Case Studies
Mar 8, 2023

Calibration and Modification of the Hargreaves–Samani Equation for Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration in Iraq

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 5

Abstract

Daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is an essential component of the hydrologic processes of surface water generation from precipitation. Iraq suffers from a scarcity of surface water due to the erection of many dams on the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers by neighboring countries on upstream locations along these rivers. Therefore, ETo values should be measured more accurately in Iraq. In this study, the Penman–Monteith (PM) equation was used as the benchmark to calculate the standard values of ETo for 103 stations in Iraq using a daily meteorological data set from 2010 to 2019 (5 years each for calibration and validation periods). Three forms of the Hargreaves–Samani (HS) equation were evaluated for estimating the ETo values. The first two equations have common and optimum coefficient sets (HSC and HSO equations, respectively). The third equation is proposed in this study and modifies the HS equation by incorporating a wind speed variable with an optimum coefficient set (HSW equation). The coefficients of the HSO and HSW equations were optimized in terms of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient and the coefficient of determination (R2) using the shuffled complex evolution (SCE) optimization method. The respective success rates of ETo estimation during the calibration and validation periods are 37% and 39% when using the HSC equation, 96% and 95% with the HSO equation, and 100% and 100% with the HSW equation. Results indicated that the HSO and HSW equations enhance the estimation of ETo values relative to the HSC equation, and the HSW equation performs best among the three. Therefore, incorporating the wind speed in the HS equation with the optimum coefficient set increases the robustness of its predictive capacity for all regions of Iraq, including those with high altitudes.

Practical Applications

The applicability of the Hargreaves–Samani equation, which depends only on temperatures, was investigated using common coefficients in estimating daily evapotranspiration values for 10 years (2010–2019) in 103 regularly distributed stations covering the entire area of Iraq. It was found that the common form of the Hargreaves–Samani equation failed in most regions of Iraq except the northern and northeastern regions. Therefore, the Hargreaves–Samani equation was calibrated with new coefficients for Iraq in lieu of the common coefficients. The Hargreaves–Samani equation with the new calibration coefficients was more successful in calculating the evapotranspiration in 95% of all stations across Iraqi area; the exceptions were some stations located in northern and northeastern regions, in which the common equation succeeded. Thus, to obtain an equation that remains applicable for the entire area of Iraq, the Hargreaves–Samani equation was developed further by incorporating the wind speed and later calibrated to obtain the appropriate coefficients for Iraq. This developed Hargreaves–Samani equation was very successful in estimating the values of evapotranspiration in all regions of Iraq.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Professor Dr. Hoshin V. Gupta for providing the SCE program. We really appreciate the data being provided by the websites of NASA and NOAA.

