Technical Papers
Aug 29, 2023

Experimental and Numerical Study on the Aerodynamic Admittance of Twin-Box Bridge Decks in Sinusoidal Gusts and Continuous Turbulence

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 11

Abstract

Aerodynamic admittance functions (AAFs) of twin-box decks are particularly complex due to the presence of a central gap, so require the performance of dedicated studies to determine them. Two main approaches are available for this purpose, which consist of studying the aerodynamic forces produced by the section when impinged by sinusoidal gusts or continuous turbulence, respectively. However, owing to the difficulty in the generation of large-scale turbulence in traditional wind tunnel tests, the two aforementioned approaches often provide remarkably different results. To address this problem, this study aims to systematically investigate the admittance function of twin-box decks by comparing three approaches: active wind tunnel tests, and large eddy simulations (LESs) using both sinusoidal gusts and continuous synthetic turbulence. In particular, wind tunnel tests equipped with an active gust generator are conducted to generate a series of single-frequency vertical sinusoidal gusts. The effects of gust amplitudes and gap widths on the AAFs are experimentally investigated. In addition, LESs are performed aiming to provide valuable insights regarding the discrepancy between AAFs obtained in the two inflow conditions. Results obtained adopting all the aforementioned methodologies are compared, showing good agreement among the three approaches and values sometimes higher than the Sears function. It is also shown that buffeting forces are mainly produced by the upstream deck, so explaining the good agreement obtained between sinusoidal gust and continuous turbulent inflows.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study is sponsored by the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52122803), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFC3005302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778106), and Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Project (Nos. 2022AC18010 and 2022AC21179), which are greatly acknowledged.

