A CPT-Based Design Framework for Uplifted Open-Ended Piles Installed in Spatially Variable Sandy Soils. II: Implications to Site Investigation and Pile Design for Offshore Wind Farms
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 11
Abstract
Interpreting seabed properties for future offshore wind farm development appears challenging given the requirement to investigate very large areas. Current approaches, where significant numbers of geotechnical boreholes and cone penetration tests (CPTs) are conducted—often at the location of each foundation or anchor—may prove prohibitive given the scale of modern wind farms (typically over 100 turbines). This paper presents a framework for the refinement of the design of piles under axial tension [for example, to anchor floating offshore wind turbines (OWTs)] in seabeds where the spatial variability of soil properties exhibits isotropy or anisotropy in the horizontal and vertical directions. The framework relies on the approach to the rational selection of design lines representing the soil resistance for achieving a target probability of failure () presented in the companion paper. The framework is validated via application to the design of piles for OWTs in both artificially generated (synthetic) and real seabeds using standard deterministic design methods, and then comparing the achieved values to the target. The framework is also implemented jointly with a cost model to investigate the overall project cost for different CPT layouts for an example floating wind farm layout anchored in synthetic seabeds. The spatial variability levels of cone tip resistance for these seabeds are assumed to be the same in the vertical direction but different in the horizontal direction. The optimum CPT layouts that achieved the minimum total project cost are shown to depend on the per-CPT cost and the horizontal spatial variability of cone tip resistance, so that a generally applicable “best” CPT layout cannot be identified. However, CPT layouts that include clustered CPTs and/or have small spacings between CPTs and piles (compared to the underlying actual horizontal spatial variability scale of soil properties) resulted both in a lower total project cost and require fewer total CPTs, suggesting significant potential in this approach.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support provided by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency under Project ARENA-2015-RND086. The work presented in this paper is part of the research activities undertaken by the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems within the Oceans Graduate School at the University of Western Australia. The second author holds the Fugro Chair whose support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Al-Addous, M., M. Jaradat, A. Albatayneh, J. Wellmann, and S. Al Hmidan. 2020. “The significance of wind turbines layout optimization on the predicted farm energy yield.” Atmosphere 11 (1): 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010117.
Arany, L., S. Bhattacharya, J. Macdonald, and S. Hogan. 2017. “Design of monopiles for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (Jan): 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.024.
Baecher, G. B., and J. T. Christian. 2003. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Breton, S. P., and G. Moe. 2009. “Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America.” Renewable Energy 34 (3): 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.040.
Cai, Y., F. Bransby, C. Gaudin, M. O’Neill, and M. Uzielli. 2023. “A CPT-based design framework for uplifted open-ended piles installed in spatially variable sandy soils. Part I: Soil resistance design line optimization.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 149 (11): 04023097. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11387.
Cai, Y., F. Bransby, C. Gaudin, and M. Uzielli. 2021. “A framework for the design of vertically loaded piles in spatially variable soil.” Comput. Geotech. 134 (Jun): 104140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104140.
Cai, Y., M. F. Bransby, C. Gaudin, and Y. Tian. 2022. “Accounting for soil spatial variability in plate anchor design.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (2): 04021178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002720.
Cheon, J. Y., and R. B. Gilbert. 2014. “Modeling spatial variability in offshore geotechnical properties for reliability-based foundation design.” Struct. Saf. 49 (Jul): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.07.008.
Chicco, D., M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman. 2021. “The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation.” PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7 (Jul): e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2011. “A quantile-based approach for calibrating reliability-based partial factors.” Struct. Saf. 33 (4–5): 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.04.002.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2012. “Value of geotechnical site investigation in reliability-based design.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 15 (11): 1935–1945. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.11.1935.
Ching, J., and T. Schweckendiek, eds. 2021. State-of-the-art review of inherent variability and uncertainty in geotechnical properties and models. ISSMGE Technical Committee 304. London: International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Ching, J., T. J. Wu, A. W. Stuedlein, and T. Bong. 2018. “Estimating horizontal scale of fluctuation with limited CPT soundings.” Geosci. Front. 9 (6): 1597–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.11.008.
Crisp, M. P., M. B. Jaksa, and Y. L. Kuo. 2020. “Toward a generalized guideline to inform optimal site investigations for pile design.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (8): 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0111.
Damgaard, M., M. Bayat, L. V. Andersen, and L. B. Ibsen. 2014. “Assessment of the dynamic behaviour of saturated soil subjected to cyclic loading from offshore monopile wind turbine foundations.” Comput. Geotech. 61 (Sep): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.05.008.
Fenton, G. A., and D. V. Griffiths. 2008. Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
ISO. 2014. Petroleum and natural gas industries—Specific requirements for offshore structures—Part 8: Marine soil investigations. ISO 19901-8. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2020. Petroleum and natural gas industries-fixed steel offshore structures. ISO 19902. Geneva: ISO.
Kaiser, M. J. 2017. “Offshore pipeline construction cost in the US Gulf of Mexico.” Mar. Policy 82 (Aug): 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.003.
Lacal-Arántegui, R., J. M. Yusta, and J. A. Domínguez-Navarro. 2018. “Offshore wind installation: Analysing the evidence behind improvements in installation time.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 92 (Sep): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.044.
Laloy, E., B. Rogiers, J. A. Vrugt, D. Mallants, and D. Jacques. 2013. “Efficient posterior exploration of a high-dimensional groundwater model from two-stage MCMC simulation and polynomial chaos expansion.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (5): 2664–2682. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20226.
Lehane, B., J. Schneider, and X. Xu. 2005. “The UWA-05 method for prediction of axial capacity of driven piles in sand.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, edited by M. J. Cassidy and S. Gourvenec, 683–689. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Pérez-Collazo, C., D. Greaves, and G. Iglesias. 2015. “A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 42 (Feb): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.032.
Phoon, K. K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Roberts, C., and G. Casella. 1999. Monte Carlo statistical methods. Berlin: Springer.
Schwab, C., and R. A. Todor. 2006. “Karhunen–Loève approximation of random fields by generalized fast multipole methods.” J. Comput. Phys. 217 (1): 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.048.
Suzuki, K., H. Yamaguchi, M. Akase, A. Imakita, T. Ishihara, Y. Fukumoto, and T. Oyama. 2011. “Initial design of tension leg platform for offshore wind farm.” J. Fluid Sci. Technol. 6 (3): 372–381.
Uzielli, M., G. Vannucchi, and K. K. Phoon. 2005. “Random field characterisation of stress-normalised cone penetration testing parameters.” Géotechnique 55 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.1.3.
Uzielli, M., M. Zei, and M. J. Cassidy. 2019. “Probabilistic assignment of design undrained shear strength using quantile regression.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety and Risk—ISGSR 2019, edited by J. Ching, D. Q. Li, and J. Zhang, 188–193. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Vanmarcke, E. H. 1984. Random fields: Analysis and synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 6, 2022
Accepted: Jun 12, 2023
Published online: Aug 29, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 29, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Agriculture
- Bodies of water (by type)
- Construction costs
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Design (by type)
- Energy engineering
- Energy sources (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Foundations
- Geomechanics
- Geometry
- Geotechnical engineering
- Irrigation engineering
- Load and resistance factor design
- Load factors
- Mathematics
- Pile foundations
- Piles
- Project management
- Renewable energy
- Sea floor
- Seas and oceans
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Spatial variability
- Structural design
- Water and water resources
- Water management
- Wind power
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.