Abstract

The rising demand for electric vehicles (EVs), motivated by their environmental benefits, is generating an increased need for EV charging infrastructure. Also, it has been recognized that the adequacy of such infrastructure helps promote EV use. Therefore, to facilitate EV adoption, governments seek guidance on continued investments in EV charging infrastructure development. Such investment decisions, which include EV charging station locations and capacities, and the timing of such investments require robust estimates of future travel demand and EV battery range constraints. This paper develops and implements a framework to establish an optimal schedule and locations for new charging stations and decommissioning gasoline refueling stations over a long-term planning horizon, considering the uncertainty in future travel demand forecasts and the driving range heterogeneity of EVs. A robust mathematical model is proposed to solve the problem by minimizing not only the worst-case total system travel cost but also the total penalty for unused capacities of charging stations. This study uses an adaptation of the cutting-plane method to solve the proposed model. Based on two key decision criteria (travelers’ cost and charging supply sufficiency), the results indicate that the robust scheme outperforms its deterministic counterpart.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Purdue University’s Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (CCAT), a part of the larger CCAT consortium that is a USDOT Region 5 University Transportation Center funded by the US Department of Transportation, Award #69A3551747105. The paper is also a part of the Center for Innovation in Control, Optimization, and Networks (ICON), and the Autonomous and Connected Systems (ACS) initiatives at Purdue University’s College of Engineering. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the sponsoring organization.

