Lectures
Jun 6, 2023

2022 H. Bolton Seed Memorial Lecture: Evaluating Liquefaction Effects

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 8

Abstract

The potential effects of soil liquefaction at level ground sites should be evaluated through examining soil element responses of the individual soil layers and system responses of the soil deposits they form. The cyclic responses and postliquefaction volumetric strain of uniform clean sand, sandy gravel, nonplastic silty sand, and nonplastic silt at the element level can be captured in a unified manner using relative density or the state parameter. The depositional environment should be characterized because geologic details, such as soil fabric, which can be discerned through detailed logging of high-quality continuous sampling, are important in evaluating liquefaction effects. Effective stress analysis enables soil system responses that govern the effects of liquefaction, including the formation of ejecta, to be investigated. A calibrated cone penetration test (CPT) procedure employing the liquefaction ejecta demand parameter captures key aspects of system response and provides an estimate of ejecta-induced building settlement. A probabilistic CPT-based procedure for estimating postliquefaction ground settlement is developed using laboratory and field case history databases. Correlations are developed to estimate Dr or ψo to enable use of the laboratory-based volumetric strain models. Adjustment factors enable the procedure to capture field observations of postliquefaction ground settlement. The proposed ground settlement procedure is combined with shear and ejecta-induced settlement procedures to estimate liquefaction-induced building settlement.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Support for this research was provided primarily by grants from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) through CMMI-1956248 and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through Agreement 65A0774 Amendment TO-005. The findings, opinions, and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The NSF-sponsored Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Association funding through Grant CMMI-1266418 enabled researchers to document and learn from the case histories discussed in this article. Additionally, the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB), provided support through the Faculty Chair in Earthquake Engineering Excellence. The numerous significant contributions of Professor H. Bolton Seed over his distinguished career are recognized. Prof. Kenji Ishihara also provided data, insights, and inspiration for this work. Zorana Mijic and Daniel Hutabarat of UCB shared data and insights from their Ph.D. research. We acknowledge the efforts of all GEER team members who participated in postearthquake reconnaissance relied upon in this study. We thank Misko Cubrinovski of the University of Canterbury, who shared data and concepts freely, and those whose research supported this study, including Michael Riemer, Rodolfo Sancio, Jennifer Donahue, Christine Beyzaei, Christopher Markham, Claudio Cappellaro, Sean Rees, Ribu Dhakal, Jorge Macedo, Roberto Luque, Josh Zupan, Mark Stringer, Merrick Taylor, Tom O’Rourke, Brendon Bradley, Sjoerd Van Ballegooy, Mike Jacka, Rick Wentz, Ian McCahon, Nick Traylen, and Iain Haycock. We also thank Uri Eliahu and Pedro Espinosa of ENGEO, Inc., for providing CPT data for Treasure Island, the team of engineers who worked on the Treasure Island project, which included P. Espinosa, P. Stuecheli, S. Papadopoulos, J. Tootle, U. Eliahu, S. Vahdani, B. Heidarzadeh, S. Dickenson, M. Beaty, J. Pestana, N. Sitar, M. Riemer, and C. Markham. R. Luna and J. P. Bardet provided CPT data for Treasure Island and the Marina District, respectively. The New Generation Liquefaction project provided access to data. Norman Abrahamson of UCB assisted in the development of the probabilistic models. Ross Boulanger of UC Davis provided useful feedback after the Seed Lecture.