References

Ali, H. Z., and S. H. Faraj. 2017. “Estimation of daily evaporation from calculated evapotranspiration in Iraq.” J. Madenat Alelem Univ. Coll. 9 (2): 84–96.
Allen, R. G. 1993. Evaluation of a temperature difference method for computing grass reference evapotranspiration. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Allen, R. G., A. J. Clemmens, C. M. Burt, K. Solomon, and T. O’Halloran. 2005. “Prediction accuracy for projectwide evapotranspiration using crop coefficients and reference evapotranspiration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 131 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(24).
Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Allen, R. G., W. O. Pruitt, J. L. Wright, T. A. Howell, F. Ventura, R. Snyder, D. Itenfisu, P. Steduto, J. Berengena, and J. B. Yrisarry. 2006. “A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method.” Agric. Water Manage. 81 (1–2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007.
Almorox, J., and C. Hontoria. 2004. “Global solar radiation estimation using sunshine duration in Spain.” Energy Convers. Manage. 45 (9–10): 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.08.022.
Al-Sudani, H. I. Z. 2019. “Rainfall returns periods in Iraq.” J. Univ. Babylon Eng. Sci. 27 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29196/jubes.v27i2.2288.
Amatya, D. M., C. A. Harrison, and C. C. Trettin. 2014. “Comparison of potential evapotranspiration (PET) using three methods for a grass reference and a natural forest in coastal plain of South Carolina.” In Proc., 2014 South Carolina Water Resources Conf., 7. Clemson, SC: Clemson Univ. Public Service.
Amatya, D. M., R. W. Skaggs, and J. D. Gregory. 1995. “Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 121 (6): 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:6(427).
Brêda, J. P. L. F., J. M. Bravo, and R. C. D. D. Paiva. 2017. “Efficient number of calibrated cross sections bottom levels on a hydrodynamic model using the SCE-UA algorithm. Case study: Madeira River.” Rev. Bras. Recur. Hidricos 22 (53): 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.0217170068.
Brutsaert, W. 2013. Evaporation into the atmosphere: Theory, history and applications. Ithaca, NY: Springer.
Citakoglu, H., M. Cobaner, T. Haktanir, and O. Kisi. 2014. “Estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration in Turkey.” Water Resour. Manage. 28 (1): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0474-1.
Cobaner, M., H. Citakoǧlu, T. Haktanir, and O. Kisi. 2017. “Modifying Hargreaves-Samani equation with meteorological variables for estimation of reference evapotranspiration in Turkey.” Hydrol. Res. 48 (2): 480–497. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.217.
Cooper, V. A., V. T. V. Nguyen, and J. A. Nicell. 1997. “Evaluation of global optimization methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff model calibration.” Water Sci. Technol. 36 (5): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0163.
Doorenbos, J. 1977. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Droogers, P., and R. G. Allen. 2002. “Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions.” Irrig. Drain. Syst. 16 (1): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015508322413.
Duan, Q. 1991. A global optimization strategy for efficient and effective calibration of hydrologic models. Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (4): 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985.
Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta. 1994. “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models.” J. Hydrol. 158 (3–4): 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4.
Duan, Q. Y., V. K. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1993. “Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization.” J. Optim. Theory Appl. 76 (3): 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939380.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2021. “ETo calculator for FAO Penman-Monteith equation.” Accessed January 20, 2021. https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/eto-calculator/en/.
Fooladmand, H. R., H. Zandilak, and M. H. Ravanan. 2008. “Comparison of different types of Hargreaves equation for estimating monthly evapotranspiration in the south of Iran.” Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 54 (3): 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340701793603.
Franchini, M., G. Galeati, and S. Berra. 1998. “Techniques d’optimisation globales pour le calage de modèles conceptuels pluie-débit.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 43 (3): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669809492137.
Frenken, K. 2009. Irrigation in the Middle East region in figures. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gan, T. Y., and G. F. Biftu. 1996. “Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Optimization algorithms, catchment conditions, and model structure.” Water Resour. Res. 32 (12): 3513–3524. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02195.
Gocic, M., and S. Trajkovic. 2010. “Software for estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data.” Comput. Electron. Agric. 71 (2): 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.01.003.
Haider, S., and S. Adnan. 2014. “Classification and assessment of aridity over Pakistan provinces (1960-2009).” Int. J. Environ. 3 (4): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.3126/ije.v3i4.11728.
Hallabia, H., H. Hamam, and A. Ben Hamida. 2020. “An optimal use of SCE-UA method cooperated with superpixel segmentation for pansharpening.” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 18 (9): 1620–1624. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.3004320.
