Assessment of Resistance Factors for LRFD of Steel Bolted Connections in Pultruded FRP Frames
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 2
Abstract
Resistance factors (ϕ-factors) are reliability-based factors of safety used in load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of structural systems. The ϕ-factors specified in the consensus standard for the structural design of pultruded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) structural members and connections are generally lower than the ϕ-factors used for more conventional materials (e.g., structural steel, reinforced concrete, and wood) for comparable limit states, consequently potentially limiting the application of pultruded FRP as a structural material. This work describes a review of 350 published experimental tests of bolted connections in pultruded FRP and compares these test results with the nominal strengths from equations in the consensus standard. Subsequently, a first-order reliability method analysis—following the methodology proposed by Ellingwood for pultruded FRP composites—was performed to re-examine ϕ-factors for the most common limit states of bolted connections in pultruded FRP. All relevant limit states for bearing-type connections as defined by the consensus standard were considered in the study and the derived ϕ-factors were compared with the ϕ-factors prescribed in the consensus standard with the goal of highlighting the need for additional research.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study are available upon reasonable request from the authors and at the following DOIs: 10.7274/nc580k25p40; 10.17605/OSF.IO/KBG6X.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- Ans
- net area subjected to shear;
- Ant
- net area subjected to tension;
- CC
- correlation coefficient;
- CCH
- chemical environment factor;
- Ci
- correlation coefficient for net tension strength of bolted connection;
- CM
- moisture adjustment factor for sustained in-service exposure condition;
- CP
- correction factor;
- CT
- temperature factor for sustained in-service temperatures;
- CΔ
- geometry factor for pitch spacing;
- Cϕ
- calibration coefficient;
- d
- nominal bolt diameter;
- dn
- nominal hole diameter;
- e1
- end distance;
- e1,min
- minimum end distance;
- e2
- edge distance;
- e2,min
- minimum edge distance;
- characteristic pin-bearing strength at the angle θ;
- average longitudinal pin-bearing strength;
- average transverse pin-bearing strength;
- Fm
- mean fabrication factor;
- characteristic tensile strength at the angle θ;
- average longitudinal tensile strength;
- average transverse tensile strength;
- Fsh
- characteristic in-plane shear strength;
- Fsh,m
- average in-plane shear strength;
- g
- Gage (i.e., the bolt spacing across a row);
- Knt,i
- stress concentration factor at the angle θ;
- Mm
- mean material factor;
- m
- number of rows;
- ms
- degree of freedom;
- N
- sample size;
- n
- number of bolts across the effective width;
- Pm
- mean professional factor;
- Pm,i
- professional factor of the sample i;
- Rbr
- pin-bearing strength;
- Rbs
- block shear strength;
- Rcl
- cleavage strength;
- Rn
- nominal strength per the predictive analysis model;
- Rnt
- net tension splitting strength for one row of bolts;
- Rnt,f
- net tension splitting strength of the first row of bolts for multiple rows of bolts;
- Rn,i
- calculated nominal strength of the sample i per the predictive analysis model;
- Rsh
- shear out strength;
- Rt
- tested strength;
- Rt,i
- tested strength of the sample i;
- s
- pitch spacing (i.e., the bolt spacing between rows);
- sc
- standard deviation of the mean professional factor;
- t
- thickness of the specimen;
- VF
- coefficient of variation of the fabrication factor;
- VM
- coefficient of variation of the material factor;
- VP
- coefficient of variation of the professional factor;
- VQ
- coefficient of variation of load effect;
- w
- effective width;
- Z
- safety margin
- β
- reliability index;
- ζ
- factor in pin-bearing strength that is equal to 1.0 if thread is excluded, otherwise equal to 0.6;
- θ
- angle between the direction of the connection force and the direction of pultrusion;
- λ
- time effect factor; and
- ϕ-factor
- resistance factor.
References
Abd-El-Naby, S. F. M., and L. Hollaway. 1993a. “The experimental behaviour of bolted joints in pultruded glass/polyester material. Part 1: Single-bolt joints.” Composites 24 (7): 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(93)90266-B.
