Technical Papers
May 23, 2024

Determining Factors Influencing BIM Adoption: A Competency-Driven Approach

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 8

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) adoption has received increasing attention over the past two decades due to its potential to revolutionize the built asset industry. Several different characteristics, facilitators, and drivers of BIM adoption have been identified, which has led to the development of BIM adoption frameworks and guidelines. Many of these elements and frameworks have focused on specific organizational-, project-, or industry-level characteristics. Few have taken a competency-based approach to BIM adoption. Thus, this paper aims to empirically evaluate and validate the factors influencing BIM adoption within organizations operating in the built asset industry as understood through the evolution of their BIM competency profiles. The research consists of a mixed-method data collection on a sample set of 368 organizations participating in the Initiative Québécoise pour la Construction 4.0 (IQC 4.0). The research method of analysis is based on a bivariate approach for testing the correlation between the variables concerning the organization’s internal characteristics and their BIM competency development level. The findings show that the factors, which include field of activity, BIM experience, size, financial capacity, and geographical location, are correlated to an organization’s BIM competency development level; in parallel, an organization’s perceived maturity is strongly correlated. The results from this research can be potentially useful to properly guide and structure governmental initiatives supporting competency development for digital transformation.

Practical Applications

Government initiatives have been undertaken to promote the adoption of BIM in the built asset industry and to encourage organizations to undertake their digital transformation. The province of Quebec, Canada, has established a governmental roadmap for BIM adoption that identifies the key actions to be undertaken by all public bodies in the province to ensure a consistent approach to BIM adoption, and a targeted initiative supporting the digitalization of companies called IQC 4.0. The paper discusses the factors impacting BIM adoption through the lens of organizational competency, an approach not yet covered in the literature. The organizational competencies include managerial, administrative, functional, operational, technical, implementation, supportive, research and development, and normative (ISO) ones. Factors such as an organization’s size, field of activity, financial capacity, and location can influence the development of organizational competencies that impact BIM adoption. Moreover, the internal characteristics of an organization may have varying effects depending on the competencies involved. Those results will provide feedback and potentially inform governmental and organizational initiatives.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research was funded in part by the Quebec Ministry of Economy, Innovation and Energy. The data collection was conducted in collaboration with the Groupe BIM du Québec.