References

Álvarez, A., F. Nieto, K. Kwok, and S. Hernández. 2018. “Aerodynamic performance of twin-box decks: A parametric study on gap width effects based on validated 2D URANS simulations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 182: 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.004.
Álvarez, A., F. Nieto, K. Kwok, and S. Hernández. 2021. “A computational study on the aerodynamics of a twin-box bridge with a focus on the spanwise features.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 209: 104465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104465.
Bruno, L., M. V. Salvetti, and F. Ricciardelli. 2014. “Benchmark on the aerodynamics of a rectangular 5:1 cylinder: An overview after the first four years of activity.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 126: 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.01.005.
Chen, W.-L., H. Li, and H. Hu. 2014. “An experimental study on the unsteady vortices and turbulent flow structures around twin-box-girder bridge deck models with different gap ratios.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 132: 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.06.015.
Chen, X., M. Matsumoto, and A. Kareem. 2000. “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(7).
Chen, Z., Y. Han, X. Hua, and Y. Luo. 2009. “Investigation on influence factors of buffeting response of bridges and its aeroelastic model verification for Xiaoguan bridge.” Eng. Struct. 31 (2): 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.016.
Cheynet, E., J. B. Jakobsen, and J. Snæbjörnsson. 2019. “Flow distortion recorded by sonic anemometers on a long-span bridge: Towards a better modelling of the dynamic wind load in full-scale.” J. Sound Vib. 450: 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.03.013.
Cid Montoya, M., F. Nieto, S. Hernández, A. Fontán, J. Jurado, and A. Kareem. 2021. “Aero-structural optimization of streamlined twin-box deck bridges with short gap considering flutter.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (6): 04021028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001705.
Cui, W., L. Zhao, and Y. Ge. 2022. “Non-Gaussian turbulence induced buffeting responses of long-span bridges based on state augmentation method.” Eng. Struct. 254: 113774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113774.
Davenport, A. G. 1962. “The response of slender, line-like structures to a gusty wind.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 23 (3): 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1962.10876.
de Miranda, S., L. Patruno, M. Ricci, and F. Ubertini. 2015. “Numerical study of a twin box bridge deck with increasing gap ratio by using RANS and LES approaches.” Eng. Struct. 99: 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.017.
Diana, G., S. Bruni, A. Cigada, and E. Zappa. 2002. “Complex aerodynamic admittance function role in buffeting response of a bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (12–15): 2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00321-5.
Diana, G., G. Fiammenghi, M. Belloli, and D. Rocchi. 2013. “Wind tunnel tests and numerical approach for long span bridges: The Messina bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 122: 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.012.
Du, S., M. Li, and Y. Yang. 2020. “Effects of turbulence integral scales on characteristics of fluctuating wind pressures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 204: 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104245.
Fenerci, A., and O. Øiseth. 2017. “Measured buffeting response of a long-span suspension bridge compared with numerical predictions based on design wind spectra.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (9): 04017131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001873.
Germano, M., U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. H. Cabot. 1991. “A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model.” Phys. Fluids A 3 (7): 1760–1765. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.857955.
Harding, S., G. Payne, and I. Bryden. 2014. “Generating controllable velocity fluctuations using twin oscillating hydrofoils: Experimental validation.” J. Fluid Mech. 750: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.257.
Hatanaka, A., and H. Tanaka. 2002. “New estimation method of aerodynamic admittance function.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (12–15): 2073–2086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00324-0.
Hejlesen, M. M., J. T. Rasmussen, A. Larsen, and J. H. Walther. 2015. “On estimating the aerodynamic admittance of bridge sections by a mesh-free vortex method.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 146: 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.08.003.
Helgedagsrud, T., Y. Bazilevs, K. Mathisen, and O. Øiseth. 2019. “ALE-VMS methods for wind-resistant design of long-span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 191: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.001.
Hu, C., Z. Zhou, and K. Yan. 2020. “Wind-induced stability of a cable-stayed bridge with double main spans of 1,500 m and a twin-box section.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001501.
Hu, L., Y.-L. Xu, Q. Zhu, A. Guo, and A. Kareem. 2017. “Tropical storm–induced buffeting response of long-span bridges: Enhanced nonstationary buffeting force model.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (6): 04017027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001745.
Hui, M., A. Larsen, and H. Xiang. 2009. “Wind turbulence characteristics study at the Stonecutters bridge site: Part II: Wind power spectra, integral length scales and coherences.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97 (1): 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.11.003.
Irwin, H. 1981. “The design of spires for wind simulation.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 7 (3): 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(81)90058-1.
Irwin, H., K. Cooper, and R. Girard. 1979. “Correction of distortion effects caused by tubing systems in measurements of fluctuating pressures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 5 (1–2): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(79)90026-6.
