Technical Papers
Jan 8, 2024

Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Vibration-Based Damage State Prediction in a Reinforced Concrete Building

Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 38, Issue 2

Abstract

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is critical in identifying the degradation of infrastructure systems to ensure structural integrity and safety. Vibration-based SHM approaches, including numerical-physics-based modeling and data-driven strategies, are commonly used to detect damage. This study proposes a method for predicting damage conditions using a hybrid vibration-based approach with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained with physics-based data sets. The method is evaluated using a five-story reinforced concrete building that undergoes multiple base excitations, resulting in cumulative damage that affects the building’s stiffness and dynamic responses. A set of damage states is defined based on the structure’s response, and simplified models of the building are used to create a training database for the CNNs. The CNNs are trained on noise-free dynamic responses (i.e., accelerations or displacements) from numerically simulated white noise (WN) sequences and then tested with the appropriate floor response data from different types of base shaking. The accuracy of the models is consistently high, with noise-free acceleration and displacement responses yielding results of 99.9% and 93.9% for numerically simulated WN base excitations, respectively. The accuracy remained high when tested with 30 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) noisy acceleration and displacement responses, with accuracies of 99.9% and 93.8%, respectively, and 100% when using acceleration responses from experimentally measured WN base excitations with a similar SNR. Ambient microtremor acceleration data collected within California’s Central Valley were used to validate the approach for low-amplitude ambient ground vibrations, achieving an accuracy of 86.69% when tested with noisy acceleration responses with the measured microtremors as base shaking. The proposed method has limitations in identifying bordering damage states and reduced accuracy when tested on field data, but overall shows promise for damage state identification and story stiffness reduction analysis.

Practical Applications

This study presents a new method for detecting damage scenarios in buildings using vibration data and machine learning (ML). We used CNNs, a learning algorithm, to analyze vibrations from a five-story building with varying damage levels. The CNN models were trained with computer simulations and real-world measurements to recognize various damage states. The proposed method proved to be highly accurate and efficient in detecting and associating damage with reductions in floor stiffness, even with noisy data, achieving up to 99.9% accuracy. The study also found that detailed computer models are not necessary for generating training data. A simplified model resembling a real structure is effective, making the method more practical and computationally efficient. This allows the technique to be applied in real-world situations, where limited measurements of the structure’s response can be input into the CNN model to assess if the building has experienced damage over time. In summary, this research shows that CNN models trained with data from simple numerical models can effectively identify damage scenarios in a building using real-world measured vibrations from the building, even during minor shaking.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These items include the simplified numerical models, the CNN models, the data sets of numerically simulated data, and the code used to generate the aforementioned items.

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the NSF under Grant No. 2040665. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.

