Technical Papers
Dec 11, 2023

Theoretical Model for the Shear Strength of Prestressed Concrete Beams with FRP Tendons

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 1

Abstract

Prestressing tendons made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) are a promising alternative to conventional steel tendons in prestressed concrete structures owing to their corrosion resistance. However, the shear strength of FRP prestressed concrete beams is still not well understood. This paper presents a theoretical model for predicting the shear strength of prestressed concrete beams with FRP tendons or strands, with and without FRP shear reinforcement. The model is an extension of the compression chord capacity model (CCCM), originally proposed for steel-reinforced concrete structures, which has been adapted to account for the particularities of FRP as active and passive reinforcement. The model is applicable to rectangular, T, and I sections and accounts for reductions in shear strength caused by bond loss in FRP tendons. Experimental validation of the model was performed by comparing the theoretical predictions for 55 shear tests found in the literature. Good accuracy was obtained in predicting the ultimate shear capacity of beams and identifying shear bond failures observed in some tests.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data and models that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The study presented in this paper was developed in the scope of research projects RTI2018-097314-B-C21 and PID2021-123701OB-C21 funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
a
shear span;
b
width;
bv,eff
shear effective width;
bw
web width;
b0
effective width of the diagonal strut in the beam web (deducting the diameter of ducts in post-tensioned reinforcement);
c
neutral axis depth;
c0
neutral axis depth for the state of zero prestressing;
cw
vertical projection of the length along the crack where the tensile stresses are extended;
d
effective depth;
ds
effective depth of the passive reinfrocement;
d0
effective depth of the cross section, d, but not less than 100 mm;
e
beam offset;
fc
concrete compressive strength;
fct
tensile strength of concrete;
fyw
yield strength of the transverse reinforcement;
h
overall depth of the concrete cross section;
hf
flange thickness;
lav
available bonded length between the critical shear crack and the free end of the beam;
lreq
anchorage length required to develop the tensile force of the prestressing reinforcement at the cracked section.;
s
stirrups spacing;
scr
distance of the first crack to the zero bending moment point;
u
total perimeter of prestressing reinforcement;
vc
nondimensional shear strength contribution of concrete;
vcc
nondimensional shear resisted in the uncracked region subjected to flexural compression forces;
vw
nondimensional shear transferred across the web by aggregate interlock and residual stresses;
vl
nondimensional shear resisted by the longitudinal reinforcement;
vs
nondimensional shear resisted by the transverse reinforcement;
x
coordinate in the longitudinal direction of the beam;
y
vertical coordinate from the top fiber of the concrete element;
z
lever arm;
Ac
concrete cross-sectional area;
Asw
area of the transverse reinforcement;
Afw
area of the FRP transverse reinforcement;
C
compression force in the concrete compression chord;
Ecm
modulus of elasticity of concrete;
Ef
modulus of elasticity of the FRP reinforcement;
Fp
tensile force of prestressing reinforcement at the critical crack;
Gf
concrete fracture energy;
I
moment of inertia for the section;
Kad
factor for nonslender beams;
Kc
relative neutral axis depth (c/d);
Kp
prestressing factor;
M
bending moment;
Mcr
cracking moment;
Pred
reduced prestressing force;
Rt
ratio between the principal tensile stress and the tensile strength at the critical point;
S
first moment of area of the section;
T
tensile force in the longitudinal tensile reinforcement;
V
shear force;
Varch
shear strength due to the arch effect;
Vbeam
shear strength due to the beam effect;
Vc
shear strength contribution of concrete;
Vcc
shear resisted in the uncracked region subjected to flexural compression forces;
Vc,min
minimum shear strength contribution of concrete;
Vw
shear transferred across the web by aggregate interlock and residual stresses;
Vfrp
shear FRP reinforcement contribution;
Vl
shear resisted by the longitudinal reinforcement;
Vs
shear resisted by the transverse reinforcement;
Vu
shear strength;
Vu,B
shear strength for bond loss;
Vu,max
shear strength limit (diagonal compression);
Vu,U
shear strength for uncracked sections;
α
inclination angle of shear reinforcement or ties;
αe
modular ratio (Ef/Ec);
αl
degree of prestressing force transferred at the considered section;
β
horizontal projection of the inclined crack;
βw
factor affecting the effective depth to calculate the bending moment due to the aggregate interlock and residual stresses when applying equilibrium;
ɛfw,m
mean strain of the stirrups at shear failure;
ɛfw,max
maximum strain of the stirrups at shear failure;
ɛfw,u
ultimate strain of the stirrups;
ζ
size effect;
θ
inclination angle of the strut;
ν1
strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear;
ρfw
FRP transverse reinforcement ratio;
ρl
longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
ρp
longitudinal active reinforcement ratio;
σ1, σ2
principal stresses;
σcp
mean compressive stress due to the prestressing force;
σcc
effective compressive stress in the concrete (considering the reduction due to compression reinforcement);
σfw,m
mean stress of the stirrups at shear failure;
σx
normal stress in the longitudinal direction;
σy
normal stress in the transverse direction;
τ
shear stress;
τmax
average bond strength along the anchorage length; and
ΔVc
stirrup confinement factor.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2004. Prestressing concrete structures with FRP tendons. ACI 440.4R-04. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Bairán, J. M., R. Menduiña, A. Marí, and A. Cladera. 2020. “Shear strength of non-slender reinforced concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 117 (2): 277–289. https://doi.org/10.14359/51721369.
