Technical Papers
Jul 3, 2024

Diverse Forms of Greed and Self-Interest That Contribute to Corruption among Construction Stakeholders

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 9

Abstract

The factors contributing to corruption within the construction sector have yet to be associated with the phenomenon of greed—the pursuit of self-interest and a widely recognized and extensively studied primary catalyst for corrupt practices. The mechanisms by which self-centeredness culminates in corruption within the construction industry, the prevalence of greed among the various stakeholders involved in the construction industry, and the potential impact of greed and its diverse manifestations on corruption within the construction industry remain elusive. Thus, this study analyses the diverse impacts of different manifestations of greed and self-interest on the various forms of corruption observed among construction stakeholders. The individuals involved in this study are contractors who are actively involved in the execution of building and construction projects within the geographical boundaries of Nigeria. A factor structure validity, construct validity, convergent validity, and hypothesis test using structural equation modeling were performed on the items assessed in the questionnaire. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between greed and self-interest in five specific pathways. The study found that the manifestations of corruption among contractors are subject to varying degrees of strength, contingent upon the influence of greed and self-interest. It was evident in the findings that the coexistence of biological, psychological, and social disorders contributes to an increased susceptibility to partake in corruption. The study contributes to knowledge by revealing that corruption is a sequential phenomenon initiated by greed, intensified by insatiable desires, and ultimately manifested through self-interested associations. These associations create an intricate web of influences and a complex network that enable corrupt practices within the construction industry.

Practical Applications

Practical applications of this study’s findings are in terms of understanding the multifaceted nature of corruption and designing effective interventions aimed at addressing greed and self-interest-related issues within the construction sector. The study enables an understanding of the drivers behind insatiable needs by explaining that the types and severity of corruption are inherent in the different levels of greed and the different ways in which self-interest drives individuals to engage in corrupt activities. The study’s practical application in developing corruption interventions or prevention strategies is the need to promote transparency, accountability, and integrity in both the public and private sectors by exploring the relationship between socioeconomic disparities, cultural norms, political systems, international cooperation, technology, and economic consequences. The interventions should focus on education, raising awareness about the negative consequences of greed, and promoting empathy and altruism as a means to counter excessive self-interest, and laying emphasis on the benefits of cooperation and collaboration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

