Reframing Sustainability Rating Systems to Emphasize Interconnected Benefits Increases Sustainable Design Practices among Engineers
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 8
Abstract
Engineering design and construction teams commonly use decision tools, such as rating systems, to manage the complexity of infrastructure projects. However, these systems often focus predominantly on environmental dimensions, potentially overlooking the holistic economic and social aspects of sustainability. This can hinder decision-makers from recognizing the benefits, thereby inadvertently impeding optimal sustainability performance. This research explores a potential solution: reframing the goals of credits on rating systems to explicitly highlight the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and financial dimensions. The aim was to amplify engineers’ motivation towards higher levels of sustainability performance. The study examined the effect of the goal-framed credits by comparing the sustainability scores between engineering professionals () who used the original Envision system and the reframed version when evaluating a case project. The control group participants averaged a score of 95.4 Envision points (37%), while the intervention group averaged 121.8 Envision points (48%). The reframed credits significantly increased engineering professionals’ sustainability goal setting. Emphasizing financial and social objectives on credits from the Envision rating system, rather than solely focusing on the existing environmental goals, had a favorable influence on professionals’ sustainable design choices. This reframing, by emphasizing the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and financial dimensions of each decision, appears to amplify the awareness, motivation, and selection of higher levels of sustainability achievement, thereby increasing their perceived value and leading to a shift in sustainability-oriented decision-making. The findings suggest that reframing rating systems to better emphasize the interconnectedness of the environmental, social, and financial dimensions of each decision can serve to help engineering teams set higher goals for sustainable performance.
Practical Applications
For infrastructure project managers, architects, and designers, this research highlights the significance of considering economic and social aspects alongside environmental concerns. By doing so, it can further empower stakeholders to make more well-rounded and sustainable decisions that benefit both their projects and the communities they serve. Small changes in how decision tools are worded, or framed, can have a significant effect on project goal setting. A better understanding of how framing affects design cognition can also help inform how project managers, architects, and designers present information to their clients. Subtle changes in the decision tools and the way information about projects is expressed cost little compared to the actual cost of infrastructure, offering inexpensive and easy to implement strategies to influence and nudge project teams toward setting higher sustainability goals during the design and construction of infrastructure projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (data and results).
References
Afzal, F., and B. Lim. 2022. “Organizational factors influencing the sustainability performance of construction organizations.” Sustainability 14 (16): 10449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610449.
Belayutham, S., V. A. González, and T. W. Yiu. 2017. “Lean-based clean earthworks operation.” J. Cleaner Prod. 142 (Jan): 2195–2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.060.
Benz, C., and C. Stryja. 2019. “Nudged to unload: Applying choice architecture to prevent cognitive overload of participants in open idea evaluation.” In Proc., 27th European Conf. on Information Systems (ECIS). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems.
Boyle, L., K. Michell, and F. Viruly. 2018. “A critique of the application of neighborhood sustainability assessment tools in urban regeneration.” Sustainability 10 (4): 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041005.
Butt, A. N., and B. Dimitrijević. 2022. “Multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaboration in nature-based design of sustainable architecture and urbanism.” Sustainability 14 (16): 10339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610339.
Cerezo-Narváez, A., A. Pastor-Fernández, M. Otero-Mateo, and P. Ballesteros-Pérez. 2020. “Integration of cost and work breakdown structures in the management of construction projects.” Appl. Sci. 10 (4): 13869. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041386.
Chaudhuri, A., Y. Li, and T. Paichayontvijit. 2016. “What’s in a frame? Goal framing, trust and reciprocity.” J. Econ. Psychol. 57 (Dec): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.005.
Chen, S., A. Y. Lee-Chai, and J. A. Bargh. 2001. “Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 80 (2): 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173.
Corbett, C. J., and S. Muthulingam. 2007. “Adoption of voluntary environmental standards: The role of signaling and intrinsic benefits in the diffusion of the LEED green building standards.” SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1009294.