Belarbi, A., M. Dawood, P. Poudel, M. Reda, H. Tahsiri, B. Gencturk, S. H. Rizkalla, and H. G. Russell. 2019. Design of concrete bridge beams prestressed with CFRP systems. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Belarbi, A., M. Reda, P. Poudel, H. Tahsiri, M. Dawood, and B. Gencturk. 2018. “Prestressing concrete with CFRP composites for sustainability and corrosion-free applications.” MATEC Web Conf. 149: 01010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814901010.
Carmona, J. R., G. Ruiz, and J. R. del Viso. 2007. “Mixed-mode crack propagation through reinforced concrete.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 74 (17): 2788–2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.004.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2016. Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN. [Authority: European Union Per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC].
Cladera, A., A. Marí, J. M. Bairán, C. Ribas, E. Oller, and N. Duarte. 2016. “The compression chord capacity model for the shear design and assessment of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams.” Struct. Concr. 17 (6): 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500214.
Cladera, A., A. Marí, C. Ribas, J. Bairán, and E. Oller. 2015. “Predicting the shear-flexural strength of slender reinforced concrete T and I shaped beams.” Eng. Struct. 101: 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.025.
Crossett, P., S. Taylor, D. Robinson, M. Sonebi, E. Garcia-Taengua, P. Deegan, and L. Ferrara. 2015. “The flexural behaviour of SCC beams pre-stressed with BFRP.” In Proc., 7th Biennial Conf. on Advanced Composites in Construction, 62–67. Cambridge, UK: St John's College.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymer. CAN/CSA S806-12. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2007. FRP reinforcement in RC structures. fib Bulletin 40 (Fib Task Group 9.3). Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
Fornůsek, J., P. Konvalinka, R. Sovják, and J. L. Vítek. 2009. “Long-term behaviour of concrete structures reinforced with pre-stressed GFRP tendons.” WIT Trans. Modelling Simul 48: 535–545. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM090481.
Grace, N. F., K. D. Patki, E. M. Soliman, and J. Q. Hanson. 2011. “Flexural behavior of side-by-side box-beam bridges: A comparative study.” PCI J. 56 (3): 94–112. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.06012011.94.112.
Grace, N. F., S. K. Rout, K. Ushijima, and M. Bebawy. 2015. “Performance of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer stirrups in prestressed-decked bulb T-beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (3): 0401406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000524.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 1997. Recommendations for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fiber reinforcing materials. Tokyo: JSCE.
Kromoser, B., P. Huber, and P. Preinstorfer. 2018. “Experimental study of the shear behaviour of thin walled CFRP reinforced UHPC structures.” In Proc., 2018 fib Congress, 1748–1754. Melbourne, Australia: fib.
Kueres, S., N. Will, and J. Hegger. 2020. “Shear strength of prestressed FRP reinforced concrete beams with shear reinforcement.” Eng. Struct. 206: 110088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110088.
Kupfer, H. B., and K. H. Gerstle. 1973. “Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 99 (4): 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001789.
Küres, S. 2019. “Analysis and design of concrete beams with pre-tensioned CFRP reinforcement.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen Univ.
Marí, A. 2023. “Questions on shear behavior of structural concrete and answers provided by mechanical models. The challenge of performance-based shear design.” Hormigón y Acero. https://doi.org/10.33586/hya.2023.3116.
Marí, A., J. Bairán, A. Cladera, E. Oller, and C. Ribas. 2015. “Shear-flexural strength mechanical model for the design and assessment of reinforced concrete beams.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11: 1399–1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.964735.
Marí, A., J. M. Bairán, A. Cladera, and E. Oller. 2016. “Shear design and assessment of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams based on a mechanical model.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (10): 04016064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001539.
Mirshekari, M., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, and M. Limbachiya. 2016. “Deformability of pretensioned PC beams with BFRP reinforcement.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composites in Civil Engineering, 1093–1098. Hong Kong, China: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Montoya-Coronado, L. A., C. Ribas, J. G. Ruiz-Pinilla, and A. Cladera. 2023. “Time-history analysis of aggregate interlock in reinforced concrete beams without stirrups.” Eng. Struct. 283: 115912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115912.
