Treatment of Railway Laundry Wastewater through a Chain of Physicochemical Processes and an Aerobic Sequential Batch Reactor
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 29, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper introduces a comprehensive approach to treating industrial laundry wastewater collected from a railway laundry, employing a novel unique sequential combination of coagulation–flocculation, neutralization, ultraviolet (UV)-H2O2 treatment, and biological processes. Typical characterization of laundry wastewater reveals high pH, suspended solids, dissolved organic content, and low biodegradability. The researched treatment sequence involved turbidity reduction (65%) using FeCl3 and cationic polyelectrolyte coagulants followed by pH neutralization (7–8), UV-H2O2 treatment [83% and 23% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal, respectively) and aerobic biological treatment (88% and 97% for COD and BOD removal, respectively). During the UV-H2O2 process, when the H2O2 dosage exceeded 30 mg·L−1, inefficiency in COD removal was observed owing to the scavenging of hydroxyl radicals. With the increase in flow rate, the COD removal was reduced nominally. The effluent from the UV-H2O2 process was treated by an aerobic sequential batch reactor, demonstrating high efficacy in removing both BOD and COD. The biokinetics parameters, such as half-saturation coefficient (ks), maximum specific rate of substrate utilization (k), yield coefficient (Y), decay rate (Kd), and maximum specific growth rate (µm) were determined, and they were observed to be 130 mg of COD·L−1, 0.3 day−1, 0.9 mg volatile suspended solids/mg COD, 0.055 day−1, and 0.42 day−1, respectively. Overall, a reduction of approximately 95% of COD and 97% of BOD was attained, rendering the wastewater suitable for safe disposal into inland surface waters. This showcases an effective and sustainable method for treating laundry wastewater.
Practical Applications
The present work deals with the characterization and treatment of industrial laundry wastewater. The typical laundry wastewater is mainly characterized by high suspended solids and chemical oxygen demand (COD) due to nonbiodegradable organics. The biodegradability index of the wastewater was very poor (0.15–0.25), which made it difficult to treat by conventional biological processes. Hence, a treatment chain consisting of coagulation–flocculation–sedimentation, neutralization, ultraviolet-H2O2 advanced oxidation process, and sequential batch reactor (SBR) was used. Alum coagulation at high pH, along with the addition of cationic polyelectrolyte, removed the suspended solids to a great extent. Sulfuric acid was found to be the most efficient to neutralize the wastewater after coagulation. In the UV-H2O2 process, the COD of the wastewater was reduced to < 250 mg·L−1, below the discharge standard specified in the Central Pollution Control Board, India guidelines. However, the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was much higher compared to the discharge standard. The biodegradability index increased to 0.8, which indicated that nonbiodegradable organics were converted to biodegradable organics. The BOD of the wastewater was reduced to < 30 mg·L−1 through SBR. The proposed wastewater treatment chain led to an overall 95% of COD and 97% of BOD removal.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Civil Engineering (Environmental Engineering) of the Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, and the Environmental Engineering Department of the Central Leather Research Institute.
Author contributions: Mr. Yashwant Singh Maurya contributed toward the conceptualization and execution of the experimental plan and writing of the first draft of the paper. Dr. Asok Adak reviewed and supervised the experimental works and corrected the paper to its final shape. Dr. Indrasis Das was also involved in reviewing the paper, modifications, corrections, and editing.
References
Adak, A., I. Das, B. Mondal, S. Koner, P. Datta, and L. Blaney. 2019. “Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by UV 253.7 and UV-H2O2: Reaction kinetics and effects of interfering substances.” Emerging Contam. 5: 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2019.02.004.
Adak, A., K. P. Mangalgiri, J. Lee, and L. Blaney. 2015. “UV irradiation and UV-H2O2 advanced oxidation of the roxarsone and nitarsone organoarsenicals.” Water Res. 70: 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.025.
Al-Gheethi, A. A. S., E. A. Noman, R. M. S. Radin Mohamed, J. D. Bala, and A. H. Mohd Kassim. 2019. “Qualitative characterization of household greywater in developing countries: A comprehensive review.” In Management of greywater in developing countries, edited by Radin Maya Saphira Radin Mohamed, Adel Ali Saeed Al-Gheethi, and Amir Hashim Mohd Kassim, 1–31. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
APHA, AWWA, and WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation). 1998. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA, AWWA, and WEF.