References

Abbasnejad, B., M. P. Nepal, A. Ahankoob, A. Nasirian, and R. Drogemuller. 2021. “Building information modelling (BIM) adoption and implementation enablers in AEC firms: A systematic literature review.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 17 (5–6): 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1793721.
Acar, E., I. Koçak, Y. Sey, and D. Arditi. 2005. “Use of information and communication technologies by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in building construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 23 (7): 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500127112.
Adeniyi, O., N. Thurairajah, and F. Leo-Olagbaye. 2022. “Rethinking digital construction: A study of BIM uptake capability in BIM infant construction industries.” Constr. Innov. 24 (2): 584–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-09-2021-0161.
Ahmed, A. L., and M. Kassem. 2018. “A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: Conceptual development, empirical validation and application.” Autom. Constr. 96 (Dec): 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.017.
Ahmed, A. L., J. P. Kawalek, and M. Kassem. 2017. “A comprehensive identification and categorisation of drivers, factors, and determinants for BIM adoption: A systematic literature review.” In Proc., Computing in Civil Engineering 2017, 220–227. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ahuja, R., A. Sawhney, M. Jain, M. Arif, and S. Rakshit. 2020. “Factors influencing BIM adoption in emerging markets—The case of India.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 20 (1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1462445.
Ayinla, K. O., and Z. Adamu. 2018. “Bridging the digital divide gap in BIM technology adoption.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 25 (10): 1398–1416. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2017-0091.
Boktor, J., A. Hanna, and C. C. Menassa. 2014. “State of practice of building information modeling in the mechanical construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (1): 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000176.
Brito, D. M. D., E. D. A. M. Ferreira, and D. B. Costa. 2021. “Framework for building information modeling adoption based on critical success factors from Brazilian public organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (7): 05021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002086.
Chen, Y., Y. Yin, G. J. Browne, and D. Li. 2019. “Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry: The technology-organization-environment framework.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (9): 1878–1898. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2017-0246.
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., J. Tookey, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, S. Azhar, O. Efimova, and K. Raahemifar. 2017. “Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75 (Aug): 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083.
Gouvernement du Québec. 2022. Feuille de route gouvernementale pour la modélisation des données du bâtiment (2021-2026). Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
Gu, N., and K. London. 2010. “Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry.” Autom. Constr. 19 (8): 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002.
Hochscheid, E., and G. Halin. 2018. “A model to approach BIM adoption process and possible BIM implementation failures.” In Proc., Creative Construction Conf. 2018, 257–264. Budapest, Hungary: Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics.
Hochscheid, E., and G. Halin. 2020a. “Generic and SME-specific factors that influence the BIM adoption process: An overview that highlights gaps in the literature.” Front. Eng. Manage. 7 (1): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0043-2.
Hochscheid, E., and G. Halin. 2020b. “Les agences d’architecture françaises à l’ère du BIM: Contradictions, pratiques, réactions et perspectives.” Les Cahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagère 2020 (Dec): 9–10. https://doi.org/10.4000/craup.6201.
Hosseini, M. R., S. Banihashemi, N. Chileshe, M. O. Namzadi, C. Udaeja, R. Rameezdeen, and T. McCuen. 2016. “BIM adoption within Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): An innovation diffusion model.” Constr. Econ. Build. 16 (3): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v16i3.5159.
Hosseini, M. R., E. A. Pärn, D. J. Edwards, E. Papadonikolaki, and M. Oraee. 2018. “Roadmap to mature BIM use in Australian SMEs: Competitive dynamics perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (5): 05018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000636.
ISO. 2018. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM)—Information management using building information modelling—Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO 19650-1:2018. Geneva: ISO.
Joseph Garcia, A., S. Mollaoglu, and M. Syal. 2018. “Implementation of BIM in small home-building businesses.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 23 (2): 04018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000362.
Jung, Y., and M. Joo. 2011. “Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation.” Autom. Constr. 20 (2): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010.
Karampour, B., et al., 2021. “Formulating a strategic plan for BIM diffusion within the AEC Italian industry: The application of diffusion of innovation theory.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 26 (1): 161–184. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.1.8.
Khosrowshahi, F., and Y. Arayici. 2012. “Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 19 (6): 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211277531.
Kim, S., C. H. Park, and S. Chin. 2016. “Assessment of BIM acceptance degree of Korean AEC participants.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1163–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0647-y.
Kouch, A. M. 2018. “A three-step BIM implementation framework for the SME contractors.” In Product lifecycle management to support industry 4.0, edited by P. Chiabert, A. Bouras, F. Noël, and J. Ríos, 15–24. Berlin: Springer.
Lakusic, S. 2023. “BIM Adoption for effective interface management in Indian construction industries.” Građevinar 75 (3): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.3559.2022.
Liao, L., E. A. L. Teo, R. Chang, and X. Zhao. 2020. “Diffusion of building information modeling in building projects and firms in Singapore.” Sustainability 12 (18): 7762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187762.
Lidelöw, S., S. Engström, and O. Samuelson. 2023. “The promise of BIM? Searching for realized benefits in the Nordic architecture, engineering, construction, and operation industries.” J. Build. Eng. 76 (Oct): 107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107067.
Machado, F. A., J. P. M. Delatorre, and R. C. Ruschel. 2021. “BIM in Latin American countries: An analysis of regulation evolution.” In Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, edited by E. Toledo Santos and S. Scheer, 425–451. Berlin: Springer.
Mahamadu, A.-M., P. Manu, L. Mahdjoubi, C. Booth, C. Aigbavboa, and F. H. Abanda. 2019. “The importance of BIM capability assessment: An evaluation of post-selection performance of organisations on construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (1): 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0357.
Munianday, P., A. R. Radzi, M. Esa, and R. A. Rahman. 2022. “Optimal strategies for improving organizational BIM capabilities: PLS-SEM approach.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 04022015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001038.
Murguia, D., P. Demian, and R. Soetanto. 2021. “Systemic BIM adoption: A multilevel perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (4): 04021014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002017.
Mustaffa, N. E., R. M. Salleh, H. Liyana, and B. T. Ariffin. 2017. “Experiences of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in various countries.” In Proc., 2017 Int. Conf. on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 1–7. New York: IEEE.
