Isomorphic Pressures to Catalyze Innovation Diffusion in Construction Project–Based Organizations: Identification of Source Factors
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 2
Abstract
Innovation is widely considered the lifeblood of organizational survival and growth. However, despite its importance, innovation diffusion does not take place spontaneously in organizations. In fact, diffusion of innovations (DoI) in project-based organizations (PBOs) is widely considered notoriously lukewarm. Nevertheless, it is inspiring to observe that project teams could suddenly change their lukewarm attitude in DoI when they receive pressure from the authority and industrial associations, or when they notice their peers starting to adopt an innovation. There seem to be some isomorphic pressures such as coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures that drive DoI. This research aims to identify the source factors of the isomorphic pressures that can be used to catalyze innovation diffusion with a focus on construction PBOs. It does so by conducting a 3-year in-depth case study in an international construction firm using a mixed-method approach including semiconstructed interviews and nonparticipatory observations. The research identified 12 specific source factors under the three categories of isomorphic pressure, i.e., coercive pressure, mimetic pressure, and normative pressure. Coercive pressure can arise from organizational policy, company culture, and influence from seniors; memetic pressure can stem from the influence of peer project teams as well as change agents such as innovation champions; and normative pressure derives from the sharing in regular events/meetings and related training. The practical contribution is that based on the source factors identified, top managers can tactically create such pressures to catalyze DoI meanwhile avoiding excessive pressures that might hinder DoI in their companies. Future studies are recommended to unravel the mechanism through which these source factors interact to take an effect, and based on that, devise the strategies that can harness the isomorphic pressures to boost DoI.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. (Survey response, and blockchain prototype code.)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Research Postgraduate Graduate (RPG) fund from the University of Hong Kong for its generous support.
References
Ajzen, I. 1985. “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior.” In Action control, 11–39. Berlin: Springer.
Amoako, G. K., A. M. Adam, G. Tackie, and C. L. Arthur. 2021. “Environmental accountability practices of environmentally sensitive firms in Ghana: Does institutional isomorphism matter?” Sustainability 13 (17): 9489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179489.
Aubert, B., P. M. Léger, and D. Larocque. 2012. “Differentiating weak ties and strong ties among external sources of influences for enterprise resource planning (ERP) adoption.” Enterprise Inf. Syst. 6 (2): 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2011.638728.
Baker, L. C. 2001. “Managed care and technology adoption in health care: Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging.” J. Health Econ. 20 (3): 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00072-8.
Baker, M. 2015. “Why innovation is the key that will unlock global growth.” Accessed January 23, 2022. https://goo.gl/Hchyag.
Barlett, K., J. L. Blanco, D. Rockhill, and G. Strube. 2019. “Breaking the mold: The construction players of the future.” Accessed March 12, 2021. https://mck.co/3Jik2RP.
Bartunek, J., and M. R. Louis. 1996. Insider/outsider team research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bi, W., W. S. Lu, Z. Zhao, and C. Webster. 2021. “Combinatorial optimization of construction waste collection and transportation: A case study of Hong Kong.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 179 (Apr): 106043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106043.
Bresnen, M., A. Goussevskaia, and J. Swan. 2004. “Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations.” Organ. Stud. 25 (9): 1535–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604047999.
Cao, D., H. Li, and G. Wang. 2014. “Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (2): 04014056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000903.
Chien, S.-S. 2008. “The isomorphism of local development policy: A case study of the formation and transformation of national development zones in post-Mao Jiangsu, China.” Urban Stud. 45 (2): 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098007085963.
CIC (Construction Industry Council). 2022. “Training.” Accessed August 1, 2022. https://www.cic.hk/eng/main/trainingservices/.
Currie, W. L., and M. W. Guah. 2007. “Conflicting institutional logics: A national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare.” J. Inf. Technol. 22 (3): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000102.
Davis, F. D. 1985. “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Delmas, M., and M. W. Toffel. 2004. “Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework.” Bus. Strategy Environ. 13 (4): 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.409.
DiMaggio, P., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” Am. Sociological Rev. 48 (2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
Dubois, A., and L. E. Gadde. 2002. “The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: Implications for productivity and innovation.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 20 (7): 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210163543.
Edwards, J. R., D. S. Mason, and M. Washington. 2009. “Institutional pressures, government funding and provincial sport organisations.” Int. J. Sport Manage. Marketing 6 (2): 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2009.028798.
Edwards-Schachter, M. 2018. “The nature and variety of innovation.” Int. J. Innovation Stud. 2 (2): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.004.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
Elangovan, N. 2015. “Isomorphic pressures of Cluster Institutions on ERP adoption: A study in SME cluster of Indian knitwear industry.” J. Enterp. Resour. Plann. Stud. 25 (1): 860631. https://doi.org/10.5171/2015.860631.
Emmitt, S. 1997. “The diffusion of innovations in the building industry.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Architecture, Univ. of Manchester.
Engwall, M. 2003. “No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context.” Res. Policy 32 (5): 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4.
Gann, D. 2000. Building innovation: Complex constructs in a changing world. London: Thomas Telford.
Ho, O. S. T. 2020. “Digital construction—How to bridge the last 100m?” Accessed January 23, 2022. https://www.bim.cic.hk/en/events/detail/296?preview=y.
Hobday, M. 2000. “The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?” Res. Policy 29 (7–8): 871–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4.
