Abstract

Excessive levels of phosphate in stormwater runoff can negatively impact receiving surface water bodies, such as retention ponds, and may also seep into groundwater. Liner systems composed of materials with greater phosphate selectivity have the potential to mitigate infiltration and eliminate phosphate. One potential material is chitosan, an abundant naturally occurring biopolymer. This study evaluated five materials for their ability to remove phosphate from synthetic stormwater using batch tests with different initial phosphate concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 12 mg/L and a fixed 24-h exposure time. The materials included two types of clayey soils (kaolin and bentonite) and three different varieties of chitosan with varying molecular weights (low, medium, and high). The phosphate removal efficiency of kaolin was found to be the highest, with efficiencies ranging from 100% to 56% at different concentrations, while bentonite was found to be the least effective, with removal efficiencies ranging from 40% to 12%. The removal efficiencies of all three types of chitosans analyzed were higher than those of bentonite but lower than those of kaolin. The removal efficiencies ranged from 77% to 19% for low-molecular-weight chitosan, 84% to 31% for medium-molecular-weight chitosan, and 55% to 18% for high-molecular-weight chitosan. The removal mechanism of phosphate by kaolin and bentonite was attributed to surface adsorption and precipitation. In chitosan, the likely mechanism is electrostatic attraction. The maximum adsorption capacity for kaolin was not reached under the tested phosphate concentration range, indicating potential adsorption sites remained available on the particle surfaces. The results for bentonite, low-molecular-weight chitosan, and high-molecular-weight chitosan showed that these materials nearly reached their maximum adsorption capacities, indicating that fewer adsorption sites were remaining. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was found to be the best-fit model for phosphate adsorption in all the materials tested compared to the Freundlich isotherm. According to the Langmuir model, the maximum adsorption capacities for kaolin, bentonite, low-molecular-weight chitosan, medium-molecular-weight chitosan, and high-molecular-weight chitosan were found to be 140.85, 33, 48.78, 82.64, and 51.28 mg/kg, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research is a part of a comprehensive project titled “Development of Novel Chitosan-Biochar-Bentonite Composite Barrier Resilient to Changing Climate: Synthesis, Characterization, and Containment Mechanisms” funded by the National Science Foundation (CMMI# 2225303), which is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

References

Abd El-Hack, M. E., M. T. El-Saadony, M. E. Shafi, N. M. Zabermawi, M. Arif, G. E. Batiha, A. F. Khafaga, Y. M. Abd El-Hakim, and A. A. Al-Sagheer. 2020. “Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of chitosan and its derivatives and their applications: A review.” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 164: 2726–2744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.153.
Adhikari, R. A., K. C. Bal Krishna, and R. Sarukkalige. 2016. “Evaluation of phosphorus adsorption capacity of various filter materials from aqueous solution.” Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 34 (4–5): 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617416653121.
Alam, M. Z., and A. H. M. Faisal Anwar. 2020. “Nutrients adsorption onto biochar and alum sludge for treating stormwater.” J. Water Environ. Technol. 18 (2): 132–146. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.19-077.
APHA, AWWA, WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 7–15. 23rd ed. Washington, DC: APHA, AWWA, WEF.
Asomaning, S. K. 2020. “Processes and factors affecting phosphorus sorption in soils.” In Vol. 45 of Sorption in 2020s, edited by G. Kyzas and N. Lazaridis, 1–16. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard test methods for oxidation-reduction potential of water. ASTM D1498. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for pH of water. ASTM D1293. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM D4972-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2023. Standard test methods for electrical conductivity and resistivity of water. ASTM D1125. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cama, J., and J. Ganor. 2015. “Dissolution kinetics of clay minerals.” Dev. Clay Sci. 6: 101–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100027-4.00004-8.
Coleman, R. 1943. “The adsorption of phosphate by kaolinitic and montmorillonitic clays.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 7 (C): 134–138. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1943.036159950007000C0020x.
Deka, A., and S. Sekharan. 2017. “Contaminant retention characteristics of fly ash–bentonite mixes.” Waste Manage. Res. 35 (1): 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16670002.