Nonirit, E., É. A. Poirier, and D. Forgues. 2023. “Assessing the assessor: A framework for BIM maturity, capacity, and competency evaluation at the organizational level.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 50 (3): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2022-0041.
Oke, A., G. Burke, and A. Myers. 2007. “Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs.” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 27 (7): 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756974.
Olawumi, T. O., and D. W. M. Chan. 2018. “Identifying and prioritizing the benefits of integrating BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 40 (Jun): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.033.
Poirier, E., S. Staub-French, and D. Forgues. 2015. “Embedded contexts of innovation: BIM adoption and implementation for a specialty contracting SME.” Constr. Innovation 15 (1): 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-01-2014-0013.
Poirier, E. A., N. Lafioune, É.-C. Forgues, and V. Duceppe. 2019. Principes du déploiement de la modélisation des données du bâtiment (Building Information Modeling—BIM). Québec, Canada: Groupe BIM du Québec.
Poirier, E. A., Y. Mezrag, and S. Brodeur. 2021. “Rapport d’analyse des résultats des phases I et II des diagnostics numériques.” Accessed April 30, 2024. https://www.bimquebec.org/ressources.
Poirier, E. A., S. Staub-French, M. Whitell, A. Shahi, and N. Dadmehr. 2022. Digital transformation in the Canadian built asset industry: Priorities for BIM policy, standardization, and guidance. Québec, Canada: Canadian Standards Association.
Prabhakaran, A., A.-M. Mahamadu, L. Mahdjoubi, J. Andric, P. Manu, and D. Mzyece. 2021. “An investigation into macro BIM maturity and its impacts: A comparison of Qatar and the United Kingdom.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 17 (5–6): 496–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2021.1923454.
Rajabi, M. S., A. R. Radzi, M. Rezaeiashtiani, A. Famili, M. E. Rashidi, and R. A. Rahman. 2022a. “Key assessment criteria for organizational BIM capabilities: A cross-regional study.” Buildings 12 (7): 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12071013.
Rajabi, M. S., M. Rezaeiashtiani, A. R. Radzi, A. Famili, A. Rezaeiashtiani, and R. A. Rahman. 2022b. “Underlying factors and strategies for organizational BIM capabilities: The case of Iran.” Appl. Syst. Innov. 5 (6): 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5060109.
Saka, A. B., and D. W. M. Chan. 2021. “Adoption and implementation of building information modelling (BIM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): A review and conceptualization.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (7): 1829–1862. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0332.
Sena, T. C. D., and M. M. Fabricio. 2022. “Framework proposal for BIM implementation in Brazilian construction and development companies.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (5): 2101–2123. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0942.
Shehzad, H. M. F., R. Binti Ibrahim, A. F. Yusof, K. A. Mohamed Khaidzir, S. Shawkat, and S. Ahmad. 2022a. “Recent developments of BIM adoption based on categorization, identification and factors: A systematic literature review.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 22 (15): 3001–3013. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1837719.
Shehzad, H. M. F., R. Ibrahim, K. Anwar Mohamed Khaidzir, F. Maqbool, M. Jauharul Fuady, M. Ilyas, and A. F. Bin Yusof. 2022b. “Determinants of building information modeling adoption: The case of the Malaysian construction industry.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. of Reliable Information and Communication Technology, 57–82. Nanjing, China: Nanjing Univ. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2022.84885.
Shojaei, R. S., K. Oti-Sarpong, and G. Burgess. 2023. “Enablers for the adoption and use of BIM in main contractor companies in the UK.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (4): 1726–1745. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2021-0650.
Statistics Canada. 2021. “Dictionary, census of population, 2021.” Accessed April 30, 2024. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/dict/az/Definition-eng.cfm?ID=geo049a.
Succar, B. 2009. “Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders.” Autom. Constr. 18 (3): 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003.
Succar, B. 2019. 201in competency table (2.1). Geneva: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2550442.
Succar, B., and E. Poirier. 2020. “Lifecycle information transformation and exchange for delivering and managing digital and physical assets.” Autom. Constr. 112 (Apr): 103090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103090.
Van Tam, N., T. N. Diep, N. Quoc Toan, and N. Le Dinh Quy. 2021. “Factors affecting adoption of building information modeling in construction projects: A case of Vietnam.” Cogent Bus. Manage. 8 (1): 1918848. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1918848.
Venter, B., S. P. Ngobeni, and H. Du Plessis. 2021. “Factors influencing the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in the South African construction and built environment (CBE) from a quantity surveying perspective.” Eng. Manage. Prod. Serv. 13 (3): 142–150. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0027.
Wong, A. K. D., F. K. W. Wong, and A. Nadeem. 2010. “Attributes of building information modelling implementations in various countries.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 6 (4): 288–302. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS6.
Wu, C., B. Xu, C. Mao, and X. Li. 2017. “Overview of BIM maturity measurement tools.” J. Inf. Technol. Construct. 22 (3): 34–62.
Yang, J.-B., and H.-Y. Chou. 2018. “Mixed approach to government BIM implementation policy: An empirical study of Taiwan.” J. Build. Eng. 20 (Nov): 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.08.007.
Yilmaz, G., A. Akcamete, and O. Demirors. 2019. “A reference model for BIM capability assessments.” Autom. Constr. 101 (May): 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.022.
Yilmaz, G., A. Akcamete, and O. Demirors. 2023. “BIM-CAREM: Assessing the BIM capabilities of design, construction and facilities management processes in the construction industry.” Comput. Ind. 147 (May): 103861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103861.
Yilmaz, G., A. Akcamete-Gungor, and O. Demirors. 2017. “A review on capability and maturity models of building information modeling.” In Proc., Joint Conf. on Computing in Construction Lean and Computing in Construction Congress, 627–636. Crete, Greece: Heriot-Watt Univ.
Yu, J., and S. Lee. 2023. “Comparative study on BIM acceptance model by adoption period.” Buildings 13 (6): 1450. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061450.
Zhang, R., Y. Tang, L. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2020. “Factors influencing BIM adoption for construction enterprises in China.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8848965.
Zhou, Y., L. Ding, Y. Rao, H. Luo, B. Medjdoub, and H. Zhong. 2017. “Formulating project-level building information modeling evaluation framework from the perspectives of organizations: A review.” Autom. Constr. 81 (Jun): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.05.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 8August 2024

History

Received: Sep 14, 2023
Accepted: Feb 23, 2024
Published online: May 23, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 23, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100, rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, Québec, Canada. H3C 1K3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-0097. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100, rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, Québec, Canada. H3C 1K3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-7221. Email: [email protected]
Nathalia de Paula [email protected]
Research Associate, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100, rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, Québec, Canada. H3C 1K3 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share