Case Studies
Feb 11, 2023

Cooperative Learning in Green Building Demonstration Projects: Insights from 30 Innovative and Environmentally Sustainable Demonstrations around the World

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

Within the context of sustainable innovation in the building industry, the goal of this study is to investigate and discuss forms of cooperative learning in project organizations as an opportunity for realizing sustainable innovation. This paper analyzes 30 worldwide cases of sustainably innovative building projects, concentrating on the cooperative learning behavior of actors that ignite and contribute to sustainable building innovation. The analysis sheds light on three clusters of project organizations, their typical cooperative learning processes, and the cooperative sustainable learning effects achieved. Theoretically, this work contributes by suggesting an analytical model to study learning forms that support sustainable building innovation; practically, this study indicates that cooperative learning practices facilitate professionals, regardless of their role in project organizations, to be innovators in proposing and achieving green innovation in the construction engineering sector.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Almeida, M. V., and A. L. Soares. 2014. “Knowledge sharing in project-based organizations: Overcoming the informational limbo.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34 (6): 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.07.003.
Altman, Y., and P. Iles. 1998. “Learning, leadership, teams: Corporate learning and organisational change.” J. Manage. Dev. 17 (1): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719810368682.
Austin-Smith: Lord. 2019. “South Lanarkshire College low carbon teaching.” Accessed August 6, 2019. https://www.austinsmithlord.com/projects/south-lanarkshire-college-low-carbon-teaching-building/.
Bellison, R., and E. Chul. 2019. “Learning pathways and the governance of innovations in urban climate change resilience and adaptation.” J. Environ. Policy Plann. 21 (1): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1493916.
Blayse, M., and K. Manley. 2004. “Key influences on construction innovation.” Constr. Innovation 4 (3): 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170410815060.
Bloomberg. 2023. “The smartest building in the world.” Accessed January 18, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-the-edge-the-worlds-greenest-building/.
Boh, W. F. 2007. “Mechanisms for sharing knowledge in project-based organizations.” Inf. Organ. 17 (1): 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.10.001.
Bos, J. J., R. R. Brown, and M. A. Farrelly. 2013. “A design framework for creating social learning situations. Global Environ. Change 23 (2): 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.003.
Bossink, B. A. G. 2013. Eco-innovation and sustainability management. New York: Routledge.
Bossink, B. A. G. 2018. “The influence of knowledge flow on sustainable innovation in a project-based industry: From demonstration to limited adoption of eco-innovations.” J. Cleaner Prod. 193 (Aug): 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.063.
Bossink, B. A. G. 2020. “Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 131 (Oct): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110025.
Bowley, M. 1960. Innovations in building materials. London: Duckworth.
Bowley, M. 1966. The British building industry. Four studies in response and resistance to change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method). 2019. “The Edge, Amsterdam.” Accessed August 2, 2019. https://www.breeam.com/case-studies/offices/the-edge-amsterdam/.
Brown, H. S., and P. J. Vergragt. 2008. “Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 75 (1): 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.014.
Brown, J., and C. Hendry. 2009. “Public demonstration projects and field trials: Accelerating commercialisation of sustainable technology in solar photovoltaics.” Energy Policy 37 (7): 2560–2573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.040.
Build Up. 2017. “The edge: Amsterdam office building with highest BREEAM score to date.” Accessed January 11, 2017. http://www.buildup.eu/en/practices/cases/edge-amsterdam-office-building-highest-breeam-score-date.
Bygballe, L., and M. Ingemansson. 2011. “Public policy and industry views on innovation in construction.” IMP J. 5 (3): 157–171.
Bygballe, L., and M. Ingemansson. 2014. “The logic of innovation in construction. Ind. Mark. Manag. 43 (3): 512–524.
Cacciatori, E. 2008. “Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adaptive learning in project-based firms.” Res. Policy 37 (9): 1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.028.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2013. Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings, sustainability of construction works. Brussels, Belgium: CEN-CENELEC Management Centre.