References

Akai, K., et al. 1995. Geotechnical reconnaissance of the effects of the January 17, 1995, Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake, Japan. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell. 2006. “Correlation of response spectral values for multi-component ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96 (1): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050060.
Been, K., and M. G. Jefferies. 1985. “A state parameter for sands.” Géotechnique 35 (2): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99.
Beyzaei, C. Z. 2017. “Fine-grained soil liquefaction effects in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, M. Riemer, and M. Stringer. 2018a. “Laboratory-based characterization of shallow silty soils in southwest Christchurch.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Jul): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.046.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, S. Cubrinovski, S. Bastin, M. Riemer, M. Stringer, M. Jacka, S. van Ballegooy, and R. Wentz. 2020. “Characterization of silty soil thin-layering and groundwater conditions for liquefaction assessment.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (2): 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0287.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, S. van Ballegooy, S. Cubrinovski, and S. Bastin. 2018b. “Depositional environment effects on observed liquefaction performance in silt swamps during the Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 107 (Apr): 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.035.
Bolton, M. D. 1986. “The strength and dilatancy of sands.” Géotechnique 36 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2008. “Closure to ‘Evaluation of cyclic softening in silts and clays’ by Ross W. Boulanger and I. M. Idriss.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (2): 308. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:2(308).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Bray, J. D., et al. 2004. “Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in Adapazari, Turkey.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (7): 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(673).
Bray, J. D., R. W. Boulanger, M. Cubrinovski, K. Tokimatsu, S. L. Kramer, T. O’Rourke, E. Rathje, R. A. Green, P. Robertson, and C. S. Beyzaei. 2017. US–New Zealand–Japan international workshop, liquefaction-induced ground movements effects. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Bray, J. D., M. Cubrinovski, J. Zupan, and M. Taylor. 2014a. “CPT-based liquefaction assessments in Christchurch, New Zealand.” In Proc., CPT’14: 3rd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing. Las Vegas: Omnipress US.
Bray, J. D., M. Cubrinovski, J. Zupan, and M. Taylor. 2014b. “Liquefaction effects on buildings in the central business district of Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1193/022113EQS043M.
Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2017. “6th Ishihara lecture: Simplified procedure for estimating liquefaction-induced building settlement.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 102 (Nov): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.026.
Bray, J. D., and R. B. Sancio. 2006. “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1165).
Bray, J. D., and R. B. Sancio. 2008. “Closure to ‘Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils’ by Jonathan D. Bray and Rodolfo B. Sancio.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (7): 1031–1034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:7(1031).
Bray, J. D., and J. P. Stewart. 2000. “Damage patterns and foundation performance in Adapazari.” Earthquake Spectra J. 1 (Suppl A): 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586152.
Bullock, Z., Z. Karimi, S. Dashti, K. Porter, A. B. Liel, and W. Franke. 2019. “A physics-informed semi-empirical probabilistic model for the settlement of shallow-founded structures on liquefiable ground.” Géotechnique 69 (5): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.174.
Cetin, K. O., H. T. Bilge, J. Wu, A. M. Kammerer, and R. B. Seed. 2009. “Probabilistic model for the assessment of cyclically induced reconsolidation (volumetric) settlements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (3): 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:3(387).
Cubrinovski, M. 2019. “Some important considerations in the engineering assessment of soil liquefaction.” In Proc., 13th Australia New Zealand Conf. on Geomechanics, 19–36. Sydney, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society.
Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, C. de la Torre, M. Olsen, B. A. Bradley, G. Chiaro, E. Stocks, L. Wotherspoon, and T. Krall. 2018a. “Liquefaction-induced damage and CPT characterization of the reclamations at CentrePort, Wellington.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 108 (3B): 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170246.
Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, M. Taylor, S. Giorgini, B. Bradley, L. Wotherspoon, and J. Zupan. 2011. “Soil liquefaction effects in the central business district during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 82 (6): 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.6.893.
Cubrinovski, M., and K. Ishihara. 2002. “Maximum and minimum void ratio characteristics of sands.” Soils Found. 42 (6): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.42.6_65.
