Asphalt Material E-Ticketing Workflow: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 3
Abstract
E-ticketing was an intriguing technology to many state transportation agencies (STAs) pre-COVID-19 pandemic but gained significant attention upon arrival of the pandemic due to the contactless nature of the technology. Research completed prior to the pandemic into E-ticketing for asphalt paving primarily identified qualitative benefits and concerns. However, minimal academic literature exists in the postpandemic era discussing the additional E-ticketing benefits not previously captured which resulted in increased implementation by STAs. This research seeks to address this gap by gathering information from state members of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Committee on Construction (AASHTO COC), employees of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), and members of the Kentucky Association of Highway Contractors (KAHC) and the Plantmix Asphalt Industry of Kentucky (PAIKY) regarding E-ticketing practices for asphalt paving in the postpandemic era. The first portion of the study combines national and state-level survey responses to create a qualitative benefit-cost analysis for E-ticketing for asphalt paving operations based upon experience gained through emergency implementation during the pandemic. To reinforce the results of the qualitative analysis and increase the power of the study, the second portion of the research creates a quantitative benefit-cost analysis (BCA) from data collected from KYTC construction projects to compare the traditional weigh ticket collection process with E-ticketing processes for both project engineers and inspectors. The analysis shows a statistically significant time savings for field employees but not project management personnel. The monetary analysis for Kentucky indicates that whereas E-ticketing does not result in significant time savings for all employees, there is substantial monetary benefit worthy of STAs adopting E-ticketing as policy. The primary contributions to the body of knowledge include an improved BCA methodology applied to a new domain of electronic bulk material tickets and an informed quantitative BCA framework useful for STAs as a proof-of-concept to champion E-ticketing implementation and by transportation-focused researchers for evaluating emerging technological applications.
Practical Applications
Previous research has focused on improving safety and task efficiency for field employees associated with asphalt paving operations. E-ticketing (electronic ticketing) has been proposed as an innovative technology to help augment typical tasks associated with asphalt paving. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, several state transportation agencies (STAs) had introduced pilot projects to study E-ticketing, but these yielded minimal policy adoption results. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many STAs pivoted to emergency usage of E-ticketing as the primary means of collecting information about asphalt material used on construction projects. This research compares previous qualitative analyses regarding the benefits and concerns associated with E-ticketing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with lessons learned by STAs across the country after utilizing E-ticketing during the pandemic. Additionally, a case study focused on the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) is used to create a quantitative benefit-cost analysis from project-level data collected from various asphalt paving projects during the 2022 construction season. The findings indicate a statistically significant time savings for field employees utilizing E-ticketing and a benefit-cost ratio that promotes STAs adopting E-ticketing as a permanent policy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the research support provided by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Committee on Construction, the Kentucky Association of Highway Contractors, the Plantmix Asphalt Industry of Kentucky, and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.
References
Americans for Transportation Mobility. 2019. “Kentucky’s transportation network shows how old bridges, maintenance backlogs & lack of new federal funding hurt U.S. communities.” Accessed June 28, 2023. https://www.fasterbettersafer.org/2019/03/kentuckys-transportation-network-shows-how-old-bridges-maintenance-backlogs-lack-of-new-federal-funding-hurt-u-s-communities/.
Arler, F. 2006. Ethics and cost-benefit analysis. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Univ.
ASCE. 2021. “2021 report card for America’s infrastructure.” Accessed October 24, 2022. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National_IRC_2021-report.pdf.
Bour, S. M. 2022. “Construction contracting basics–Unit prices.” Accessed June 28, 2023. https://learn.aiacontracts.com/articles/6538689-construction-contracting-basics-unit-prices/.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2021. “May 2021 state occupational employment and wage estimates–Kentucky.” Accessed February 9, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_ky.htm#47-0000.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2023. “State occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities.” Accessed January 10, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/iif/state-data.htm#KY.
Chi, S., S. Han, and D. Y. Kim. 2013. “Relationship between unsafe working conditions and workers’ behavior and impact of working conditions on injury severity in U.S. construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (7): 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000657.
Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Crossett, J., and L. Hines. 2007. Comparing state DOTs’ construction project cost and schedule performance–28 best practices from 9 states. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Dadi, G., R. Sturgill, D. Patel, C. Van Dyke, and G. Mulder. 2020. Electronic ticketing of materials for construction management. NCHRP synthesis 545. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Dao, B., S. Kermanshachi, J. Shane, S. Anderson, and E. Hare. 2017. “Exploring and assessing project complexity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (5): 04016126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001275.
Embacher, R. 2021. “Use of material delivery management system (MDMS) for asphalt paving applications.” Accessed September 22, 2022. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot56866.
Ewerhart, C., and K. Fieseler. 2003. “Procurement auctions and unit-price contracts.” RAND J. Econ. 34 (3): 568–580. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593747.
Federal Highway Administration. 2016. “Highway statistics 2016.” Accessed August 8, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2016/hm12.cfm.
Federal Highway Administration. 2017. “EDC-4 summit summary and baseline report.” Accessed August 2, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/reports/edc4_baseline/.