Adekunle, A., A. K. Adewale, O. A. Olaifa, and S. N. B. Ukoh. 2019. “Statistical study on types, causes, effects and remedies of corrupt practices in construction industries in Nigeria.” Int. J. Adv. in Sci. Res. Eng. 5 (9): 71–80.
Adindu, C., I. Diugwu, S. Yusuf, and M. Musa. 2020. “Issues of corruption in construction projects and infrastructure development in Nigeria: An empirical approach.” In Supporting inclusive growth and sustainable development in Africa-volume I, edited by E. G. Popkova, B. S. Sergi, L. Haabazoka, and J. V. Ragulina, 191–200. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41979-0_14.
Aimran, W., A. Setia, and A. Basri. 2014. “Engaging structural greed today: Christians and Muslims in dialogue.” Islamic Sci. 12 (1): 61–83.
Angres, D. H., and K. Bettinardi–Angres. 2008. “The disease of addiction: Origins, treatment, and recovery.” Disease-a-month 54 (10): 696–721.
Assaad, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020. “Enhancing the knowledge of construction business failure: A social network analysis approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (6): 04020052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001831.
Buchan, B. 2008. “An interest in corruption.” In Proc., Australian Political Studies Association Conf. Proc. Parkville, VIC, Australia: Australian Political Studies Association.
Cardella, E., T. Kugler, J. Anderson, and T. Connolly. 2019. “Is greed contagious? Four experimental studies.” J. Behav. Decis. Making 32 (5): 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2134.
Castro-Alvarez, S., J. N. Tendeiro, R. R. Meijer, and L. F. Bringmann. 2022. “Using structural equation modeling to study traits and states in intensive longitudinal data.” Psychol. Methods 27 (1): 17. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000393.
Cottey, A. 2013. “Moral equivalents of greed.” AI Soc. 28 (Dec): 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0436-9.
Dávid-Barrett, E., and M. Fazekas. 2020. “Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced?” World Dev. 132 (Mar): 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105000.
D’Souza, J. 2015. “Greed: Crises, causes, and solutions.” Int. J. Humanit. Social Sci. 5 (7): 1–6.
Ebekozien, A. 2020. “Corrupt acts in the Nigerian construction industry: Is the ruling party fighting corruption?” J. Contemp. Afr. Stud. 38 (3): 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2020.1758304.
Gilliland, S. W., and J. Anderson. 2011. “Perceptions of greed: A distributive justice model.” In Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics, edited by S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, and D. P. Skarlicki, 137–166. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Jin, H., and X. Y. Zhou. 2013. “Greed, leverage, and potential losses: A prospect theory perspective.” Math. Finance 23 (1): 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2011.00490.x.
Kets de Vries, M. F. 2016. “The greed syndrome.” INSEAD Working Paper No. 2016/26/EFE. Accessed June 6, 2023. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766233.
Kirchgässner, G. 2014. “On self-interest and greed.” J. Bus. Econ. 84 (Mar): 1191–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0737-1.
Köbis, N. C., J. W. van Prooijen, F. Righetti, and P. A. Van Lange. 2016. “Prospection in individual and interpersonal corruption dilemmas.” Rev. Gen. Psychol. 20 (1): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000069.
Kuoribo, E., R. Yomoah, D. G. Owusu-Manu, A. Acheampong, D. John Edwards, and C. Debrah. 2023. “Assessing the interactive effects of the ethics of construction professionals on project performance in the Ghanaian construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (10): 5233–5252. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2021-0865.
Lambie, G. W., and J. S. Haugen. 2019. “Understanding greed as a unified construct.” Personality Individual Differ. 141 (Mar): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.12.011.
Loosemore, M., and B. Lim. 2015. “Inter-organizational unfairness in the construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 33 (4): 310–326.
Mantzaris, E. 2022. “Corruption and Citizens’ financial security in public service medical schemes: The case of South Africa.” J. Public Adm. 57 (1): 106–121.
Marsh, H. W., J. Guo, T. Dicke, P. D. Parker, and R. G. Craven. 2020. “Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony.” Multivar. Behav. Res. 55 (1): 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503.
Maruichi, D., and M. Abe. 2019. “Corruption and the business environment in Vietnam: Implications from an empirical study.” Asia Pac. Policy Stud. 6 (2): 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.275.
Morey, R. D. 2008. “Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005).” Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 4 (2): 61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061.
Mussel, P., and J. Hewig. 2019. “A neural perspective on when and why trait greed comes at the expense of others.” Sci. Rep. 9 (1): 10985. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47372-5.
Nikelly, A. 2006. “The pathogenesis of greed: Causes and consequences.” Int. J. Appl. Psychoanalytic Stud. 3 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.50.
Nordin, E. 2013. “'He fell under the dragon-sickness' An analysis of greed in J.R.R. Tolkien’s The hobbit.” Dissertation, Dept. of Language, Literature and Intercultural Studies, Karlstad Univ.
Pritchard, M. S., and E. E. Englehardt, eds. 2021. Everyday greed: Analysis and appraisal. New York: Springer.
Robertson, A. F. 2013. Greed: Gut feelings, growth, and history. New York: Wiley.
Saenz, C., and H. Brown. 2018. “The disclosure of anticorruption aspects in companies of the construction sector: Main companies worldwide and in Latin America.” J. Cleaner Prod. 196 (Mar): 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.045.
Shan, M., Y. Le, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2020. “Principal causes of corruption in the public construction sector.” In Corruption in the public construction sector, 49–77. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9550-5_4.
Shan, M., Y. Le, K. T. Yiu, A. P. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2017. “Investigating the underlying factors of corruption in the public construction sector: Evidence from China.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 23 (Jun): 1643–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9865-z.
Shi, D., and A. Maydeu-Olivares. 2020. “The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices.” Educ. Psychol. Meas. 80 (3): 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164.
Simons, G. 2019. “The global public relations of failed states.” In The global public relations handbook, 178–192. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
Solomon, R. C. 1999. “Game theory as a model for business and business ethics.” Bus. Ethics Q. 9 (1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857632.
Sujati, H., and S. Gunarhadi. 2020. “Testing the construct validity and reliability of curiosity scale using confirmatory factor analysis.” J. Educ. Soc. Res. 10 (4): 229–237. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0080.
Taube, M. 2014. “Relationale korruption in der VR China. Institutionelle grundlagen und ihre (Dys) funktionalität für wirtschaftliche entwicklung und wachstum.” In (Dys-) functionalities of corruption, edited by T. Debiel, and A. Gawrich, 89–116. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04633-0_5.
Veselka, L., E. A. Giammarco, and P. A. Vernon. 2014. “The Dark Triad and the seven deadly sins.” Personality Individual Differ. 67 (Sep): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.055.
Wang, K., Y. Xu, C. Wang, M. Tan, and P. Chen. 2020. “A Corrected Goodness-of-Fit Index (CGFI) for model evaluation in structural equation modeling.” Struct. Equation Modell. Multidiscip. J. 27 (5): 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1695213.
Wang, L., D. Malhotra, and J. K. Murnighan. 2011. “Economics education and greed.” Acad. Manage. Learn. Educ. 10 (4): 643–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2009.0185.
Wang, Z., J. Liu, and X. Guan. 2022. “Investigating the causal complexity of corruption in project-based organizations: A scenario analysis of bidding activity in the Chinese construction sector.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (10): 3893–3916. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0841.
Zeelenberg, M., T. G. Seuntjens, N. van de Ven, and S. M. Breugelmans. 2020. “When enough is not enough: Overearning as a manifestation of dispositional greed.” Personality Individual Differ. 165 (Oct): 110155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110155.
Zhu, Y., X. Sun, S. Liu, and G. Xue. 2019. “Is greed a double-edged sword? The roles of the need for social status and perceived distributive justice in the relationship between greed and job performance.” Front. Psychol. 10 (Aug): 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02021.
Zulu, S., and F. Muleya. 2019. “A student perspective of ethics in the Zambian construction industry.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 17 (2): 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2018-0074.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: Oct 26, 2023
Accepted: Apr 3, 2024
Published online: Jul 3, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 3, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Building/Construction Management, Construction Engineering and Computational Modeling Research Group, Obafemi Awolowo Univ., Ife 220005, Nigeria. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-6211. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share