Cubrinovski, M., A. Rhodes, N. Ntritsos, and S. van Ballegooy. 2018b. “System response of liquefiable deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013.
Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, and J. D. Bray. 2020. “Geotechnical characterization and liquefaction evaluation of gravelly reclamations and hydraulic fills (Port of Wellington, New Zealand).” Soils Found. 60 (6): 1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.10.001.
Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, and J. D. Bray. 2022. “Evaluating the applicability of conventional CPT-based liquefaction assessment procedures to reclaimed gravelly soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 155 (Apr): 107176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107176.
Dobry, R., and R. Ladd. 1980. “Discussion on ‘Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes and liquefaction potential: Science versus practice.’” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 106 (6): 720–724. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000984.
Donahue, J. L., J. D. Bray, and M. F. Riemer. 2007. “Liquefaction testing of fine-grained soil prepared using slurry deposition.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Berlin: Springer.
Dooku, P. M., P. M. Stewart, D. H. Whang, and E. Yee. 2008. “Volumetric strains of clean sands subject to cyclic loads.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 134 (8): 1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1073).
Duncan, J. M., S. G. Wright, and T. L. Brandon. 2014. Soil strength and slope stability. New York: Wiley.
ENGEO. 2016. Dynamic behavior of the treasure Island natural shoal deposit. San Francisco: ENGEO.
Hutabarat, D., and J. D. Bray. 2021a. “Effective stress analysis of liquefiable sites to estimate the severity of sediment ejecta.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 147 (5): 04021040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002506.
Hutabarat, D., and J. D. Bray. 2021b. “Seismic response characteristics of liquefiable sites with and without sediment ejecta manifestation.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 147 (6): 04021040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002506.
Hutabarat, D., and J. D. Bray. 2022. “Estimating the severity of liquefaction ejecta using the cone penetration test.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 148 (3): 04021195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002744.
Idriss, I., and R. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351.
Ishihara, K., and M. Yoshimine. 1992. “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 32 (1): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.173.
Iwasaki, T., F. Tatsuoka, K. Tokida, and S. Yasuda. 1978. “A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Earthquake Microzonation Conf., 885–896. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Jefferies, M., and K. Been. 2016. Soil liquefaction: A critical state approach. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
JGS (Japanese Geotechnical Society). 2000. Test methods for minimum and maximum densities of sands. JIS A 1224:2000. Tokyo: JGS.
Ku, C. S., C. H. Juang, C. W. Chang, and J. Ching. 2012. “Probabilistic version of the Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction evaluation: Development and application.” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-085.
Ladd, R. S. 1977. “Specimen preparation and cyclic stability of sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (6): 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000435.
Lee, K. L., and A. Albaisa. 1974. “Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 100 (4): 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000034.
Luque, R., and J. D. Bray. 2017. “Dynamic analyses of two buildings founded on liquefiable soils during the Canterbury earthquake sequence.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001736.
Markham, C. S. 2015. “Response of liquefiable sites in the central business district of Christchurch, New Zealand.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Markham, C. S., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, and M. Riemer. 2018. “Liquefaction resistance and steady-state characterization of shallow soils within the Christchurch Central Business District.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (6): 04018032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001823.
Markham, C. S., J. D. Bray, M. F. Riemer, and M. Cubrinovski. 2016. “Characterization of shallow soils in the central business district of Christchurch, New Zealand.” Geotech. Test. J. 39 (6): 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ2015024.
Mayne, P. W., and M. Styler. 2018. “Soil liquefaction screening using CPT yield stress profiles.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Liquefaction Triggering, Consequences, and Mitigation, 605–616. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mijic, Z., J. D. Bray, M. F. Riemer, M. Cubrinovski, and S. D. Rees. 2021a. “Test method for minimum and maximum densities of small quantities of soil.” Soils Found. 61 (2): 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.12.003.
Mijic, Z., J. D. Bray, M. F. Riemer, S. D. Rees, and M. Cubrinovski. 2021b. “Cyclic and monotonic simple shear testing of native Christchurch silty soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 148 (Sep): 106834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106834.
