Technical Papers
Aug 12, 2024

Optimizing the Regulation of Commercial Real Estate Presale Deposits: The Role of Third-Party Regulation and the Design of Government Incentives

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

In recent years, the outbreak of mass loan suspension by homebuyers in China has triggered widespread concern about the regulation of presale deposits for commercial real estate. To optimize the supervision mechanism of presale deposits, the regulatory role of third-party institutions is being considered by local governments. However, the efficacy of third-party regulatory mechanisms is not guaranteed, and rent-seeking behaviors driven by substantial profits may lead to mechanism failures. By constructing evolutionary game models and analyzing system equilibriums under both administrative and third-party regulatory modes, this study investigates the effectiveness of introducing third-party institutions into the regulation of presale deposits for commercial real estate, proposes suggestions to mitigate developer speculative behavior and addresses the design challenges of local government optimal incentive contracts. Findings indicate that under the administrative regulatory mode, overly strict government regulation may inadvertently enhance the covert nature of developer speculation. The introduction of third parties effectively substitutes for government regulation and better suppresses developer speculative motives. In the setting of incentive mechanisms, the intensities of rewards and penalties need to satisfy different optimal solution relationships based on varying initial conditions. When establishing performance evaluation standards, governments should consider the magnitude of reward and penalty intensities to enhance the quality of third-party regulation. Specifically, when reward intensity exceeds penalty intensity, lowering performance evaluation standards is more conducive to achieving the ideal equilibrium of the system. Conversely, raising performance evaluation standards yields superior results. This study provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis and practical recommendations for the regulation of presale deposits in commercial real estate.

Practical Applications

In construction and engineering projects, the regulation of presale deposits is crucial to ensure the orderly progress and timely delivery of projects. Comparing the evolutionary paths of administrative and third-party regulatory modes, this study reveals the feasibility of introducing third-party involvement in presale deposit regulation and the design of incentive contracts for local governments under the third-party regulatory model. First, third-party supervision serves as a clear substitute for administrative regulatory mode, and authorities can strategically replace certain aspects of government supervision with a carefully designed third-party mechanism to enhance the effectiveness of regulatory measures. Second, when introducing third-party involvement in supervision, the government should strike a balance based on factors such as compliance costs, rent-seeking benefits, and benchmark performance standards to ensure that third-party institutions have the incentive for positive compliance without imposing excessive burdens on them. Finally, in setting benchmark performance standards, if the intensity of rewards exceeds the intensity of penalties, it is recommended that the performance evaluation standards be lowered, and conversely, that the performance evaluation standards be raised. The research has a significant theoretical and practical significance for improving regulatory efficiency, ensuring the delivery of projects on schedule, protecting the rights and interests of homebuyers, and promoting the sustainable development of the construction project management industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 23XGL027) and the Science and Technology Program of Sichuan Province (No. 24NSFSC0301).