References

Adler, J. D., P. B. Mirchandani, G. Xue, and M. Xia. 2016. “The electric vehicle shortest-walk problem with battery exchanges.” Networks Spatial Econ. 16 (1): 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9221-7.
Alternative Fuels Data Center. 2022. “The electric vehicle registrations by state.” Accessed October 10, 2022. https://afdc.energy.gov/data/widgets/10962.
Anjos, M. F., B. Gendron, and M. Joyce-Moniz. 2020. “Increasing electric vehicle adoption through the optimal deployment of fast-charging stations for local and long-distance travel.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 285 (1): 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.055.
Arslan, O., and O. E. Karaşan. 2016. “A Benders decomposition approach for the charging station location problem with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 93 (Nov): 670–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.09.001.
Bai, X., K. S. Chin, and Z. Zhou. 2019. “A bi-objective model for location planning of electric vehicle charging stations with GPS trajectory data.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 128 (Feb): 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.008.
Bertsimas, D., and M. Sim. 2003. “Robust discrete optimization and network flows.” Math. Programm. 98 (1): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10107-003-0396-4.
Brenna, M., F. Foiadelli, C. Leone, and M. Longo. 2020. “Electric vehicles charging technology review and optimal size estimation.” J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 15 (6): 2539–2552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-020-00547-x.
Chen, Z., F. He, and Y. Yin. 2016. “Optimal deployment of charging lanes for electric vehicles in transportation networks.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 91 (5): 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.05.018.
Cihat Onat, N., M. Kucukvar, and O. Tatari. 2018. “Well-to-wheel water footprints of conventional versus electric vehicles in the United States: A state-based comparative analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 204 (5): 788–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.010.
Coffman, M., P. Bernstein, and S. Wee. 2017. “Transport reviews electric vehicles revisited: A review of factors that affect adoption electric vehicles revisited.” Transp. Rev. 37 (1): 7993. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1217282.
Dantzig, G. B. 1955. “Linear programming under uncertainty.” Manage. Sci. 1 (3–4): 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1.3-4.197.
Desai, J., J. K. Mathew, H. Li, D. M. Bullock, J. Desai, J. K. Mathew, H. Li, and D. M. Bullock. 2021. “Analysis of electric and hybrid vehicle usage in proximity to charging infrastructure in Indiana.” J. Transp. Technol. 11 (4): 577–596. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2021.114036.
Fakhrmoosavi, F., M. R. Kavianipour, M. H. S. Shojaei, A. Zockaie, M. Ghamami, J. Wang, and R. Jackson. 2021. “Electric vehicle charger placement optimization in Michigan considering monthly traffic demand and battery performance variations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2675 (5): 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120981958.
Fauble, B., et al. 2022. Monthly report state of California California’s deployment plan for the national electric vehicle infrastructure program California department of transportation California energy commission primary authors & contributors project managers coordinating lead authors. Sacramento, CA: California DOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2022a. “Highway statistics series.” Accessed October 10, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2022b. “Historic step: All fifty states plus D.C. and Puerto Rico Greenlit to move EV charging networks forward, covering 75,000 miles of highway.” Accessed October 10, 2022. https://highways.dot.gov/newsroom/historic-step-all-fifty-states-plus-dc-and-puerto-rico-greenlit-move-ev-charging-networks.
Fisher, M., K. Blair Farley, Y. Gao, H. Bai, and Z. T. H. Tse. 2014. “Electric vehicle wireless charging technology: A state-of-the-art review of magnetic coupling systems.” Wireless Power Transf. 1 (2): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/wpt.2014.8.
Franke, T., and J. F. Krems. 2013. “Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 48 (15): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2012.10.010.
Funke, S. Á., F. Sprei, T. Gnann, and P. Plötz. 2019. “How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 77 (6): 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.024.
Gardner, L. M., M. Duell, and S. T. Waller. 2013. “A framework for evaluating the role of electric vehicles in transportation network infrastructure under travel demand variability.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 49 (Jun): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2013.01.031.
Guo, F., J. Yang, and J. Lu. 2018. “The battery charging station location problem: Impact of users’ range anxiety and distance convenience.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 114 (Mar): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.014.
Guo, Y., X. Qian, T. Lei, S. Guo, and L. Gong. 2022. “Modeling the preference of electric shared mobility drivers in choosing charging stations.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 110 (Jun): 103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103399.
Guo, Y., D. Souders, S. Labi, S. Peeta, I. Benedyk, and Y. Li. 2021. “Paving the way for autonomous Vehicles: Understanding autonomous vehicle adoption and vehicle fuel choice under user heterogeneity.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 154 (8): 364–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2021.10.018.
He, J., H. Yang, T. Q. Tang, and H. J. Huang. 2018. “An optimal charging station location model with the consideration of electric vehicle’s driving range.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 86 (6): 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.026.
Hosseini, M., and S. A. MirHassani. 2015. “Refueling-station location problem under uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 84 (10): 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.10.009.
Huang, Y., and K. M. Kockelman. 2020. “Electric vehicle charging station locations: Elastic demand, station congestion, and network equilibrium.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 78 (77): 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.008.
Indiana DOT. 2022. Indiana electric vehicle infrastructure deployment plan. Indianapolis: Indiana DOT.
Insideevs. 2018. “Here are the 10 longest range electric cars available in the U.S.” Accessed April 15 2022. https://insideevs.com/features/336368/here-are-the-10-longest-range-electric-cars-available-in-the-us/.
Kadri, A. A., R. Perrouault, M. K. Boujelben, and C. Gicquel. 2020. “A multi-stage stochastic integer programming approach for locating electric vehicle charging stations.” Comput. Oper. Res. 117 (8): 104888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.104888.
