Technical Papers
Jul 11, 2023

Effect Mechanism of Wind Barriers on Flutter Characteristics of Closed Box Girders with Different Aspect Ratios

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 9

Abstract

Wind barrier is an effective countermeasure to protect vehicles from the lateral wind on sea-crossing bridges. Previous studies focused on the sheltering efficiency of wind barriers and their effects on the aerodynamic/aeroelastic characteristics but ignored the analysis of intrinsic mechanism for dynamic stability, especially for flutter instability, which results only in a vague understanding of the role of wind barriers in flutter. Hence, this study paid attention to the effect mechanism of wind barriers on the flutter characteristics to generate a comprehensive understanding of the coupled relationship between wind barriers and the main structure. Wind tunnel experiments of closed box girders with different aspect ratios were first conducted to unearth the sensitivity of wind-barrier location, wind-barrier shape, wind-barrier porosity, and aspect ratios of main girders to flutter performance. The positive function of wind barriers was discovered, which was contrary to the common view that wind barriers had an adverse effect on streamlined structures. Then, the overall evolution of flutter process affected by wind barriers was investigated in detail from the flutter derivative contribution and modal participation. Simultaneously, local-region responses on the bridge surface to the installation of wind barriers were also studied by a proposed simplified local effect model based on surface fluctuating pressure. Also, the reason for the different influences of wind barriers was revealed according to the analysis from both overall and local levels.

Practical Applications

Wind barrier is an effective countermeasure to protect vehicles from the lateral wind on sea-crossing bridges. However, a modification of structural aerodynamic shape affected by wind barriers may have an adverse effect on aerodynamic stability, especially flutter instability. This study focuses on the wind-barrier effects on the flutter characteristics of closed box girders with different aspect ratios. The model test shows that there is no obvious positive or negative correspondence between wind barriers and structural flutter performance. If we can make full use of wind barriers, the flutter critical wind velocity can be improved by even 40%. Then, the flutter mechanism of wind barriers is investigated in detail based on the analysis of global derivatives, local derivatives, and unsteady pressure. Finally, the key flutter derivatives and the key function region of the deck surface are obtained, which may provide some references for the application of closed box girders in super long-span bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52178503) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant no. SLDRCE19-B-10).