Aygun, A., and T. Yilmaz. 2010. “Improvement of coagulation-flocculation process for treatment of detergent wastewaters using coagulant aids.” Int. J. Chem. Environ. Eng. 1 (2): 97–101.
Bering, S., J. Mazur, K. Tarnowski, M. Janus, S. Mozia, and A. W. Morawski. 2018. “The application of moving bed bio-reactor (MBBR) in commercial laundry wastewater treatment.” Sci. Total Environ. 627: 1638–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.029.
Braga, J. K., and M. B. A. Varesche. 2014. “Commercial laundry water characterisation.” Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2014: 8–16. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2014.51002.
Bustillo-Lecompte, C., M. Mehrvar, and E. Quiñones-Bolaños. 2016. “Slaughterhouse wastewater characterization and treatment: An economic and public health necessity of the meat processing industry in Ontario, Canada.” J. Geosci. Environ. Prot. 4: 175–186. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.44021.
Ciabattia, I., F. Cesaro, L. Faralli, E. Fatarella, and F. Tognotti. 2009. “Demonstration of a treatment system for purification and reuse of laundry wastewater.” Desalination 245 (1–3): 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.008.
Cserhati, T. 1995. “Alkyl ethoxylated and alkylphenol ethoxylated nonionic surfactants: Interaction with bioactive compounds and biological effects.” Environ. Health Perspect. 103 (4): 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.103-1519097.
Delforno, T. P., A. G. L. Moura, D. Y. Okada, and M. B. A. Varesche. 2014. “Effect of biomass adaptation to the degradation of anionic surfactants in laundry wastewater using EGSB reactors.” Bioresour. Technol. 154: 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.102.
Eriksson, E., K. Auffarth, M. Henze, and A. Ledin. 2002. “Characteristics of grey wastewater.” Urban Water 4 (1): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4.
Esteban García, A. B., K. Szymański, S. Mozia, and J. A. Sánchez Pérez. 2021. “Treatment of laundry wastewater by solar photo-Fenton process at pilot plant scale.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (7): 8576–8584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11151-x.
Ghaitidak, D. M., and K. D. Yadav. 2013. “Characteristics and treatment of greywater—A review.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20 (5): 2795–2809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1533-0.
Hoinkis, J., and V. Panten. 2008. “Wastewater recycling in laundries—From pilot to large-scale plant.” Chem. Eng. Process. 47 (7): 1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.12.010.
Ivanković, T., and J. Hrenović. 2010. “Surfactants in the environment.” Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 61 (1): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-1943.
Jekel, M., and G. L. Amy. 2006. “Arsenic removal during drinking water treatment.” Chap. 11 in Interface science in drinking water treatment, edited by G. Newcombe and D. Dixon, 193–206. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kamble, S., A. Singh, A. Kazmi, and M. Starkl. 2019. “Environmental and economic performance evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants in India: A life cycle approach.” Water Sci. Technol. 79 (6): 1102–1112. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.110.
Katam, K., and D. Bhattacharyya. 2017. “Biodegradation of laundry wastewater under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: A kinetic evaluation.” Water Environ. Res. 89 (12): 2071–2077. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X14902968254638.
Kern, D. I., O. S. Rômulo de, M. Geane, A. L. Eduardo, T. K. Lourdes, and L. M. Ênio. 2013. “Toxicity and genotoxicity of hospital laundry wastewaters treated with photocatalytic ozonation.” Sci. Total Environ. 443: 566–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.023.
Kis, L. T., A. Caroline, and L. M, Ênio. 2008. “Hospital laundry wastewater disinfection with catalytic photoozonation.” Clean Soil Air Water 36 (9): 775–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200700175.
Klimonda, A., and I. Kowalska. 2021. “Membrane technology for the treatment of industrial wastewater containing cationic surfactants.” Water Resour. Ind. 26: 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2021.100157.
Lade, O., and Z. Gbagba. 2018. “Sustainable water supply: Potential of recycling laundry wastewater for domestic use.” J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Sci. 4 (2): 56–60.
Lafi, W. K., and Z. Al-Qodah. 2006. “Combined advanced oxidation and biological treatment processes for the removal of pesticides from aqueous solutions.” J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (1): 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.027.
Luo, J., X. Jin, Y. Wang, and P. Jin. 2022. “Advanced treatment of laundry wastewater by electro-hybrid ozonation–coagulation process: Surfactant and microplastic removal and mechanism.” Water 14: 4138. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14244138.