Kchaou-Boujelben, M., and C. Gicquel. 2020. “Locating electric vehicle charging stations under uncertain battery energy status and power consumption.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 149 (Nov): 106752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106752.
Khaksari, A., G. Tsaousoglou, P. Makris, K. Steriotis, N. Efthymiopoulos, and E. Varvarigos. 2021. “Sizing of electric vehicle charging stations with smart charging capabilities and quality of service requirements.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 70 (9): 102872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102872.
Khalid, M. R., I. A. Khan, S. Hameed, M. S. J. Asghar, and J. S. Ro. 2021. “A comprehensive review on structural topologies, power levels, energy storage systems, and standards for electric vehicle charging stations and their impacts on grid.” IEEE Access 9 (21): 128069–128094. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112189.
Kınay, Ö. B., F. Gzara, and S. A. Alumur. 2021. “Full cover charging station location problem with routing.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 144 (Dec): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.12.001.
LeBlanc, L. J., E. K. Morlok, and W. P. Pierskalla. 1975. “An efficient approach to solving the road network equilibrium traffic assignment problem.” Transp. Res. 9 (5): 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(75)90030-1.
Liu, C., and Z. Lin. 2016. “How uncertain is the future of electric vehicle market: Results from Monte Carlo simulations using a nested logit model.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 11 (4): 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1248583.
Lou, Y., Y. Yin, and S. Lawphongpanich. 2009. “Robust approach to discrete network designs with demand uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2090 (1): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.3141/2090-10.
Mazda US. 2022. “2022 MX-30 EV crossover—Mazda’s first electric car | Mazda USA | Mazda USA.” Accessed April 25, 2022. https://www.mazdausa.com/vehicles/2022-mx-30.
Michigan DOT. 2022. “Michigan state plan for electric vehicle infrastructure deployment.” Accessed October 10, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/nevi/ev_deployment_plans/mi_nevi_plan.pdf.
Miralinaghi, M., G. H. de Almeida Correia, S. E. Seilabi, and S. Labi. 2020. “Designing a network of electric charging stations to mitigate vehicle emissions.” In Proc., 2020 Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems, FISTS 2020, 95–100. New York: IEEE.
Miralinaghi, M., B. B. Keskin, Y. Lou, and A. M. Roshandeh. 2016. “Capacitated refueling station location problem with traffic deviations over multiple time periods.” Netw Spat Econ. 17: 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-016-9320-3.
Miralinaghi, M., Y. Lou, B. B. Keskin, A. Zarrinmehr, and R. Shabanpour. 2017. “Refueling station location problem with traffic deviation considering route choice and demand uncertainty.” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42 (5): 3335–3351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.137.
New York DOT. 2022. “New York state national electric vehicle infrastructure formula program.” Accessed October 10, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/nevi/ev_deployment_plans/ny_nevi_plan.pdf.
Nissan US. 2022. “2022 Nissan LEAF range, charging & battery.” Accessed April 25, 2022. https://www.nissanusa.com/vehicles/electric-cars/leaf/features/range-charging-battery.html.
Racherla, K., and M. Waight. 2018. “Addressing EMI in electric cars with radio tuner architecture [Future Directions].” IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 7 (1): 85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2017.2755278.
Sathaye, N., and S. Kelley. 2013. “An approach for the optimal planning of electric vehicle infrastructure for highway corridors.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 59 (65): 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.08.003.
Shevchenko, V., O. Husev, R. Strzelecki, B. Pakhaliuk, N. Poliakov, and N. Strzelecka. 2019. “Compensation topologies in IPT systems: Standards, requirements, classification, analysis, comparison and application.” IEEE Access 7 (Jun): 120559–120580. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937891.
Texas DOT. 2022. Texas electric vehicle infrastructure plan. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
US DOT. 2016. The value of travel time savings: Departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations revision 2 (2016 Update). Washington, DC: US DOT.
Yıldız, B., E. Olcaytu, and A. Şen. 2019. “The urban recharging infrastructure design problem with stochastic demands and capacitated charging stations.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 119 (Jan): 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.11.001.
Zheng, H., X. He, Y. Li, and S. Peeta. 2017. “Traffic equilibrium and charging facility locations for electric vehicles.” Networks Spatial Econ. 17 (2): 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11067-016-9332-Z.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 29Issue 2June 2023

History

Received: Apr 29, 2022
Accepted: Jan 1, 2023
Published online: Mar 29, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammadhosein Pourgholamali, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-7722 [email protected]
Research Assistant, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Center for Connected and Automated Transportation, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-7722. Email: [email protected]
Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9785-3135 [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Transport & Planning, Delft Univ. of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, Netherlands. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9785-3135. Email: [email protected]
Mahmood Tarighati Tabesh [email protected]
Research Assistant, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Center for Connected and Automated Transportation, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Sania Esmaeilzadeh Seilabi, Ph.D. [email protected]
National Science Foundation/American Society of Engineering Education Fellows, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Buffalo, NY 14260. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-4192. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Associate Director, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Center for Connected and Automated Transportation, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9830-2071. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Parking Infrastructure Location Design and User Pricing in the Prospective Era of Autonomous Vehicle Operations, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2232, 29, 4, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share