Doan, D. T., A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, T. Zhang, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, and J. Tookey. 2017. “A critical comparison of green building rating systems.” Build. Environ. 123 (Oct): 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007.
do Canto, N. R., K. G. Grunert, and M. Dutra de Barcellos. 2022. “Goal-framing theory in environmental behaviours: Review, future research agenda and possible applications in behavioural change.” J. Social Mark. 13 (1): 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-03-2021-0058.
DuBose, J. R., S. J. Bosch, and A. R. Pearce. 2007. “Analysis of state-wide green building policies.” J. Green Build. 2 (2): 161–177. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.2.2.161.
Etienne, J. 2011. “Compliance theory: A goal framing approach.” Law Policy 33 (3): 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00340.x.
Gamliel, E., and R. Herstein. 2007. “The effect of framing on willingness to buy private brands.” J. Consum. Mark. 24 (6): 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710822918.
Harris, N., T. Shealy, and L. Klotz. 2016. “How exposure to ‘role model’ projects can lead to decisions for more sustainable infrastructure.” Sustainability 8 (2): 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020130.
Heath, C., R. P. Larrick, and G. Wu. 1999. “Goals as reference points.” Cognit. Psychol. 38 (1): 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708.
Hopkins, E. A., A. T. Carswell, and K. R. Love. 2020. “Impacts of ENERGY STAR appliances on US multifamily rents.” Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 49 (1): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12372.
Ismael, D., and T. Shealy. 2018a. “Aligning rating systems and user preferences: An initial approach to more sustainable construction through a behavioral intervention.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 716–725. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481301.071.
Ismael, D., and T. Shealy. 2018b. “Sustainable construction risk perceptions in the Kuwaiti construction industry.” Sustainability 10 (6): 1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061854.
Jalaei, F., and A. Jrade. 2015. “Integrating building information modeling (BIM) and LEED system at the conceptual design stage of sustainable buildings.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 18 (Nov): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.06.007.
Krishnamurthy, P., and A. Nagpal. 2010. “Making choices under conflict: The impact of decision frames.” Mark. Lett. 21 (1): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9079-0.
Kutty, A. A., G. M. Abdella, M. Kucukvar, N. C. Onat, and M. Bulu. 2020. “A system thinking approach for harmonizing smart and sustainable city initiatives with United Nations sustainable development goals.” Sustainable Dev. 28 (5): 1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2088.
Lavy, S., and J. L. Fernández-Solis. 2009. “LEED accredited professionals’ perceptions affecting credit point adoption.” Facilities 27 (13–14): 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770910996360.
Levin, I. P., G. J. Gaeth, J. Schreiber, and M. Lauriola. 2002. “A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 88 (1): 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2983.
Levin, I. P., S. L. Schneider, and G. J. Gaeth. 1998. “All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects.” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 76 (2): 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804.
Loewenstein, G., and R. H. Thaler. 1989. “Anomalies: Intertemporal choice.” J. Econ. Perspect. 3 (4): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.4.181.
Marshall, G. 2015. Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. London: Bloomsbury.
McCalley, L. T., and C. J. H. Midden. 2002. “Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation.” J. Econ. Psychol. 23 (5): 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00119-8.
McClure, J. B., E. J. Ludman, L. Grothaus, C. Pabiniak, and J. Richards. 2009. “Impact of a brief motivational smoking cessation intervention: The get PHIT randomized controlled trial.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 37 (2): 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.018.
McGraw, A. P., J. T. Larsen, D. Kahneman, and D. Schkade. 2010. “Comparing gains and losses.” Psychol. Sci. 21 (10): 1438–1445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610381504.
Olubunmi, O. A., P. B. Xia, and M. Skitmore. 2016. “Green building incentives: A review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 59 (Jun): 1611–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.028.
Paoletti, J., T. M. Bisbey, D. L. Reyes, M. A. Wettergreen, and E. Salas. 2020. “A checklist to diagnose teamwork in engineering education.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 36 (1): 365–377.