Del Campillo, M. C., S. E. A. T. M. Van der Zee, and J. Torrent. 1999. “Modelling long-term phosphorus leaching and changes in phosphorus fertility in excessively fertilized acid sandy soils.” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50 (3): 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00244.x.
Deng, Y. 2020. “Low-cost adsorbents for urban stormwater pollution control.” Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 14: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1262-9.
Edzwald, J. K., D. C. Toensing, and M. C.-Y. Leung. 1976. “Phosphate adsorption reactions with clay minerals.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 10 (5): 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1021/es60116a001.
Eltaweil, A. S., A. M. Omer, H. G. El-Aqapa, N. M. Gaber, N. F. Attia, G. M. El-Subruiti, M. S. Mohy-Eldin, and E. M. Abd El-Monaem. 2021. “Chitosan based adsorbents for the removal of phosphate and nitrate: A critical review.” Carbohydr. Polym. 274: 118671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118671.
Feng, P., Y. Luo, C. Ke, H. Qiu, W. Wang, Y. Zhu, R. Hou, L. Xu, and S. Wu. 2021. “Chitosan-based functional materials for skin wound repair: Mechanisms and applications.” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9: 650598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.650598.
Ferrazzo, S. T., R. de Souza Tímbola, L. Bragagnolo, E. Prestes, E. P. Korf, P. D. M. Prietto, and C. Ulsen. 2020. “Effects of acidic attack on chemical, mineralogical, and morphological properties of geomaterials.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27: 37718–37732.
Gamage, A., and F. Shahidi. 2007. “Use of chitosan for the removal of metal ion contaminants and proteins from water.” Food Chem. 104 (3): 989–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.004.
Guibal, E., M. Van Vooren, B. A. Dempsey, and J. Roussy. 2006. “A review of the use of chitosan for the removal of particulate and dissolved contaminants.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 41 (11): 2487–2514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390600742807.
Hance, R. J. 1967. “The speed of attainment of sorption equilibria in some systems involving herbicides.” Weed Res. 7 (1): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1967.tb01345.x.
Harmayani, K. D., and A. H. M. Faisal Anwar. 2016. “Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium study of nitrogen species onto radiata pine (Pinus radiata) sawdust.” Water Sci. Technol. 74 (2): 402–415. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.217.
Holtz, R. D., W. D. Kovacs, and T. C. Sheahan. 2011. An introduction to geotechnical engineering. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Huang, X., G. D. Foster, R. V. Honeychuck, and J. A. Schreifels. 2009. “The maximum of phosphate adsorption at pH 4.0: Why it appears on aluminum oxides but not on iron oxides.” Langmuir 25 (8): 4450–4461. https://doi.org/10.1021/la803302m.
Kalam, S., S. A. Abu-Khamsin, M. S. Kamal, and S. Patil. 2021. “Surfactant adsorption isotherms: A review.” ACS Omega 6 (48): 32342–32348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04661.
Kamari, A., I. D. Pulford, and J. S. J. Hargreaves. 2011. “Chitosan as a potential amendment to remediate metal contaminated soil—A characterisation study.” Colloids Surf., B 82 (1): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.019.
Kaufhold, S., R. Dohrmann, D. Koch, and G. Houben. 2008. “The pH of aqueous bentonite suspensions.” Clays Clay Minerals 56 (3): 338–343.
Lee, J. H., and K. W. Bang. 2000. “Characterization of urban stormwater runoff.” Water Res. 34 (6): 1773–1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00325-5.
Li, W., Z. Shen, T. Tian, R. Liu, and J. Qiu. 2012. “Temporal variation of heavy metal pollution in urban stormwater runoff.” Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 6: 692–700.
Liu, X.-q., X.-x. Zhao, Y. Liu, and T.-a. Zhang. 2022. “Review on preparation and adsorption properties of chitosan and chitosan composites.” Polym. Bull. 79: 2633–2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03626-9.
