Technical Papers
Mar 2, 2023

Investigation of Infiltration Loss in North Central Texas by Retrieving Initial Abstraction and Constant Loss from Observed Rainfall and Runoff Events

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 5

Abstract

Accurate modeling of infiltration losses is vital for runoff estimation and thus the development of flood design/protection criteria and water management schemes, etc. In design flood practices, the initial abstraction and constant loss (IACL) method has been widely applied due to its simplicity. However, due to a lack of physical equivalent properties, the IACL method is often subject to issues in parametrization and has large dependency on calibration efforts for storm events. Despite the wide range/variability of IACL values, a single set of IA and CL values is normally adopted for specific flood frequency, which may introduce uncertainty and bias in resulting peak streamflow. In this study, we identified a total of 2,036 rainfall-runoff events for 18 watersheds in North Central Texas to estimate the total losses with their IA and CL components based on time-series of mean areal precipitation (MAP) and streamflow data. Threshold behavior is found for all studied subbasins between the summation of gross rainfall and antecedent soil moisture versus runoff depth: below the threshold, runoff depth is minimal; whereas above it, runoff is largely linearly correlated with the summation of rainfall and antecedent soil moisture. This finding provides a convenient way to estimate/predict total loss or runoff depth given MAP and antecedent soil moisture. In addition, this study shows that the IA and CL values can be approximated by the gamma and Weibull distributions, respectively. The fitted distributions of IA and CL values can be applied in a Monte Carlo simulation framework to stochastically simulate numerous rainfall-runoff events for a flood frequency analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the funding support from US Army Corps of Engineers (Project No. W9126G-17-2-SOI-0977). We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for providing insightful and constructive comments that helped us make significant improvements to the earlier version of this manuscript.