Pulaski, M., T. Pohlman, M. Horman, and D. Riley. 2012. “Synergies between sustainable design and constructability at the pentagon.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress: Wind of Change: Integration and Innovation, 1–8. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40671(2003)49.
Ropret Homar, A., and L. Knežević Cvelbar. 2021. “The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review.” Ecol. Econ. 183 (May): 106950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106950.
Rothman, A. J., and P. Salovey. 1997. “Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing.” Psychol. Bull. 121 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3.
Sabater-Grande, G., N. Georgantzís, and N. Herranz-Zarzoso. 2023. “Goals and guesses as reference points: A field experiment on student performance.” Theory Decis. 94 (2): 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09892-x.
Saha, J. K., R. Selladurai, M. V. Coumar, M. L. Dotaniya, S. Kundu, and A. K. Patra. 2017. “Impact of different developmental projects on soil fertility.” In Soil pollution—An emerging threat to agriculture, edited by J. K. Saha, R. Selladurai, M. V. Coumar, M. L. Dotaniya, S. Kundu, and A. K. Patra, 251–269. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4274-4_10.
Schmidt, R., Z. Chen, and V. Paz Soldan. 2022. “Choice posture, architecture, and infrastructure: Systemic behavioral design for public health policy.” J. Des. Econ. Innovation 8 (4): 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2022.08.002.
Scofield, J. H. 2013. “Efficacy of LEED-certification in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission for large New York City office buildings.” Energy Build. 67 (Dec): 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.032.
Shealy, T., E. Johnson, E. Weber, L. Klotz, S. Applegate, D. Ismael, and R. G. Bell. 2018. “Providing descriptive norms during engineering design can encourage more sustainable infrastructure.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 40 (Jul): 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.017.
Shealy, T., and L. Klotz. 2015. “Well-endowed rating systems: How modified defaults can lead to more sustainable performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (10): 04015031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001009.
Shealy, T., and L. Klotz. 2017. “Choice architecture as a strategy to encourage elegant infrastructure outcomes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (1): 04016023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000311.
Shinkle, J., T. W. Nesser, T. J. Demchak, and D. M. McMannus. 2012. “Effect of core strength on the measure of power in the extremities.” J. Strength Cond. Res. 26 (2): 373. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822600e5.
Shurrab, J., M. Hussain, and M. Khan. 2019. “Green and sustainable practices in the construction industry: A confirmatory factor analysis approach.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (6): 1063–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0056.
Steg, L., S. Lindenberg, and K. Keizer. 2016. “Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: The dynamics of overarching goals.” Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 9 (1–2): 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000077.
Thaler, R. H. 2015. Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Udeigwe, T. K., J. M. Teboh, P. N. Eze, M. Hashem Stietiya, V. Kumar, J. Hendrix, H. J. Mascagni, T. Ying, and T. Kandakji. 2015. “Implications of leading crop production practices on environmental quality and human health.” J. Environ. Manage. 151 (Mar): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.024.
Van de Velde, L., W. Verbeke, M. Popp, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2010. “The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy.” Energy Policy 38 (10): 5541–5549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.053.
Wang, L., Z.-X. Wang, Q. Zhang, A. Jebbouri, and P. P. W. Wong. 2022. “Consumers’ intention to visit green hotels-A goal-framing theory perspective.” J. Sustainable Tourism 30 (8): 1837–1857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1977937.
Wu, J., Y. Zhang, and Z. Shi. 2021. “Crafting a sustainable next generation infrastructure: Evaluation of China’s new infrastructure construction policies.” Sustainability 13 (11): 6245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116245.
Zhang, X., D. Schaumann, B. Haworth, P. Faloutsos, and M. Kapadia. 2019. “Multi-constrained authoring of occupant behavior narratives in architectural design.” In Proc., Symp. on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, 1–8. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150 • Issue 8 • August 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 30, 2023
Accepted: Mar 5, 2024
Published online: May 30, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.