Technical Papers
Sep 8, 2023

Main Cable Shape-Finding and Live Load Response of the Suspension Bridge with Central Buckles: An Analytical Algorithm

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 11

Abstract

The stiffness of suspension bridges, which are flexible systems composed of main cables and stiffening beams, is frequently increased by adding one or more pairs of central buckles in the midspan. This study examined a suspension bridge with flexible central buckles, proposing a set of analytical calculation methods for the shape-finding of the main cable under dead load and the structural deformation and internal forces under any uniform live loads. The proposed method is based on the known bridge design parameters. First, the suspender and central buckle tension of each hanging point of the stiffening beam was determined by the multipoint rigid support continuous beam method. After assigning these tensions to the suspenders and the central buckles, the multisegment catenary theory was used to derive the equation for each main cable segment in turn. The constraint equation was established through the closure condition of the height difference within the span. The equation was then transformed into an objective function to be programmatically solved, determining the completed bridge state. To determine the live load response of the bridge, the deformation and position relationships of the main cable, main beam, and bridge towers were analyzed in sequence, with known live load parameters. Five types of constraint equations were established through the conservation of the unstrained length of each main cable segment, the coordination of the force and deformation of each suspender, the coordination of the force and deformation of each central buckle, the closure of span length and height difference in each span, and the force balance of the main beam. Then, they were converted into an objective function to be programmatically solved, leading to the live load response of the structure. Finally, a case study of a suspension bridge with a main span of 1,050 m was used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. The structural deformation and internal forces provided by the analytical solution for the live load action had good accuracy, which is in good agreement with the finite-element method results.