Federal Highway Administration. 2020a. “E-ticketing: implementation.” Accessed August 2, 2022. https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/2022-02/Task%20715_HPA_Presentation_508_FINAL%20%281%29.pdf.
Federal Highway Administration. 2020b. “Worker safety.” Accessed July 25, 2021. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/workersafety/index.htm.
Federal Highway Administration. 2021a. “E-ticketing and digital as-builts.” Accessed August 2, 2022. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc_6/eticketing.cfm.
Federal Highway Administration. 2021b. “FHWA work zone facts and statistics.” Accessed July 25, 2021. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/facts_stats.htm.
Gurevich, U., and R. Sacks. 2020. “Longitudinal study of BIM adoption by public construction clients.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (4): 05020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000797.
Hyari, K., N. Shatarat, and A. Khalafallah. 2017. “Handling risks of quantity variations in unit-price contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 143 (10): 04017079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001393.
Ikpe, E., F. Hammon, and D. Oloke. 2012. “Cost-benefit analysis for accident prevention in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (8): 991–998. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000496.
Kasim, N. 2015. “Intelligent materials tracking system for construction projects management.” J. Eng. Techn. Sci. 47(2): 218–230. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.2.11.
Kimmel, S., N. Toohey, and J. Delborne. 2015. Innovation at the crossroads: Exploring the intersection of innovation adoption and specification reform in public highway construction. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Liu, X., Y. Yin, and K. Choi. 2022. “Economical validation of residential solar power investment: A cost-benefit analysis approach.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 05022006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001031.
Mandell, S., and F. Brunes. 2014. “Quantity choice in unit price contract procurements.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy 48 (3): 483–497.
Mulder, G. 2019. “Iowa experience electronic tickets (e-Tickets).” Accessed April 13, 2023. https://www.concretestate.org/uploads/1/1/8/9/118914016/2019_iowa_icpa_etickets.pdf.
Murphy, G. T., J. Patel, L. I. Boden, and J. Boden. 2021. “Workers’ compensation: Benefits, costs, and coverage (2019 data).” Accessed February 9, 2023. https://www.nasi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021-Workers-Compensation-Report-2019-Data.pdf.
National Safety Council. 2023. “Work injury costs.” Accessed April 12, 2023. https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/work/costs/work-injury-costs/#:∼:text=Cost%20per%20medically%20consulted%20injury,costs%20except%20to%20motor%20vehicles.
Navon, R., and Y. Shpatnitsky. 2005. “A model for automated monitoring of road construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 23(9): 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500183917.
Nipa, T. J., B. Rouhanizadeh, and S. Kermanshachi. 2019. “Utilization and implementation of the E-Ticketing technology to electronically track the delivery of construction materials.” In Proc., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conf. Pointe Claire, QC, Canada: Canadian Society of Civil Engineering.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2023. “OSHA’s $afety pays program.” Accessed March 7, 2023. https://www.osha.gov/safetypays/estimator.
Powe, S. 2020. “COVID-19 impact on E-ticketing.” Accessed July 25, 2021. https://construction.transportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2020/08/COVID-19-Impact-on-e-Ticketing.pdf.
Robertson, G., S. Zhang, and S. Bogus. 2022. Challenges of implementing E-ticketing for rural transportation construction projects. Arlington, VA: Construction Research Congress.
Saad, D. A., and T. Hegazy. 2015. “Enhanced benefit-cost analysis for infrastructure fund allocation.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 42 (2): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0281.
Sadasivam, S., R. Sturgill, J. Mallela, and G. Dadi. 2021. “E-ticketing implementation plan.” Accessed September 16, 2022. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/60767.
Sinden, A. 2015. “Formality and informality in cost-benefit analysis.” Accessed October 25, 2022. https://scholarshare.temple.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.12613/6614/Sinden-JournalArticle-2015.pdf?sequence=1.
Sturgill, R., G. Dadi, C. Van Dyke, D. Patel, J. Withrow, and C. Newcomer. 2019. E-tickets and advanced technologies for efficient construction inspections. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center.
Subramanya, K., and S. Kermanshachi. 2022. E-ticketing technology in construction projects: Adoption, benefits, and challenges. Arlington, VA: Construction Research Congress.
Taghizadeh, A., A. Jafari, and S. Kermanshachi. 2020. Exploring project management practices in the U.S. transportation agencies. Arlington, VA: Construction Research Congress.
Taylor, T., and W. Maloney. 2013. Forecasting highway construction staffing requirements. NCHRP synthesis 450. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Transportation Research Board. 1996. Building momentum for change: Creating a strategic forum for innovation in highway infrastructure—Special report 249. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Weisner, K. 2021. “FHWA EDC-3/4 e-construction & EDC-6 E-ticketing.” Accessed July 19, 2023. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DOT/documents/AEC/IHEEP/FHWA-EDC-6-e-Ticketing-and-EDC-34-e-Construction.pdf.
Wilkinson, C., and T. Schroeder. 2020. “E-tickets.” Accessed September 1, 2021. https://construction.transportation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2020/08/Iowa-e-ticketing.pdf.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150 • Issue 3 • March 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 28, 2023
Accepted: Oct 6, 2023
Published online: Dec 19, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 19, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.