Hanson, C. L., and F. Rauzi. 1977. “Class A pan evaporation as affected by shelter, and a daily prediction equation.” Agric. Meteorol. 18 (1): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(77)90025-5.
Hargreaves, G. H. 1989. “Accuracy of estimated reference crop evapotranspiration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 115 (6): 1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1989)115:6(1000).
Hargreaves, G. H., and R. G. Allen. 2003. “History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 129 (1): 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53).
Hargreaves, G. H., and Z. A. Samani. 1985. “Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature.” Appl. Eng. Agric. 1 (2): 96–99. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26773.
Haslinger, K., and A. Bartsch. 2016. “Creating long-term gridded fields of reference evapotranspiration in Alpine terrain based on a recalibrated Hargreaves method.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 (3): 1211–1223. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1211-2016.
Holland, J. H. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001.
Huang, L., L. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Xing, Q. Hao, Y. Xiao, L. Yang, and H. Zhu. 2018. “Identification of groundwater pollution sources by a SCE-UA algorithm-based simulation/optimization model.” Water 10 (2): 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020193.
Itenfisu, D., R. L. Elliott, R. G. Allen, and I. A. Walter. 2003. “Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as part of the ASCE standardization effort.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 129 (6): 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:6(440).
Jensen, D. T., G. H. Hargreaves, B. Temesgen, and R. G. Allen. 1997. “Computation of ETo under nonideal conditions.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 123 (5): 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:5(394).
Jensen, M. E., R. D. Burman, and R. G. Allen. 1990. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. MOP 70. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kan, G., X. He, L. Ding, J. Li, K. Liang, and Y. Hong. 2017. “A heterogeneous computing accelerated SCE-UA global optimization method using OpenMP, OpenCL, CUDA, and OpenACC.” Water Sci. Technol. 76 (7): 1640–1651. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.322.
Kashyap, P. S., and R. K. Panda. 2001. “Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop-coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region.” Agric. water Manage. 50 (1): 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00102-0.
Khoob, A. R. 2008. “Comparative study of Hargreaves’s and artificial neural network’s methodologies in estimating reference evapotranspiration in a semiarid environment.” Irrig. Sci. 26 (3): 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0090-z.
Kuczera, G. 1997. “Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models.” Water Resour. Res. 33 (1): 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR02671.
Lu, J., G. Sun, S. G. McNulty, and D. M. Amatya. 2005. “A comparison of six potential evapotranspiration methods for regional use in the Southeastern United States.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 41 (3): 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03759.x.
Martinez, C. J., and M. Thepadia. 2010. “Estimating reference evapotranspiration with minimum data in Florida.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 136 (7): 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000214.
Martınez-Cob, A., and M. Tejero-Juste. 2004. “A wind-based qualitative calibration of the Hargreaves ET0 estimation equation in semiarid regions.” Agric. Water Manage. 64 (3): 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00199-9.
McMahon, T. A., B. L. Finlayson, and M. C. Peel. 2016. “Historical developments of models for estimating evaporation using standard meteorological data.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 3 (6): 788–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1172.
Mendicino, G., and A. Senatore. 2013. “Regionalization of the Hargreaves coefficient for the assessment of distributed reference evapotranspiration in Southern Italy.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 139 (5): 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000547.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Muttil, N., and S.-Y. Liong. 2004. “Superior exploration–exploitation balance in shuffled complex evolution.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 130 (12): 1202–1205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:12(1202).
Naeini, M. R., B. Analui, H. V. Gupta, Q. Duan, and S. Sorooshian. 2019. “Three decades of the shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) optimization algorithm: Review and applications.” Sci. Iran. 26 (4): 2015–2031. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2019.21500.
Najmaddin, P. M., M. J. Whelan, and H. Balzter. 2017. “Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region using remote sensing data.” Remote Sens. 9 (8): 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080779.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2021. “POWER data access viewer: Prediction of worldwide energy resource.” Accessed January 20, 2021. https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/.
Ndiritu, J. G., and T. M. Daniell. 2001. “An improved genetic algorithm for rainfall-runoff model calibration and function optimization.” Math. Comput. Model. 33 (6–7): 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00273-9.
Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead. 1965. “A simplex method for function minimization.” Comput. J. 7 (4): 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2021. “ESRL global monitoring laboratory: Global radiation and aerosols.” Accessed January 20, 2021. https://gml.noaa.gov/grad/solcalc/table.php.
Nunoo, C., and D. Mrawira. 2004. “Shuffled complex evolution algorithms in infrastructure works programming.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 18 (3): 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:3(257).
Qi, Z., G. Kang, C. Chu, Y. Qiu, Z. Xu, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Comparison of SWAT and GWLF model simulation performance in humid south and semi-arid north of China.” Water 9 (8): 567–586. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9080567.
Rajabi, A., and Z. Babakhani. 2018. “The study of potential evapotranspiration in future periods due to climate change in west of Iran.” Int. J. Clim. Change Strategies Manage. 10 (1): 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2017-0008.
Ravazzani, G., C. Corbari, S. Morella, P. Gianoli, and M. Mancini. 2012. “Modified Hargreaves-Samani equation for the assessment of reference evapotranspiration in Alpine river basins.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (7): 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000453.
Samani, Z. 2004. “Discussion of ‘History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation’ by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 130 (5): 447–448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:5(447.2).
Sentelhas, P. C., T. J. Gillespie, and E. A. Santos. 2010. “Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada.” Agric. Water Manage. 97 (5): 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.001.
Shahidian, S., R. Serralheiro, J. Serrano, J. Teixeira, N. Haie, and F. Santos. 2012. Hargreaves and other reduced-set methods for calculating evapotranspiration. London: IntechOpen.
Singh, R. K., and P. S. Pawar. 2011. “Comparative study of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) by different energy based method with FAO 56 Penman-Monteith method at New Delhi, India.” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 3 (10): 7861–7868.
Sorooshian, S., Q. Duan, and V. K. Gupta. 1993. “Calibration of rainfall-runoff models: Application of global optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model.” Water Resour. Res. 29 (4): 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02617.
Tabari, H., and P. H. Talaee. 2011. “Local calibration of the Hargreaves and Priestley-Taylor equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid and cold climates of Iran based on the Penman-Monteith model.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (10): 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000366.
Talaee, P. H. 2014. “Performance evaluation of modified versions of Hargreaves equation across a wide range of Iranian climates.” Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 126 (1): 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-014-0333-5.
Tegos, A., N. Malamos, A. Efstratiadis, I. Tsoukalas, A. Karanasios, and D. Koutsoyiannis. 2017. “Parametric modelling of potential evapotranspiration: A global survey.” Water 9 (10): 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100795.
Tegos, A., N. Malamos, and D. Koutsoyiannis. 2015. “A parsimonious regional parametric evapotranspiration model based on a simplification of the Penman-Monteith formula.” J. Hydrol. 524 (May): 708–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.024.
Temesgen, B., S. Eching, B. Davidoff, and K. Frame. 2005. “Comparison of some reference evapotranspiration equations for California.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 131 (1): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(73).
Thyer, M., G. Kuczera, and B. C. Bates. 1999. “Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: A comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (3): 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900058.
Türkeş, M. 1999. “Vulnerability of Turkey to desertification with respect to precipitation and aridity conditions.” Turkish J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 23 (5): 363–380.
Yu, Y., A. C. Megri, R. Miao, and X. Hu. 2022. “Calibrated dynamic zonal model DOMA+ using the SCE-UA method–application to atrium temperature distribution prediction.” Sci. Technol. Built Environ. 28 (10): 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2022.2118498.
Zhang, L., T. Ren, Y. Yu, Y. Yao, C. Li, Y. Zhao, Q. Zhuang, Z. Liu, X. Zhang, and S. Li. 2021. “Optimization of environmental variable functions of GPP quantitative model based on SCE-UA and minimum loss screening method.” Ecol. Inform. 66 (Dec): 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101479.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 5May 2023

History

Received: Jul 16, 2022
Accepted: Jan 5, 2023
Published online: Mar 8, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 8, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Mechanics, Univ. of Arizona, 1209 E. 2nd St., Tucson, AZ 85721 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3257-1073. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Basrah, P.O. Box 49, Basrah 61004, Iraq. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-3984. Email: [email protected]
Ammar Salman Dawood [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Basrah, P.O. Box 49, Basrah 61004, Iraq. Email: [email protected]
Jennifer G. Duan, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Mechanics, Univ. of Arizona, 1209 E. 2nd St., Tucson, AZ 85721. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share