Predicting the Outcome of Construction Change Disputes Using Machine-Learning Algorithms
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 1
Abstract
Construction disputes are among the most stressful events that may occur throughout the course of a project. Construction executives are increasingly seeking new means to avoid and resolve disputes. Artificial intelligence may be utilized to predict court judgments by uncovering hidden links between interconnected dispute factors, giving disputing parties a better insight on their case position and likely possible outcome. This paper investigates the change order disputes by creating a list of legal factors on which the court rulings were based for previously similar cases in order to determine the likelihood of a potential outcome for a future claim. Various machine-learning models are utilized and tested to determine the best conforming algorithm. These models are evaluated using confusion matrix based on their accuracy, precision, recall, and sensitivity. This study found that the random forest algorithm rendered the best overall performance and achieved (95.0%) prediction accuracy. The model developed in this research may be utilized as a practical means by disputing parties to evaluate and decide whether to file a claim or to settle it privately to resolve the disputes more efficiently for construction dispute negotiation purposes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
List of Cases
Advance Iron Works, Inc. v. Schaefges Bros., Inc. 2018. No. 1-17-1110 (Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division, June 1).
BJK of Manitowoc Cnty., Inc. v. Rupke, 841 N.W.2d 580 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013) (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. November 27, 2013).
Daugherty v. Shrum, Inc. 2015. No. 5-14-0218 (Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, June 23).
Heartland Constr. Grp., Inc. v. Nelson, 2011. 998 N.E.2d 713 (Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, March 4).
MJC Constructors Inc v. State of Illinois, Department Of Transportation. 2011. 64 Ill.Ct.Cl. 142 (Court of Claims of Illinois, September 13).
Radarsat Media, Inc. v. Taty Dev., Inc. 2021. No. 1-20-0774 (Illinois Appellate Court, First District, Fifth Division, June 18).
Roy Zenere Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Build Tech, Inc. 2016. 408 Ill. Dec. 118 (Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District., August 2).
Schmoldt & Daniels Masonry, Inc. v. 723 S. Neil, LLC, No. 4-14-0102 (Appellate Court of Illinois Fourth District, December 2, 2014).
T & W Edmier Corporation v. State of Illinois. 2013. 66 Ill.Ct.Cl. 154 (Court of Claims of Illinois, October 21).
Town of New Ross v. Ferretti. 2004. 815 N.E.2d 162 (Court of Appeals of Indiana, September 22).
Works Cited
Alpaydin, E. 2014. Introduction to machine learning. London: MIT Press.
Alqaisi, A. S. 2022. “Outcome prediction of construction change disputes using machine learning.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil, Materials, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago.
Arcadis. 2022. “2022 global construction disputes report.” Accessed September 28, 2022. https://www.arcadis.com/en-gb/knowledge-hub/perspectives/global/global-construction-disputes-report.
Arditi, D., F. E. Oksay, and O. B. Tokdemir. 1998. “Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using neural networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (2): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00087.
Arditi, D., and T. Pulket. 2005. “Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using boosted decision trees.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 19 (4): 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19:4(387).
Arditi, D., and T. Pulket. 2010. “Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using an integrated artificial intelligence model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(73).
Arditi, D., and O. B. Tokdemir. 1999. “Comparison of case-based reasoning and artificial neural networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:3(162).
Ayhan, M., I. Dikmen, and M. Talat Birgonul. 2021. “Predicting the occurrence of construction disputes using machine learning techniques.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (4): 04021022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002027.
Barnett, J., and P. Treleaven. 2018. “Algorithmic dispute resolution—The automation of professional dispute resolution using AI and blockchain technologies.” Comput. J. 61 (3): 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxx103.
Bradburn, N. M., S. Sudman, and B. Wansink. 2004. Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design—For market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. London: Jossey-Bass.
Breiman, L. 2002. Manual on setting up, using, and understanding random forests v3.1. Berkeley, CA: Statistics Dept., Univ. of California Berkeley.