References

Awaga, A. L., W. Xu, L. Liu, and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Evolutionary game of green manufacturing mode of enterprises under the influence of government reward and punishment.” Adv. Prod. Eng. Manage. 15 (4): 416–430. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.4.375.
Bai, Y., Z. Yang, M. Huang, M. Hu, S. Chen, and J. Luo. 2023. “How can blockchain technology promote food safety in agricultural market?—An evolutionary game analysis.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (40): 93179–93198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28780-7.
Bian, X., J. C. Contat, B. D. Waller, and S. A. Wentland. 2023. “Why disclose less information? Toward resolving a disclosure puzzle in the housing market.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 66 (2): 443–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09824-6.
Cao, Y., Z. Yu, and G. Wan. 2017. “Evolutionary game study between government and enterprise in food adulteration under the new media environment.” Chin. J. Manage. Sci. 25 (6): 179–187. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.06.019.
Chen, J., F. Zhang, L. Liu, and L. Zhu. 2019. “Does environmental responsibility matter in cross-sector partnership formation? A legitimacy perspective.” J. Environ. Manage. 231 (Apr): 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.099.
Chen, M. H., H. Wei, M. Wei, H. Huang, and C. H. J. Su. 2021. “Modeling a green supply chain in the hotel industry: An evolutionary game theory approach.” Int. J. Hospitality Manage. 92 (Jun): 102716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102716.
Cui, M. 2021. “Tripartite evolutionary game analysis for environmental credit supervision under the background of collaborative governance.” Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 41 (3): 713–726. https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2020-0480.
Deng, L., Y. Li, S. Wang, and J. Luo. 2023. “The impact of blockchain on optimal incentive contracts for online supply chain finance.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (5): 12466–12494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22498-8.
Dvir, D., T. Raz, and A. J. Shenhar. 2003. “An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (2): 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00012-1.
Friedman, D. 1991. “Evolutionary games in economics.” J. Econ. Soc. 59 (3): 637–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111111148.
Gao, R., and J. Liu. 2019. “Selection of government supervision mode of PPP projects during the operation stage.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 37 (10): 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1564347.
Gao, X., N. J. Tian, and G. Z. Feng. 2019. “Design of an incentive contract on the agent emergency supplies productivity capacities reservation system being consigned by local government.” J. Ind. Eng. Manage. 33 (1): 182–188. https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2019.01.018.
García, F. T., A. L. S. Orozco, M. P. G. Pineda, and L. J. G. Villalba. 2023. “Agency theory: Forecasting agent remuneration at insurance companies.” Expert Syst. Appl. 215 (Jul): 119340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119340.
GitHub. 2022. “Summary of loan suspensions for rotten buildings in different provinces and cities across the China.” Accessed March 11, 2023. https://github.com/jinweicheng/SummaryOfLoanSuspension1.
Jiang, S., X. Wei, J. Jia, and G. Ma. 2022. “Toward sustaining the development of green residential buildings in China: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis.” Build. Environ. 223 (Apr): 109466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109466.
Jiang, X., H. Sun, K. Lu, S. Lyu, and M. Skitmore. 2023. “Using evolutionary game theory to study construction safety supervisory mechanism in China.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (2): 514–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0182.
Juan, Y. K., I. C. Lin, and J. X. Tsai. 2019. “A hybrid approach to optimize initial design strategies for pre-sale housing projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (3): 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2018-0187.
Kim, H., H. Choi, T. Hong, C. Ji, and J. Lee. 2022. “Evolutionary game analysis of green loans program to achieve the national carbon emissions reduction target in South Korea.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 04022018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001041.
Kong, X., S. Liu, X. Shen, and G. Feng. 2022. “The optimal joint incentive contract designs and inventory decisions with an overconfident agent.” Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 42 (1): 123–137. https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2021-0660.
Li, L., and K. W. Chau. 2019. “What motivates a developer to sell before completion?” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 59 (2): 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-018-9662-3.
Li, Y., N. He, H. Li, Z. Liu, and J. Qi. 2021. “Influencing factors on inter-organizational trust asymmetry behavior in construction projects: Evidence from China.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (1): 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2019-0256.
Li, Y., D. Zhu, J. Zhao, X. Zheng, and L. Zhang. 2020. “Effect of the housing purchase restriction policy on the real estate market: Evidence from a typical suburb of Beijing, China.” Land Use Policy. 94 (Aug): 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104528.
Liu, J., R. Gao, C. Y. Cheah, and J. Luo. 2016. “Incentive mechanism for inhibiting investors’ opportunistic behavior in PPP projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1102–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.013.
Liu, J., and G. Ma. 2021. “Study on incentive and supervision mechanisms of technological innovation in megaprojects based on the principal-agent theory.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (6): 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0163.
Liu, Z., C. Yu, Q. K. Qian, R. Huang, K. You, H. Visscher, and G. Zhang. 2023. “Incentive initiatives on energy-efficient renovation of existing buildings towards carbon–neutral blueprints in China: Advancements, challenges and perspectives.” Energy Build. 296 (Oct): 113343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113343.
Lu, W., L. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2016. “Effect of contract completeness on contractors’ opportunistic behavior and the moderating role of interdependence.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (6): 04016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001110.
