Air Pocket Removal during Siphon Priming
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 7
Abstract
Siphon frequently is employed in pump stations as a pump outlet with a convenient flow cutoff mode for pump shutdown, and it usually works with axial-flow pumps with a large discharge and low head. After the pump starts, the initial air pocket in the siphon should be removed quickly from the siphon to generate a primed siphon flow, a process called priming. In this study, experiments were conducted to investigate the characteristics of air pocket removal during priming, in which two stages can be defined: air-compression and air-entrainment stages. During the air-compression stage, the air is compressed by the pumped water, and the increased air pressure can break the downstream water seal and expel some air out of the siphon. During the air-entrainment stage, the air is removed mainly in the form of bubbly flow. The air-entrainment stage can be divided further into two states: at a small water discharge, the priming process stays in State 1, in which the air pocket always remained in the siphon hump; and at a large discharge, the residual air pocket can be entirely swept out of the siphon in State 2, finally generating the primed siphon flow. The air-compression stage accounts for less than 5% of the priming time but discharges 20%–60% of the initial air. For the bubbly flow during the air-entrainment stage, the bubble diameters follow a log-normal distribution with the median of about 2.3 mm. The critical flow rate for generating primed siphon flow was predicted based on the bubble clearing velocity and force and on the motion analysis of the bubble, which can be a rough value for the calculation of the critical flow rate. The prediction indicates that the critical flow rate should increase with the descending angle and cross-section area of siphon.
Practical Applications
Siphons are inverted U-shaped pipes that commonly are used as pump outlets. We experimentally studied the air–water interactions during siphon priming in a laboratory-scale siphon model to elucidate the hydraulic removal of the air in the siphon. Because air-entrainment is the typical feature of siphon priming, high-speed photography was used to capture the bubble characteristics during siphon priming. Based on the in-depth observations of siphon priming at the bubble-scale, the priming time and the critical conditions for generating the primed siphon flow are discussed. The study shows that as the flow rate decreases, the priming time increases significantly and even the primed siphon flow cannot be generated; the priming time also increases with the increasing cross-sectional area and descending angle of the siphon. The empirical equation of the priming time was established, and the corresponding coefficients should be decided based on the siphon geometries. The prediction of the critical condition for generating the primed siphon flow was analyzed from the perspective of bubble motion. This study improves the understanding of air–water flow patterns during siphon priming and their influence on the siphon characteristics, which can be a reference for structural design and operational optimization in practical siphons.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The writers gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51779082 and 52279063), the China Scholar Council (CSC) (File No. 202006710079), and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
References
Aydin, M., M. Öztürk, and A. Yücel. 2015. “Experimental and numerical investigation of self-priming siphon side weir on a straight open channel.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 45 (Oct): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.06.014.
Aydin, M., and A. Ulu. 2021. “Aeration performance of high-head siphon-shaft spillways by CFD models.” Appl. Water Sci. 11 (10): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01496-0.
Babaeyan-Koopaei, K., E. M. Valentine, and D. A. Ervine. 2002. “Case study on hydraulic performance of Brent Reservoir siphon spillway.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 128 (6): 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:6(562).
Balacco, G., C. Apollonio, and A. F. Piccinni. 2015. “Experimental analysis of air valve behaviour during hydraulic transients.” J. Appl. Water Eng. Res. 3 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2015.1032374.
Bendiksen, K. H. 1984. “An experimental investigation of the motion of long bubbles in inclined tubes.” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 10 (4): 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(84)90057-0.
Boes, R. M., and W. H. Hager. 2003. “Two-phase flow characteristics of stepped spillways.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 129 (9): 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:9(661).
Carlos, M., F. J. Arregui, E. Cabrera, and C. V. Palau. 2011. “Understanding air release through air valves.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 137 (4): 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000324.
Casteleyn, J. A., P. Van Groen, and P. A. Kolkman. 1977. Air entrainment in siphons: Results of tests in two scale models and an attempt at extrapolation. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Hydraulics Laboratory.
Chen, X., J. Zhang, X. Yu, S. Chen, and L. Shi. 2022a. “Study on joint protection of air tank and air valve in long-distance water supply system.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 144 (6): 061701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054209.
