Integrating Virtual Reality and Consensus Models for Streamlined Built Environment Design Collaboration
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 4
Abstract
Collaboration in design decision-making is a critical factor in enhancing the quality of built environments. However, several factors, such as the lack of clarity in the negotiation process, the diverse disciplinary backgrounds of stakeholders, and conformity bias, pose significant challenges, rendering the collaboration in built environment design time-consuming. To overcome these challenges and improve the efficiency of collaborative design, a novel solution that introduces a consensus model enhanced by virtual reality (VR) is proposed in this paper. The proposed model implements a structured decision-making process to foster fact-based discussions and minimize conflicts arising from personal biases. It ensures equal influence among all stakeholders, prevents the dominance of any single viewpoint, and offers personalized recommendations to guide stakeholders toward group consensus while respecting their initial preferences. The study leverages VR techniques to enhance communication and comprehension during design negotiations. The VR collaboration platform provides a robust visualization and user-friendly interface, empowering stakeholders to understand the decision-making process better and iteratively refine their preferences for optimal user satisfaction. By integrating VR, the burden traditionally placed on a moderator in group decision-making (GDM) is reduced, resulting in a more streamlined and efficient collaborative process. Additionally, stakeholders can conveniently communicate their preferences remotely through cloud services within the immersive VR collaboration environment, further enhancing the overall design collaboration experience. To the best knowledge of the authors, this study is the first attempt to combine a consensus model with VR to create a comprehensive solution that supports stakeholders in achieving consensus design solutions in the early design stage. This study contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field of design collaboration by exploring the potential benefits of a VR-enhanced consensus model for GDM.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to the Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta for their review and approval of the test case conducted in this study (Pro00119069). This project is supported by the Alberta Innovates Graduate Student Scholarship program from Alberta Innovates, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 90YAH23019), and the Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science (Grant No. 23YJCZH311).
References
Alonso, S., E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Chiclana, and F. Herrera. 2010. “A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences.” Inf. Sci. 180 (23): 4477–4495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.005.
Aly, S., and I. Vrana. 2008. “Evaluating the knowledge, relevance and experience of expert decision makers utilizing the Fuzzy-AHP.” Agric. Econ. 54 (11): 529–535.
Arroyo, P., C. Fuenzalida, A. Albert, and M. R. Hallowell. 2016. “Collaborating in decision making of sustainable building design: An experimental study comparing CBA and WRC methods.” Energy Build. 128 (Jul): 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.079.
Bhooshan, S. 2017. “Collaborative design.” Archit. Des. 87 (3): 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2177.
Bonissone, P. P., and K. S. Decker. 1986. “Selecting uncertainty calculi and granularity: An experiment in trading-off precision and complexity.” Mach. Intell. Pattern Recognit. 4 (Jan): 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-70058-2.50021-8.
Chen, Z. S., X. Zhang, R. M. Rodríguez, W. Pedrycz, and L. Martínez. 2021. “Expertise-based bid evaluation for construction-contractor selection with generalized comparative linguistic ELECTRE III.” Autom. Constr. 125 (Feb): 103578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103578.
Cho, J. Y., M. H. Cho, and N. Kozinets. 2016. “Does the medium matter in collaboration? Using visually supported collaboration technology in an interior design studio.” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 26 (4): 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9322-3.
Dong, Y., Q. Zha, H. Zhang, G. Kou, H. Fujita, F. Chiclana, and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2018. “Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges.” Knowl. Based Syst. 162 (Jan): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036.
Elf, M., P. Frö, G. Lindahl, and H. Wijk. 2015. “Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments-time to begin improving quality.” BMC Health Serv. Res. 15 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0782-7.
Faidley, J., D. H. Evensen, J. Salisbury-Glennon, J. Glenn, and C. E. Hmelo. 2000. “How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context.” In Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions, 109–135. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
Flavián, C., S. Ibáñez-Sánchez, and C. Orús. 2019. “The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience.” J. Bus. Res. 100 (Oct): 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050.
Ghoddousi, P., F. Nasirzadeh, and H. Hashemi. 2018. “Evaluating highway construction projects’ sustainability using a multicriteria group decision-making model based on bootstrap simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (9): 04018092. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001514.
Hoisington, A. J., K. A. Stearns-Yoder, S. J. Schuldt, C. J. Beemer, J. P. Maestre, K. A. Kinney, T. T. Postolache, C. A. Lowry, and L. A. Brenner. 2019. “Ten questions concerning the built environment and mental health.” Build. Environ. 155 (Jan): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.036.
Islam, M. S., M. P. Nepal, and M. Skitmore. 2019. “Modified fuzzy group decision-making approach to cost overrun risk assessment of power plant projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001593.
