Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2023

Stiffness Characteristics of Composite Beams and Application in Damage Identification

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 149, Issue 9

Abstract

Composite structures are used commonly in civil engineering; a typical example is a bridge deck consisting of concrete slabs and steel girder beams, in which shear connectors are used to connect the concrete slabs and steel beams to form a composite structure. The structural performance of a composite structure is well understood to depend not only on the properties of the primary components (slabs and steel beams) but also on the properties and condition of the shear connectors. Therefore, in a structural health monitoring and damage identification process, it is imperative to distinguish the damages in the primary components and in the shear connectors. However, in the existing literature concerning damage assessment of composite structures, there generally is a lack of differentiation between the damages in the two distinctive groups of constituent entities, and oftentimes the damages are treated simply in terms of the gross flexural stiffness with the use of an equivalent Euler–Bernoulli beam. This could result in a false identification of the actual severity of the damages, and even in misleading results. In this study, the basic mechanics governing the equivalent flexural rigidity and its distribution in a composite beam were investigated analytically, and the effects of the essential differences between the component beam damage and the shear connector damage on the distribution of the flexural rigidity were examined using numerical simulations. On this basis, the feasibility of differentiating the two types of damage from a damage identification process using vibration information, namely the natural frequencies and mode shapes, was demonstrated by means of a finite-element model updating procedure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Girhammar, U. A., and V. K. A. Gopu. 1993. “Composite beam-columns with interlayer slip—Exact analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (Aug): 1265–1282. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1265).
Girhammar, U. A., and D. Pan. 1993. “Dynamic analysis of composite members with interlayer slip.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 30 (6): 797–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(93)90041-5.
Hou, C., and Y. Lu. 2016. “Identification of cracks in thick beams with a cracked beam element model.” J. Sound Vib. 385 (Dec): 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.09.009.
Malveiro, J., D. Ribeiro, C. Sousa, and R. Calçada. 2018. “Model updating of a dynamic model of a composite steel-concrete railway viaduct based on experimental tests.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.057.
Moaveni, B., J. P. Conte, and F. M. Hemez. 2009. “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of damage identification results obtained using finite element model updating.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 24 (5): 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00589.x.
Nie, J., and C. S. Cai. 2003. “Steel–concrete composite beams considering shear slip effects.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (Aug): 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:4(495).
Oehlers, D., and C. Coughlan. 1986. “The shear stiffness of stud shear connections in composite beams.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 6 (4): 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(86)90008-8.
Oehlers, D. J., N. T. Nguyen, M. Ahmed, and M. A. Bradford. 1997. “Partial interaction in composite steel and concrete beams with full shear connection.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 41 (2–3): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(97)80892-9.
Queiroz, F. D., P. C. G. S. Vellasco, and D. A. Nethercot. 2007. “Finite element modelling of composite beams with full and partial shear connection.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (4): 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.003.
Sadeghi, F., Y. Yu, X. Zhu, and J. Li. 2021. “Damage identification of steel-concrete composite beams based on modal strain energy changes through general regression neural network.” Eng. Struct. 244 (Sep): 112824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112824.
Shu, J., Z. Zhang, I. Gonzalez, and R. Karoumi. 2013. “The application of a damage detection method using Artificial Neural Network and train-induced vibrations on a simplified railway bridge model.” Eng. Struct. 52 (Nov): 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.031.
Talebinejad, I., C. Fischer, and F. Ansari. 2011. “Numerical evaluation of vibration-based methods for damage assessment of cable-stayed bridges.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 26 (May): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00684.x.
Tan, Z. X., D. P. Thambiratnam, T. H. T. Chan, M. Gordan, and H. Abdul Razak. 2020. “Damage detection in steel-concrete composite bridge using vibration characteristics and artificial neural network.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (9): 1247–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1696378.
Tu, Z., and Y. Lu. 2008. “FE model updating using artificial boundary conditions with genetic algorithms.” Comput. Struct. 86 (7–8): 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.07.005.
Wu, Y. F., D. J. Oehlers, and M. C. Griffith. 2002. “Partial-interaction analysis of composite beam/column members.” Mech. Struct. Mach. 30 (3): 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1081/SME-120004420.
Wu, Y.-F., R. Xu, and W. Chen. 2007. “Free vibrations of the partial-interaction composite members with axial force.” J. Sound Vib. 299 (4–5): 1074–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.08.008.
Xia, Y., H. Hao, J. M. W. Brownjohn, and P.-Q. Xia. 2002. “Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (5): 1053–1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.137.
Xia, Y., H. Hao, and A. J. Deeks. 2007. “Dynamic assessment of shear connectors in slab–girder bridges.” Eng. Struct. 29 (7): 1475–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.09.014.
Xia, Y., H. Hao, A. J. Deeks, and X. Zhu. 2008. “Condition assessment of shear connectors in slab-girder bridges via vibration measurements.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (Jun): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(43).
Xu, R., and Y. Wu. 2007. “Static, dynamic, and buckling analysis of partial interaction composite members using Timoshenko’s beam theory.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 49 (10): 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.02.006.
Zona, R., M. Barbato, and J. P. Conte. 2005. “Finite element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite beams with deformable shear connection.” J. Eng. Mech. 131 (11): 1126–1139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:11(1126).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 149Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Dec 29, 2022
Accepted: May 1, 2023
Published online: Jun 28, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Yu Gu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, School of Engineering, Univ. of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, School of Engineering, Univ. of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2142-1299. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share