Technical Papers
Jun 6, 2024

Risk Assessment Method for Forecasting Time-Dependent Aging Effects on Corrosion Rate: Preemptive Bridge Assets Management

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 30, Issue 3

Abstract

Current bridge assets management (BAM) is based on a site inspection–based condition rating methodology. Mitigation measures are adapted to assets’ condition assessment results. The reaction approach of bridge infrastructure structural evaluation does not help in judicious planning for repair and rehabilitation in prioritization for bridge assets management. This research paper presents a risk assessment method (RAM) developed upon the statistical data analysis using analytical tools and techniques of the aging effect on the corrosion anomaly rate (CAR), as proposed by the authors. The proposed RAM methodology is developed in order to provide the bridge asset manager with an analytical tool for risk-based BAM optimization. A cluster of 92 New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) steel girder with reinforced concrete deck bridges was selected. The main objectives of this research paper are to (1) develop a risk rating methodology (RAM) for preemptive bridge assets management, (2) compare the RAM-based risk rating (RR) with the primary member condition rating (CR) of 92 NYCDOT nonrehabilitated steel girder with reinforced concrete deck bridges, and (3) provide analytical tools for bridge life-cycle determination for different vulnerability levels and for forecasting the financial risk of prolonged delayed rehabilitation. This innovative paper illustrates the RAM application for predicting the aging process on the CAR and its disposition for a preemptive BAM planning and development.

Practical Applications

Extending the useful service life of aging bridges is a critical issue of global interest. One problem faced globally by the transportation industry is the degradation of structural components of bridges. The purpose and practical application of this paper is to demonstrate a risk assessment approach for BAM relying on statistical data analysis for prioritizing the repair/rehabilitation of deteriorating bridge system. This research presents the deterioration rate concept in BAM framework consisting of estimating the useful service life expectancy of deteriorating bridge system through statistical data analysis, developing a deterioration rate model. The current BAM is based on a site inspection–based condition rating methodology, which depends upon structural evaluator’s judgments. The outcomes of this research have demonstrated, through statistical data analysis, that the pattern of aging effects on the time-dependent CAR value may effectively serve as a substantial time-dependent early degradation indicator for life-cycle state evaluation and serviceability performance degradation. BAM provides valuable aid for bridge owner decision makers in forecasting the degradation rate of bridge system and making preemptive decisions for rehabilitation investment prioritization. One practical application of this research is forecasting the cost implications of deferred repair/rehabilitation along with associated financial risk.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Bridge data for this innovative research are made available through the data sharing agreement between NYCDOT (New York City Department of Transportation) and NYU (New York University). These bridge data are not available in the public domain. All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge and thank NYCDOT professionals for their kind support and assistance in providing access to bridge data with data sharing agreement and creative discussions with reference to bridge assets management.