Manouchehri, M., and A. Kargari. 2017. “Water recovery from laundry wastewater by the cross flow microfiltration process: A strategy for water recycling in residential buildings.” J. Cleaner Prod. 168: 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.211.
Melián, E. P., D. E. Santiago, E. León, J. V. Reboso, and J. A. Herrera-Melián. 2023. “Treatment of laundry wastewater by different processes: Optimization and life cycle assessment.” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11 (2): 109302–100000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109302.
Moharir, S. R., P. A. Patni, A. V. Datar, and T. S. Suryawanshi. 2020. “Study of treatment of laundry wastewater.” J. Emerging Technol. Innov. Res. 7 (9): 574–591.
Mondal, B., A. Adak, and P. Datta. 2021. “Integrated UV-H2O2 and biological treatment processes for removal of cationic surfactant.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 16 (2): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.20.00027.
Noutsopoulos, C., A. Andreadakis, N. Kouris, D. Charchousi, P. Mendrinou, A. Galani, I. Mantziaras, and E. Koumaki. 2018. “Greywater characterization and loadings—Physicochemical treatment to promote onsite reuse.” J. Environ. Manage. 216: 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.094.
Patil, V. V., P. R. Gogate, A. P. Bhat, and P. K. Ghosh. 2020. “Treatment of laundry wastewater containing residual surfactants using combined approaches based on ozone, catalyst and cavitation.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 239: 116594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116594.
Ramcharan, T., and A. Bissessur. 2017. “Treatment of laundry wastewater by biological and electrocoagulation methods.” Water Sci. Technol. 75 (1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.464.
Santiago, D. E., M. J. Hernández Rodríguez, and E. Pulido-Melián. 2021. “Laundry wastewater treatment: Review and life cycle assessment.” J. Environ. Eng. 147 (10): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001902.
Schellenberg, T., V. Subramanian, G. Ganeshan, D. Tompkins, and R. Pradeep. 2020. “Wastewater discharge standards in the evolving context of urban sustainability—The case of India.” Front. Environ. Sci. 8: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00030.
Schönberger, H., J. L. G. Martos, and D. Styles. 2013. Best environmental management practice in the tourism sector. Luxembourg: European Union.
Shu, Z., A. Singh, N. Klamerth, K. McPhedran, P. Chelme-Ayala, J. R. Bolton, M. Belosevic, and M. G. El Din. 2016. “Application of the UV/hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation process for municipal reuse water: Bench- and pilot-scale studies.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 209: 233–244. https://doi.org/10.2495/wp160211.
Sirtori, C., A. Zapata, I. Oller, W. Gernjak, A. Agüera, and S. Malato. 2009. “Decontamination industrial pharmaceutical wastewater by combining solar photo-Fenton and biological treatment.” Water Res. 43 (3): 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.013.
Sumisha, A., G. Arthanareeswaran, Y. Lukka Thuyavan, A. F. Ismail, and S. Chakraborty. 2015. “Treatment of laundry wastewater using polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrollidone ultrafiltration membranes.” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 121 (2004): 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.004.
Turkay, O., S. Barişçi, and M. Sillanpää. 2017. “E-peroxone process for the treatment of laundry wastewater: A case study.” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5 (5): 4282–4290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.012.
Vilve, M., A. Hirvonen, and M. Sillanpaa. 2007. “Ozone-based advanced oxidation processes in nuclear laundry water treatment.” Environ. Technol. 28 (9): 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332808618863.
Vilve, M., A. Hirvonen, and M. Sillanpää. 2009. “Effects of reaction conditions on nuclear laundry water treatment in Fenton process.” J. Hazard. Mater. 164 (2–3): 1468–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.058.
Yuan, C. L., Z. Z. Xu, M. X. Fan, H. Y. Liu, Y. H. Xie, and T. Zhu. 2014. “Study on characteristics and harm of surfactants.” J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 6 (7): 2233–2237.
Zotesso, J. P., E. S. Cossich, V. Janeiro, and C. R. G. Tavares. 2017. “Treatment of hospital laundry wastewater by UV/H2O2 process.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (7): 6278–6287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6860-5.
Zou, H., W. Ma, and Y. Wang. 2015. “A novel process of dye wastewater treatment by linking advanced chemical oxidation with biological oxidation.” Arch. Environ. Prot. 41 (4): 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/aep-2015-0037.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 29 • Issue 1 • January 2025
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 27, 2024
Accepted: Jun 18, 2024
Published online: Sep 24, 2024
Published in print: Jan 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Feb 24, 2025
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.