Abd-El-Naby, S. F. M., and L. Hollaway. 1993b. “The experimental behaviour of bolted joints in pultruded glass/polyester material. Part 2: Two-bolt joints.” Composites 24 (7): 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(93)90267-C.
ACMA (American Composites Manufacturers Association). 2010. Pre-standard for load and resistance factors design (LRFD) of pultruded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) structures. Arlington, VA: ACMA.
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute). 2016. North America specifications for the design of cold-formed steel structural members. AISI S100-16. Washington, DC: AISI.
ANSI/AISC (American National Standards Institute, and American Institute of Steel Construction). 2022. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-22. Chicago: AISC.
ASCE/SEI (American Society of Civil Engineers, and Structural Engineering Institute). Forthcoming. Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for pultruded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) structures. ASCE/SEI 74. Reston, VA: ASCE/SEI.
ASCE/SEI (American Society of Civil Engineers, and Structural Engineering Institute). 2022. Minimum design load and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-22. Reston, VA: ASCE/SEI.
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 2019. Standard test method for bearing strength of plastics. ASTM D953-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 2022. Standard practice for evaluating material property characteristic values for polymeric composites for civil engineering structural applications. ASTM D7290-22. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Ascione, F., L. Feo, and F. Maceri. 2010. “On the pin-bearing failure load of GFRP bolted laminates: An experimental analysis on the influence of bolt diameter.” Composites, Part B 41 (6): 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.04.001.
Ascione, L., J. F. Caron, P. Godonou, K. van IJselmuijden, J. Knippers, T. Mottram, M. Oppe, M. G. Sorensen, J. Taby, and L. Tromp. 2016. Prospect for new guidance in the design of FRP. Ispra, Italy: European Commission—Joint Research Centre.
BRP (Bedford Reinforced Plastics). 2012. Design guide. Bedford, PA: Bedford Reinforced Plastics.
CNBC. 2021. “China’s property distress sours steel sector in warning sign for economy.” Accessed March 4, 2022. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/19/chinas-property-distress-sours-steel-sector-in-warning-sign-for-economy.html.
Cooper, C., and G. J. Turvey. 1995. “Effects of joint geometry and bolt torque on the structural performance of single bolt tension joints in pultruded GRP sheet material.” Compos. Struct. 32 (1–4): 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(95)00071-2.
Creative Pultrusion. 2016. The pultrex pultrusion design. Alum Bank, PA: Creative Pultrusion.
Ellingwood, B. R. 2003. “Toward load and resistance factor design for fiber-reinforced polymer composite structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (4): 425–563. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:4(449).
Ellingwood, B. R., J. G. MacGregor, T. V. Galambos, and C. A. Cornell. 1982. “Probability based load criteria: Load factors and load combinations.” J. Struct. Div. 108 (5): 978–997. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005959.
Erki, M. A. 1995. “Bolted glass-fibre-reinforced plastic joints.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 22 (4): 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-084.
Galambos, T. V., B. R. Ellingwood, J. G. MacGregor, and C. A. Cornell. 1982. “Probability based load criteria: Assessment of current design practice.” J. Struct. Div. 108 (5): 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005958.
Hart-Smith, L. J. 1978. “Mechanically-fastened joints for advanced composites—Phenomenological considerations and simple analyses.” In Proc., 4th Conf. on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, 543–574. New York: Plenum Press.
Hassan, N. K., M. A. Mohamedien, and S. H. Rizkalla. 1997. “Multibolted joints for GFRP structural members.” J. Compos. Constr. 1 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:1(3).
IMARC Group. 2022. Fiberglass market: Global industry trends, share, size, growth, opportunity and forecast 2022–2027. Market Research Rep. New York: IMARC Group.
Martins, D., J. Gonilha, J. R. Correia, and N. Silvestre. 2021a. “Exterior beam-to-column bolted connections between GFRP I-shaped pultruded profiles using stainless steel cleats. Part 1: Experimental study.” Thin-Walled Struct. 163: 107719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107719.
