Technical Papers
Jul 13, 2024

Risk Assessment of the Challenges in the Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 9

Abstract

To create a resilient environment, adaptive reuse of old buildings is becoming rampant through renovation, restoration, or refurbishment. Although such efforts bring advantages by preserving heritage assets while accommodating current needs, the challenges involved in this type of project are compelling. Therefore, this study is focused on assessing the risk level of common challenges in historic building renovation and restoration projects. By conducting a survey of industry practitioners, this study identified that the common challenges have a higher average frequency than their corresponding severity rankings. Also, the survey responses indicated schematic design estimates should include the highest contingency. This study has contributed to the body of knowledge in the adaptive reuse of buildings and risk management research domain by revealing the risk level of challenges in historical building renovation and restoration projects. Moreover, this study allows industry practitioners to better manage this type of project by understanding the relative frequency and severity of common challenges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data gathered during the study either appear in the submitted article or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude and appreciation to survey respondents for their participation in this research effort and to the research assistant, Sebastian Maurer for his efforts.

References

Aigwi, I. E., T. Egbelakin, and J. Ingham. 2018. “Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres.” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adap. 36 (4): 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007.
Altman, D. G. 1991. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall.
Arfa, F. H., B. Lubelli, H. Zijlstra, and W. Quist. 2022. “Criteria of ‘effectiveness’ and related aspects in adaptive reuse projects of heritage buildings.” Sustainability 14 (3): 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031251.
Arpitha, S. 2022. “Building a sustainable environment: A guide to adaptive reuse architecture.” Accessed May 4, 2023. https://parametric-architecture.com/building-a-sustainable-environment-a-guide-to-adaptive-reuse-architecture/.
Azizi, N. Z. M., A. A. Razak, M. A. M. Din, and N. M. Nasir. 2016. “Recurring issues in historic building conservation.” Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 222 (4): 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.217.
Bauerlein, D. 2015. “Clara white mission renovation comes up $400,000 short.” Accessed June 26, 2023. https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/2015/09/30/clara-white-mission-renovation-comes-400000-short/15682176007/.
Blau, R. 2020. “Epic $62m landmarks commission HQ project building history of cost overruns.” Accessed June 26, 2023. https://www.thecity.nyc/government/2020/2/18/21210516/epic-62m-landmarks-commission-hq-project-building-history-of-cost-overruns.
Bottero, M., C. D’Alpaos, and A. Oppio. 2019. “Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach.” Sustainability 11 (3): 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030785.
Bullen, P. A. 2007. “Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings.” Facilities 25 (1–2): 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770710716911.
Bullen, P. A., and P. E. Love. 2009. “Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: Learning from the experiences of Los Angeles.” Struct. Surv. 27 (5): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800911002611.
Bullen, P. A., and P. E. Love. 2010. “The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field.” Cities 27 (4): 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.005.
Burton-Jones, A. 2009. “Minimizing method bias through programmatic research.” MIS Q. 33 (3): 445–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650304.
Chapman, A. 2004. “Technology as world building.” Ethics Place Environ. 7 (1–2): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366879042000264778.
Conejos, S., C. Langston, E. H. Chan, and M. Y. Chew. 2019. “Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse.” Build. Res. Inf. 44 (5–6): 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951.
Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2013. “AdaptSTAR model: A climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability.” Habitat Int. 37 (Jan): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.003.
Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2015. “Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset: A comparison of adaptSTAR and Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) models.” Facilities 33 (9–10): 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0011.
Cooper, I. 2001. “Post-occupancy evaluation - where are you?” Build. Res. Inf. 29 (2): 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010016820.
Desanctis, G., and M. Poole. 1994. “Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory.” Organ. Sci. 5 (2): 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121.
Douglas, J. 2002. Building adaptation. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Forgues, D., and L. Koskela. 2009. “The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performance.” Int. J. Manage. Projects Bus. 2 (3): 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910971036.