Practical Applications

Long-span suspension bridges, compared with traditional small- and medium-span bridges, have greater flexibility, and they are more prone to large deflection and deformation under live loads such as vehicles. To improve the structural stiffness of suspension bridges, engineers often set central buckles connecting the cable and stiffening beam in the middle of the span. The current method of calculating the live load response of suspension bridges depends on finite-element modeling. However, when purchasing and using finite-element software, it is often expensive. At the same time, the finite-element method (FEM) modeling process is relatively complex and exhibits low efficiency. In addition, Link10 element in the current commercial finite-element software ANSYS (version 16.0) cannot consider its geometric nonlinearity, which will produce deviation to the results. Therefore, this paper proposes a set of accurate live load analytical algorithms for suspension bridges with central buckles, which are solved by the same number of basic unknowns and constraint equations. It is helpful to reduce the dependence of practitioners on finite-element software and can also be used as the verification and supplement of finite-element results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFB3706703) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52078134), which are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Abdel-Ghaffar, A. M. 1976. “Dynamic analyses of suspension bridge structures.” In Proc., EERL 76-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology.
Ahmadi-Kashani, K., and A. J. Bell. 1988. “The analysis of cables subject to uniformly distributed loads.” Eng. Struct. 10 (3): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(88)90004-1.
Brotton, D. M. 1966. “A general computer programme for the solution of suspension bridge problems.” Struct. Eng. 44 (5): 161–167.
Buonopane, S. G., and D. P. Billington. 1993. “Theory and history of suspension bridge design from 1823 to 1940.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (3): 954–977. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:3(954).
Cao, H., Y. Chen, J. Li, and S. Liu. 2021. “Static characteristics analysis of three-tower suspension bridges with central buckle using a simplified model.” Eng. Struct. 245: 112916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112916.
Chen, Z. Q., T. J. A. Agar, A. Namini, P. Albrecht, and H. Bosch. 1994. “Finite element-based flutter analysis of cable-suspended bridges closure.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (3): 1044–1046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(1044).
Han, Y., K. Li, and C. S. Cai. 2020. “Study of central buckle effects on flutter of long-span suspension bridges.” Wind Struct. 31 (5): 403–418.
Hu, T.-F., X.-G. Hua, W.-W. Zhang, and Q.-S. Xian. 2016. “Influence of central buckles on the modal characteristics of long-span suspension bridge.” J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev. 10 (1): 72–77.
Huddleston, J. V. 1981. “Computer analysis of extensible cables.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 107 (1): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002697.
Irvine, H. M. 1975. “Statics of suspended cables.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 101 (3): 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002010.
Jayaraman, H. B., and W. C. Knudson. 1981. “A curved element for the analysis of cable structures.” Comput. Struct. 14 (3–4): 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(81)90016-X.
Jennings, A. 1983. “Gravity stiffness of classical suspension bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 109 (1): 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:1(16).
Jung, M.-R., D.-J. Min, and M.-Y. Kim. 2013. “Nonlinear analysis methods based on the unstrained element length for determining initial shaping of suspension bridges under dead loads.” Comput. Struct. 128: 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.06.014.
Jung, M.-R., S.-U. Shin, M. M. Attard, and M.-Y. Kim. 2015. “Deflection theory for self-anchored suspension bridges under live load.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (7): 04014093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000687.
Kim, H. K., M. J. Lee, and S. P. Chang. 2002. “Non-linear shape-finding analysis of a self-anchored suspension bridge.” Eng. Struct. 24 (12): 1547–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00097-4.
Lasdon, L. S., R. L. Fox, and M. W. Ratner. 1974. “Nonlinear optimization using the generalized reduced gradient method.” RAIRO Oper. Res. Rech. Oper. 8 (3): 73–103.
Lasdon, L. S., A. D. Waren, A. Jain, and M. Ratner. 1978. “Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming.” ACM Trans. Math. Software 4 (1): 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/355769.355773.
Liu, L. P., Y. Liu, and Y. Li. 2018. “Research on the influence law of central buckle on long-span suspension bridge’s dynamic and seismic performance.” In Maintenance, Safety, Risk, Management and Life-Cycle Performance of Bridges: Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, edited by N. Powers, D. M. Frangopol, R. Al-Mahaidi, and C. Caprani, 9–13. Melbourne, Australia: CRC.
Melan, J. 1888. “Theorie der eisernen bogenbrucken und der hangebrucken.” In Handbuch der ingenieurwissenschaften. 2nd ed. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
Moisseiff, L. S. 1927. The deflection theory is applied to suspension bridges with suspended spans. Final Rep.: The Bridge over the Delaware River Connecting Philadelphia, PA and Camden, NJ, Appendix D, 96-105. Camden, NJ: Delaware River Bridge Joint Commission.
Navier, C. L. M. H. 1823. Rapport a Monsieur Becquey et mémoire sur les ponts suspendus. Paris: Imprimérie Royal.
Pugsley, A. 1968. The theory of suspension bridges. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.
Saafan, S. A. 1966. “Theoretical analysis of suspension bridges.” J. Struct. Div. 92 (4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0001488.
Shin, S.-U., M.-R. Jung, J. Park, and M.-Y. Kim. 2015. “A deflection theory and its validation of earth-anchored suspension bridges under live loads.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 19 (1): 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0641-9.
Steinman, D. B. 1929. A practical treatise on suspension bridges. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Viola, J. M., S. Syed, and J. Clenance. 2005. “The new Tacoma narrows suspension bridge: Construction support and engineering.” In Proc., 2005 Structures Congress, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Wang, D., C. M. Chen, and Y. Liu. 2013. “Central buckle influence research on dynamical characteristics of suspension bridge.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 405–408: 1489–1493. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.1489.
Wang, H., K.-G. Zou, A.-Q. Li, and C.-K. Jiao. 2010. “Parameter effects on the dynamic characteristics of a super-long-span triple-tower suspension bridge.” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 11 (5): 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900496.
Wang, X., S. Chai, and Y. Xu. 2016. “Deformation characteristics of double-cable multispan suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (4): 06015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000858.
West, H. H., and A. R. Robinson. 1968. “Continuous method of suspension bridge analysis.” J. Struct. Div. 94 (12): 2861–2884. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002145.
Wollmann, G. P. 2001. “Preliminary analysis of suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (4): 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:4(227).
Wu, X., and B. L. Li. 2015. “Estimation and optimization of cable force in completion state of cable-stayed bridge.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 744–746: 763–766. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.744-746.763.
Yang, C.-D. 2014. “The compared study of flexible central buckles cable girder anchorage system of steel truss girder suspension bridge.” In Green building, materials and civil engineering. 1st ed., edited by J. C. M. Kao, W.-P. Sung, and R. Chen. London: CRC Press.
Zhang, W.-M., J.-Q. Chang, X.-F. Lu, G.-M. Tian, and J.-G. Li. 2021a. “Suspension bridge deformation and internal forces under the concentrated live load: Analytical algorithm.” Eng. Struct. 248: 113271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113271.
Zhang, W.-M., G.-M. Tian, C.-Y. Yang, and Z. Liu. 2019. “Analytical methods for determining the cable configuration and construction parameters of a suspension bridge.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 71 (6): 603–625.
Zhang, W.-M., C.-Y. Yang, and J.-Q. Chang. 2021b. “Cable shape and construction parameters of triple-tower double-cable suspension bridge with two asymmetrical main spans.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (2): 04020127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001674.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 11November 2023

History

Received: Mar 2, 2023
Accepted: Jul 25, 2023
Published online: Sep 8, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 8, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1121. Email: [email protected]
Xing-hang Shen [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]
Jia-qi Chang [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share