Chen, Y., H. Xu, J. Feng, S. Qian, and H. Tong. 2022b. “Effect of section forms on hydraulic characteristics of a siphon outlet passage.” [In Chinese.] Adv. Sci. Technol. Water Resour. 42 (1): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.3880/j.issn.10067647.2022.01.007.
Colgate, D. 1966. Hydraulic model studies of the flow characteristics and air entrainment in the check towers of the main aqueduct, Canadian river project Texas. Denver: US Dept. of the Bureau of Reclamation.
Darquenne, C. 2020. “Deposition mechanisms.” J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Delivery 33 (4): 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2020.29029.cd.
Emadzadeh, A. D. E. L., and Y. M. Chiew. 2017. “Bubble dynamics and PIV measurements in a hydraulic jump.” In Proc., 37th IAHR World Congress. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research.
Ervine, D. A. 1976. “The design and modelling of air-regulated siphon spillways.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 61 (2): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1976.3446.
Escarameia, M. 2007. “Investigating hydraulic removal of air from water pipelines.” Water Manage. 160 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2007.160.1.25.
Falvey, H. T. 1980. Air–water flow in hydraulic structures. Denver: Water and Power Resources Service.
Feng, J., B. Cheng, and X. Wang. 2011. “Similarity analysis of siphon formation time of siphon pipes between the prototype and model based on the theorem.” [In Chinese.] J. Tsinghua Univ. (Sci. Tech.) 51 (4): 503–507. https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2011.04.027.
Ferreira, J. P., N. Buttarazzi, D. Ferras, and D. I. C. Covas. 2021. “Effect of an entrapped air pocket on hydraulic transients in pressurized pipes.” J. Hydraul. Res. 59 (6): 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2020.1862323.
Fuertes-Miquel, V. S., O. E. Coronado-Hernández, P. L. Iglesias-Rey, and D. Mora-Meliá. 2019. “Transient phenomena during the emptying process of a single pipe with water–air interaction.” J. Hydraul. Res. 57 (3): 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1492465.
Kalinske, A. A., and P. H. Bliss. 1943. “Removal of air from pipe lines by flowing water.” Proc. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 13 (10): 480–482.
Kent, J. C. 1952. The entrainment of air by water flowing in circular conduits with downgrade slopes. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Kim, S., H. Park, H. A. Gruszewski, D. G. Schmale III, and S. Jung. 2019. “Vortex-induced dispersal of a plant pathogen by raindrop impact.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 (11): 4917–4922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820318116.
Lau, T. C. W., and G. J. Nathan. 2014. “Influence of Stokes number on the velocity and concentration distributions in particle-laden jets.” J. Fluid Mech. 757 (Oct): 432–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.496.
Li, Z., H. Chen, H. Xu, J. Feng, Y. Chen, M. Shi, and H. Tong. 2022. “Multi-objective shape optimization of siphon outlet in pumping station considering two-phase flow.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A: J. Power Energy 237 (2): 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509221113920.
Liu, L., H. Yan, and G. Zhao. 2015. “Experimental studies on the shape and motion of air bubbles in viscous liquids.” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 62 (Apr): 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.11.018.
Liu, Y., J. Zhou, and D. Zhou. 2017. “Transient flow analysis in axial-flow pump system during stoppage.” Adv. Mech. Eng. 9 (9): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017723280.
Liu, Z., and J. Liu. 2009. Water pump and water pump station. 4th ed., 337–344. [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Water & Power Press.
Pothof, I., and F. Clemens. 2010. “On elongated air pockets in downward sloping pipes.” J. Hydraul. Res. 48 (4): 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.491651.
Pozos, O., C. A. Gonzalez, J. Giesecke, W. Marx, and E. A. Rodal. 2010. “Air entrapped in gravity pipeline systems.” J. Hydraul. Res. 48 (3): 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.481839.
Ramezani, L., B. Karney, and A. Malekpour. 2016. “Encouraging effective air management in water pipelines: A critical review.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 142 (12): 04016055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000695.
