Simulated Effectiveness of Claims and Disputes Resolution Progression Using Agent-Based Modeling
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 1
Abstract
Previous research has shown that several operational mechanisms are offered Aby standard forms of construction contract conditions to address the administration and resolution progression of claims and disputes. However, it is still unknown to practitioners as to which set of operational steps can be viewed as most effective in allowing an optimum such progression. The work presented in this paper examines this exact progression optimality property by conducting agent-based modeling (ABM) simulations, to compare the real-life effectiveness of the six standard forms of contract conditions that are in use. The adopted methodology involved: (1) developing the conceptual models, (2) formulating the simulation rules, (3) building the ABM simulation models, and (4) verifying and validating each of them, to respectively check both whether the model in question was built right and whether the right model was built. The findings are presented through an in-depth analysis of the outputs, namely (1) average time to have a binding judgment, (2) percentages of claims/disputes resolved upon reaching agreement, (3) average time to reach agreement, (4) percentages of claims/disputes ending up in an unregulated period, and (5) percentages of claims/disputes referred to arbitration. The work contribution is in the form of a proposed optimum mechanism, involving a preferably long consultation stage to precede the initial judgment one, and the subsequent inclusion of a time-regulated adjudication step followed by a mediation stage regulating the referral of unresolved disputes to arbitration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the doctoral fellowship support granted to the first author by the Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture at the American University of Beirut.
References
Works Cited
Abdul-Malak, M. A. U., M. M. El-Saadi, and M. G. Abou-Zeid. 2002. “Process model for administrating construction claims.” J. Manage. Eng. 18 (2): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:2(84).
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2017. American Institute of Architects document A201: General conditions of the contract for construction. Washington, DC: AIA.
Arditi, D., F. E. Oksay, and O. B. Tokdemir. 1998. “Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using neural networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (2): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00087.
ASCE Technical Committee on Contracting Practices of the Underground Technology Council. 1991. Avoiding and resolving disputes during construction: Successful practices and guidelines, New York. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Axelrod, R. 2006. Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In Vol. 2 of Handbook of computational economics, 1565–1584. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Barakat, M., M. A. Abdul-Malak, and H. Khoury. 2018a. “Particularized analysis of AIA’s expeditious mechanisms for administering claims and disputes.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000262.
Barakat, M., M. A. Abdul-Malak, and H. Khoury. 2019. “Sequencing and operational variations of standard claims and disputes resolution mechanisms.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000304.
Barakat, M., H. Khoury, and M. A. Abdul-Malak. 2018b. “Progression analysis of the EJCDC’s underlying claim and dispute resolution mechanism.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000263.
Barakat, M., H. Khoury, and M. A. Abdul-Malak. 2018c. “Responsible design and delivery of the constructed project.” In Evaluation of simulation techniques for modeling progression of construction claims. Greenwood Village, CO: International Structural Engineering and Construction Press.
Bennett, N. D., et al. 2013. “Characterising performance of environmental models.” Environ. Modell. Software 40 (Feb): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011.
Braimah, N. 2013. “Understanding construction delay analysis and the role of preconstruction programming.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (5): 04014023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000216.
Bramble, B. B., and M. D. Cipollini. 1995. “Resolution of disputes to avoid construction claims.” Transportation Research Board. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/154416.aspx.
Bubshait, A. A., and S. A. Almohawis. 1994. “Evaluating the general conditions of a construction contract.” Int. J. Project Manage. 12 (3): 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90027-2.
Carsman, H. W. 2000. “Real-time dispute resolution.” In Proc., 2000 Mid-Year Meeting: Real-Time Dispute Resolution. Alexandria, VA: Associated General Contractors.
Cheung, S. O., and K. H. Y. Pang. 2012. “Anatomy of construction disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000532.
Cheung, S. O., K. T. Yiu, and P. S. Chim. 2006. “How relational are construction contracts?” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 132 (1): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:1(48).
Cheung, S. O., T. W. Yiu, and H. W. Chan. 2009. “Exploring the potential for predicting project dispute resolution satisfaction using logistic regression.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (5): 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000157.
Conlin, J. T., D. A. Langford, and P. Kennedy. 1996. “The sources, causes and effects of construction disputes: A research project.” In Cib report, 69–75. Kanata, ON, Canada: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
ConsensusDocs. 2017. ConsensusDocs 200: Standard agreement and general conditions between owner and contractor. Arlington, VA: ConsensusDocs.
DiDonato, S. L. 1993. “Alternate methods to resolve contract disputes: Approaches to effective prevention, management, and settlement of construction contract claims.” AACE Int. Trans. G.02.
