Technical Papers
Jan 30, 2024

Machine Learning–Based Bridge Maintenance Optimization Model for Maximizing Performance within Available Annual Budgets

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

Effective maintenance planning for bridges is crucial for maintaining their performance, safety, and minimizing maintenance costs. Timely implementation of interventions can improve the performance of bridges and avoid the need for costly interventions. However, bridge maintenance is often delayed because of inadequate planning and budget allocation, as well as resource constraints such as funding. With the availability of historical condition data of bridges in databases such as the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) and National Bridge Elements (NBE), there is an opportunity to use data-driven methods to predict deterioration of bridge elements and optimize their maintenance interventions to maximize the performance of bridges. This paper presents the development of a novel system that uses machine learning (ML) techniques, to predict the condition of concrete bridge elements, and binary linear programming optimization method, to identify the optimal selection of maintenance interventions and their timing, to maximize the performance of bridges while complying with available annual budgets. Four ML methods are explored: decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, and support vector machines. The results of the ML evaluation show that, while the values of the predictive performance metrics varied for different elements, random forest method had the best performance for all elements. A case study of a concrete bridge is analyzed to evaluate the performance of the system and demonstrate its new capabilities. The case study results show that the developed model identifies optimal maintenance interventions for various annual budgets over a 50-year study period. The primary contributions of this research to the body of knowledge are as follows: (1) the development of a novel system that integrates machine learning techniques and linear programming for predicting bridge element conditions and optimizing maintenance interventions; (2) modeling and predicting the deterioration of bridge elements based on health index metric; and (3) generating long-term maintenance plans for each of the bridge elements to maximize the performance of bridges within available annual budgets. The present system is expected to support decision makers, such as highway agencies, in allocating the limited financial resources for bridge maintenance more efficiently and cost-effectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the federal financial support that they received from Mountain Plan Consortium (MPC) to conduct this research work. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the MPC.

