Technical Papers
Mar 29, 2023

Effect of Hydrostatic and Hydrodynamic Pressures on the Stability of Landfill Veneer Covers with an Internal Seeper

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 27, Issue 3

Abstract

The accumulated water in the drainage layer of the municipal solid waste landfill veneer cover system becomes the principal cause of the failure of landfill cover. In this study, seismic stability evaluation is carried out using the pseudostatic approach considering direct sliding and uplifted floating failures. The factors of safety against direct sliding failure (FSds) and uplifted floating failure (FSuf) are estimated considering hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures. Hydrodynamic pressures acting along the failure planes are computed using Westergaard’s theory. The different cases based on the height of accumulated seepage levels in the drainage layer (hw) are considered in the analysis. The angle of the sliding plane (ψ) for direct sliding failure and the failure ratio (Ω) for the uplifted floating failure are evaluated to determine the critical values of FSds and FSuf. It is observed that the immersion ratio (Ir) is the most important parameter that significantly affects the factor of safety against both failure modes (FSds and FSuf) under seismic loading. The results of the present study under static loading are compared with the available results in the literature. The effects of the slope angle (θ), the ratio of the thickness of the cover soil layer to the height of the landfill (h/H), the stability number (c/γsatH), the horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient (kh), and the ratio of vertical to horizontal seismic acceleration coefficients (kv/kh) on FSds and FSuf are presented for different values of immersion ratios (Ir). The magnitude and the direction of seismic inertia forces also govern the factor of safety values against both direct sliding and uplifted floating failure modes. The design charts are established to estimate the allowable thickness of the cover soil layer (h) for different values of immersion ratios by targeting the factors of safety, FSds and FSuf ≥ 1.15. This condition ensures the safety of the landfill veneer cover system against direct sliding and uplifted floating failures simultaneously.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this project was provided by the Government of India, Ministry of Education (12-2/2019-U1), which is gratefully acknowledged.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
AAct, APass
area of active and passive wedges (m2);
Af, Aaf
area of failure and mass above the failure blocks (m2);
Bf, Baf
failure and mass above the failure blocks;
c
cohesion of the veneer cover soil (kPa);
c0
interface cohesion of the veneer cover soil (kPa);
EA, EP
interwedge forces (kN/m);
FJR, FPJ
normal forces from the soil acting on the sliding plane (kN/m);
FPP,FPJ,FIJ
normal forces from the soil acting on the faces of the failure block (kN/m);
FSds
factor of safety against direct sliding failure (dimensionless);
FSuf
factor of safety against uplifted floating failure (dimensionless);
h
thickness of the cover soil slope (m);
hw
vertical height of accumulated water in the drainage layer (m);
H
height of the landfill (m);
kh, kv
horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficients (dimensionless);
Ir
immersion ratio (dimensionless);
lPJ, lJR
lengths of the faces of the sliding plane (m);
lPI
length of the uplifted block (m);
L
length of the cover soil slope (m);
N1, N2
number of sections divided for ψmax and Ωmax;
SPJ, SJR
resisting forces against sliding failure acting on the sliding plane (kN/m);
SIJ,SPP
shear resisting forces acting on the faces of the failure block (kN/m);
UJRx,UPJx
hydrostatic forces acting on the sliding plane for the case number x (kN/m);
UJRdynx,UPJdynx
hydrodynamic forces acting on the sliding plane for the case number x (kN/m);
UPPz,UPJz,UIJz
hydrostatic forces acting on the faces of the failure block for the case number z (kN/m);
UPPdynz,UPJdynz,UIJdynz
hydrodynamic forces acting on the faces of the failure block for the case number z (kN/m);
WAct, WPass
weight of active and passive wedges (kN/m);
Wf, Waf
weight of failure and mass above the failure blocks (kN/m);
γsat
unit weight of the veneer cover soil under a saturated state (kN/m3);
δ
interface friction angle between the drainage layer and the cover soil layer above the drainage layer (°);
ϕ
angle of the internal friction of the veneer cover soil (°);
θ
slope angle of the veneer cover soil (°);
ψ
angle of the sliding plane “PJ” (°);
ψmax
maximum possible angle of the sliding plane “PJ” (°);
ψcri
critical angle of the sliding plane “PJ” (°);
Ω
failure ratio (dimensionless);
Ωmax
maximum possible failure ratio (dimensionless); and
Ωn
value of Ω at the nth section of Ωmax (dimensionless);.