Kavrakov, I., T. Argentini, S. Omarini, D. Rocchi, and G. Morgenthal. 2019. “Determination of complex aerodynamic admittance of bridge decks under deterministic gusts using the vortex particle method.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 193: 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103971.
Kawatani, M., and H. Kim. 1992. “Evaluation of aerodynamic admittance for buffeting analysis.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41 (1–3): 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90470-U.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1970. “Diffusion by a random velocity field.” Phys. Fluids 13 (1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692799.
Kwok, K. C., X. R. Qin, C. Fok, and P. A. Hitchcock. 2012. “Wind-induced pressures around a sectional twin-deck bridge model: Effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic forces and vortex shedding mechanisms.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 110: 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.07.010.
Laima, S., C. Jiang, H. Li, W. Chen, and J. Ou. 2018. “A numerical investigation of Reynolds number sensitivity of flow characteristics around a twin-box girder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 172: 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.016.
Larose, G., and J. Mann. 1998. “Gust loading on streamlined bridge decks.” J. Fluids Struct. 12 (5): 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1998.0161.
Li, M., Y. Yang, M. Li, and H. Liao. 2018. “Direct measurement of the Sears function in turbulent flow.” J. Fluid Mech. 847: 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.351.
Li, S., and M. Li. 2017. “Spectral analysis and coherence of aerodynamic lift on rectangular cylinders in turbulent flow.” J. Fluid Mech. 830: 408–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.593.
Li, S., Y. Liu, M. Li, W. Zeng, S. Gu, and Y. Gao. 2022. “The effect of turbulence intensity on the unsteady gust loading on a 5:1 rectangular cylinder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 225: 104994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104994.
Li, W., L. Patruno, H. Niu, S. de Miranda, and X. Hua. 2021a. “Aerodynamic admittance of a 6:1 rectangular cylinder: A computational study on the role of turbulence intensity and integral length scale.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 218: 104738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104738.
Li, W., L. Patruno, H. Niu, S. de Miranda, and X. Hua. 2021b. “Identification of complex admittance functions using 2D-URANS models: Inflow generation and validation on rectangular cylinders.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 208: 104435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104435.
Liepmann, H. W. 1955. “Extension of the statistical approach to buffeting and gust response of wings of finite span.” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 22 (3): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3305.
Lilly, D. K. 1992. “A proposed modification of the germano subgrid-scale closure method.” Phys. Fluids A 4 (3): 633–635. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858280.
Ma, C., Q. Duan, Q. Li, H. Liao, and Q. Tao. 2019a. “Aerodynamic characteristics of a long-span cable-stayed bridge under construction.” Eng. Struct. 184: 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.097.
Ma, C., C. Pei, H.-L. Liao, M. Liu, and M. Li. 2020. “Field measurement and wind tunnel study of aerodynamic characteristics of twin-box girder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 202: 104209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104209.
Ma, C., J. Wang, Q. Li, and H. Liao. 2019b. “3D aerodynamic admittances of streamlined box bridge decks.” Eng. Struct. 179: 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.007.
Ma, C., J. Wang, Q. Li, H. Qin, and H. Liao. 2018. “Vortex-induced vibration performance and suppression mechanism for a long suspension bridge with wide twin-box girder.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (11): 04018202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002198.
Ma, T., L. Zhao, S. Cao, Y. Ge, and H. Miyagi. 2013. “Investigations of aerodynamic effects on streamlined box girder using two-dimensional actively-controlled oncoming flow.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 122: 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.011.
Macdonald, J. H. 2003. “Evaluation of buffeting predictions of a cable-stayed bridge from full-scale measurements.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (12–15): 1465–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.009.
Montoya, M. C., F. Nieto, S. Hernández, A. Fontán, J. Jurado, and A. Kareem. 2021. “Optimization of bridges with short gap streamlined twin-box decks considering structural, flutter and buffeting performance.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 208: 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104316.
Nieto, F., M. C. Montoya, S. Hernández, I. Kusano, A. Casteleiro, A. J. Álvarez, J. Á. Jurado, and A. Fontán. 2020. “Aerodynamic and aeroelastic responses of short gap twin-box decks: Box geometry and gap distance dependent surrogate based design.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 201: 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104147.
Patruno, L., and M. Ricci. 2018. “A systematic approach to the generation of synthetic turbulence using spectral methods.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 340: 881–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.06.028.
Rasmussen, J. T., M. M. Hejlesen, A. Larsen, and J. H. Walther. 2010. “Discrete vortex method simulations of the aerodynamic admittance in bridge aerodynamics.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (12): 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.011.
Scanlan, R. 1978. “The action of flexible bridges under wind, II: Buffeting theory.” J. Sound Vib. 60 (2): 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80029-7.
Scanlan, R. H. 2000. “Bridge deck aeroelastic admittance revisited.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(1).
Sears, W. R. 1941. “Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application.” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 8 (3): 104–108. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10655.