Lv, L., H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, and R. Qiao. 2022. “Evolutionary game analysis for rent-seeking behavior supervision of major infrastructure projects based on prospect theory.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 28 (1): 6–24. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.15852.
Ma, L., and H. Fu. 2022. “A governance framework for the sustainable delivery of megaprojects: The interaction of megaproject citizenship behavior and contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (4): 04022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002251.
Mahmoudi, R., and M. Rasti-Barzoki. 2018. “Sustainable supply chains under government intervention with a real-world case study: An evolutionary game theoretic approach.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 116 (May): 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.028.
Monkkonen, P., G. Deng, and W. Hu. 2019. “Does developers’ ownership structure shape their market behavior? Evidence from state owned enterprises in Chengdu, Sichuan, 2004–2011.” Cities 84 (Jul): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.08.003.
Mou, X., X. Li, and J. Dong. 2021. “The impact of population aging on housing demand in china based on system dynamics.” J. Syst. Sci. Complexity 34 (1): 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9114-z.
Niu, X., X. Wang, J. Gao, and X. Wang. 2020. “Has third-party monitoring improved environmental data quality? An analysis of air pollution data in China.” J. Environ. Manage. 253 (Aug): 109698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109698.
Qin, Y., X. J. Wang, and W. J. Yang. 2022. “Design of government incentive and supervisory mechanism for sediment resource utilization based on principal-agent theory.” J. Ind. Eng. Manage. 36 (6): 129–143. https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2022.06.011.
Ross, S. A. 1973. “The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem.” Am. Econ. Rev. 63 (2): 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0182.
Schieg, M. 2008. “Strategies for avoiding asymmetric information in construction project management.” J. Bus. Econ. Manage. 9 (1): 47–51. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.47-51.
Wang, H. Y., L. Gao, and Y. Jia. 2022a. “The predicament of clean energy technology promotion in China in the carbon neutrality context: Lessons from China’s environmental regulation policies from the perspective of the evolutionary game theory.” Energy Rep. 8 (Jun): 4706–4723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.142.
Wang, W. K., C. C. Lin, and I. C. Tsai. 2022b. “Long-and short-term price behaviors in presale housing markets in Taiwan.” Econ. Anal. Policy 74 (Jul): 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.02.007.
Wang, Y., P. Cui, and J. Liu. 2018. “Analysis of the risk-sharing ratio in PPP projects based on government minimum revenue guarantees.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (6): 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.007.
Wang, Y., H. O. Gao, and J. Liu. 2019. “Incentive game of investor speculation in PPP highway projects based on the government minimum revenue guarantee.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 125 (Sep): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.006.
Wang, Y., J. Liu, R. Gao, and B. G. Hwang. 2020. “Government subsidies in public-private partnership projects based on altruistic theory.” Int. J. Strategy Property Manage. 24 (3): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2020.11545.
Wu, W., Y. Hu, and Q. Wu. 2023. “Subsidies and tax incentives—Does it make a difference on TFP? Evidences from China’s photovoltaic and wind listed companies.” Renewable Energy 208 (Jan): 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.080.
Xie, Y., Y. Su, and F. Li. 2022. “The evolutionary game analysis of low carbon production behaviour of farmers, Government and consumers in food safety source governance.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (19): 12211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912211.
Xu, L., S. Zhao, and J. Du. 2023. “Incentive model for third-party remediation of legacy contamination sites left by closed enterprises from the perspective of fully linked accountability.” Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 43 (2): 598–618. https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2022-0880.
Yan, L., K. Hong, K. Chen, H. Li, and L. Liao. 2021. “Benefit distribution of collectively-owned operating construction land entering the market in rural China: A multiple principal–agent theory-based analysis.” Habitat Int. 109 (Mar): 102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102328.
Yang, H. J., and Y. J. Kim. 2022. “The role of territorial collective goods in Korea’s residential development.” Land Use Policy 112 (Apr): 105789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105789.
Yang, X., S. Liao, and R. Li. 2021. “The evolution of new ventures’ behavioral strategies and the role played by governments in the green entrepreneurship context: An evolutionary game theory perspective.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28 (24): 31479–31496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12748-6.
Yang, Z., and S. Wu. 2019. “Land acquisition outcome, developer risk attitude and land development timing.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 59 (2): 233–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-018-9663-2.
Zhang, S., C. Wang, and C. Yu. 2019. “The evolutionary game analysis and simulation with system dynamics of manufacturer’s emissions abatement behavior under cap-and-trade regulation.” Appl. Math. Comput. 355 (Feb): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.080.
Zhou, X., M. Jia, L. Wang, G. D. Sharma, X. Zhao, and X. Ma. 2022. “Modelling and simulation of a four-group evolutionary game model for green innovation stakeholders: Contextual evidence in lens of sustainable development.” Renewable Energy 197 (Jun): 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.068.
Zhou, Y. N., and J. C. Liu. 2023. “Study on supervision strategy of PPP project considering the participation of higher-level government.” Chin. J. Manage. Sci. 31 (2): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0801.
Zuo, W., Q. Wang, and P. Li. 2022. “Rent-seeking decisions of the main participants in construction projects based on evolutionary-game and system dynamics.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 28 (2): 106–119. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2022.16159.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Nov 17, 2023
Accepted: May 16, 2024
Published online: Aug 12, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 12, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Chunmei Fan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5336-6227. Email: [email protected]
Huaqiang Li, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share