Coppo, M., P. Pelacchi, F. Pilo, G. Pisano, G. G. Soma, and R. Turri. 2015. “The Italian smart grid projects: Selection and assessment of the test beds for the regulation of smart electricity distribution.” Electr. Power Syst. Resilience 120 (Mar): 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.06.018.
Davidson, M. C. G., and L. De Marco. 1999. “Corporate change: Education as a catalyst.” Int. J. Contemp. Hospitality Manage. 11 (1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596119910250355.
Davies, L. L., K. Uchitel, and J. Ruple. 2013. “Understanding barriers to commercial-scale carbon capture and sequestration in the United States: An empirical assessment.” Energy Policy 59 (Aug): 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.033.
Dubois, A., and L. E. Gadde. 2002. “The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 20 (7): 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210163543.
Dunphy, D., and D. Stace. 1993. “The strategic management of corporate change.” Hum. Relations 46 (8): 905–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600801.
Duodu, B., and S. Rowlinson. 2019. “Intellectual capital for exploratory and exploitative innovation: Exploring linear and quadratic effects in construction constructor firms.” J. Intellectual Capital 20 (3): 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2018-0144.
Ecran, T. 2019. “Building the link between technological capacity strategies and innovation in construction companies.” In Sustainable management practice. London: IntechOpen.
Egan, J. 1998. Re-thinking construction. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Femenías, P. 2004. “Demonstration projects for sustainable building: Towards a strategy for sustainable development in the building sector based on Swedish and Dutch experience.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Built Enviroment & Sustsinable Development, Chalmers Univ. of Technology.
Frishammar, J., P. Söderholm, K. Bäckström, H. Hellsmark, and H. Ylinenpää. 2015. “The role of pilot and demonstration project plants in technological development: Synthesis and directions for future research.” Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 27 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.943715.
Gann, D. M. 1997. “Should governments fund construction research?” Build. Res. Inf. 25 (5): 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132197370228.
Gann, D. M. 2000. Building innovation. London: Thomas Telford.
Gann, D. M. 2001. “Putting academic ideas into practice: Technological progress and the absorptive capacity of construction organizations.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 19 (3): 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190010020480.
Gann, D. M., and A. J. Salter. 2000. “Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems.” Res. Policy 29 (7–8): 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1.
Groak, S. 1992. The idea of building: Thought and action in the design and production of buildings. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
Groak, S., and F. Krimgold. 1989. The practitioner researcher in the building industry. London: Barlett School of Architecture.
Harrison, L., and A. Waluszewsky. 2008. “The development of a user network as a way to re-launch an unwanted product. Res. Policy 37 (1): 115–130.
Heiskanen, E., H. Nissilä, and R. Lovio. 2015. “Demonstration buildings as protected spaces for clean energy solutions—The case of solar building integration in Finland.” J. Cleaner Prod. 109 (Dec): 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.090.
Hellsmark, H., J. Frishammar, P. Söderholm, and H. Ylinenpää. 2016. “The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technology development and innovation policy.” Res. Policy 45 (9): 1743–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.005.
Hendry, C., P. Harborne, and P. Brown. 2010. “So what do innovating companies really get from publicly funded demonstration projects and trials? Innovation lessons from solar photovoltaics and wind.” Energy Policy 38 (8): 4507–4519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.005.
Holzbau, R. 2019. “Guastalla Kindergarten.” Accessed August 2, 2019. https://www.rubner.com/en/holzbau/references/reference/iride-daycare-facility-guastalla-re-ita/.
Jensen, P., H. L. Rasmussen, and S. Chatzilazarau. 2019. “Knowledge transfer between building operation and building projects.” J. Facility Manage. 17 (2): 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-05-2018-0030.
Katzer, J. M. 2010. “Sustainable research, development, and demonstration project (RD&D).” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (21): 10154–10158. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1005965.
Kern, F., J. Gadde, J. Meadowcroft, and J. Watson. 2016. “The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects.” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 102 (Jan): 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.010.
