Case Studies
Sep 15, 2023

Flow Assessment Downstream of a Hydroelectric Project in an Ungauged Area

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 11

Abstract

Hydropower dams can induce flash floods, leading to a severe cataclysm in flood-prone areas at downstream regions. On the catchment scale, flooding is not contributed solely by the reservoir releases, and there can be significant flow contributions from tributaries downstream of the dam. The major challenge in estimating the lateral flow contribution is that most tributaries are ungauged and situated in inaccessible areas. To overcome this inconsistency and to increase the precision of downstream flood warnings, a modeling framework was developed to quantify the flow contribution by ungauged tributaries to the mainstream using the drainage area ratio (DAR) method. The model parameters were estimated using optimization algorithms, and the best parameters were selected based on the error metrics. The modeling framework constitutes a reservoir operation model and hydrodynamic model developed in MATLAB version 2020b environment with the ease of coupling the two models. The estimated flow from the lateral tributaries based on the optimal model parameters of DAR and hourly inflow hydrographs were incorporated into the model. Two scenarios were analysed with and without lateral flow from ungauged tributaries. Results impart that the flood peaks have increased by more than 75% with the incorporation of the lateral flow. The model was validated with downstream stage and discharge data. The results indicated that the magnitude of the model generated and actual flow data were in the same range.

Practical Applications

Flooding downstream due to sudden release from a hydropower dam is a matter of serious concern worldwide. To evaluate the potential flooding situation downstream, a dam release is generally routed by a hydrodynamic model. However, because hydropower dams are mostly located in remote areas, the tributaries located at inaccessible downstream areas remain ungauged and, therefore, obtaining precipitation/streamflow data of such tributaries become difficult. In absence of downstream flow contribution, the water level obtained by routing the reservoir release underestimates flood magnitude. The dam release flood falls in the high-hazard category because of its suddenness characteristics and, therefore, adverse consequences of underestimation cannot be overemphasized. This paper presents a framework that couples a reservoir operation model, a hydrodynamic model, and a simplified area–proportionate model to estimate downstream tributary contribution, so that a more reliable estimation of the downstream flood situation can be made. The modeling framework has been tested in the Ranganadi Hydropower Project situated in northeastern part of India. The coupled model can be applied to any reservoir with proper calibration of model parameters. By applying this model, a disaster manager would be in a position to disseminate in advance a more reliable downstream flood warning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some of the data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank North Eastern Electric Power Corporation (NEEPCO), Government of India, for providing the reservoir and hydrologic data of the Ranganadi River.