Chau, K. W. 2007. “Application of a PSO-based neural network in analysis of outcomes of construction claims.” Autom. Constr. 16 (5): 642–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.11.008.
Clough, R. H., G. A. Sears, S. K. Sears, R. O. Segner, and J. L. Rounds. 2015. Construction contracting: A practical guide to company management. New York: Wiley.
Cooper, S. 2018. Data science from scratch: The #1 data science guide for everything a data scientist needs to know: Python, linear algebra, statistics, coding, applications, neural networks, and decision trees. North Charleston, SC: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
Dreyfus, G. 2004. Neural networks: Methodology and applications. Berlin: Springer.
El Naqa, I., and M. J. Murphy. 2015. What is machine learning?, 3–11. New York: Springer.
Hartshorn, S. 2016. Machine learning with random forests and decision trees a visual guide for beginners. Washington, DC: Amazon Kindle.
Kelleher, J. D., B. Mac Namee, and A. D’arcy. 2020. Fundamentals of machine learning for predictive data analytics: Algorithms, worked examples, and case studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keogh, E., and A. Mueen. 2017. “Curse of dimensionality.” In Encyclopedia of machine learning and data mining. New York: Springer.
Levin, P. 2016. Construction contract claims, changes, and dispute resolution. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Menze, B. H., B. M. Kelm, R. Masuch, U. Himmelreich, P. Bachert, W. Petrich, and F. A. Hamprecht. 2009. “A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data.” BMC Bioinf. 10 (Dec): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-213.
Osman, I., H. Ataei, and A. Seyrfar. 2022. “Differing site conditions: Clarifying misunderstandings to reduce costly litigation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (2): 04522002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000534.
Oxford University Press. 2003. The oxford essential dictionary. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
Parvaneh, M., A. Seyrfar, A. Movahedi, H. Ataei, K. Le Nguyen, and S. Derrible. 2022. “Energy consumption prediction of residential buildings using machine learning: A study on energy benchmarking datasets of selected cities across the United States.” In Proc., CIGOS 2021, Emerging Technologies and Applications for Green Infrastructure: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering and Structures, 197–205. New York: Springer.
Raschka, S., and V. Mirjalili. 2019. Machine learning and deep learning with Python. Mumbai, India: Packt Publishing.
Sethi, S. 2018. Machine learning with SAS: Special collection. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Seyrfar, A., and H. Ataei. 2021. “Evaluating computational methodologies for grading buildings on energy performance using machine learning techniques.” In Computing in civil engineering, 205–212. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seyrfar, A., H. Ataei, A. Movahedi, and S. Derrible. 2021. “Data-driven approach for evaluating the energy efficiency in multifamily residential buildings.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (2): 04020074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000555.
Seyrfar, A., H. Ataei, and I. Osman. 2022. “Robotics and automation in construction (RAC): Priorities and barriers toward productivity improvement in civil infrastructure projects.” In Automation and robotics in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry, 59–71. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Shah, A. S., R. Bhatt, and J. Bhavsar. 2014. “Types and causes of construction claims.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 3 (12).
Sullivan, W. 2017. Machine learning for beginners guide algorithms: Supervised & unsupervised learning, decision tree & random forest introduction. North Charleston, SC: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
Taylor, M. 2017. Make your own neural network: An in-depth visual introduction for beginners. Chicago: Blue Windmill Media.
Vanwinckelen, G., and H. Blockeel. 2012. “On estimating model accuracy with repeated cross-validation.” In Proc., 21st Belgian-Dutch Conf. on Machine Learning, 39–44. Ghent, Belgium: Benelearn 2012 Organization Committee.
Vapnik, V. N. 1998. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley.
Wang, R., V. Asghari, S. C. Hsu, C. J. Lee, and J. H. Chen. 2020. “Detecting corporate misconduct through random forest in China’s construction industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 268 (Sep): 122266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122266.
Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16 • Issue 1 • February 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 19, 2023
Accepted: Sep 8, 2023
Published online: Nov 10, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 10, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.