis of differing site condition (DSC) litigation reasoning through statistical modeling.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 12 (4): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2016.1172140.
Mahfouz, T. S. 2009. Construction legal support for differing site conditions (DSC) through statistical modelling and machine learning (ML). Ames, IO: Iowa State Univ.
McClure, G. H. 1984. “Differing site conditions: Evaluating the material difference.” Public Contract Law J. 15 (15): 138–176.
McClure, J. P., S. Singh, D. K. Bamgboye, F. S. Johnson, and H. Kil. 1998. “Occurrence of equatorial F region irregularities: Evidence for tropospheric seeding.” J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 103 (A12): 29119–29135.
McLain, K., D. Gransberg, and M. Loulakis. 2014. “Managing geotechnical risk on US design-build transport projects.” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 14 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v14i1.3745.
Mirhosseini, A. F., K. Pitera, J. Odeck, and M. Welde. 2022. “Sustainable project management: Reducing the risk of cost inaccuracy using a PLS-SEM approach.” Sustainability 14 (2): 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020960.
Mishra, A. K. 2022. Operational analysis of projects in Nepal. Mangaluru, India: Institute of Management and Commerce, Srinivas Univ.
Mohajan, H. K. 2018. “Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects.” J. Econ. Dev. Environ. People 7 (1): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571.
Morrison, M. A., E. Haley, K. B. Sheehan, and R. E. Taylor. 2011. Using qualitative research in advertising: Strategies, techniques, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ng, M. S., D. M. Hall, and S.-H. Hsieh. 2022. “Liability factors and conceptual framework for contracts to manage design for digital fabrication in construction projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 15 (1): 04522043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000578.
Ogunsanmi, O. E. 2015. “Risk classification model for design and build projects.” Covenant J. Res. Built Environ. 3 (1): 54–76.
Ongkowijoyo, C. S., A. Gurmu, and A. Andi. 2021. “Investigating risk of bridge construction project: Exploring Suramadu strait-crossing cable-stayed bridge in Indonesia.” Int. J. Disaster Resilience Built Environ. 12 (1): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2020-0018.
Osman, I., H. Ataei, and A. Seyrfar. 2022. “Differing site conditions: Who is responsible for the risks of additional costs?.” In Forensic engineering, 864–869. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Perera, B., B. J. Ekanayake, C. Jayalath, and G. Jayathilaka. 2021. “A study on variation-specific disputes that arise in road projects in Sri Lanka: A qualitative approach.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 21 (6): 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1573478.
Perkins, R. A. 2009. “Sources of changes in design–build contracts for a governmental owner.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (7): 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:7(588).
Permana, A. I. 2015. Contractor’s liability under unforeseen ground conditions. Malaysia: Univ. of Technology.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and J. M. De la Garza. 2012. “Comparative analysis of design-bid-build and design-build from the standpoint of claims.” In Construction research congress 2012, 21–30. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Prasad, K. V., V. Vasugi, R. Venkatesan, and N. S. Bhat. 2019. “Critical causes of time overrun in Indian construction projects and mitigation measures.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 15 (3): 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2018.1499569.
Procurement and Supply for Plant Construction. 2013. The second edition of the ENAA Model Form-International Contract for Engineering. Tokyo: Engineering Advancement Association of Japan.
Puerto, C. L., D. D. Gransberg, and M. C. Loulakis. 2016. “Contractual approaches to address geotechnical uncertainty in design-build projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (1): 04516010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000202.
Putro, A., and Y. Latief. 2020. “Implementation of design and build contract in government building construction project practice.” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 897 (1): 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/897/1/012016.
Rahi, S. 2017. “Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development.” Int. J. Econ. Manage. Sci. 6 (2): 1–5.
Robinson, M. D. 2011. Contractor’s guide to the FIDIC conditions of contract. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Rostiyanti, S., A. B. Koesalamwardi, and C. Winata. 2018. “Identification of design-build project risk factors: Contractor’s perspective.” In Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 276. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Saaidin, S., I. R. Endut, S. A. Samah, and A. R. Ridzuan. 2017. “Stakeholder’s perspective on risks allocation in design and build projects in Malaysia.” In Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 103. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Smith, K. A. 2014. “Differing site conditions and Metcalf: Judicial shifting of the risks.” Constr. Law 34 (34): 35.
Sweet, J., M. M. Schneier, and B. Wentz. 2014. Construction law for design professionals, construction managers and contractors. Stamford, CT: Timothy Anderson.
Thomas, H. R. 2012. “Differing site conditions indications and disclaimers.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 4 (3): 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000092.
Walker, O. S. 2013. “Differing site condition claims: What is below the surface of exculpatory clauses or other disclaimers?” Procure. Lawyer 48 (4): 4824–4827.
Whitman, J., A. Deshpande, W. Zech, and M. Perez. 2021. “Construction site utilization planning: A process-based upon industry best practices.” Civ. Eng. 2 (2): 309–324.
Zaneldin, E. K. 2018. “Investigating the types, causes and severity of claims in construction projects in the UAE.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 20 (5): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484863.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16 • Issue 4 • November 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 2, 2023
Accepted: Apr 19, 2024
Published online: Jul 27, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Construction sites
- Contracts and subcontracts
- Design-build
- Disaster risk management
- Dispute resolution
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Legal affairs
- Liability
- Practice and Profession
- Project management
- Risk management
- Site investigation
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.