Martins, D., J. Gonilha, J. R. Correia, and N. Silvestre. 2021b. “Exterior beam-to-column bolted connections between GFRP I-shaped pultruded profiles using stainless steel cleats, Part 2: Prediction of initial stiffness and strength.” Thin-Walled Struct. 164: 107762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107762.
Martins, D., M. Proença, J. R. Correia, J. Gonilha, M. Arruda, and N. Silvestre. 2017. “Development of a novel beam-to-column connection system for pultruded GFRP tubular profiles.” Compos. Struct. 171: 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.049.
Matharu, N. S., and J. T. Mottram. 2017. “Plain and threaded bearing strengths for the design of bolted connections with pultruded FRP material.” Eng. Struct. 152: 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.003.
Meimand, V. Z., and B. W. Schafer. 2014. “Impact of load combinations on structural reliability determined from testing cold-formed steel components.” Struct. Saf. 48: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.10.006.
Mottram, J. T. 2013. “Rationale for simplifying the strength formulae for the design of multi-row bolted connections failing in net tension.” In Proc., 6th Inter. Conf. on Advanced Composites in Construction—ACIC, 383–392. Chesterfield, UK: NetComposites Ltd.
Mottram, J. T., and G. J. Turvey. 2003. “Physical test data for the appraisal of design procedures for bolted joints in pultruded FRP structural shapes and systems.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 5 (4): 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.154.
Pirchio, D. 2023. “Advancements in the design of pultruded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame.
Pirchio, D., J. A. Althouse, T. A. Madlem, M. D. Denavit, B. D. Weldon, and K. Q. Walsh. 2023. “Tensile strength and modulus of FRP pultruded composites at varying load angles relative to the pultrusion direction.” Constr. Build. Mater. 385: 131477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131477.
Prabhakaran, R., Z. Razzaq, and S. Devara. 1996. “Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) approach for bolted joints in pultruded composites.” Composites, Part B 27 (3–4): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-8368(95)00021-6.
Raghunathan, M. D., R. Senthil, and G. S. Palani. 2017. “On the tensile capacity of single-bolted connections between GFRP angles and gusset plates—Testing and modelling.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21 (6): 2259–2272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1102-4.
Rosner, C. N. 1992. “Single-bolted connections for orthotropic fibre-reinforced composite structural members.” Master’s thesis. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba.
Rosner, C. N., and S. H. Rizkalla. 1995. “Bolted connections for fiber-reinforced composite structural members: Experimental program.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 7 (4): 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1995)7:4(223).
Shinozuka, M. 1983. “Basic analysis of structural safety.” J. Struct. Eng. 109 (3): 599–827. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:3(721).
Steffen, R. E. 1998. “Behavior and design of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite equal-leg single angle struts.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Strongwell. 2016. Strongwell design manual. Bristol, VA: Strongwell.
Tajeuna, T. A., F. Legeron, S. Langlois, P. Labossiere, and M. Demers. 2016. “Effect of geometric parameters on the behavior of bolted GFRP pultruded plates.” J. Compos. Mater. 50 (26): 3731–3749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998315625101.
Tencom 2021. “Pultruded profiles experience rising popularity.” Accessed March 4, 2022. https://www.tencom.com/blog/pultruded-profiles-experience-rising-popularity.
Turvey, G. J. 1998. “Single-bolt tension joint tests on pultruded GRP plate—Effects of tension direction relative to pultrusion direction.” Compos. Struct. 42 (4): 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00079-8.
Wang, Y. 2002. “Bearing behavior of joints in pultruded composites.” J. Compos. Mater. 36 (18): 2199–2216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998302036018535.
Weimert, K. D. 2015. “Bolted connection strength in pultruded glass fiber reinforced polymer structural shapes.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia Univ.
Weinmann, B. M. 2021. “Tensile rupture strength of single-bolt connections in pultruded structures.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 5, 2022
Accepted: Oct 2, 2023
Published online: Jan 11, 2024
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.