Technical Papers
Dec 5, 2023

Representation of Incidence Angle in Seismic Analysis of Skewed Highway Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 2

Abstract

Bridges are critical components of lifeline systems that must remain functional without being severely damaged during earthquakes. Recently, researchers have carried out many studies on how the earthquake incidence angle affects the analysis results of bridges. In the literature, the earthquake incidence angle (θ) is considered using two different methods. In the first method, the bridge principal axes remain constant, and the ground motion components are rotated using linear transformation equations (Method 1). The ground motion components remain constant in the second method, and the bridge’s principal axes are rotated (Method 2). In Method 1, the acceleration values in the time series of the ground motion are modified by the linear transformation process. There is no interference with the earthquake ground motion records in Method 2. However, the most important difficulty with Method 2 is the necessity to reconstruct the bridge analytical model for each earthquake incidence angle. Within the scope of this study, the aim was to identify the method that will most efficiently reflect the incidence angle of the ground motion components in the nonlinear analysis of skewed highway bridges. In this context, analytical models of a highway bridge that consisted of prestressed concrete I-section beams and a continuous deck with different skew angles were created in OpenSees. Nonlinear response history analyses were performed for each incidence angle using two different methods. According to the analysis results, when several engineering demand parameters were considered, such as superstructure displacement that belonged to a joint at the bridge midpoint on the superstructure, force and curvature demands of the bridge piers, and pounding effect, the most effective method was investigated. Then, the aim was to identify the most unfavorable earthquake incidence angle for these parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council (TÜBİTAK) under Grant Number 120M968 and the Council of Higher Education 100/2000 program, which the authors gratefully acknowledge.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Atak, B., Ö Avşar, and A. Yakut. 2014. “Directional effect of the strong ground motion on the seismic behavior of skewed bridges.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Structural Dynamic, EURODYN, 1253–1258. Porto, Portugal: European Association for Structural Dynamics (EASD).
Avşar, Ö, A. Yakut, and A. Caner. 2011. “Analytical fragility curves for ordinary highway bridges in Turkey.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (4): 971–996. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3651349.
Basnet, A., and R. Suwal. 2019. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete skewed bridge pier using fragility curve.” Invent. J. Res. Technol. Eng. Manage. 3 (6): 98–107.
Bhatnagar, U. R., and S. Banerjee. 2014. “Fragility of skewed bridges under orthogonal seismic ground motions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (9): 1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.936880.
Bisadi, V., and M. Head. 2010. “Orthogonal effects in nonlinear analysis of bridges subjected to multicomponent earthquake excitation.” In Structures Congress 2010, edited by S. Senapathi, K. Casey and M. Hoit, 204–215. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bisadi, V., and M. Head. 2011. “Evaluation of combination rules for orthogonal seismic demands in nonlinear time history analysis of bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (6): 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000241.
Caltrans. 2019. Seismic design criteria. Sacramento, CA: State of California, DOT.
Deepu, S. P., K. Prajapat, and S. Ray-Chaudhuri. 2014. “Seismic vulnerability of skew bridges under bi-directional ground motions.” Eng. Struct. 71: 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.013.
Gao, X.-A., X.-Y. Zhou, and L. Wang. 2004. “Multi-component seismic analysis for irregular structures.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1156. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Ghobarah, A. A., and W. K. Tso. 1974. “Seismic analysis of skewed highway bridges with intermediate supports.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2 (3): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020304.
Han, Q., J. Y. Chen, X. L. Du, and C. Huang. 2017. “Nonlinear seismic response of skewed highway bridges subjected to bidirectional near-fault ground motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (7): 04017032.
Haque, M. N., and M. A. R. Bhuiyan. 2012. “Seismic response analysis of simple span concrete deck girder skewed bridge : Effect of skew angles.” J. Civ. Eng. 40 (2): 227–237.
Huo, Y., and J. Zhang. 2013. “Effects of pounding and skewness on seismic responses of typical multispan highway bridges using the fragility function method.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (6): 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000414.
Jónsson, M. H., B. Bessason, and E. Haflidason. 2010. “Earthquake response of a base-isolated bridge subjected to strong near-fault ground motion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (6): 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.001.