References

Abdeljaber, O., S. Kiranyaz, O. Avci, M. Gabbouj, and D. J. Inman. 2017. “Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks.” J. Sound Vib. 388 (Feb): 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.043.
Astroza, R., H. Ebrahimian, J. P. Conte, J. I. Restrepo, and T. C. Hutchinson. 2022. “Statistical analysis of the modal properties of a seismically-damaged five-story RC building identified using ambient vibration data.” J. Build. Eng. 52 (Mar): 104411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104411.
Barthorpe, R. J. 2010. “On model and data based approaches to structural health monitoring.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield.
Baruch, M. 1978. “Optimization procedure to correct stiffness and flexibility matrices using vibration tests.” AIAA J. 16 (11): 1208–1210. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61032.
Buckreis, T., W. Allen, W. Pengfei, B. Scott, and S. Jonathan. 2021. Microtremor data collected in Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region of California. Gainesville, FL: DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-dk6t-8610v1.
Chang, C. M., T. K. Lin, and C. W. Chang. 2018. “Applications of neural network models for structural health monitoring based on derived modal properties.” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confederation 129 (Dec): 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.051.
Chen, M. C., et al. 2016. “Full-scale structural and nonstructural building system performance during earthquakes: Part I—Specimen description, test protocol, and structural response.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (2): 737–770. https://doi.org/10.1193/012414eqs016m.
Fernandez-Navamuel, A., D. Zamora-Sánchez, D. Pardo, A. J. Omella, D. Garcia-Sanchez, and F. Magalhães. 2022. “Supervised deep learning with finite element simulations for damage identification in bridges.” Eng. Struct. 257 (Apr): 114016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114016.
Friswell, M. I. 2007. “Damage identification using inverse methods.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365 (1851): 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1930.
Gulgec, N. S., M. Takáč, and S. N. Pakzad. 2019. “Convolutional neural network approach for robust structural damage detection and localization.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 33 (3): 04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000820.
Ioffe, S., and C. Szegedy. 2015. “Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift.” In Proc., 32nd Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, ICML 2015, 448–456. Vancouver, BC, Canada: International Machine Learning Society.
Kim, B., and S. Cho. 2018. “Automated vision-based detection of cracks on concrete surfaces using a deep learning technique.” Sensors 18 (10): 3452. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103452.
Li, D., and Y. Wang. 2020. “Modal dynamic residual-based model updating through regularized semidefinite programming with facial reduction.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 143 (Sep): 106792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106792.
Liu, H., and Y. Zhang. 2019. “Image-driven structural steel damage condition assessment method using deep learning algorithm.” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confederation 133 (Feb): 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.081.
Mangal, L., V. G. Idichandy, and C. Ganapathy. 1996. “ART-based multiple neural networks for monitoring offshore platforms.” Appl. Ocean Res. 18 (2–3): 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1187(96)00024-7.
Moaveni, B., J. P. Conte, and F. M. Hemez. 2009. “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of damage identification results obtained using finite element model updating.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 24 (5): 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00589.x.
Ni, F. T., J. Zhang, and Z. Chen. 2019. “Zernike-moment measurement of thin-crack width in images enabled by dual-scale deep learning.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 34 (5): 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12421.
Pappa, R. S., K. B. Elliott, and A. Schenk. 1993. “Consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm.” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 16 (5): 852–858. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21092.
Paz, M., Y. Hoon Kim, M. Paz, and Y. Hoon Kim. 2019. “Nonlinear structural response.” In Structural dynamics: Theory and computation, 143–170. Berlin: Springer.
Stepinski, T., T. Uhl, and W. Staszewski. 2013. Advanced structural damage detection: From theory to engineering applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118536148.
Su, Z., and L. Ye. 2004. “An intelligent signal processing and pattern recognition technique for defect identification using an active sensor network.” Smart Mater. Struct. 13 (4): 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/4/034.
Wang, N., S. Li, Q. Zhao, X. Zhao, and P. Zhao. 2018. “Damage classification for masonry historic structures using convolutional neural networks based on still images.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33 (12): 1073–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12411.
Yeum, C. M., S. J. Dyke, and J. Ramirez. 2018. “Visual data classification in post-event building reconnaissance.” Eng. Struct. 155 (Oct): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.057.
Zhang, Z., and C. Sun. 2021. “Structural damage identification via physics-guided machine learning: A methodology integrating pattern recognition with finite element model updating.” Struct. Health Monit. 20 (4): 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720927488.
Zhu, D., C. Cho, J. Guo, Y. Wang, and K. M. Lee. 2012. “Wireless mobile sensor network for the system identification of a space frame bridge.” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 17 (3): 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2012.2187915.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 38Issue 2March 2024

History

Received: May 16, 2023
Accepted: Nov 9, 2023
Published online: Jan 8, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 8, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael L. Whiteman, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-0452 [email protected]
Postdoctoral, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Howard Univ., Washington, DC 20059 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-0452. Email: [email protected]
Claudia C. Marin-Artieda, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-7671 [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Howard Univ., Washington, DC 20059. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-7671. Email: [email protected]
Jale Tezcan, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share