Ryu, Y., K. A. Chang, and H. J. Lim. 2005. “Use of bubble image velocimetry for measurement of plunging wave impinging on structure and associated greenwater.” Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 (10): 1945–1953. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/16/10/009.
Shi, M. Y., M. Qi, C. G. Yi, D. Y. Liu, and K. X. Zhang. 2017. “Study on drag coefficient of rising bubble in still water.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 231 (1): 012093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/231/1/012093.
Shomayramov, M., B. Norkulov, J. Rakhmanov, D. Tadjiyeva, and J. Suyunov. 2019. “Experimental researches of hydraulic vacuum breakdown devices of siphon outlets of pumping stations.” E3S Web Conf. 97 (May): 05009. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199705009.
Sussman, R. A., E. Golberstein, and R. Polosa. 2021. “Modeling aerial transmission of pathogens (including the SARS-CoV-2 virus) through aerosol emissions from e-cigarettes.” Appl. Sci. 11 (14): 6355. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146355.
Tadayon, R., and A. S. Ramamurthy. 2013. “Discharge coefficient for siphon spillways.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 139 (3): 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000542.
Talaia, M. A. 2007. “Terminal velocity of a bubble rise in a liquid column.” Int. J. of Phys. and Math. Sci. 1 (4): 220–224.
Thielicke, W., and R. Sonntag. 2021. “Particle image velocimetry for MATLAB: Accuracy and enhanced algorithms in PIVlab.” J. Open Res. Software 9 (1): 12. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.334.
USBR (United States Bureau of Reclamation). 1987. Design of small dams. 3rd ed. Denver: US Dept. of the Interior.
Viana, F., R. Pardo, R. Yanez, J. L. Trallero, and D. D. Joseph. 2003. “Universal correlation for the rise velocity of long gas bubbles in round pipes.” J. Fluid Mech. 494 (Nov): 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003006165.
Wang, X., J. Feng, H. Chen, L. Bu, and L. Tan. 2014. “Numerical simulation for two-phase flow of siphon outlet in pumping station.” [In Chinese.] Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Machinery 45 (5): 78–83. https://doi.org/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2014.05.012.
Wisner, P. E., F. N. Mohsen, and N. Kouwen. 1975. “Removal of air from water lines by hydraulic means.” J. Hydraul. Div. 101 (2): 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004201.
Xu, L., B. Karney, W. Shi, D. Ji, B. Xu, and W. Lu. 2022. “Influence of spiral flow on the hydraulic performance of a siphon outlet conduit in an axial flow pump system.” J. Hydraul. Res 60 (4): 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2021.2001593.
Yang, F., Y. Zhang, Y. Yuan, C. Liu, Z. Li, and A. Nasr. 2021. “Numerical and experimental analysis of flow and pulsation in hump section of siphon outlet conduit of axial flow pump device.” Appl. Sci. 11 (11): 4941. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114941.
Zhang, X., F. Tang, C. Liu, L. Shi, H. Liu, Z. Sun, and W. Hu. 2021. “Numerical simulation of transient characteristics of start-up transition process of large vertical siphon axial flow pump station.” Front. Energy Res. 9 (Jul): 382. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.706975.
Zhou, D., J. Gui, Z. D. Deng, H. Chen, Y. Yu, A. Yu, and C. Yang. 2019. “Development of an ultra-low head siphon hydro turbine using computational fluid dynamics.” Energy 181 (Aug): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.060.
Zhou, L., D. Liu, and B. Karney. 2013a. “Investigation of hydraulic transients of two entrapped air pockets in a water pipeline.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (9): 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000750.
Zhou, L., D. Liu, B. Karney, and P. Wang. 2013b. “Phenomenon of white mist in pipelines rapidly filling with water with entrapped air pockets.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (10): 1041–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000765.
Zhou, L., D. Liu, B. Karney, and Q. Zhang. 2011. “Influence of entrapped air pockets on hydraulic transients in water pipelines.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 137 (12): 1686–1692. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000460.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 12, 2022
Accepted: Feb 21, 2023
Published online: Apr 22, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 22, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.