References

Ahmad, S. M., and D. Choudhury. 2008. “Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic design for waterfront reinforced soil-wall.” Geotext. Geomembr. 26 (4): 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.12.004.
ASCE. 2000. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-98. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baker, R., R. Shukha, V. Operstein, and S. Frydman. 2006. “Stability charts for pseudo-static slope stability analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (9): 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.01.023.
Basha, B. M., S. Mahapatra, and B. Manna. 2015. “Allowable design strength of geosynthetic reinforcement for veneer stability of MSW landfills: A reliability based approach.” In Proc., of the Int. Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo 2015, Geotechnical Special Publication 256, edited by M. Iskander, M. T. Suleiman, J. B. Anderson, and D. F. Laefer, 1806–1815. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chen, Y. M., D. Gao, B. Zhu, and R. P. Chen. 2008. “Seismic stability and permanent displacement of landfill along liners.” Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 51: 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-008-0031-y.
Chen, Y., Q. Xue, X. He, S. Zhang, P. Wang, and C. Song. 2019. “Stability analysis on veneer cover system for landfill considering the effect of internal seeper.” Eng. Geol. 252: 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.02.024.
Chetri, J. K., and K. R. Reddy. 2021. “Advancements in municipal solid waste landfill cover system: A review.” J. Indian Inst. Sci. 101 (4): 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-021-00229-1.
Choudhury, D., and S. M. Ahmad. 2007. “Stability of waterfront retaining wall subjected to pseudo-static earthquake forces.” Ocean Eng. 34 (14–15): 1947–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.03.005.
Choudhury, D., and S. M. Ahmad. 2008. “Stability of waterfront retaining wall subjected to pseudodynamic earthquake forces.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 134 (4): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2008)134:4(252).
Choudhury, D., and P. Savoikar. 2011. “Seismic stability analysis of expanded MSW landfills using pseudo-static limit equilibrium method.” Waste Manage. Res. 29 (2): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10375333.
Ebeling, R. M., and Jr. E. E. Morrison. 1993. The seismic design of waterfront retaining structures. Vicksburg, MS: Information Technology Laboratory, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Feng, S., S. Ai, and R. Huang. 2016. “Stability analysis of landfill cover systems considering reinforcement.” Environ. Earth Sci. 75: 303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5186-9.
Feng, S., and L. Y. Gao. 2010. “Seismic analysis for translational failure of landfills with retaining walls.” Waste Manage. 30 (11): 2065–2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.008.
Finn, W. L., G. Wu, and N. Yoshida. 1992. “Seismic response of sheet pile walls.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1689–1694. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Feng, S., and L. Y. Gao. 2012. “Seismic stability analyses for landfill cover systems under different seepage build-up conditions.” Environ. Earth Sci. 66 (1): 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1619-x.
Giroud, J. P., J. G. Zornberg, and A. Zhao. 2000. “Hydraulic design of geosynthetic and granular liquid collection layers.” Geosynth. Int. 7 (4–6): 285–380. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.7.0176.
Guo, M., X. Ge, and S. Wang. 2011. “Slope stability analysis under seismic load by vector sum analysis method.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 3 (3): 282–288. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1235.2011.00282.
Guyer, J. P. 2010. Continuing Education and Development Inc. Stony Point, NY: Continuing Education and Development Inc.
Khoshand, A., A. Fathi, M. Zoghi, and H. Kamalan. 2018. “Seismic stability analyses of reinforced tapered landfill cover systems considering seepage forces.” Waste Manage. Res. 36 (4): 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18757628.
Koerner, R. M., and T. Y. Soong. 2005. “Analysis and design of veneer cover soils.” Geosynth. Int. 12 (1): 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2005.12.1.28.