Knauseder, I., P. E. Josephson, and A. Styhre. 2003. “Learning capability in construction projects: From the learning organization to the learning projects.” In Proc., CIB W99 Quality and Safety on Construction Sites. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Kua, H. W., and S. E. Lee. 2002. “Demonstration intelligent building—A methodology for the promotion of total sustainability in the built environment.” Build. Environ. 37 (3): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00002-6.
Law, N., and L. Liang. 2019. “Socitechnical co-evolution of an e-learning innovation network.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50 (3): 1340–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12768.
Lorenzen, M. 2007. “Social capital and localised learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics.” Urban Stud. 44 (4): 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601184752.
Manseau, A. 2019. Building tomorrow: Innovation in construction and engineering. New York: Routledge.
McElroy, M. 2003. The new knowledge management. Complexity, learning, and sustainable innovation. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Mlecnik, E. 2014. “Which factors determine the success of strategic niche developments? Reflections from the emergence of a passive house network.” Constr. Innovation 14 (1): 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-01-2012-0007.
Mlecnik, E. 2016. “Activating the adoption of innovation: Lessons from a passive house network.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 6 (2): 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2014-0036.
Nam, C. H., and C. B. Tatum. 1989. “Toward understanding of product innovation process in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 115 (4): 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1989)115:4(517).
Nigra, M. 2019. “Patterns of sustainable innovation in the building industry. Towards a strategic management perspective on environmental, social, and economic values.” Doctorate dissertation, Dept. of Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino.
Nigra, M., and B. Dimitrijevic. 2018. “Is radical innovation critical to sustainable architecture? Lessons from three Scottish contemporary buildings.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 14 (4): 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2018.1465392.
NLÉ Architects. 2019. “The Makoko Floating School.” Accessed August 2, 2019. http://www.nleworks.com/case/makoko-floating-school/.
O’Connor, G. C. 1998. “Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects.” J. Prod. Innovation Manage. 15 (2): 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00078-7.
Pearce, D. W. 2003. The social and economic value of construction: The construction industry’s contribution to sustainable development. London: New Construction Research and Innovation Strategy Panel.
Pries, F., and F. Janszen. 1995. “Innovation in the construction industry: The dominant role of the environment.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 13 (1): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199500000006.
Senge, P., A. Kleiner, C. Roberts, R. Ross, G. Roth, B. Smith, and E. C. Guman. 1999. The dance of change: The challenges to sustain momentum in learning organizations. New York: Wiley Periodic.
Slaughter, S. 1998. “Models of construction innovation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (3): 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226).
Solli-Sæther, H., J. T. Karlsen, and K. J. Van Oorschot. 2015. “Strategic and cultural misalignment: Knowledge sharing barriers in project networks.” Project Manage. 46 (3): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21501.
USGBC. 2019. “The Edge and OAK timber tower—PLP Architects.” Accessed April 27, 2018. https://www.usgbc.org/education/sessions/green-building-festival-conference/edge-and-oakwood-timber-tower-plp-architecture.
Wendt, K. 2019. Positive impact investing: A sustainable bridge between strategy, innovation, change and learning. New York: Springer.
Whyte, J., B. Ewenstein, M. Hales, and J. Tidd. 2008. “Visualizing knowledge in project-based work. Long Range Plann. 41 (1): 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.10.006.
Winch, G. 1998. “Zephyrs of creative destruction: Understanding the management of innovation in construction.” Build. Res. Inf. 26 (5): 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132198369751.
Yin, K. R. 2013. Case study research, design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Ystrom, A., S. Ollila, and M. Agoguè. 2018. “The role of a learning approach in building an interorganizational network aiming for collaborative innovation.” J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 55 (1): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886318793383.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Jul 7, 2022
Accepted: Nov 28, 2022
Published online: Feb 11, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 11, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Interuniversity Dept. of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli, 39, Turin, TO 10125, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-6136. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Science, Business, and Innovation, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081 HV, Netherlands. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-5121. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share