Issa, R. R. A. 2000. “Virtual reality: A solution to seamless technology integration in the AEC industry.” In Proc., Construction Congress VI, 1007–1013. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Khoshnava, S. M., R. Rostami, A. Valipour, M. Ismail, and A. R. Rahmat. 2018. “Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method.” J. Cleaner Prod. 173 (Mar): 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.066.
Kim, M. J., X. Wang, P. E. D. Love, H. Li, and S. C. Kang. 2013. “Virtual reality for the built environment: A critical review of recent advances.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 18 (Aug): 279–305.
Kohler, T., J. Fueller, D. Stieger, and K. Matzler. 2011. “Avatar-based innovation: Consequences of the virtual co-creation experience.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 27 (1): 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.019.
Koutsabasis, P., S. Vosinakis, K. Malisova, and N. Paparounas. 2012. “On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design.” Des. Stud. 33 (4): 357–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.11.004.
Kwon, T.-W., K.-T. Lee, J.-H. Kim, and J.-J. Kim. 2022. “Proposal of hierarchical organization structure for negotiation consensus in multinational joint-client megaprojects: Case of US force relocation program in Korea.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (2): 05022019. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12567.
Lee, H. S. 2005. “On fuzzy preference relation in group decision making.” Int. J. Comput. Math. 82 (2): 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020716042000272548.
Liu, X., Y. Xu, Z. Gong, and F. Herrera. 2022. “Democratic consensus reaching process for multi-person multi-criteria large scale decision making considering participants’ individual attributes and concerns.” Inf. Fusion 77 (Sep): 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.023.
Luck, R. 2018. “Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times.” Des. Stud. 59 (Jun): 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.003.
Rahim, M. A. 2023. Managing conflict in organizations. London: Taylor & Francis.
Self, J. A. 2016. “Problem or solution focused? Ill-defined design problems and the influence of design ability.” In Proc., DESIGN 2016 14th Int. Design Conf., 67–76. Cavtat, Croatia: The Design Society.
Shameri, M. A., M. A. Alghoul, O. Elayeb, M. F. M. Zain, M. S. Alrubaih, H. Amir, and K. Sopian. 2013. “Daylighting characteristics of existing double-skin façade office buildings.” Energy Build. 59 (Jun): 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.12.025.
Shanthi Priya, R., P. Shabitha, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2020. “Collaborative and participatory design approach in architectural design studios.” Social Sci. Humanit. Open 2 (1): 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100033.
Singhaputtangkul, N., and X. Zhao. 2016. “Applying a fuzzy consensus scheme to enhance the group decision making of a building envelope design team.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (8): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001142.
Uribe Larach, D., and J. F. Cabra. 2010. “Creative problem solving in second life: An action research study.” Creativity Innovation Manage. 19 (2): 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00550.x.
van Dijk, T. 2021. “What collaborative planning practices lack and the design cycle can offer: Back to the drawing table.” Plann. Theory 20 (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220913073.
Wang, H., L. Duanmu, R. Lahdelma, and X. Li. 2018. “A fuzzy-grey multicriteria decision making model for district heating system.” Appl. Therm. Eng. 128 (Mar): 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.048.
Wu, J., and F. Chiclana. 2014. “visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations.” Inf. Sci. 279 (Aug): 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.025.
Wu, J., L. Dai, F. Chiclana, H. Fujita, and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2018. “A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust.” Inf. Fusion 41 (Sep): 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.012.
Xu, X., Z. Du, X. Chen, and C. Cai. 2019. “Confidence consensus-based model for large-scale group decision making: A novel approach to managing non-cooperative behaviors.” Inf. Sci. 477 (Mar): 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.058.
Zhang, B., Y. Dong, and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2019a. “Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: An automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching.” Group Decis. Negotiation 28 (3): 585–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-09609-y.
Zhang, F., Y. Ju, E. D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, A. Wang, P. Dong, and M. Giannakis. 2021. “A new framework to select energy-efficient retrofit schemes of external walls: A case study.” J. Cleaner Prod. 289 (Apr): 125718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125718.
Zhang, H., Y. Dong, F. Chiclana, and S. Yu. 2019b. “Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275 (2): 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052.
Zhang, H., Y. Dong, and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2018. “Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26 (2): 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2697403.
Zhang, Y., H. Liu, S.-C. Kang, and M. Al-Hussein. 2020. “Virtual reality applications for the built environment: Research trends and opportunities.” Autom. Constr. 118 (Aug): 103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103311.
Zhou, X., L. Wang, H. Liao, S. Wang, B. Lev, and H. Fujita. 2019. “A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information.” Knowl. Based Syst. 168 (Sep): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.029.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150 • Issue 4 • April 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 2, 2023
Accepted: Oct 6, 2023
Published online: Jan 18, 2024
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 18, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.