Technical Papers
Oct 27, 2023

Stress–Dilatancy and Critical-State Behavior of Geogrid-Reinforced Recycled Waste Materials

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28, Issue 1

Abstract

Waste disposal has become a major challenge due to the increasing production driven by urbanization. Two such wastes generated in substantial quantities are steel slag and construction and demolition waste (CDW). The current study explored the stress–dilatancy and critical-state behaviors of geogrid-reinforced recycled steel slag and CDW for evaluating its suitability in various geotechnical applications. A set of consolidated drained triaxial tests were carried out on test samples, with and without geogrid reinforcement, to achieve this objective. The performance of the steel slag and CDW material was compared with that of commonly used geomaterial, namely, sand. Steel slag exhibited higher strength compared to sand and CDW. At a confining stress of 50 kPa, the strength of steel slag was 1.6 times greater than that of sand, while the strength of CDW was 1.3 times higher than that of sand. The effect of geogrid reinforcement on stress–dilatancy and critical-state behavior was quantified for all the materials. Results revealed that the critical-state line rotates in a clockwise direction in the presence of the geogrid. On the other hand, the stress–dilatancy curve of the materials shifted upward with the inclusion of the geogrid. At a confining pressure of 50 kPa, the peak dilation angles of reinforced sand, slag, and CDW were 0.8, 0.7, and 0.9 times that of the unreinforced specimens, respectively. In addition, the strength properties, energy absorption capacity, and modulus degradation of the materials were also evaluated. A mathematical expression was proposed to relate the energy absorption capacity of the geogrid-reinforced materials with the critical-state stress ratio. Moreover, the Li and Dafalias stress–dilatancy model parameters were proposed to capture the stress–dilatancy behavior of the materials. Overall, encouraging performance of the waste materials was observed for potential geotechnical applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