Ling, H. I., and D. Leshchinsky. 1997. “Seismic stability and permanent displacement of landfill cover systems.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (2): 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:2(113).
Ling, H. I., D. Leshchinsky, and Y. Mohri. 1997. “Soil slopes under combined horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26: 1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199712)26:12%3C1231:AID-EQE707%3E3.0.CO;2-Z.
MATLAB. 2016. Optimization toolbox. Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc. MATLAB R2016a. 9.0.0.341360 (R2016). Accessed July 10, 2022. https://www.mathworks.com/products/optimization.html.
Matsuzawa, H., I. Ishibashi, and M. Kawamura. 1985. “Dynamic soil and water pressures of submerged soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (10): 1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:10(1161).
Metasovic, N., and E. Kavazanjian. 2006. “Seismic response of a composite landfill cover.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132: 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:4(448).
Mitchell, J. K., R. B. Seed, and H. B. Seed. 1990. “Kettleman hills waste landfill slope failure. I: Liner-system properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (4): 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:4(647).
Mononobe, N., and H. Matsuo. 1929. “On the determination of earth pressure during earthquakes.” In Proc., of the World Engineering Conf. Berlin: Springer.
Nadukuru, S., M. Zhu, C. Gokmen, and R. Bonaparte. 2017. “Combined seepage and slope stability analysis of a landfill cover system.” In Geotechnical Frontiers 2017: Waste Containment, Barriers, Remediation, and Sustainable Geoengineering, Geotechnical Special Publication 276, edited by T. L. Brandon and R. J. Valentine, 170–179. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Okabe, S. 1926. “General theory of earth pressure.” J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. 12 (1): 123–134.
Qian, X., and R. M. Koerner. 2009. “Stability analysis when using an engineered berm to increase landfill space.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135: 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000065.
Richardson, G. N., E. Kavazanjian Jr, and N. Matasovic. 1995. Seismic design guidance for municipal solid waste landfill facilities. RCRA subtitle D (258). Washington, DC: Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Stark, T. D., and E. J. Newman. 2010. “Design of a landfill final cover system.” Geosynth. Int. 17 (3): 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2010.17.3.124.
Tedder, R. B. 2005. “Use of geosynthetic drainage materials at landfills in Florida.” In Waste Containment and Remediation, Geotechnical Special Publication 142, edited by A. Alshawabkeh, C. H. Benson, P. J. Culligan, J. C. Evans, B. A. Gross, D. Narejo, K. R. Reddy, C. D. Shackelford, and J. G. Zornberg. Reston, VA: ASCE.
The Dept. of the Navy. 1971. Soil mechanics, foundations, and earth structures. NAVFAC DM-7.01. Delhi, India: The Dept. of the Navy.
Westergaard, H. M. 1933. “Water pressures on dams during earthquakes.” Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 98 (2): 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0004496.
Yang, X. G., Y. Wang, and Z. B. Hu. 2018. “A comparative study of pseudo-static slope stability analysis using different design codes.” Water Sci. Eng. 11 (4): 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2018.12.003.
Zhang, B., G. Fowmes, and D. R. V. Jones. 2012. “Landfill capping stability: Tapered solution with seepage.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manage. 165 (3): 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2012.165.3.141.
Zhou, Y., L. Yao, H. Ai, and B. Wang. 2018. “Experimental study on the applicability of Westergaard’s formula for calculating earthquake-induced hydrodynamic pressure in small lake.” J. Mod. Transport. 26 (1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-017-0149-3.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 27Issue 3July 2023

History

Received: Aug 5, 2022
Accepted: Jan 28, 2023
Published online: Mar 29, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi 502285, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-3650 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi 502285, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-644X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share