Ma, J., K. Tracy, and J. Lenhart. 2009. “Phosphorus removal in urban runoff using adsorptive filtration media.” In Proc., StormCon, 16–20. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
May, D., and M. Sivakumar. 2009. “Prediction of nutrient concentrations in urban storm water.” J. Environ. Eng. 135 (8): 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000027.
Miretzky, P., and A. F. Cirelli. 2009. “Hg(II) removal from water by chitosan and chitosan derivatives: A review.” J. Hazard. Mater. 167 (1–3): 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.060.
Mirzai, M., and S. Asadabadi. 2022. “Magnetic nanocomposites containing low and medium-molecular weight chitosan for dye adsorption: Hydrophilic property versus functional groups.” J. Polym. Environ. 30: 1560–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02300-5.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2000. “Adsorption–desorption using a batch equilibrium method.” In Vol. 106 of OECD guideline for testing chemicals, 1–42. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pasek, M. A. 2008. “Rethinking early earth phosphorus geochemistry.” PNAS 105 (3): 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708205105.
Pontoni, L., and M. Fabbricino. 2012. “Use of chitosan and chitosan-derivatives to remove arsenic from aqueous solutions—A mini review.” Carbohydr. Res. 356: 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2012.03.042.
Qin, C., H. Li, Q. Xiao, Y. Liu, J. Zhu, and Y. Du. 2006. “Water-solubility of chitosan and its antimicrobial activity.” Carbohydr. Polym. 63 (3): 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.09.023.
Rajeswari, A., A. Amalraj, and A. Pius. 2015. “Removal of phosphate using chitosan-polymer composites.” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 3 (4): 2331–2341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.08.022.
Reddy, K. R., T. Xie, and S. Dastgheibi. 2014. “Nutrients removal from urban stormwater by different filter materials.” Water Air Soil Pollut. 225: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1778-8.
Sharma, H. D., and K. R. Reddy. 2004. Geoenvironmental engineering: Site remediation, waste containment, and emerging waste management technologies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Szymczyk, P., U. Filipkowska, T. Jóźwiak, and M. Kuczajowska-Zadrożna. 2016. “Phosphate removal from aqueous solutions by chitin and chitosan in flakes.” Prog. Chem. Appl. Chitin Deriv. 21: 192–202.
Tolaimate, A., J. Desbrieres, M. Rhazi, A. Alagui, M. Vincendon, and P. Vottero. 2000. “On the influence of deacetylation process on the physicochemical characteristics of chitosan from squid chitin.” Polymer 41 (7): 2463–2469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00400-0.
USEPA. 2022a. Climate change indicators: Greenhouse gases. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2022b. Understanding global warming potentials. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Wan, M. W., I. G. Petrisor, H. T. Lai, D. Kim, and T. F. Yen. 2004. “Copper adsorption through chitosan immobilized on sand to demonstrate the feasibility for in situ soil decontamination.” Carbohydr. Polym. 55 (3): 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.09.009.
Wieland, E., and W. Stumm. 1992. “Dissolution kinetics of kaolinite in acidic aqueous solutions at 25°C.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56: 3339–3355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(92)90382-S.
Yaghoobi-Rahni, S., B. Rezaei, and N. Mirghaffari. 2017. “Bentonite surface modification and characterization for high selective phosphate adsorption from aqueous media and its application for wastewater treatments.” J. Water Reuse Desalin. 7 (2): 175–186. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2016.212.
Yang, R., H. Li, M. Huang, H. Yang, and A. Li. 2016. “A review on chitosan-based flocculants and their applications in water treatment.” Water Res. 95: 59–89.
Zhou, A., H. Tang, and D. Wang. 2005. “Phosphorus adsorption on natural sediments: Modeling and effects of pH and sediment composition.” Water Res. 39 (7): 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.026.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Apr 19, 2023
Accepted: Aug 9, 2023
Published online: Sep 21, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 21, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Materials, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois Chicago, 842 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2385-6088. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Materials, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois Chicago, 842 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-5808. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Materials, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois Chicago, 842 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6577-1151. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee Knoxville, 423 John D. Tickle Building, Knoxville, TN 37996. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9999-6252. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share