Kaviani, P., F. Zareian, and E. Taciroglu. 2012. “Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutments.” Eng. Struct. 45: 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.013.
Kent, D. C., and R. Park. 1971. “Flexural members with confined concrete.” J. Struct. Div. 97 (7): 1969–1990. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957.
Khaled, A., R. Tremblay, and B. Massicotte. 2011. “Effectiveness of the 30%-rule at predicting the elastic seismic demand on bridge columns subjected to bi-directional earthquake motions.” Eng. Struct. 33 (8): 2357–2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.009.
MacKie, K. R., K. J. Cronin, and B. G. Nielson. 2011. “Response sensitivity of highway bridges to randomly oriented multi-component earthquake excitation.” J. Earthquake Eng. 15 (6): 850–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2010.551706.
Maleki, S., and V. Bisadi. 2006. “Orthogonal effects in seismic analysis of skewed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (1): 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:1(122).
Menassa, C., M. Mabsout, K. Tarhini, and G. Frederick. 2007. “Influence of skew angle on reinforced concrete slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (2): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:2(205).
Meng, J. Y., and E. M. Lui. 2000. “Seismic analysis and assessment of a skew highway bridge.” Eng. Struct. 22 (11): 1433–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00097-8.
Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure of the Republic of Turkey. 2020. Principles for the design of highway and railroad bridges and viaducts under the impact of earthquakes. Ankara,Turkey: Türkiye Earthquakes Recovery and Reconstruction Assessment.
Moschonas, F. I., and J. A. Kappos. 2011. “Generalized fragility curves for bearing-supported skew bridges, for arbitrary angle of incidence of the seismic action.” City Res. Online 37 (9): 1591–1601.
Moschonas, I. F., and A. J. Kappos. 2013. “Assessment of concrete bridges subjected to ground motion with an arbitrary angle of incidence: Static and dynamic approach.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 11 (2): 581–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9395-2.
Mosleh, A., J. Jara, M. S. Razzaghi, and H. Varum. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic performance analysis of RC bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 24 (11): 1704–1728. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1477637.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007a. “Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (3): 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007b. “Seismic performance assessment of simply supported and continuous multispan concrete girder highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (5): 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:5(611).
Noori, H. R., M. M. Memarpour, M. Yakhchalian, and S. Soltanieh. 2019. “Effects of ground motion directionality on seismic behavior of skewed bridges considering SSI.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 127 (July): 105820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105820.
OpenSees. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley: University of California. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. https://opensees.berkeley.edu.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). n.d. “PEER ground motion database - PEER center.” Accessed December 6, 2021. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
Pottatheere, P., and P. Renault. 2008. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of skew bridges.” In Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Roy, A., G. Bhattacharya, and R. Roy. 2017. “Maximum credible damage of RC bridge pier under bi-directional seismic excitation for all incidence angles.” Eng. Struct. 152: 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.008.
TEHM (Turkish Earthquake Hazard Map). 2019. Accessed December 6, 2021. https://tdth.afad.gov.tr.
Torbol, M., and M. Shinozuka. 2012. “Effect of the angle of seismic incidence on the fragility curves of bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (14): 2111–2124. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2197.
Wang, J., H. V. Burton, and K. Dai. 2019. “Combination rules used to account for orthogonal seismic effects: State-of-the-art review.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (11): 03119001.
XTRACT. 2007. Cross section analysis program for structural engineers. Sacramento, CA: IMBSEN & Associates.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 2February 2024

History

Received: May 1, 2023
Accepted: Oct 5, 2023
Published online: Dec 5, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 5, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Eskisehir Technical Univ., Iki Eylul Kampusu, Eskisehir 26555, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0277-2034. (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Eskisehir Technical Univ., Iki Eylul Kampusu, Eskisehir 26555, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-9631. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share