Theoretical Study of Self-Balancing Pretensioned CFRP Cable Braces for Seismic Resistance of Buildings
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 4
Abstract
Earthquakes cause nonstructural, if not structural, damage to buildings. This damage is proportional to interstory drift (ISD). Concentric braced frames (CBFs) are one of the most effective measures to limit the ISD in steel buildings. When compressed, conventional concentric hot-rolled (HR) steel braces tend to buckle when slender and are aesthetically unpleasant if stocky. This limitation of conventional concentric hot-rolled steel braces motivates the present work to use pretensioned carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) cables as braces in CBFs. The theoretically proposed self-balancing pretensioned CFRP cable braces (SPCCBs) in CBFs eliminate buckling in braces and provide a comparable elastic strain energy reserve for earthquake resistance design. Being slender, SPCCBs will add to the aesthetic beauty of buildings. The performance of the SPCCB system was evaluated by comparing it with conventional CBFs using stocky HR. CFRP cables with two different tensile strengths were used as braces in the SPCCB system, i.e., CFRP cable with tensile strength of 4,700 MPa (CB4700) and 3,600 MPa (CB3600). Fifty-seven models (19 each for HR, CB4700, and CB3600) were prepared using a commercially available code and were designed using Indian standards, keeping the compressive capacity of the braces similar for all three systems. The performance of all of the aforementioned systems was evaluated on the basis of energy dissipation (through total strain energy capacity of braces), fundamental time period, base shear attracted, ISD, and size of braces. This study showed that the SPCCB system has not only improved the strain energy capacity but also reduced the base shear compared to conventional hot-rolled steel brace CBFs. The overall performance of the building with CB4700 braces was found to be the best, followed by CB3600 and HR braces. Finally, a design guideline for the SPCCB system was proposed by following the Indian standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgments
The first author acknowledges the student’s scholarship from the Ministry of Human Resources and Development, Government of India, India.
Author contributions: All the data in the manuscript are generated by the combined effort of Mr. Prateek Narayan Panda, Prof. Anupam Chakrabarti, and Prof. Vipul Prakash. The first draft of the manuscript has been prepared by Mr. Prateek Narayan Panda, and all the authors read and commented on all the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- ,
- composite areas of CB3600 and CB4700 cable braces, respectively;
- Ag, N
- gross area of the cross section and applied axial compressive load, respectively;
- b and c
- and h/L, respectively;
- bf, d, D
- width of flange, inner depth of the web, and overall depth of the beam, respectively;
- Cmy, Cmz, CmLT
- equivalent uniform moment factors;
- Dslab
- depth of the RCC slab;
- EHR, ECB
- modulus of elasticity of hot-rolled sections and CFRP cables in MPa, respectively;
- fcd
- design stress under axial compression as governed by buckling;
- fcre, σs
- expected critical stress and postyield strength in HR braces, respectively;
- fy, fu, fyw
- yield, tensile strength, and the yield strength of the web;
- h, L
- story height and bay width, respectively;
- Izz, Iyy
- second moment of area about major (zz) and minor (yy) axes, respectively;
- Lyy
- buckling length about the minor (yy) axis;
- lb
- length of the brace;
- M, V
- applied moment and shear;
- Md,zz, Md,yy
- design bending strength about major (zz) and minor (yy) axes, respectively;
- Ncr
- Euler's buckling load;
- Ncr,zz, Ncr,yy
- Euler's buckling load about major (zz) and minor (yy) axes, respectively;
- Nd
- design compressive strength due to yielding;
- Ndb
- design capacity under axial compression as governed by buckling;
- Ndb,yy, Ndb,zz
- design strength under axial compression as governed by buckling about minor (yy) and major (zz) axes, respectively;
- Ps,b
- ultimate compressive force in hot-rolled braces;
- Ps,c
- cable pretension force;
- Q1 and Q2
- applied lateral force in the top roof and first floor level, respectively;
- , W
- acceleration coefficient and seismic weight;
- s, Ry
- length of yield plateau under axial compression and over strength factor;
- T
- fundamental time period of the building;
- TEHR, TECB3600, and TECB4700
- total strain energy capacity of HR, CB3600, and CB4700 braces, respectively;
- tf, tw
- thickness of the flange and web, respectively;
- Vb
- base shear;
- Vs
- shear-wave velocity;
- Ybeam, Yslab
- centroid distance of the steel beam and RCC slab, respectively;
- Z, I, R
- zone factor, importance factor, and response reduction factor, respectively;
- Zpz, Zpy
- plastic sectional modulus about major (zz) and minor (yy) axes, respectively;
- Δzz, Leff
- maximum deflection in beam and effective length against buckling, respectively;
- r, λ
- radius of gyration and slenderness ratio of the brace, respectively;
- λc
- nondimensional effective slenderness ratio;
- α, Ky, Kz, KLT
- imperfection factors;
- axial stress and axial strain, respectively;
- σexp,
- expected strength and strain under axial compression in HR braces, respectively;
- σps,
- permissible strength and permissible strain in CB braces, respectively;
- ,
- permissible strength and permissible strain in CB3600 braces, respectively; and
- ,
- permissible strength and permissible strain in CB4700 braces, respectively.