Tabor, G. R., and M. Baba-Ahmadi. 2010. “Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review.” Comput. Fluids 39 (4): 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.10.007.
Trein, C. A., H. Shirato, and M. Matsumoto. 2015. “On the effects of the gap on the unsteady pressure characteristics of two-box bridge girders.” Eng. Struct. 82: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.036.
Wang, H., A. Li, and R. Hu. 2011. “Comparison of ambient vibration response of the Runyang Suspension Bridge under skew winds with time-domain numerical predictions.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (4): 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000168.
Wang, J., C. Ma, E. Dragomirescu, X. Chen, and Y. Yang. 2021. “Two-dimensional aerodynamic admittance of a flat closed-box bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (3): 04020359. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002949.
Wang, J., C. Ma, H. Jing, C. Pei, and E. Dragomirescu. 2020a. “Experimental study on aerodynamic admittance of twin-box bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 198: 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104080.
Wang, J., C. Ma, Q. Li, and H. Qin. 2020b. “Influence of gap width on buffeting force spatial correlation and aerodynamic admittance of twin-box bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 207: 104392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104392.
Wang, Y., X. Chen, and Y. Li. 2022. “Influence of wind turbulence on aerodynamic admittances of a streamlined bridge deck at different angles of attack.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (9): 04022080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001932.
Wei, N. J., J. Kissing, T. T. Wester, S. Wegt, K. Schiffmann, S. Jakirlic, M. Hölling, J. Peinke, and C. Tropea. 2019. “Insights into the periodic gust response of airfoils.” J. Fluid Mech. 876: 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.537.
Weller, H. 2012. “Controlling the computational modes of the arbitrarily structured C grid.” Mon. Weather Rev. 140 (10): 3220–3234. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00221.1.
Wen, H., J. Zhang, W. Yao, and L. Tang. 2017. “FFT-based amplitude estimation of power distribution systems signal distorted by harmonics and noise.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14 (4): 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.9424.
Wu, F., Z. Wang, L. Zhao, T. Pan, H. Xiao, and Y. Ge. 2023. “Aerodynamic force distribution characteristics around a double-slotted box girder of a long-span bridge during vortex-induced vibration.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (1): 04022132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001977.
Wu, X. 2017. “Inflow turbulence generation methods.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49 (1): 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/fluid.2017.49.issue-1.
Wu, Z., G. Bangga, T. Lutz, G. Kampers, and M. Hölling. 2020. “Insights into airfoil response to sinusoidal gusty inflow by oscillating vanes.” Phys. Fluids 32 (12): 125107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023297.
Yan, L., L. D. Zhu, X. H. He, and R. G. J. Flay. 2019. “Experimental determination of aerodynamic admittance functions of a bridge deck considering oscillation effect.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 190: 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.04.009.
Yang, Y., M. Li, Y. Su, and Y. Sun. 2019. “Aerodynamic admittance of a 5:1 rectangular cylinder in turbulent flow.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 189: 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.023.
Yang, Y., T. Wu, Y. Ge, and A. Kareem. 2015. “Aerodynamic stabilization mechanism of a twin box girder with various slot widths.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (3): 04014067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000645.
Ye, Z., N. Li, and F. Zhang. 2019. “Wind characteristics and responses of Xihoumen Bridge during typhoons based on field monitoring.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 9 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00325-y.
Zhang, Z., and W. Zhang. 2017. “Experimental investigation on relations between flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001117.
Zhang, Z., X. Zhang, Y. Yang, and Y. Ge. 2017. “Nonlinear aerodynamic and energy input properties of a twin-box girder bridge deck section.” J. Fluids Struct. 74: 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.06.016.
Zhao, L., X. Xie, T. Wu, S.-P. Li, Z.-P. Li, Y.-J. Ge, and A. Kareem. 2020. “Revisiting aerodynamic admittance functions of bridge decks.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 21 (7): 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900353.
Zhu, Q., and Y. L. Xu. 2014. “Characteristics of distributed aerodynamic forces on a twin-box bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 131: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.05.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 11November 2023

History

Received: Dec 2, 2022
Accepted: Jun 6, 2023
Published online: Aug 29, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 29, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Weilin Li
State Key Laboratory of Featured Metal Materials and Life-cycle Safety for Composite Structures, Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of China Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi Univ., Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China.
DICAM, Univ. of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-207X
Huawei Niu
College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410006, China.
Yonghui An, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
State Key Laboratory of Featured Metal Materials and Life-cycle Safety for Composite Structures, Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of China Ministry of Education, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; Dept. of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116023, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Xugang Hua
College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share