References

Abdallah, A. M., R. A. Atadero, and M. E. Ozbek. 2022. “A state-of-the-art review of bridge inspection planning: Current situation and future needs.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (2): 03121001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001812.
Abdelkader, E. M., O. Moselhi, M. Marzouk, and T. Zayed. 2021. “Integrative evolutionary-based method for modeling and optimizing budget assignment of bridge maintenance priorities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (9): 04021100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002113.
Alogdianakis, F., L. Dimitriou, and D. C. Charmpis. 2021. “Pattern recognition in road bridges’ deterioration mechanism: An artificial approach for analysing the US National Bridge Inventory.” Transp. Res. Procedia 52 (2020): 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.021.
Alonso Medina, P., F. J. León González, and L. Todisco. 2022. “Data-driven prediction of long-term deterioration of RC bridges.” Constr. Build. Mater. 317: 12579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125790.
Althaqafi, E., and E. Chou. 2022. “Developing bridge deterioration models using an artificial neural network.” Infrastructures 7 (8): 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7080101.
Amini, A., N. Nikraz, and A. Fathizadeh. 2016. “Identifying and evaluating the effective parameters in prioritization of urban roadway bridges for maintenance operations.” Aust. J. Civil Eng. 14 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2015.1092640.
Bektas, B. A. 2017. “Use of recursive partitioning to predict national bridge inventory condition ratings from national bridge elements condition data.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2612: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3141/2612-04.
Bukhsh, Z. A., I. Stipanovic, S. S. Palic, and G. Klanker. 2018. “Robustness of the multi-attribute utility model for bridge maintenance planning.” Balt. J. Road Bridge Eng. 13 (4): 404–415. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2018-13.425.
Chyad, A. M., and O. Abudayyeh. 2020. “Performance prediction modeling of concrete bridge deck condition using an optimized approach.” J. Civ. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 127–137. https://doi.org/10.32732/jcec.2020.9.3.127.
Contreras-Nieto, C., Y. Shan, and P. Lewis. 2018. “Characterization of steel bridge superstructure deterioration through data mining techniques.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (5): 04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001205.
Contreras-Nieto, C., Y. Shan, P. Lewis, and J. A. Hartell. 2019. “Bridge maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process and fusion tables.” Autom. Constr. 101: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.016.
Courville Aaron Goodfellow lan, B. Y. 2016. Deep learning—Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville—Google Books. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Czum, J. M. 2020. “Dive into deep learning.” J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 17 (5): 637–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.02.005.
Das, R., and M. Nakano. 2021. “A multi-criteria decision-making model using socio-technical attributes for transportation bridge maintenance prioritisation.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 23: 1–7.
Echaveguren, T., and P. Dechent. 2019. “Allocation of bridge maintenance costs based on prioritization indexes.” Revista de la Construcción 18 (3): 568–578. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.18.3.568.
Farahani, M. A., A. Vahid, and A. E. Goodwell. 2022. “Evaluating ecohydrological model sensitivity to input variability with an information-theory-based approach.” Entropy 24 (7): 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070994.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation's bridges.” Accessed April 9, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/mtguide.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2010. “Bridge management questionnaire report.” FHWA. Accessed April 9, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/management/bms.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2014. “Specification for the national bridge inventory.” Accessed April 9, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/snbi/snbi_march_2022_publication.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. “Synthesis of national and international methodologies used for bridge health indices.” Accessed April 9, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/bridge/15081/15081.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2023. “Bridges & structures.” FHWA. Accessed January 28, 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/.
Fiorillo, G., and H. Nassif. 2020. “Improving the conversion accuracy between bridge element conditions and NBI ratings using deep convolutional neural networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (12): 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1725065.
Fitriani, H., M. A. Surya Pratama, Y. Idris, and G. Tanzil. 2019. “Determination of prioritization for maintenance of the upper structure of truss bridge.” MATEC Web Conf. 276: 01036. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927601036.
Fraher, M. J., S. Hwang, and J. Fu. 2010. “An improved model for predicting NBI condition ratings.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization, 1039–1043. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Franzen, S. E., M. A. Farahani, and A. E. Goodwell. 2020. “Information flows: Characterizing precipitation-streamflow dependencies in the Colorado headwaters with an information theory approach.” Water Resour. Res. 56 (10): e2019WR026133. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026133.
Ghafoori, M., and M. Abdallah. 2022a. “Simulation-based optimization model to minimize equivalent annual cost of existing buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (2): 04021202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002232.
Ghafoori, M., and M. Abdallah. 2022b. “Building optimization model for minimizing operation and maintenance costs.” In construction research congress 2022, 422–431. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ghafoori, M., and M. Abdallah. 2022c. “Innovative optimization model for planning upgrade and maintenance interventions for buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 36 (6): 04022051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001757.
Ghodoosi, F., S. Abu-Samra, M. Zeynalian, and T. Zayed. 2018. “Maintenance cost optimization for bridge structures using system reliability analysis and genetic algorithms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001435.
Gokasar, I., M. Deveci, and O. Kalan. 2022. “CO2 emission based prioritization of bridge maintenance projects using neutrosophic fuzzy sets based decision making approach.” Res. Transp. Econ. 91: 101029.
Hadjidemetriou, G. M., M. Herrera, and A. K. Parlikad. 2022. “Condition and criticality-based predictive maintenance prioritisation for networks of bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18 (8): 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1897146.