EJCDC (Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee). 2013. “Standard general conditions of the construction contract.” In EJCDC C-700, National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. Alexandria, VA: EJCDC.
El-adaway, I., S. Fawzy, M. Ahmed, and R. White. 2016a. “Administering extension of time under national and international standard forms of contracts: A contractor’s perspective.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (2): 04516001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000182.
El-adaway, I., S. Fawzy, T. Allard, and A. Runnels. 2016b. “Change order provisions under national and international standard forms of contract.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (3): 03716001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000187.
El-adaway, I., S. Fawzy, H. Burrell, and N. Akroush. 2016c. “Studying payment provisions under national and international standard forms of contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (2): 04516011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000200.
Fenn, P., D. Lowe, and C. Speck. 1997. “Conflict and dispute in construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 15 (6): 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372719.
FIDIC (International Federation for Consulting Engineers). 1999. Conditions of contract for construction. 1st ed. Geneva: FIDIC.
Harmon, K. M. 2003. “Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 3 (4): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187).
Harmon, K. M. J. 2001. “Pseudo arbitration clauses in New York City construction contracts.” In Construction briefings, 7. Eagan, MN: Thomson Reuters.
Hughes, G. A. 1985. Claims in perspective. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
Iyer, K. C., N. B. Chaphalkar, and G. A. Joshi. 2008. “Understanding time delay disputes in construction contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (2): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.002.
Karau, S. J., and J. R. Kelly. 1992. “The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process.” J. Exp. Social Psychol. 28 (6): 542–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90045-L.
Kennedy, P., A. Morrison, and D. O. Milne. 1997. “Resolution of disputes arising from set-off clauses between main contractors and subcontractors.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 15 (6): 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372737.
Kululanga, G. K., W. Kuotcha, R. McCaffer, and F. Edum-Fotwe. 2001. “Construction contractors’ claim process framework.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (4): 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(309).
Law, A. M. 2014. Simulation modeling and analysis, 804. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Levin, P. 1998. Construction contract claims, changes and dispute resolution. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lim, S. G. S., and J. K. Murnighan. 1994. “Phases, deadlines, and the bargaining process.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 58 (2): 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1032.
McManamy, R. 1994. “Industry pounds away at disputes.” Eng. News Rec. 24 (3).
Mix, D. M. 1996. “ADR in the construction industry: Continuing the development of a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism.” Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 12 (Mar): 463.
Ng, H. S., F. Pena-Mora, and T. Tamaki. 2007. “Dynamic conflict management in large-scale design and construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 23 (2): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(52).
Ofori, G. 2013. “Conflict in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 31 (5): 497–501.
Pinnell, S. 1998. How to get paid for construction changes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Podvezko, V., S. Mitkus, and E. Trinkūniene. 2010. “Complex evaluation of contracts for construction.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 16 (2): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.33.
Ren, Z., C. J. Anumba, and O. O. Ugwu. 2001. “Construction claims management: Towards an agent-based approach.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 8 (3): 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021181.
Sargent, R. G. 2011. “Verification and validation of simulation models.” In Proc., 2011 Winter Simulation Conf., 98–183. New York: IEEE.
Shannon, R. E. 1998. “Introduction to the art and science of simulation.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 1998 Winter Simulation Conf., 7–14. New York: IEEE.
Steen, R. H., and R. J. MacPherson. 2000. “Resolving construction disputes out of court through ADR.” J. Property Manage. 65 (5): 58.
Syal, M., and M. Bora. 2016. “Change order clauses in standard contract documents.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 21 (2): 04015021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000281.
Vidogah, W., and I. Ndekugri. 1997. “Improving management of claims: Contractors’ perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 13 (5): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:5(37).
Yiu, T. W., S. O. Cheung, and F. M. Mok. 2006. “Logistic likelihood analysis of mediation outcomes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (10): 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:10(1026).
Zack, J. G., Jr. 1995. “Practical dispute management.” Cost Eng. Morgantown 37 (12): 55–60.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16 • Issue 1 • February 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 23, 2023
Accepted: Jul 24, 2023
Published online: Sep 28, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Arbitration
- Building codes
- Business management
- Claims
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Contracts and subcontracts
- Dispute resolution
- Engineering fundamentals
- Legal affairs
- Litigation
- Methodology (by type)
- Models (by type)
- Practice and Profession
- Research methods (by type)
- Simulation models
- Standards and codes
- Validation
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Mariam Elazhary, Ahmed Shiha, Islam H. El-adaway, Sammi Young, Quantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6072, 40, 5, (2024).