A Parametric Study on the Effect of Drainage on Sand Liquefaction under High Overburden Pressure
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 3
Abstract
The effect of high overburden pressure above 1 atm on sand liquefaction potential is typically evaluated based on cyclic undrained testing, with the overburden pressure correction factor, and decreasing as the pressure increases. Recent centrifuge experiments of a prototype 5 m-thick clean sand layer having a permeability , with free drainage at the top and subjected to 1 and 6 atm overburden pressures, show that a high overburden pressure may increase partial drainage. As a result, the measured field overburden pressure factor, was estimated to be >1.0 instead of in these centrifuge tests. A parametric study is presented here that extends the centrifuge results for a relative density, and free top drainage, utilizing a high-fidelity, calibrated numerical model (P2Psand in FLAC 3D). A stepped acceleration base input is used that ensures a uniform cyclic shear stress amplitude at the elevation of maximum pore pressure ratio. The main parameters varied in the numerical study are overburden pressure, (1-12 atm); sand permeability, ( to ); and sand layer thickness, (2-10 m). A new drainage factor, , is proposed to separate the usual undrained from the effect of partial drainage. The recommendation is to evaluate the overburden pressure factor to be used in liquefaction charts, , as the product of two factors, . The study shows that for constant atm, when to , even for a very thick sand layer of . Still for a constant atm, decreases considerably to values close to 1.0 for a low , when the layer thickness is or 8m or greater. And for constant and atm, if , increasing to if the layer thickness decreases to . The parametric study provides insight on when the current State-of-Practice of using only undrained becomes too conservative and should be supplemented with consideration of partial drainage through use of factor . Ready-to-use charts are provided to evaluate and for a sand layer with free top drainage.
Practical Applications
This research challenges conventional notions of sand liquefaction risk assessment. Traditionally, higher overburden pressures were thought to increase this risk, as indicated by the factor . However, recent findings, supported by centrifuge experiments and advanced numerical modeling, reveal a more nuanced reality. Under specific field conditions, especially with elevated overburden pressures, partial drainage in clean sand deposits can enhance the layer stability, resulting in values greater than 1.0. This means that high overburden pressures may not necessarily lead to increased liquefaction vulnerability, contrary to previous assumptions. To better guide practical applications, a novel drainage factor, , is introduced. When combined with , it provides a more accurate assessment of liquefaction potential. For engineers and practitioners, this means considering both and when evaluating the liquefaction potential of loose sand layers with at least one drainage boundary. This study supplies valuable insights into when the current practice of relying solely on undrained may be overly conservative. It offers ready-to-use charts to assess and , empowering practitioners to make more informed decisions regarding liquefaction risk. It must be noted that an actual field case history is expected to require some engineering judgment due to soil stratigraphy and the usual spatial variability associated with field deposits.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This research was performed using the FLAC3D demo version provided by Itasca Consulting Group Inc. The authors would like to thank Dr. Zhao Cheng from FLAC3D support team for his guidance during the course of this research. The research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. 1545026 and 1904313 and NYU Abu Dhabi; this support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Abdoun, T., M. Ni, R. Dobry, K. Zehtab, A. Marr, and W. El-Sekelly. 2020. “Pore pressure and evaluation at high overburden pressure under field drainage conditions. II: Additional interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002302.
Biot, M. A. 1955. “Theory of elasticity and consolidation for a porous anisotropic solid.” J. Appl. Phys. 26 (2): 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721956.
Boulanger, R. W. 2003. “High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1071).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2004. “State normalization of penetration resistance and the effect of overburden stress on liquefaction resistance.” In Proc., 11th SDEE and 3rd ICEGE. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2015 “Cyclic shear strain needed for liquefaction triggering and assessment of overburden pressure factor .” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (11): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001342.
Elgamal, A. W., M. Zeghal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. I: Evaluation of site dynamic properties.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 121 (4): 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(350).
El Ghoraiby, M. A., H. Park, and M. T. Manzari. 2017. LEAP 2017: Soil characterization and element tests for Ottawa F65 sand. Washington, DC: The George Washington Univ.
El-Sekelly, W., R. Dobry, and T. Abdoun. 2023a. “Assessment of state-of-practice use of field liquefaction charts at low and high overburden using centrifuge experiments.” Eng. Geol. 312 (Aug): 106952.
El-Sekelly, W., R. Dobry, and T. Abdoun. 2023b. “A numerical approach for simulation of stress-controlled cyclic shear loading in a soil column considering partial drainage.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 174 (Feb): 108191.
El-Sekelly, W., R. Dobry, T. Abdoun, and M. Ni. 2022. “Evaluation of field sand liquefaction including partial drainage under low and high overburden using a generalized bounding surface model.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 152 (Jun): 107059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107059.
Gillette, D. 2013. “Liquefaction issues for dam safety—Bureau of Reclamation.” In Proc., Presentation in One-Day Workshop, Committee on State of the Art and Practice in Earthquake Induced Soil Liquefaction Assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
Hynes, M. E., R. S. Olsen, and D. E. Yule. 1999. “Influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, 145–152. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2006. “Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes: Monograph MNO-12. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Manzari, M. T., et al. 2018. “Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP): Summary of observations from the planning phase.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 714–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015.
Montgomery, J., R. W. Boulanger, and L. F. Harder Jr. 2012. Examination of the Kσ overburden correction factor on liquefaction resistance. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
National Academies. 2017. “State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences.” In A report of the national academies, committee on state of the art and practice in earthquake-induced soil liquefaction. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ni, M., T. Abdoun, R. Dobry, K. Zehtab, A. Marr, and W. El-Sekelly. 2020. “Pore pressure and evaluation at high overburden pressure under field drainage conditions. I: Centrifuge experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002303.
Seed, H. B. 1983. “Earthquake-resistant design of earth dams.” In Proc., Seismic Design of Earth Dams and Caverns. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Seed, R. B., and L. F. Harder Jr. 1990. “SPT-based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength.” In Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symp. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Vaid, Y. P., and J. Thomas. 1995. “Liquefaction and postliquefaction behavior of sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (2): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:2(163).
Youd, T. L., and I. M. Idriss. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (4): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
Zeghal, M., A. W. Elgamal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole seismic array: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(363).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 9, 2023
Accepted: Oct 11, 2023
Published online: Dec 30, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 30, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Drainage
- Engineering fundamentals
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Irrigation engineering
- Layered soils
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Mathematics
- Numerical analysis
- Parameters (statistics)
- Permeability (soil)
- Soil dynamics
- Soil liquefaction
- Soil mechanics
- Soil pressure
- Soil properties
- Soils (by type)
- Statistics
- Thickness
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.