Foster, G. 2020. “Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 152 (Jan): 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507.
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Gregory, J. 2004. Rehabilitation: New ways for older housing. Liverpool, AU: NSW Department of Housing.
Günçe, K., and D. Mısırlısoy. 2014. “Adaptive reuse of military establishments as museum: Conservation vs. museography.” In Defence sites II: Heritage and future, edited by C. A. Brebbia and C. Clark, 125–136. Southhampton, UK: WIT Press.
Günçe, K., and D. Mısırlısoy. 2019. “Assessment of adaptive reuse practices through user experiences: Traditional houses in the walled city of Nicosia.” Sustainability 11 (2): 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020540.
Hettema, J., and L. Egberts. 2019. “Designing with maritime heritage: Adaptive re-use of small-scale shipyards in northwest Europe.” J. Cult. Heritage Manage. Sustainable Dev. 10 (2): 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2019-0032.
Kelly, D., and H. J. Koo. 2023. “Challenges managing large historic building renovations: Lessons learned from Detroit, Michigan.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 150 (2): 05023015. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13555.
Langston, C., and R. Lauge-Kristensen. 2002. Strategic management of built facilities. London: Routledge.
Langston, C., F. K. Wong, E. C. Hui, and L. Y. Shen. 2008. “Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong.” Build. Environ. 43 (10): 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017.
Latham, D. 2000. Creative re-use of buildings: Volume II. Shaftesbury, UK: Donhead.
Li, Y., L. Zhao, J. Huang, and A. Law. 2021. “Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: A review.” Built Heritage 5 (8): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x.
Ostertagova, E., O. Ostertag, and J. Kováč. 2014. “Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 611 (Apr): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115.
Othman, A. A. E., and E. Heba. 2018. “Adaptive reuse: An innovative approach for generating sustainable values for historic buildings in developing countries.” Organ. Technol. Manage. Constr. Int. J. 10 (1): 1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0002.
Pintossi, N., D. Ikiz Kaya, and A. Pereira Roders. 2021a. “Assessing cultural heritage adaptive reuse practices: Multi-scale challenges and solutions in Rijeka.” Sustainability 13 (7): 3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073603.
Pintossi, N., D. Ikiz Kaya, and A. Pereira Roders. 2021b. “Identifying challenges and solutions in cultural heritage adaptive reuse through the historic urban landscape approach in Amsterdam.” Sustainability 13 (10): 5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105547.
Remøy, H., and T. van der Voordt. 2014. “Adaptive reuse of office buildings: Opportunities and risks of conversion into housing.” Build. Res. Inf. 42 (3): 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.865922.
Richardson, J. T., J. B. Slater, and J. Wilson. 2007. “The national student survey: Development, findings and implications.” Stud. Higher Educ. 32 (5): 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701573757.
Rochon, J., M. Gondan, and M. Kieser. 2012. “To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples.” BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 12 (8): 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-81.
Schwarz, N. 1996. “Survey research: Collecting data by asking questions.” In Applied social psychology edited by G. R. Semin and K. Fiedler, 65–90. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001.
Singh, V., V. K. Paul, and S. K. Solanki. 2022. “Feasibility study of adaptive reuse of old buildings.” Int. J. Housing Human Settlement Plann. 8 (1): 10–31.
Staley, R. 2006. “Practice points 01: Successful preservation implementation, a planned approach to risk management.” J. Preserv. Technol. 37 (2–3): 1–6.
Strack, F., and N. Schwarz. 1992. “Communicative influences in standardized question situations: The case of implicit collaboration.” In Language, interaction and social cognition, edited by G. R. Semin and K. Fiedler, 173–193. London: SAGE.
Tan, Y., C. Shuai, and T. Wang. 2018. “Critical success factors (CSFs) for the adaptive reuse of industrial buildings in Hong Kong.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (7): 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071546.
Tourangeau, R., L. J. Rips, and K. A. Rasinski. 2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Walsh, N. P. 2022. “Almost half of architecture billings include work to existing buildings says AIA Survey.” Accessed June 25, 2024. https://archinect.com/news/article/150329757/almost-half-of-architecture-billings-include-work-to-existing-buildings-says-aia-survey.
Yung, E. H., and E. H. Chan. 2012. “Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities.” Habitat Int. 36 (3): 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: Sep 26, 2023
Accepted: Apr 29, 2024
Published online: Jul 13, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State Univ., 5050 Anthony Wayne Dr., Detroit, MI 48202 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-8609. Email: [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, 2350 Hayward St., 2144 GG Brown Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1661-8991. Email: [email protected]
David Deman [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State Univ., 5050 Anthony Wayne Dr., Detroit, MI 48202. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share