References
Al-Saidy, A. H., F. W. Klaiber, and T. J. Wipf. 2004. “Repair of steel composite beams with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer plates.” J. Compos. Construct. 8 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(163).
ANSI/AISC (American National Standards Institute/American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016a. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-16. Chicago: ANSI/AISC.
ANSI/AISC (American National Standards Institute/American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016b. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. Chicago: ANSI/AISC.
ANSI/SEI (American National Standards Institute/Structural Engineering Institute). 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: ANSI/SEI.
ANSI/SEI (American National Standards Institute/Structural Engineering Institute). 2016. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ANSI/SEI.
Atasever, K., S. Inanaga, T. Takeuchi, Y. Terazawa, and O. C. Celik. 2020. “Experimental and numerical studies on buckling restrained braces with posttensioned carbon fiber composite cables.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (15): 1640–1661. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3321.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1 general provisions and building (sixth revision). IS 1893. New Delhi: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2011. Hot rolled medium and high tensile structural steel-specification. 7th ed. IS 2062. New Delhi: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2007. General construction in steel—Code of practice (third revision). IS 800. New Delhi: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, part 2 imposed loads (second revision). IS 875 (Part 2). New Delhi: BIS.
Bozkurt, M. B., and C. Topkaya. 2016. “Development of welded overlap core steel encased buckling-restrained braces.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 127: 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.07.034.
Bozorgnia, Y., and V. V. Bertero. 2004. Earthquake engineering from engineering seismology to performance based engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Clark, P.W., I. D. Aiken, F. F. Tajirian, K. Kasai, E. Co, and I. Kimura. 1999. “Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices.” In Int. Post-SMiRT Conf. Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures. Berkeley, CA: Seismic Isolation Engineering.
CSI (Computer and Structures, Inc., Analysis Reference Manual). 2019. Structural analysis programme. SAP2000 version 21.0.2. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
Deng, K., P. Pan, X. Nie, X. Xu, P. Feng, and L. Ye. 2015. “Study of GFRP steel buckling restraint braces.” J. Compos. Construct. 19 (6): 04015011 (8). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000567.
Ghowsi, A. F., and D. R. Sahoo. 2021. “Cyclic behavior of all-steel BRBs with bolted angle restrainers: Testing and numerical analysis.” J. Earthquake Eng. 27 (2): 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.2002217.
Guo, T., J. Wang, Y. Song, W. Xuan, and Y. Chen. 2020. “Self-centering cable brace with friction devices for enhancing seismic performance of RC frame structures.” Eng. Struct. 207: 110–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110187.
Guo, Y. N., B. H. Zhang, B. L. Zhu, P. Zhou, Y. H. Zhang, and J. Z. Tong. 2017. “Theoretical and experimental studies on battened buckling-restrained braces.” Eng. Struct. 136: 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.034.
Hjelmstad, K. D., and E. P. Popov. 1984. “Characteristics of eccentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 110 (2): 340–553. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:2(340).
Hou, X., and H. Tagawa. 2009. “Displacement-restraint bracing for seismic retrofit of steel moment frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (5): 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.11.008.
Lee, K. S. 2015. “An experimental study on non-compression X-bracing systems using carbon fiber composite cables for seismic strengthening of RC buildings.” Polymers 7 (9): 1716–1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7091480.
Liang, Y., C. Sun, and F. Ansari. 2011. “Damage assessment and ductility evaluation of post tensioned beams with hybrid FRP tendons.” J. Compos. Construct. 15 (3): 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000166.