Mijic, Z., J. D. Bray, and S. van Ballegooy. 2022. “Liquefaction ejecta case histories for 2010–11 Canterbury earthquakes.” Int. J. Geo-Eng. Case Hist. 6 (3): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.4417/IJGCH-06-03-04.
Mitchell, J., and K. Soga. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Mulilis, J. P., H. B. Seed, C. K. Chan, J. K. Mitchell, and K. Arulanandan. 1977. “Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000387.
Olaya, F. R., and J. D. Bray. 2022a. CPT case histories of post-liquefaction free-field ground settlement. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Olaya, F. R., and J. D. Bray. 2022b. “Strain potential of liquefied soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (11): 04022099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002896.
Polito, C. P., and J. R. Martin II. 2001. “Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (5): 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408).
Robertson, P. K. 2009. “Performance-based earthquake design using the CPT.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Performance—Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Tokyo: Taylor & Francis.
Robertson, P. K. 2010. “Estimating in-situ state parameter and friction angle in sandy soils from CPT.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing. Signal Hill, CA: Gregg Drilling & Testing.
Robertson, P. K. 2016. “Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system—An update.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (12): 1910–1927.
Robertson, P. K., and K. L. Cabal. 2015. Guide to CPT for geotechnical engineering. 6th ed. Signal Hill, CA: Gregg Drilling Testing.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Russell, J., and S. van Ballegooy. 2015. Canterbury earthquake sequence: Increased liquefaction vulnerability assessment methodology. Earthquake Commission. Auckland, New Zealand: Tonkin & Taylor.
Seed, H. B. 1979. “Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 105 (2): 201–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000768.
Shamoto, Y., M. Sato, and J. Zhang. 1996. “Simplified estimation of earthquake-induced settlements in saturated sand deposits.” Soils Found. 36 (1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.39.
Shuttle, D. A., and J. Cunning. 2007. “Liquefaction potential of silts from CPTu.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (1): 140–141. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-086.
Shuttle, D. A., and J. Cunning. 2008. “Reply to the discussion by Robertson on liquefaction potential of silts from CPTu.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (1): 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-119.
Tatsuoka, F., S. Zhou, T. Sato, and S. Shibuya. 1990. “Method of evaluating liquefaction potential and its application.” [In Japanese.] In Report on seismic hazards on the ground in urban areas. Tokyo: Ministry of Education of Japan.
Thevanayagam, S., T. Shenthan, S. Mohan, and J. Liang. 2002. “Undrained fragility of clean sands, silty sands, and sandy silts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (10): 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:10(849).
Toriihara, M., Y. Yamada, I. Morimoto, and K. Ishihara. 2000. “The characteristics of settlement after liquefaction for sand containing fines.” [In Japanese.] In Vol. 3 of Proc., 35th Japan Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, 1655–1656. Tokyo: Japanese Geotechnical Society.
van Ballegooy, S., P. Malan, V. Lacrosse, M. E. Jacka, M. Cubrinovski, J. D. Bray, T. D. O’Rourke, S. A. Crawford, and H. Cowan. 2014. “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra J. 30 (1): 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1193/031813EQS070M.
Whang, D. H. 2001. “Seismic compression of compacted soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Yasuda, S., K. Ishihara, K. Harada, and N. Shinkawa. 1996. “Effect of soil improvement on ground subsidence due to liquefaction.” Soils Found. 36 (Jun): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.Special_99.
Yoshimine, M., H. Nishizaki, K. Amano, and Y. Hosono. 2006. “Flow deformation of liquefied sand under constant shear load and its applications to analysis of flow slide in infinite slope.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.016.
Youd, T., and D. Perkins. 1978. “Mapping liquefaction-induced ground failure potential.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 104 (4): 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000612.
Zhang, G., P. K. Robertson, and R. W. I. Brachman. 2002. “Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (5): 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-047.
Zhang, G., P. K. Robertson, and R. W. I. Brachman. 2004. “Estimating liquefaction induced lateral deformations from SPT and CPT.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(861).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 8August 2023

History

Received: Aug 5, 2022
Accepted: Apr 19, 2023
Published online: Jun 6, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 6, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-4365. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Graduate Student Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-912X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share