Järvinen, J. 2006. “Institutional pressures for adopting new cost accounting systems in Finnish hospitals: Two longitudinal case studies.” Financ. Accountability Manage. 22 (1): 1017731.
Kraus, S., W. McDowell, E. E. Ribeiro-Soriano, and M. Rodríguez-García. 2021. “The role of innovation and knowledge for entrepreneurship and regional development.” Entrepreneurship Reg. Dev. 33 (3–4): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2021.1872929.
Lai, K. H., C. W. Wong, and T. E. Cheng. 2006. “Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management.” Comput. Ind. 57 (1): 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.05.002.
Latif, B., Z. Mahmood, O. T. San, M. R. Said, and A. Bakhsh. 2020. “Coercive, normative and mimetic pressures as drivers of environmental management accounting adoption.” Sustainability 12 (11): 4506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114506.
Lindkvist, L. 2004. “Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies.” J. Manage. Governance 8 (1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MAGO.0000015392.75507.ad.
Liu, D. D., W. S. Lu, and Y. H. Niu. 2018. “Extended technology-acceptance model (TAM) to make smart construction systems successful.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001487.
Liu, H., W. Ke, K. K. Wei, J. Gu, and H. Chen. 2010. “The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems.” J. Oper. Manage. 28 (5): 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010.
Lu, W. S., A. M. M. Liu, S. M. Rowlinson, and S. W. Poon. 2012. “Sharpening competitive edge through procurement innovation: Perspectives from Chinese international construction companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (3): 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000614.
Lundblad, J. P. 2003. “A review and critique of Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organizations.” Organ. Dev. J. 21 (4): 50.
Madon, S., N. Reinhard, D. Roode, and G. Walsham. 2009. “Digital inclusion projects in developing countries: Processes of institutionalization.” Inf. Technol. Dev. 15 (2): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20108.
Meadows, M., K. Ball, E. Daniel, S. Dibb, and K. Spiller. 2010. Transferring the ‘War on Terror’ to the private sector: Practice perspective on organisational tensions. Rome: Strategic Management Society.
Mizruchi, M. S., and L. C. Fein. 1999. “The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism.” Admin. Sci. Q. 44 (4): 653–683. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667051.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018. Guidelines for collecting. Paris: OECD Development Center.
O’Sullivan, D., and L. Dooley. 2009. Applying innovation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Pal, A., and A. K. Ojha. 2017. “Institutional isomorphism due to the influence of information systems and its strategic position.” In Proc., 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conf. on Computers and People Research, 147–154. Waco, TX: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems.
Peng, C. H. 2020. “The last mile of BIM—How to deal with it?” Accessed January 23, 2022. http://5bur.cscec.com/oa/dtxw/202006/3122819.html.
Prencipe, A., and F. Tell. 2001. “Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms.” Res. Policy 30 (9): 1373–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3.
Rajão, R., and N. Hayes. 2009. “Conceptions of control and IT artefacts: An institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system.” J. Inf. Technol. 24 (4): 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.12.
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations (various Ed.). New York: Free Press.
Seyfried, M., M. Ansmann, and P. Pohlenz. 2019. “Institutional isomorphism, entrepreneurship and effectiveness: The adoption and implementation of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany.” Tertiary Educ. Manage. 25 (2): 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09022-3.
Shibeika, A., and C. Harty. 2015. “Diffusion of digital innovation in construction: A case study of a UK engineering firm.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 33 (5–6): 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1077982.
Sørensen, F., J. Mattsson, and J. Sundbo. 2010. “Experimental methods in innovation research.” Res. Policy 39 (3): 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.006.
Teo, H. H., K. K. Wei, and I. Benbasat. 2003. “Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective.” MIS Q. 27 (1): 19–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518.
Thiry, M., and M. Deguire. 2007. “Recent developments in project-based organisations.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (7): 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.001.
Trampusch, C. 2010. “Co-evolution of skills and welfare in coordinated market economies? A comparative historical analysis of Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland.” Eur. J. Ind. Relations 16 (3): 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680110375129.
Tuttle, B., and J. Dillard. 2007. “Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in US accounting research.” Accounting Horiz. 21 (4): 387–409. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.4.387.
Wang, J., and W. S. Lu. 2021. “A deployment framework for BIM localization.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (1): 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0747.
Winch, G. 1998. “Zephyrs of creative destruction: Understanding the management of innovation in construction.” Build. Res. Inf. 26 (5): 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132198369751.
Wright, R. E., J. C. Palmar, and D. C. Kavanaugh. 1995. “The importance of promoting stakeholder acceptance of educational innovations.” Education 115 (4): 628–633.
Wu, T., E. M. Daniel, M. Hinton, and P. Quintas. 2013. “Isomorphic mechanisms in manufacturing supply chains: A comparison of indigenous Chinese firms and foreign-owned MNCs.” Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 18 (2): 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541311318809.
Xu, J. Y., W. S. Lu, and E. Papadonikolaki. 2021. “Human-organization-technology (HOT) fit model for BIM adoption in construction project organizations: Impact factor analysis using social network analysis and comparative case study.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 04022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001013.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149 • Issue 2 • February 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 21, 2022
Accepted: Oct 12, 2022
Published online: Dec 5, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 5, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Ruyan Zhang, Yongcheng Fu, Yongqiang Chen, Bo Du, Down to Earth: Implementing Project-Level ESG Metrics in Chinese AEC Firms’ Practices, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5941, 40, 5, (2024).