Case Studies
Oct 3, 2023

Performance of Composite Plate Girder Bridges with Full-Depth Precast Concrete Deck Systems

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 12

Abstract

Recently, the construction of composite steel plate girder bridges that uses precast concrete deck planks has significantly increased due to their ease of construction, rapid installment, relatively low cost, and lightweight. Recent structural failures have been reported for this type of bridge system, which include the total collapse of one section of the Mexico City Metro Overpass in May 2021. The bridge collapse killed 23 people, and dozens were injured. This study provides an overview of the causes of the failure of the Mexico City Metro Overpass. It highlights important structural deficiencies that are currently overlooked in design codes and could cause future catastrophic collapses in existing bridges that utilize the same type of bridge. Therefore, a detailed finite-element model of a composite steel girder bridge that uses precast deck planks was established. The bridge dimensions, properties, and loading conditions that were used in this study were obtained from the Mexico City Metro Overpass parameters with some modifications. The performance of the bridge structure was investigated under different conditions with consideration of joint deterioration between the precast concrete planks. The results indicated that the deterioration in the transverse joints due to long-term exposure to moisture, environmental conditions, and vibrations affected the amount of force that was transferred between the concrete deck and the bare steel girder and, therefore, hindered the composite action. The gradual loss of composite action could cause a significant increase in the demands that are imposed on the bare steel section and result in high deflections in the bridge deck. Further deterioration in the transverse joints could be ongoing due to the repetitive vehicle loading on the compromised composite girder. Vibrations and exposure of the cracked joints to moisture and weather could worsen these conditions. Catastrophic failure of the bridge could occur if the deterioration issues were not observed and addressed in a timely manner. This study concludes by providing recommendations for design considerations to improve bridge performance, extend service life, and prevent such failures.