Nabipay, P., and D. Svecova. 2014. “Shear behavior of CFRP prestressed concrete T-beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (2): 04013049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000450.
Nabipaylashgari, M. 2012. Shear strength of concrete beams pre-stressed with CFRP cables. Winnipeg, MB: Univ. of Manitoba.
Nanni, A., and M. Rossini. 2020. NCHRP-IDEA/207 mildglass GFRP strand for resilient mild prestressed concrete. IDEA Program Final Report. Miami, FL: University of Miami.
Oller, E., A. Marí, J. M. Bairán, and A. Cladera. 2015. “Shear design of reinforced concrete beams with FRP longitudinal and transverse reinforcement.” Composites, Part B 74: 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.031.
Park, S. Y., and A. E. Naaman. 1999. “Shear behavior of concrete beams prestressed with FRP tendons.” PCI J. 44 (1): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011999.74.85.
Pavlović, A., T. Donchev, D. Petkova, M. Limbachiya, and R. Almuhaisen. 2019. “Pretensioned BFRP reinforced concrete beams: Flexural behaviour and estimation of initial prestress losses.” MATEC Web Conf. 289: 09001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928909001.
Pearson, M., and T. Donchev. 2013. “Experimental study on the behavior of prestressed concrete beams with internal BFRP reinforcement.” In Proc., 11th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Reinforced Concrete Structures. Braga, Portugal: University of Minho.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2021a. “Experimental investigation on shear behavior of FRP post-tensioned concrete beams without stirrups.” Eng. Struct. 244: 112835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112835.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2021b. “Shear behavior of post-tensioned concrete beams with draped FRP tendons and without transverse reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (4): 04021027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0001128.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2022. “Experimental investigation on shear behavior of FRP prestressed concrete beams with shear reinforcements.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (10): 04022084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001930.
Placas, A., and P. E. Regan. 1971. “Shear failure of reinforced concrete beams.” J. Am. Concr. Inst. 68 (10): 763–773.
Preinstorfer, P., P. Huber, T. Huber, B. Kromoser, and J. Kollegger. 2021. “Experimental investigation and analytical modelling of shear strength of thin walled textile-reinforced UHPC beams.” Eng. Struct. 231: 111735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111735.
Rossini, M., and A. Nanni. 2019. “Composite strands for prestressed concrete: State-of-the-practice and experimental investigation into mild prestressing with GFRP.” Constr. Build. Mater. 205: 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.045.
Shapack, G., R. Seracino, G. Lucier, and S. Rizkalla. 2015. “Flexural behavior of cored slabs prestressed with carbon fiber strands.” In Proc., 12th Int. Symp. of Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures and the 5th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers in Structures. Nanjing: FRPRCS/APFIS.
Singh, M., and D. Svecova. 2014. “Long term deflection of GFRP prestressed concrete slabs.” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. FRP Compos. Civ. Eng. CICE. Vancouver, BC: International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC).
Spadea, S., M. Rossini, and A. Nanni. 2018. “Design analysis and experimental behavior of precast concrete double-tee girders prestressed with carbonfiber-reinforced polymer strands.” PCI J. 63 (1): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij63.1-01.
Thorhallsson, E. R., and B. S. Jonsson. 2012. “Test of prestressed concrete beams with BFRP tendons.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composites in Civil Engineering. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.
Whitehead, P. A., and T. J. Ibell. 2001. “Shear behaviour of FRP-prestressed concrete beams.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Fibre Reinforced Plastics for Reinforced Concrete Structures. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.
Whitehead, P. A., and T. J. Ibell. 2005. “Novel shear reinforcement for fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced and prestressed concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 102 (2): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.14359/14280.
Yonekura, A., E. Tazawa, and H. Nakayama. 1993. “Flexural and shear behavior of prestressed concrete beams using FRP rods as prestressing tendons.” Am. Concr. Inst., ACI Spec. Publ. SP138: 525–548. https://doi.org/10.14359/3938.
Zawam, M., K. Soudki, and J. S. West. 2017. “Effect of prestressing level on the time-dependent behavior of GFRP prestressed concrete beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000783.
Zdanowicz, K., R. Kotynia, and S. Marx. 2019. “Prestressing concrete members with fibre-reinforced polymer reinforcement: State of research.” Struct. Concr. 20 (3): 872–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800347.
Zou, P. X. W. 2003. “Long-term deflection and cracking behavior of concrete beams prestressed with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer tendons.” J. Compos. Constr. 7 (3): 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2003)7:3(187).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: May 22, 2023
Accepted: Oct 4, 2023
Published online: Dec 11, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 11, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona 08034, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-3587. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona 08034, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-7262.
Antonio Marí
Full Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona 08034, Spain.
Tecla Legasa
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona 08034, Spain.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share