Hasan, S., and E. Elwakil. 2020. “National bridge inventory data-based stochastic modeling for deck condition rating of prestressed concrete bridges.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (3): 04020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000505.
Huang, Y.-H., T. M. Adams, and J. A. Pincheira. 2004. “Analysis of life-cycle maintenance strategies for concrete bridge decks.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (3): 250–258.
Jaafaru, H., and B. Agbelie. 2022. “Bridge maintenance planning framework using machine learning, multi-attribute utility theory and evolutionary optimization models.” Autom. Constr. 141: 104460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104460.
Kim, K. H., M. S. Nam, H. H. Hwang, and K. Y. Ann. 2020. “Prediction of remaining life for bridge decks considering deterioration factors and propose of prioritization process for bridge deck maintenance.” Sustainability 12 (24): 1–25.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2020. “Fusing data extracted from bridge inspection reports for enhanced data-driven bridge deterioration prediction: A hybrid data fusion method.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 34 (6): 04020047.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2022. “Deep learning–based analytics of multisource heterogeneous bridge data for enhanced data-driven bridge deterioration prediction.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 36 (5): 1–14.
Liu, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2005. “Balancing connectivity of deteriorating bridge networks and long-term maintenance cost through optimization.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (4): 468–481.
Lu, P., H. Wang, and D. Tolliver. 2019. “Prediction of bridge component ratings using ordinal logistic regression model.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019: 9797584.
Miner, N., and A. Alipour. 2022. “Bridge damage, repair costs, and fragilities for inland flood events.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (8): 04022057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001865.
Murphy, K. P. 2012. Machine learning—A probabilistic perspective—Table-of-contents. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nguyen, T. T., and K. Dinh. 2019. “Prediction of bridge deck condition rating based on artificial neural networks.” J. Sci. Technol. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 15–25.
Nili, M. H., H. Taghaddos, and B. Zahraie. 2021. “Integrating discrete event simulation and genetic algorithm optimization for bridge maintenance planning.” Autom. Constr. 122: 103513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103513.
Nili, M. H., B. Zahraie, and H. Taghaddos. 2020. “BrDSS: A decision support system for bridge maintenance planning employing bridge information modeling.” Smart Struct. Syst. 26 (4): 533–544.
Peng, J., Y. Yang, H. Bian, J. Zhang, and L. Wang. 2022. “Optimisation of maintenance strategy of deteriorating bridges considering sustainability criteria.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18 (3): 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1855215.
Rashidi Nasab, A., and H. Elzarka. 2023. “Optimizing machine learning algorithms for improving prediction of bridge deck deterioration: A case study of Ohio bridges.” Buildings 13 (6): 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061517.
Ross, B. C. 2014. “Mutual information between discrete and continuous data sets.” PLoS One 9 (2): e87357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087357.
RSMeans. 2020. Building construction costs book, edited by P. R. Waier. Rockland, MA: RSMeans.
Sabatino, S., D. M. Frangopol, and Y. Dong. 2015. “Sustainability-informed maintenance optimization of highway bridges considering multi-attribute utility and risk attitude.” Eng. Struct. 102: 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.030.
Santamaria Ariza, M., I. Zambon, H. S. Sousa, J. A. Campos e Matos, and A. Strauss. 2020. “Comparison of forecasting models to predict concrete bridge decks performance.” Struct. Concr. 21 (4): 1240–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900434.
Saydam, D., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Risk-based maintenance optimization of deteriorating bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001038.
Srikanth, I., and M. Arockiasamy. 2020. “Deterioration models for prediction of remaining useful life of timber and concrete bridges: A review.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 7 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.005.
Suzuki, T., M. Sugiyama, J. Sese, and T. Kanamori. 2008. “Approximating Mutual Information by Maximum Likelihood Density Ratio Estimation.” In Proc., Workshop on New Challenges for Feature Selection in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery at ECML/PKDD 2008. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v4/suzuki08a/suzuki08a.pdf.
Tian, Z., B. Si, X. Shi, and Z. Fang. 2019. “An application of Bayesian Network approach for selecting energy efficient HVAC systems.” J. Build. Eng. 25: 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100796.
Toasa Caiza, P. D., T. Ummenhofer, J. A. F. O. Correia, and A. De Jesus. 2020. “Applying the Weibull and Stüssi methods that derive reliable Wöhler curves to historical German bridges.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (4): 04020029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000506.
Valenzuela, S., H. de Solminihac, and T. Echaveguren. 2010. “Proposal of an integrated index for prioritization of bridge maintenance.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000068.
Wakchaure, S. S., and K. N. Jha. 2011. “Prioritization of bridges for maintenance planning using data envelopment analysis.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (9): 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.614267.
Wang, T.-K., and Y. Piao. 2019. “Development of BIM-AR-based facility risk assessment and maintenance system.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 33 (6): 04019068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001339.
Xie, H.-B., W.-J. Wu, and Y.-F. Wang. 2018. “Life-time reliability based optimization of bridge maintenance strategy considering LCA and LCC.” J. Cleaner Prod. 176: 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.123.
Zhang, W., and N. Wang. 2017. “Bridge network maintenance prioritization under budget constraint.” Struct. Saf. 67: 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 4April 2024

History

Received: Apr 18, 2023
Accepted: Nov 17, 2023
Published online: Jan 30, 2024
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Building Construction Science, Mississippi State Univ., Starkville, MS 39762. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-7619. Email: [email protected]
Moatassem Abdallah, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80217 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mehmet Egemen Ozbek, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Joseph Phelps Endowed Chair, Dept. of Construction Management, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share