AbdelRazek, A., R. M. El-Sherbiny, and H. A. Lotfi. 2018. “Mechanical properties and time-dependent behaviour of sand-granulated rubber mixtures.” Geomech. Geoeng. 13 (4): 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2018.1440013.
Alimohammadi, H., J. Zheng, V. R. Schaefer, J. Siekmeier, and R. Velasquez. 2021. “Evaluation of geogrid reinforcement of flexible pavement performance: A review of large-scale laboratory studies.” Transp. Geotech. 27: 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100471.
Anita, A., S. Karthika, and P. V. Divya. 2023. “Construction and demolition waste as valuable resources for geosynthetic-encased stone columns.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 27 (2): 04022047. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1175.
Arulrajah, A., J. Piratheepan, M. M. Disfani, and M. W. Bo. 2013. “Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (8): 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for determining tensile properties of geogrids by the single or multi-rib tensile method. ASTM D6637. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM D6913. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM D7181. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baadiga, R., U. Balunaini, S. Saride, and M. R. Madhav. 2021. “Influence of geogrid properties on rutting and stress distribution in reinforced flexible pavements under repetitive wheel loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003972.
Bildik, S., and M. Laman. 2020. “Effect of geogrid reinforcement on soil–structure–pipe interaction in terms of bearing capacity, settlement and stress distribution.” Geotext. Geomembr. 48 (6): 844–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105196.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2015. Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BS8002: 2015. London: British Standards Institution.
Cai, X., S. Li, H. Xu, L. Jing, X. Huang, and C. Zhu. 2021. “Shaking table study on the seismic performance of geogrid reinforced soil retaining walls.” Adv. Civil Eng. 2021: 1–16.
Chegenizadeh, A., M. Keramatikerman, and H. Nikraz. 2020. “Effect of loading strain rate on creep and stress-relaxation characteristics of sandy silt.” Results Eng. 7: 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100143.
Chen, X., Y. Jia, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Geogrid-reinforcement and the critical state of graded aggregates used in heavy-haul railway transition subgrade.” Transp. Geotech. 11: 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.04.001.
Daouadji, A., P. Y. Hicher, and A. Rahma. 2001. “An elastoplastic model for granular materials taking into account grain breakage.” Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 20 (1): 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(00)01130-X.
Dash, S. K., and A. Majee. 2021. “Geogrid reinforcement for stiffness improvement of railway track formation over clay subgrade.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (9): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002128.
Ding, L., J. Zhang, C. Zhou, S. Han, and Q. Du. 2022. “Particle breakage investigation of construction waste recycled aggregates in subgrade application scenario.” Powder Technol. 404: 117448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117448.
Duncan, J. M., and C. Y. Chang. 1970. “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 96 (5): 1629–1653. https://doi.org/10.1061/jsfeaq.0001458.
Ertugrul, O. L., and A. C. Trandafir. 2011. “Reduction of lateral earth forces acting on rigid nonyielding retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (12): 1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000348.
Estabragh, A. R., and A. A. Javadi. 2008. “Critical state for overconsolidated unsaturated silty soil.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (3): 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-105.
Frydman, S., and I. Keissar. 1987. “Earth pressure on retaining walls near rock faces.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (6): 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:6(586).
Gencel, O., O. Karadag, O. H. Oren, and T. Bilir. 2021. “Steel slag and its applications in cement and concrete technology: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 283: 122783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122783.
Grubb, D. G., M. Wazne, S. Jagupilla, N. E. Malasavage, and W. B. Bradfield. 2013. “Aging effects in field-compacted dredged material: Steel slag fines blends.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 17 (2): 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000154.
Gu, X., B. Yu, Q. Dong, and Y. Deng. 2018. “Application of secondary steel slag in subgrade: Performance evaluation and enhancement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 181: 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.172.
Hegde, A. M., and P. S. Palsule. 2020. “Performance of geosynthetics reinforced subgrade subjected to repeated vehicle loads: Experimental and numerical studies.” Front. Built Environ. 6: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00015.
Hyodo, T., Y. Wu, and M. Hyodo. 2022. “Influence of fines on the monotonic and cyclic shear behaviour of volcanic soil ‘Shirasu.’” Eng. Geol. 301: 106591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106591.
Indraratna, B., D. Ionescu, and H. D. Christie. 1998. “Shear behavior of railway ballast based on large-scale triaxial tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (5): 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:5(439).
Islam, M. A., F. F. Badhon, and M. Z. Abedin. 2017. “Relation between effective particle size and angle of internal friction of cohesionless soil.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering. Bangladesh, India: Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology.
Karatağ, H., S. Fırat, and N. S. Işik. 2018. “Assessment of performance of steel slag used in road base by finite element analysis.” In Proc., 13th Int. Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 12–14. Izmir, Turkey: Ege University.
Kikumoto, M., D. Muir Wood, and A. Russell. 2010. “Particle crushing and deformation behaviour.” Soils Found. 50 (4): 547–563. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.547.
Kim, U. J., and D. S. Kim. 2020. “Load sharing characteristics of rigid facing walls with geogrid reinforced railway subgrade during and after construction.” Geotext. Geomembr. 48 (6): 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.08.002.
Koh, T., S. W. Moon, H. Jung, Y. Jeong, and S. Pyo. 2018. “A feasibility study on the application of basic oxygen furnace (BOF) steel slag for railway ballast material.” Sustainability 10 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020284.
Korini, O., M. Bost, J. P. Rajot, Y. Bennani, and N. Freitag. 2021. “The influence of geosynthetics design on the behavior of reinforced soil embankments subjected to rockfall impacts.” Eng. Geol. 286: 106054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106054.
Li, G., C. Xu, C. Yoo, P. Shen, T. Wang, and C. Zhao. 2022. “Effect of geogrid reinforcement on the load transfer in pile-supported embankment under cyclic loading.” Geotext. Geomembr. 51 (1): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.10.004.
Li, X. S., and Y. F. Dafalias. 2000. “Dilatancy for cohesionless soils.” Geotechnique 50 (4): 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.4.449.