References

ASCE. 2021. A comprehensive assessment of America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Biondini, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2014. “Life-cycle performance of structural systems under uncertainty.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2014. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413357.196.
Biondini, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2019. “Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures.” In Life-cycle design, assessment, and maintenance of structures and infrastructure systems, 33–64. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415467.ch02.
Brown, A. W., K. A. Kaiser, and D. B. Allison. 2018. “Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 (11): 2563–2570. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708279115.
Cantos, W., and I. Juran. 2019. “Infrastructure aging risk assessment for water distribution systems.” Water Supply 19 (3): 899–907. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2018.139.
Cesare, M., J. C. Santamarina, C. J. Turkstra, and E. Vanmarcke. 1993. “Risk-based bridge management.” J. Transp. Eng. 119 (5): 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:5(742).
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2017. “Framework for mitigating human bias in selection of explanatory variables for bridge deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (3): 04017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000352.
Commerceiets. 2019. “10 limitations of statistics.” Commerceiets. Accessed December 30, 2022. https://commerceiets.com/limitations-of-statistics/.
Craig, T., et al. 2021. “AASHTO—Strategic highway research program 2—Service life design for bridges.” Accessed May 15, 2024. https://shrp2.transportation.org/Pages/ServiceLifeDesignforBridges.aspx.
Dataworks. 2019. “The 5 stages of data lifecycle management—Data integrity.” Accessed December 30, 2023. https://www.dataworks.ie/5-stages-in-the-data-managementlifecycle-process/.
Frangopol, D. M., and J. S. Kong. 2001. “Life-cycle safety and costing for maintenance of aging bridges.” In Structures 2001: A structural engineering odyssey, 1–6. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40558(2001)9.
Furuta, H. 2010. “Bridge management and life cycle performance in Japan.” In Proc., Structures congress 2010, 2757–2768. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)249.
He, X., and X. Lin. 2020. “Challenges and opportunities in statistics and data science: Ten research areas.” Sci. Rev. 2 (3). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.95388fcb.
Jang, S., J. Li, and B. F. Spencer. 2013. “Corrosion estimation of a historic truss bridge using model updating.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (7): 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)be.1943-5592.0000403.
Jiang, Y., and K. C. Sinha. 1989. “Bridge service life prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1223 (1): 24–30.
Kenett, R. S. 2014. “Statistics: A life cycle view.” Qual. Eng. 27 (1): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2015.968054.
Kobayashi, K., K. Kaito, and N. Lethanh. 2010. “Deterioration forecasting model with multistage Weibull hazard functions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (4): 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000033.
Kumar, K., and H. Merulia. 2018. “What are the main limitations of statistics? Can these short comings be overcome?” Careers360. Accessed May 14, 2024. https://www.careers360.com/question-what-are-the-main-limitations-of-statistics-can-these-short-comings-be-overcome.
Kumar Verma, S., S. Singh Bhadauria, and S. Akhtar. 2013. “Estimating residual service life of deteriorated reinforced concrete structures.” Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 1 (5): 92–96. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-1-5-1.
Le, B., and J. Andrews. 2013. “Modelling railway bridge asset management.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 227 (6): 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713490924.
Liang, Y., D. Wu, G. Liu, Y. Li, C. Gao, Z. J. Ma, and W. Wu. 2016. “Big data-enabled multiscale serviceability analysis for aging bridges.” Digital Commun. Networks 2 (3): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2016.05.002.
Mishra, P., C. M. Pandey, U. Singh, A. Keshri, and M. Sabaretnam. 2019. “Selection of appropriate statistical methods for data analysis.” Ann. Card. Anaesth. 22 (3): 297–301. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_248_18.
New York City DOT. 2022. Bridges and tunnels annual condition report. New York: New York City DOT.
New York State DOT. 2017. Bridge inspection manual. New York: New York State DOT.
Ng, S. K., and F. Moses. 2014. “Prediction of bridge service life using time-dependent reliability analysis.” Bridge Manage. 3 (Mar): 26–33.
Prasad, A., I. Juran, and B. Yanev. 2022. “Statistical data analysis of the aging effect on time-dependent corrosion rate for steel girder bridges with concrete decks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 28 (2): 04022002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000674.
Sobanjo, J., P. Mtenga, and M. Rambo-Roddenberry. 2010. “Reliability-based modeling of bridge deterioration hazards.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (6): 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000074.
Strauss, A., K. Bergmeister, S. Hoffmann, R. Pukl, and D. Novák. 2008. “Advanced life-cycle analysis of existing concrete bridges.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20 (1): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:1(9).
Struzinsky, M., et al. 2017. “Bridge inspection manual—NYSDOT.” Accessed May 14, 2022. https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/structures/repository/manuals/inspection/nysdot_bridge_inspection_manual_2017.pdf.
Tran, D. H., A. W. Ng, K. J. McManus, and S. Burn. 2008. “Prediction models for serviceability deterioration of stormwater pipes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 4 (4): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470600792236.
USDOT. 1999. “The infrastructure assets management goal consists of costeffectively and efficiently improving asset performance, as measured by attributes such as infrastructure service life.” Online TDM encyclopedia—Asset management. Accessed May 14, 2022. https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm109.htm.
Xie, Y. 2011. “Values and limitations of statistical models.” Res. Social Stratification Mobility 29 (3): 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.04.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 30Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: Apr 16, 2022
Accepted: Mar 15, 2024
Published online: Jun 6, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 6, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Avinash Prasad, Ph.D., P.E., P.L.S., F.ASCE [email protected]
Administrative Engineer, Bridge Division, New York City Dept. of Transportation, 30-30 Thomson Ave., 5th Floor, Long Island City, NY 11101 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Ilan Juran, Ph.D. [email protected]
Formerly, Professor, Dept. of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York Univ., Brooklyn, NY 11201. Email: [email protected]
Bojidar Yanev, Sc.D., P.E. [email protected]
Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ., New York, NY 10027. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share