Liu, T., Y. Xiao, J. Yang, and B. S. Chen. 2017. “CFRP strip cable retrofit of RC frame for collapse resistance.” J. Compos. Construct. 21 (1): 04016067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000722.
Liu, Y., B. Zwingmann, and M. Schlaich. 2015. “Carbon fiber reinforced polymer for cable structures—A review.” Polymers 7 (10): 2078–2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7101501.
Mehrabi, M. H., Z. Ibrahim, S. S. Ghodsi, and M. Suhatril. 2019. “Seismic characteristics of X-cable braced frames bundled with a pre-compressed spring.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 116: 732–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.014.
Miller, J. D., L. A. Fahnestock, and M. R. Eatherton. 2012. “Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace.” Eng. Struct. 40: 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.
Mousavi, S. A., and S. M. Zahrai. 2016. “Contribution of pre-slacked cable braces to dynamic stability of non-ductile frames; an analytical study.” Eng. Struct. 117: 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.013.
PEER Database. “NGA-West2 Flatfile of 5% damped spectra of vertical ground motion.” Accessed April 14, 2015. https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/data-sciences/databases
Ren, L., Z. Fang, and K. Wang. 2019. “Design and behavior of super-long cable-stayed bridge with CFRP cables and UHPC members.” Composites, Part B 164: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.060.
Ricles, J. M., and E. P. Popov. 1987. Experiments on eccentrically braced frames with composite floors. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERC) Report No. 87-06. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California
Ricles, J. M., and E. P. Popov. 1989. “Composite action in eccentrically braced frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 115 (8): 2046–2066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(2046).
Roeder, C. W. 1989. “Seismic behavior of concentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 115 (8): 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(1837).
Roeder, C. W., and E. P. Popov. 1977. Inelastic behavior of eccentrically braced steel frames under cyclic loadings. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERC) Report No. 77–18. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California,
Saberi, V., M. Gerami, and A. Kheyroddin. 2016. “Seismic rehabilitation of bolted end plate connections using post-tensioned tendons.” Eng. Struct. 129: 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.037.
Timoshenko, S. P., and J. M. Gere. 2012. Theory of elastic stability. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw-Hill Edition.
van Zili, G. P. A. G., and P. A. de Vries. 2005. “Masonary wall crack control with carbon fiber reinforced polymer.” J. Compos. Construct. 9 (1): 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:1(84).
Wang, W., Q. Han, J. Xu, Q. Cao, and Y. Chang. 2023. “A novel integrated sleeve-wedge anchorage system for multi-tendon CFRP cable utilized in cable roof structures: Concept and numerical investigation.” J. Build. Eng. 76: 107404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107404.
Xiong, W., C. S. Sai, Y. Zhang, and R. Xiao. 2011. “Study of super long span cable-stayed bridges with CFRP components.” Eng. Struct. 33 (2): 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.013.
Yang, D., J. Zhang, S. Song, F. Zhou, and C. Wang. 2018. “Experimental investigation on the creep property of carbon fiber reinforced polymer tendons under high stress levels.” Materials 11 (11): 2273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112273.
Zhang, A., Y. Zhang, R. Li, and Z. Y. Wang. 2016. “Cyclic behavior of a prefabricated self-centering beam–column connection with a bolted web friction device.” Eng. Struct. 111: 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.025.
Zhou, Z., Q. Xie, X. C. Lei, X. T. He, and S. P. Meng. 2015. “Experimental investigation of the hysteretic performance of dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces with composite tendons.” J. Compos. Construct. 19 (6): 04015011 (13). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000565.
Zhu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2008. “Seismic analysis of concentrically braced frame systems with self-centering friction damping braces.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (1): 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(121).
Zhu, S., and Y. Zhang. 2007. “Seismic behavior of self-centering braced frame buildings with reusable hysteretic damping brace.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (10): 1329–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.683.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 19, 2023
Accepted: Mar 26, 2024
Published online: May 30, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Bracing
- Cables
- Carbon fibers
- Construction engineering
- Construction methods
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Equipment and machinery
- Fiber reinforced polymer
- Fibers
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Materials processing
- Polymer
- Pretensioning
- Strength of materials
- Synthetic materials
- Tensile strength
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.