References

Argentini, T., D. Rocchi, S. Muggiasca, and A. Zasso. 2012. “Cross-sectional distributions versus integrated coefficients of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances identified with surface pressure measurement.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (3): 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.03.009.
Buljac, A., H. Kozmar, S. Pospíšil, and M. Macháček. 2017a. “Aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of typical bridge decks equipped with wind barriers at the windward bridge-deck edge.” Eng. Struct. 137: 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.055.
Buljac, A., H. Kozmar, S. Pospíšil, and M. Macháček. 2017b. “Flutter and galloping of cable-supported bridges with porous wind barriers.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 171: 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.012.
Buljac, A., H. Kozmar, S. Pospíšil, M. Macháček, and S. Kuznetsov. 2020. “Effects of wind-barrier layout and wind turbulence on aerodynamic stability of cable-supported bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (12): 04020102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001631.
Chen, N., Y. Li, B. Wang, Y. Su, and H. Xiang. 2015. “Effects of wind barrier on the safety of vehicles driven on bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 143: 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.021.
Chen, X. 2007. “Improved understanding of bimodal coupled bridge flutter based on closed-form solutions.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(22).
Dorigatti, F., M. Sterling, D. Rocchi, M. Belloli, A. D. Quinn, C. J. Baker, and E. Ozkan. 2012. “Wind tunnel measurements of crosswind loads on high sided vehicles over long span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 107–108: 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.017.
Flint, A. R. 1992. “Strengthening and refurbishment of the Severn Crossing.” ICE Civ. Eng. 94 (1): 7–22.
He, X., L. Zhou, Z. Chen, H. Jing, Y. Zou, and T. Wu. 2019. “Effect of wind barriers on the flow field and aerodynamic forces of a train–bridge system.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 233 (3): 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409718793220.
Kozmar, H., L. Procino, A. Borsani, and G. Bartoli. 2012. “Sheltering efficiency of wind barriers on bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 107–108: 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.027.
Kozmar, H., L. Procino, A. Borsani, and G. Bartoli. 2014. “Optimizing height and porosity of roadway wind barriers for viaducts and bridges.” Eng. Struct. 81: 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.029.
Laima, S., and H. Li. 2015. “Effects of gap width on flow motions around twin-box girders and vortex-induced vibrations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 139: 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.009.
Larsen, A. 1993. “Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 48 (2): 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90141-A.
Larsen, A. 2000. “Aerodynamics of the Tacoma narrows bridge—60 years later.” Struct. Eng. Int. 10 (4): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686600780481356.
Li, K., S. Li, Y. Ge, and B. Yan. 2019. “An investigation into the bimodal flutter details based on flutter derivatives’ contribution along the bridge deck’s surface.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 192: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.019.
Matsumoto, M., N. Nakajima, Y. Taniwaki, and R. Shijo. 2001. “Grating effect on flutter instability.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89: 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00143-X.
Matsumoto, M., K. Okubo, Y. Ito, H. Matsumiya, and G. Kim. 2008. “The complex branch characteristics of coupled flutter.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1843–1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.011.
Matsumoto, M., F. Yoshizumi, T. Yabutani, K. Abe, and N. Nakajima. 1999. “Flutter stabilization and heaving-branch flutter.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 83: 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00079-3.
Mizon, D., N. Smith, and A. Yeoward. 1997. “Second severn crossing—Cable-stayed bridge.” Civ. Eng. 120 (6): 49–63.
Scanlan, R. H., and J. J. Tomko. 1971. “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97 (6): 1717–1737. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526.
Smith, B., and C. Barker. 1998. “Design of wind screen to bridges, experience and applications on major bridges.” In Bridge aerodynamics, edited by A. Larsen and S. Esdahl, 289–298. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Balkema.
Tang, H., Y. Li, and K. M. Shum. 2018. “Flutter performance and aerodynamic mechanism of plate with central stabilizer at large angles of attack.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 21 (3): 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217717120.
Tang, H., Y. Li, Y. Wang, and Q. Tao. 2017. “Aerodynamic optimization for flutter performance of steel truss stiffening girder at large angles of attack.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 168: 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.013.
Tao, W., P. Lou, Y. Zou, C. Cai, X. He, and S. Jiang. 2022. “Effects of curved wind barrier on the aerodynamic characteristics of a train–bridge system and its static wind load.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22 (10): 2241006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455422410061.
Taylor, Z. J., R. Gurka, G. A. Kopp, and A. Liberzon. 2010. “Long-duration time-resolved PIV to study unsteady aerodynamics.” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 59 (12): 3262–3269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2010.2047149.
Telenta, M., J. Duhovnik, F. Kosel, and V. Šajn. 2014. “Numerical and experimental study of the flow through a geometrically accurate porous wind barrier model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 124: 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.11.010.
Trein, C. A., H. Shirato, and M. Matsumoto. 2015. “On the effects of the gap on the unsteady pressure characteristics of two-box bridge girders.” Eng. Struct. 82: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.036.
Wilde, K., Y. Fujino, and J. Masukawa. 1996. “Time domain modeling of bridge deck flutter.” Struct. Eng. Earthquake Eng. 13 (2): 93–104.
Xia, J., K. Li, Y. Ge, and F. Cao. 2017. “Crosswind environment and flutter performances of bridge deck with different wind barriers.” J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 49 (3): 98–105.
Yang, Y., Y. Ge, and H. Xiang. 2007. “Investigation on flutter mechanism of long-span bridges with 2D-3DOF method.” Wind Struct. 10 (5): 421–435. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2007.10.5.421.
Yang, Y., Y. Ge, R. Zhou, S. Chen, and L. Zhang. 2020. “Aerodynamic countermeasure schemes of super long-span suspension bridges with various aspect ratios.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 20 (5): 2050061. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455420500613.
Yang, Y., J. Zhang, F. Cao, Y. Ge, and L. Zhao. 2022. “Evaluation and improvement of wind environment and vehicle safety on long-span bridge deck under strong crosswind.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 228: 105089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105089.
Yang, Y., R. Zhou, Y. Ge, D. Mohotti, and P. Mendis. 2015. “Aerodynamic instability performance of twin box girders for long-span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 145: 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.014.
Yang, Y., R. Zhou, Y. Ge, and L. Zhang. 2016. “Experimental studies on VIV performance and countermeasures for twin-box girder bridges with various slot width ratios.” J. Fluids Struct. 66: 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.08.010.
Yang, Y., R. Zhou, Y. Ge, and L. Zhang. 2018. “Flutter characteristics of thin plate sections for aerodynamic bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (1): 04017121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001165.
Ying, X., F. Xu, M. Xu, and Z. Zhe. 2017. “Numerical explorations of the limit cycle flutter characteristics of a bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 169: 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.020.
Zhang, W., Y. Yang, Y. Ge, and Y. Shao. 2008. “Effects of wind barrier on wind-resistant performance of long-span suspension bridge.” J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 30 (11): 113–116.
Zhu, J., Y. Yang, Y. Ge, S. Zheng, and R. Zhou. 2022. “Improvements in convergence robustness with a 2D-3DOF method: Application of genetic algorithm to coupled flutter.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (10): 04022095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001935.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Sep 23, 2022
Accepted: May 30, 2023
Published online: Jul 11, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Yongxin Yang
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, P. R. China.
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, P. R. China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-0851. Email: [email protected]
Lizhu Hong
Bridge Engineering Design Institute, Tongji Univ. Architectural Design and Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, P. R. China.
Yaojun Ge
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, P. R. China.
Rushen Su
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, P. R. China.
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, P. R. China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7191-8666.
Rui Zhou
College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen Univ., Shenzhen 518060, P. R. China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share