References

Anderson, T. W., and D. A. Darling. 1952. “Asymptotic theory of certain ‘goodness of fit’ criteria based on stochastic processes.” Ann. Math. Stat. 1952 (1): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729437.
Asquith, W. H., and M. C. Roussel. 2007. An initial-abstraction, constant-loss model for unit hydrograph modeling for applicable watersheds in Texas. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
Beran, M. A. 1973. “Estimation of design floods and the problem of equating the probability of rainfall and runoff.” In Proc., Symp. on the Design of Water Resources Projects with Inadequate Data, Madrid, Spain, 33–50. Paris: UNESDOC Digital Library.
Blume, T., E. Zehe, and A. Bronstert. 2007. “Rainfall-runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 52 (5): 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.5.843.
Bove, M. C., J. B. Elsner, C. W. Landsea, X. Niu, and J. J. O’Brien. 1998. “Effect of El Niño on US landfalling hurricanes, revisited.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79 (11): 2477–2482. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079%3C2477:EOENOO%3E2.0.CO;2.
Burnash, R. J. C., R. L. Ferral, and R. A. McGuire. 1973. A generalized streamflow simulation system: Conceptual modeling for digital computers. Sacramento, CA: Joint Federal-State River Forecast Center.
Caballero, W. L. 2013. “Enhanced joint probability approach for flood modelling.” Doctoral thesis, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, Univ. of Western Sydney.
Charalambous, J., A. Rahman, and D. Carroll. 2013. “Application of Monte Carlo simulation technique to design flood estimation: A case study for North Johnstone River in Queensland, Australia.” Water Resour. Manage. 27 (11): 4099–4111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0398-9.
Collis-George, N. 1977. “Infiltration equations for simple soil systems.” Water Resour. Res. 13 (2): 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR013i002p00395.
Detty, J. M., and K. J. McGuire. 2010a. “Threshold changes in storm runoff generation at a till-mantled headwater catchment.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (Jul): 7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008102.
Detty, J. M., and K. J. McGuire. 2010b. “Topographic controls on shallow groundwater dynamics: Implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones in a till mantled catchment.” Hydrol. Processes 24 (16): 2222–2236. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7656.
Du, J. 2011. NCEP/EMC 4KM gridded data (GRIB) Stage IV data. Version 1.0. UCAR/NCAR. Boulder, CO: Earth Observing Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.7158/W12-034.2013.17.1.
Eagleson, P. S. 1972. “Dynamics of flood frequency.” Water Resour. Res. 8 (4): 878–898. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i004p00878.
Fu, C., J. Chen, H. Jiang, and L. Dong. 2013. “Threshold behavior in a fissured granitic catchment in southern China: 1. Analysis of field monitoring results.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (5): 2519–2535. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20191.
Gamage, S. H. P. W., G. A. Hewa, and S. Beecham. 2013. “Probability distributions for explaining hydrological losses in South Australian catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (11): 4541–4553. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4541-2013.
Green, W. H., and G. A. Ampt. 1911. “Studies on soil physics.” J. Agric. Sci. 4 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600001441.
Heneker, T. M. 2002. “An improved engineering design flood estimation technique: Removing the need to estimate initial loss.” Doctoral thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Adelaide Univ., Australia.
Hill, P., J. Zhang, and R. Nathan. 2016. Australian rainfall and runoff revision project 6: Loss models for catchment simulation. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Holtan, H. N. 1961. A concept of infiltration estimates in watershed engineering. Washington, DC: US Department of Agricultural Service.
Horton, R. I. 1938. “The interpretation and application of runoff plot experiments with reference to soil erosion problems.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 3 (6): 340–349. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1939.036159950003000C0066x.
James, A. L., and N. T. Roulet. 2007. “Investigating hydrologic connectivity and its association with threshold change in runoff response in a temperate forested watershed.” Hydrol. Processes 21 (25): 3391–3408. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6554.
James, A. L., and N. T. Roulet. 2009. “Antecedent moisture conditions and catchment morphology as controls on spatial patterns of runoff generation in small forest catchments.” J. Hydrol. 377 (3–4): 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.039.
Katz, R. W. 2002. “Stochastic modeling of hurricane damage.” J. Appl. Meteorol. 41 (7): 754–762. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041%3C0754:SMOHD%3E2.0.CO;2.
Kuczera, G., M. Lambert, T. Heneker, S. Jennings, A. Frost, and P. Coombes. 2006. “Joint probability and design storms at the crossroads.” Australas. J. Water Resour. 10 (1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2006.11465282.
Latron, J., and F. Gallart. 2008. “Runoff generation processes in a small Mediterranean research catchment (Vallcebre, Eastern Pyrenees).” J. Hydrol. 358 (3–4): 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.014.
Loveridge, M., A. Rahman, P. Hill, and M. Babister. 2013. “Investigation into probabilistic losses for design flood estimation: A case study for the Orara River catchment, NSW.” Australas. J. Water Resour. 17 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.7158/W12-034.2013.17.1.
Mei, Y., and E. N. Anagnostou. 2015. “A hydrograph separation method based on information from rainfall and runoff records.” J. Hydrol. 523 (Apr): 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.083.
Mein, R. G., and C. L. Larson. 1971. Modeling the infiltration component of the rainfall-runoff process. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota.
Mein, R. G., and C. L. Larson. 1973. “Modeling infiltration during a steady rain.” Water Resour. Res. 9 (2): 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR009i002p00384.
Mishra, S. K., J. V. Tyagi, and V. P. Singh. 2003. “Comparison of infiltration models.” Hydrol. Processes 17 (13): 2629–2652. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1257.
Mockus, V., and A. T. Hjelmfelt. 1972. Chap 10: Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. Washington, DC: USDA, SCS National Engineering Handbook.
Niu, G. Y., et al. 2011. “The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 116 (Dec): 12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139.
Overton, D. E. 1964. Mathematical refinement of an infiltration equation for watershed engineering. Washington, DC: US Department of Agricultural Service.
Penna, D., H. J. Tromp-van Meerveld, A. Gobbi, M. Borga, and G. Dalla Fontana. 2011. “The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (3): 689–702. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-689-2011.
Philip, J. R. 1957. “The theory of infiltration.” Soil Sci. 84 (3): 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195709000-00010.
Philip, J. R. 1969. “Theory of infiltration.” In Advances in hydroscience, edited by V. T. Chow, 215–296. New York: Academic Press.
Pilgrim, D. H., and I. Cordery. 1975. “Rainfall temporal patterns for design floods.” J. Hydraul. Div. 101 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004197.
Rahman, A., E. Weinmann, and R. G. Mein. 2002a. “The use of probability-distributed initial losses in design flood estimation.” Australas. J. Water Resour. 6 (1): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2002.11465207.
Rahman, A., P. E. Weinmann, T. M. T. Hoang, and E. M. Laurenson. 2002b. “Monte Carlo simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall.” J. Hydrol. 256 (3–4): 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00533-9.
Richards, L. A. 1931. “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums.” Physics 1 (5): 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010.
Saffarpour, S., A. W. Western, R. Adams, and J. J. McDonnell. 2016. “Multiple runoff processes and multiple thresholds control agricultural runoff generation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 (11): 4525–4545. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4525-2016.
Singh, V. P., and F. X. Yu. 1990. “Derivation of infiltration equation using systems approach.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 116 (6): 837–858. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1990)116:6(837).
Smith, R. E. 1972. “The infiltration envelope: Results from a theoretical infiltrometer.” J. Hydrol. 17 (1–2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(72)90063-7.
Thompson, D. B., T. G. Cleveland, D. B. Copula, and X. Fang. 2008. “Lost-rate functions for selected Texas watershed.” Accessed June 1, 2020. http://www.techmrt.ttu.edu/reports.php.
USACE. 1992. Upper trinity river reconnaissance study. Washington, DC: USACE.
USACE. 2013. Corridor development certificate (CDC) –Upper Trinity River, Texas –Hydrologic and hydraulic model update. Washington, DC: USACE.
USGS. n.d. “National water information system.” Accessed March 1, 2020. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/rt.
van Meerveld, I. T., and J. J. McDonnell. 2005. “Comment to “Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes.” J. Hydrol. 303 (1–4): 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.09.002.
Viglione, A., R. Merz, and G. Blöschl. 2009. “On the role of the runoff coefficient in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (5): 577–593. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-577-2009.
Yang, Z. L., et al. 2011. “The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 116 (Dec): 12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015140.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 5May 2023

History

Received: Jul 25, 2022
Accepted: Dec 23, 2022
Published online: Mar 2, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 2, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-6742. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-8405. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Infiltration Model Parameters from Rainfall Simulation for Sandy Soils, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6025, 29, 1, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share