Liu, J., and R. Guo. 2018. “Applications of steel slag powder and steel slag aggregate in ultra-high performance concrete.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1426037.
Liu, L., Z. Li, G. Cai, X. Geng, and B. Dai. 2022. “Performance and prediction of long-term settlement in road embankments constructed with recycled construction and demolition waste.” Acta Geotech. 17 (9): 4069–4093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01473-0.
Liu, J., B. Yu, and Q. Wang. 2020. “Application of steel slag in cement treated aggregate base course.” J. Cleaner Prod. 269: 121733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121733.
Liu, M., Y. Zhang, and H. Zhu. 2017. “3D elastoplastic model for crushable soils with explicit formulation of particle crushing.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (12): 04017140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001361.
Lu, B., S. Drissi, J. Liu, X. Hu, B. Song, and C. Shi. 2022. “Effect of temperature on CO2 curing, compressive strength and microstructure of cement paste.” Cem. Concr. Res. 157: 106827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106827.
Maghool, F., A. Arulrajah, M. Mirzababaei, C. Suksiripattanapong, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2020. “Interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced steel slags using a large-scale direct shear testing apparatus.” Geotext. Geomembr. 48 (5): 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105196.
Mandloi, P., and A. Hegde. 2022. “Performance evaluation of reinforced earth walls with sustainable backfills subjected to railway loading.” Front. Built Environ. 8: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1048079.
Mandloi, P., S. Sarkar, and A. Hegde. 2022. “Performance assessment of mechanically stabilised earth walls with sustainable backfills: Experimental and numerical approach.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustainability 175 (6): 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.22.00012.
Modoni, G., J. Koseki, and L. Q. Anh Dan. 2011. “Cyclic stress–strain response of compacted gravel.” Geotechnique 61 (6): 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.7.00150.
Muktinutalapati, J., A. GuhaRay, and A. Kar. 2020. “Experimental analysis of strength and deformation behavior of soils reinforced with building-derived materials.” Indian Geotech. J. 50 (3): 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00367-5.
Naeini, M., A. Mohammadinia, A. Arulrajah, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2021. “Stress–dilatancy responses of recovered plastics and demolition waste blends as a construction material.” Constr. Build. Mater. 297: 123762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123762.
Powers, T. C. 1947. A discussion of cement hydration in relation to the curing of concrete. Chicago: Portland Cement Association.
Prasad, P. S., and G. V. Ramana. 2016. “Feasibility study of copper slag as a structural fill in reinforced soil structures.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (4): 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.03.007.
Qi, Y., B. Indraratna, and J. S. Vinod. 2018. “Behavior of steel furnace slag, coal wash, and rubber crumb mixtures with special relevance to stress–dilatancy relation.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (11): 04018276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002459.
Rahman, M. A., M. Imteaz, A. Arulrajah, and M. M. Disfani. 2014. “Suitability of recycled construction and demolition aggregates as alternative pipe backfilling materials.” J. Cleaner Prod. 66: 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.005.
Ramesh, S. T., R. Gandhimathi, P. V. Nidheesh, S. Rajakumar, and S. Prateepkumar. 2013. “Use of furnace slag and welding slag as replacement for sand in concrete.” Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 4 (1): 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-3.
Rizzo, P., A. Nasrollahi, W. Deng, and J. M. Vandenbossche. 2016. “Detecting the presence of high water-to-cement ratio in concrete surfaces using highly nonlinear solitary waves.” Appl. Sci. 6 (4): 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6040104.
Santos, E. C., E. M. Palmeira, and R. J. Bathurst. 2013. “Behaviour of a geogrid reinforced wall built with recycled construction and demolition waste backfill on a collapsible foundation.” Geotext. Geomembr. 39: 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.002.
Sarkar, S., and A. Hegde. 2022a. “Strength enhancement of geogrid reinforced marginal backfill materials in triaxial condition.” In Proc., Geo-Congress, 467–476. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sarkar, S., and A. Hegde. 2022b. “Performance evaluation of geogrid reinforced recycled marginal backfill materials in triaxial test conditions.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 8 (4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00395-x.
Toubal Seghir, N., M. Mellas, Ł Sadowski, A. Krolicka, and A. Żak. 2019. “The effect of curing conditions on the properties of cement-based composites blended with waste marble dust.” JOM 71: 1002–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3254-9.
Venkateswarlu, H., K. N. Ujjawal, and A. Hegde. 2018. “Laboratory and numerical investigation of machine foundations reinforced with geogrids and geocells.” Geotext. Geomembr. 46 (6): 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.08.006.
Wang, L., J. Yan, Q. Wang, B. Wag, and W. Gong. 2019. “Dynamic shear properties of recycled waste steel slag used as a geo-backfill material.” Shock Vib 2019: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6410362.
Yang, J., and X. D. Luo. 2015. “Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 84: 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.001.
Yu, C., C. Cui, Y. Wang, J. Zhao, and Y. Wu. 2021. “Strength performance and microstructural evolution of carbonated steel slag stabilized soils in the laboratory scale.” Eng. Geol. 295: 106410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106410.
Yu, Z., P. K. Woodward, O. Laghrouche, and D. P. Connolly. 2019. “True triaxial testing of geogrid for high speed railways.” Transp. Geotech. 20 (2019): 100247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100247.
Zhang, J., A. Zhang, C. Huang, H. Yu, and C. Zhou. 2021. “Characterising the resilient behaviour of pavement subgrade with construction and demolition waste under freeze–thaw cycles.” J. Cleaner Prod. 300: 126702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126702.
Zhao, J., N. Guo, and X. S. Li. 2013. “Unique quantification of critical state in granular media considering fabric anisotropy.” In Constitutive Modeling of Geomaterials. Vol. 1 of Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, edited by Q. Yang, J. M. Zhang, H. Zheng, and Y. Yao, 247–252. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32814-5_31.
Zheng, Y., F. Li, W. Guo, P. Wang, and G. Yang. 2023. “Influence of facing conditions on the dynamic response of back-to-back MSE walls.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 164: 107650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107650.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Mar 26, 2023
Accepted: Sep 1, 2023
Published online: Oct 27, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Sanjana Sarkar [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna 801106, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Amarnath Hegde [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Dharwad 580011, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share