Practical Applications

The collapse of the Mexico City Metro Overpass killed 23 people and injured many others and inspired this study. The system used in this bridge is a composite plate girder with full-depth precast concrete (FDPC) deck, a recent system that allows rapid construction. The best way for engineers to prevent repeating these accidents is to understand the factors that lead bridges to fail. This study starts by exploring the causes of failure in bridges when focusing on the expected deterioration effects in the long run. Simulation techniques are employed to build a model for a bridge that is similar to the system that collapsed in the Mexico City Metro Overpass. It was used to understand the factors that led to the collapse under the moving train load. The results showed that adhering to current design codes and guidelines is not sufficient to prevent the failure of a bridge. This is a serious issue, because the codes are expected to provide the minimum requirements that guarantee the safety of structures during their service life. Therefore, this study concludes by providing recommendations for design considerations to improve bridge performance, extend service life, and prevent such failures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD-guide specification for accelerated bridge construction. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Interim Revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abbas, H. H., and M. M. Hassan. 2017. “Steel railway bridges in Egypt.” J. Egypt. Soc. Eng. 56 (2): 2–7.
Abbas, H. H., and M. M. Hassan. 2022. “Rehabilitation applications of roadway structures.” In Current perspectives and new directions in mechanics, modelling and design of structural systems, 1949–1955. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Abdelnaby, A. E., T. M. Frankie, A. S. Elnashai, B. F. Spencer, D. A. Kuchma, P. Silva, and C.-M. Chang. 2014. “Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration.” Eng. Struct. 70: 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.009.
Agüero, A., and F. J. Pallarés. 2007. “Proposal to evaluate the ultimate limit state of slender structures. Part 1: Technical aspects.” Eng. Struct. 29: 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.05.014.
Alhassan, M. 2011. State-of-the-art report on full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panels. Chicago: Prestressed Concrete Institute.
Alotaibi, E., N. Nassif, M. Alhalabi, H. Al Sebai, and S. Barakat. 2021. “Numerical investigation on redundancy of bridges with AASHTO I-girders.” Bridge Struct. 17 (1–2): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.3233/BRS-210187.
Al-Rousan, R. 2020. “Behavior of prefabricated full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panel system: Optimum prestress level.” Procedia Manuf. 44: 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.249.
ANSI/AISC (American National Standards Institute/American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. AISC Committee 2016. Washington, DC: ANSI/AISC.
AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association). 2018. Manual for railway engineering. Chap. 15. Washington, DC: AREMA.
Badie, S. S., A. F. Morgan Girgis, M. K. Tadros, and N. T. Nguyen. 2010. “Relaxing the stud spacing limit for full-depth precast concrete deck panels supported on steel girders (phase I).” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (5): 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000082.
Badie, S. S., M. K. Tadros, and A. F. Girgis. 2006. Full-depth, precast-concrete bridge deck panel systems. National Cooperative Highway Research Board Report 584. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Bagge, N., C. Popescu, and L. Elfgren. 2018. “Failure tests on concrete bridges: Have we learnt the lessons?” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (3): 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1350985.
CSI (Computers & Structures). 2021. Analysis reference manual. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
Culmo, M. P. 1991. “Bridge deck rehabilitation using precast concrete slabs.” Connecticut Department of Transportation. Eighth Annual International Bridge Conference. Pittsburgh, PA. Paper No. IBC-91-55. pp. 389–396.
Culmo, M. P. 2009. Connection details for prefabricated bridge elements and systems. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
DNV Energy Systems. 2022. Final report-phase II: Technical report of incident that occurred on the elevated portion of line 12 between Station Olivos and Station Tezonco, Mexico. Mexico: DNV Energy Systems.
Flesch, R. G., and K. Kernbichler. 1990. “A dynamic method for the safety inspection of large prestressed bridges.” In Bridge evaluation, repair and rehabilitation, edited by A. S. Nowak, 175–185. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Garber, D. 2016. “ABC project database.” Accessed May 24, 2016. http://utcdb.fiu.edu/.
Ghosn, M., F. Moses, and D. M. Frangopol. 2019. “Redundancy and robustness of highway bridge superstructures and substructures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Syst. 6: 376–397. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351182805-24.
Graybeal, B. A., B. M. Phares, D. D. Rolander, M. Moore, and G. Washer. 2002. “Visual inspection of highway bridges.” J. Nondestr. Eval. 21 (3): 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022508121821.
Hassan, M. M., S. A. Elsawaf, and H. H. Abbas. 2017. “Existing metallic bridges in Egypt: Current conditions and problems.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 7 (5): 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0251-6.
Hassan, M. M., M. M. Saleh, and H. H. Abbas. 2015. “Assessment of existing steel combined railway and roadway bridges over waterways.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Bridge Testing, Monitoring & Assessment. Cairo, Egypt: Housing & Building National Research Center (HBRC-ISHMII).
Heang, L. A. 2017. “Redundancy evaluation of steel-concrete composite twin I-girder bridges.” Ph.D. thesis. Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Waseda Univ.
Imam, B. M., and M. K. Chryssanthopoulos. 2007. Failure statistics for metallic bridges. COST601: Timissoara, Romania: Robustness of Structure.
Issa, M. A., C. L. R. do Valle, H. A. Abdalla, S. Islam, and M. A. Issa. 2003a. “Performance of transverse joint grout materials in full-depth precast concrete bridge deck systems.” PCI J. 48 (4): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012003.92.103.
Issa, M. A., T. A. Patton, H. A. Abdalla, A. A. Yousif, and M. A. Issa. 2003b. “Composite behavior of shear connections in full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panels on steel stringers.” PCI J. 48 (5): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012003.76.89.
Issa, M. A., J. S. Salas, H. I. Shabila, and R. Z. Alrousan. 2006. “Composite behavior of precast concrete full-depth panels and prestressed girders.” PCI J. 51 (5): 132. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012006.132.145.
Issa, M. A., A. A. Yousif, and M. A. Issa. 1995. Structural behavior of full depth precast prestressed concrete bridge deck replacement. Final Report. Springfield, IL: Illinois Dept. of Transportation.
Lam, H., W. Lin, and T. Yoda. 2014. “Effects of bracing systems on redundancy of three-span composite twin I-girder bridge.” Struct. Eng. Proc. 60: 59–69. https://doi.org/10.11532/structcivil.60A.59.
Lin, W., T. Yoda, Y. Kumagai, and T. Saigyo. 2013. “Numerical study on post-fracture redundancy of the two-girder steel-concrete composite highway bridges.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 13 (4): 671–681. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13296-013-4008-8.
Menkulasi, F., and C. L. Roberts-Wollmann. 2005. “Behavior of horizontal shear connections for full-depth precast concrete bridge decks on prestressed I-girders.” PCI J. 50 (3): 60–73. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012005.60.73.
Moravcik, M., P. Bujnakova, and F. Bahleda. 2020. “Failure and damage of a first-generation precast prestressed bridge in Slovakia.” Struct. Concr. 21 (6): 2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900526.
Ollgaard, J., R. G. Slutter, and J. W. Fisher. 1971. “The strength of stud shear connection in lightweight and normal-weight concrete.” Eng. J. 8 (2): 55–64.
Park, Y., W. Joe, J. Park, M. Hwang, and B. H. Choi. 2012. “An experimental study on after-fracture redundancy of continuous span two-girder bridges.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 12 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-1001-6.
Polat, G. 2008. “Factors affecting the use of precast concrete systems in the United States.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (3): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(169).
Russell, H. G., M. L. Ralls, and B. M. Tang. 2005. “Prefabricated bridge elements and systems in Japan and Europe.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1928 (1): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192800111.
Shahrokhinasab, E., and D. Garber. 2021. “Long-term performance of full-depth precast concrete (FDPC) deck panels.” Eng. Struct. 244: 112738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112738.
Sullivan, S. R., C. L. Roberts-Wollmann, and M. K. Swenty. 2011. “Composite behavior of precast concrete bridge deck-panel systems.” PCI J. 56 (3): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.06012011.43.59.
Tang, L. 2021. “Maintenance and inspection of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bridges: A review of methods.” Materials 14 (24): 7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247826.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2023. Bridge design guide: Bridge division. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
The New York Times. 2021. Accessed November 26, 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-56977129.
Wardhana, K., and F. C. Hadipriono. 2003. “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 17 (3): 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2022. Bridge design manual (LRFD). M 23-50.21. Washington, DC: WSDOT.
Yamane, T., M. K. Tadros, S. S. Badie, and M. C. Baishya. 1995. “Full-depth precast prestressed concrete bridge deck system.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska.
Yousif, A. A. 1995. Field performance of full depth precast concrete panels in bridge deck reconstruction. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Illinois.
Yousif, A. A. 1998. “Analysis of full depth precast concrete bridge deck panels.” PCI J. 43 (1): 74–85.
Yousif, A. A., and M. A. Issa. 1995. “Construction procedures for rapid replacement of bridge decks.” Concr. Int. 17 (2): 49–52.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 12December 2023

History

Received: Nov 25, 2022
Accepted: Aug 11, 2023
Published online: Oct 3, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 3, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Adel E. Abdelnaby, Ph.D., S.E., P.E., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-0950 [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-0950. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Cairo Univ., Cairo 12613, Egypt; Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Prince Magrin, Madinah 42241, Saudi Arabia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-451X

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share