References

Althoff, D., L. N. Rodrigues, and D. D. da Silva. 2022. “Predicting runoff series in ungauged basins of the Brazilian Cerrado biome.” Environ. Modell. Software 149 (Dec): 105315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105315.
Andrei, A., B. Robert, and B. Erika. 2017. “Numerical limitations of 1D hydraulic models using MIKE11 or HEC-RAS software–Case study of Baraolt River, Romania.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 245 (7): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072010.
Ashrafi, S. M., and A. B. Dariane. 2017. “Coupled operating rules for optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems.” Water Resour. Manage. 31 (14): 4505–4520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1762-y.
Asquith, W. H., M. C. Roussel, and J. Vrabel. 2006. Statewide analysis of the drainage-area ratio method for 34 streamflow percentile ranges in Texas. Washington, DC: USGS.
Barati, R. 2013. “Application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum models.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (Jul): 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0037-2.
Baruah, A., and A. K. Sarma. 2021. “Ecological flow assessment using hydrological and hydrodynamic routing model in Bhogdoi River, India.” Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 7 (4): 2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00982-9.
Berga, L. 2016. “The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: A review.” Engineering 2 (3): 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.03.004.
Bhattacharjya, R. K. 2011. “Solving groundwater flow inverse problem using spreadsheet solver.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (5): 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000329.
Chuan, W., Y. Lei, and Z. Jianguo. 2014. “Study on optimization of radiological worker allocation problem based on nonlinear programming function-fmincon.” In Proc., 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. on Mechatronics and Automation, IEEE ICMA 2014, 1073–1078. New York: IEEE.
de Carvalho Barreto, I. D., T. Stosic, M. C. Filho, C. Delrieux, V. P. Singh, and B. Stosic. 2020. “Complexity analyses of Sao Francisco river streamflow: Influence of dams and reservoirs.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 25 (10): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001996.
Devi, D., A. Baruah, and A. K. Sarma. 2022. “Characterization of dam-impacted flood hydrograph and its degree of severity as a potential hazard.” Nat. Hazards 112 (3): 1989–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05253-7.
Devi, D., K. M. Chaudhury, and A. K. Sarma. 2019. “Application of BRAHMA hydrodynamic model for flood forecasting.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1276 (1): 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1276/1/012015.
Gianfagna, C. C., C. E. Johnson, D. G. Chandler, and C. Hofmann. 2015. “Watershed area ratio accurately predicts daily streamflow in nested catchments in the Catskills, New York.” J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud. 4 (Sep): 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.09.002.
Gibbs, M. S., H. R. Maier, and G. C. Dandy. 2012. “A generic framework for regression regionalization in ungauged catchments.” Environ. Modell. Software 27 (Jan): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.10.006.
Hadihardaja, I. K., and R. Vadiya. 2016. “Identification of flash flood hazard zones in mountainous small watershed of Aceh Besar Regency, Aceh Province, Indonesia.” Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 19 (1): 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.11.001.
Hassan, R., B. Cohanim, O. De Weck, and G. Venter. 2005. “A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm.” In Proc., 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., 1897. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Jamshidi, J., and M. Shourian. 2019. “Hedging rules-based optimal reservoir operation using bat algorithm.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (13): 4525–4538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02402-9.
Ji, W., and T. Shao. 2021. “Finite element model updating for improved box girder bridges with corrugated steel webs using the response surface method and fmincon algorithm.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 25 (2): 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0591-3.
Kalita, H. M. 2020. “A numerical model for 1D bed morphology calculations.” Water Resour. Manage. 34 (15): 4975–4989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02707-0.
Kansal, M. L., and S. Singh. 2022. “Flood management issues in hilly regions of Uttarakhand (India) under changing climatic conditions.” Water 14 (12): 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121879.
Karahan, H., G. Gurarslan, and Z. W. Geem. 2015. “A new nonlinear Muskingum flood routing model incorporating lateral flow.” Eng. Optim. 47 (6): 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2014.918115.
Katoch, S., S. S. Chauhan, and V. Kumar. 2021. “A review on genetic algorithm: Past, present, and future.” Multimedia Tools Appl. 80 (Feb): 8091–8126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6.
Lasdon, L. S., A. D. Waren, A. Jain, and M. Ratner. 1978. “Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming.” ACM Trans. Math. Software 4 (1): 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/355769.355773.
Maier, H. R., et al. 2014. “Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions.” Environ. Modell. Software 62 (Dec): 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.013.
Marak, J. D. K., A. K. Sarma, and R. K. Bhattacharjya. 2020. “Assessing the impacts of interbasin water transfer reservoir on streamflow.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 25 (10): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001984.
Nagesh Kumar, D., F. Baliarsingh, and K. Srinivasa Raju. 2010. “Optimal reservoir operation for flood control using folded dynamic programming.” Water Resour. Manage. 24 (6): 1045–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9485-3.
Nruthya, K., and V. V. Srinivas. 2015. “Evaluating methods to predict streamflow at ungauged sites using regional flow duration curves: A case study.” Aquat. Procedia 4 (Jan): 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.083.
O’donnell, T. 1985. “A direct three-parameter muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 30 (4): 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668509491013.
Patowary, S., and A. K. Sarma. 2017. “A modified hydrodynamic model for routing unsteady flow in a river having piedmont zone.” J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 65 (1): 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0052.
Spada, E., M. Sinagra, T. Tucciarelli, S. Barbetta, T. Moramarco, and G. Corato. 2017. “Assessment of river flow with significant lateral inflow through reverse routing modeling.” Hydrol. Processes 31 (7): 1539–1557. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11125.
Spiliotis, M., A. Sordo-Ward, and L. Garrote. 2021. “Estimation of fuzzy parameters in the linear muskingum model with the aid of particle swarm optimization.” Sustainability 13 (13): 7152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137152.
Tsegaw, A. T., K. Alfredsen, T. Skaugen, and T. M. Muthanna. 2019. “Predicting hourly flows at ungauged small rural catchments using a parsimonious hydrological model.” J. Hydrol. 573 (Oct): 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.090.
Wang, J., T. Zhao, J. Zhao, H. Wang, and X. Lei. 2021. “Improving real-time reservoir operation during flood season by making the most of streamflow forecasts.” J. Hydrol. 595 (Nov): 126017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126017.
Xu, W., F. Meng, W. Guo, X. Li, and G. Fu. 2021. “Deep reinforcement learning for optimal hydropower reservoir operation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (8): 04021045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001409.
Yeniay, Ö. 2005. “Penalty function methods for constrained optimization with genetic algorithms.” Math. Comput. Appl. 10 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca10010045.
Yildiz, V., and J. A. Vrugt. 2019. “A toolbox for the optimal design of run-of-river hydropower plants.” Environ. Modell. Software 111 (Aug): 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.018.
You, J. Y., and X. Cai. 2008. “Hedging rule for reservoir operations: 1. A theoretical analysis.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005481.
Zakwan, M. 2018. “Spreadsheet-based modelling of hysteresis-affected curves.” Appl. Water Sci. 8 (4): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0745-3.
Zakwan, M., M. Muzzammil, and J. Alam. 2017. “Developing stage-discharge relations using optimization techniques.” Aquademia 1 (2): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20897/awet/81286.
Zarfl, C., J. Berlekamp, F. He, S. C. Jähnig, W. Darwall, and K. Tockner. 2019. “Future large hydropower dams impact global freshwater megafauna.” Sci. Rep. 9 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54980-8.
Zhang, F., and Y. Zhang. 2021. “A multi-objective optimization prediction approach for water resources based on swarm intelligence.” Earth Sci. Inf. 14 (1): 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00521-1.
Zolfagharpour, F., B. Saghafian, and M. Delavar. 2022. “Hydrological alteration and biodiversity change along the river network caused by anthropogenic activities and climate variability.” Ecol. Processes 11 (1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-022-00362-4.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 11November 2023

History

Received: Mar 31, 2023
Accepted: Jul 11, 2023
Published online: Sep 15, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-3889. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-9200. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share