Abstract

Conventional bridge systems make use of expansion joints to accommodate movements caused primarily by thermal changes. These joints may accelerate the deterioration of bridge elements and often require significant maintenance costs. Originally proposed in Australia, the seamless bridge concept eliminates the need for expansion joints between bridge decks and roadway pavements. Past applications of seamless bridges have utilized a continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) in which a transition zone is employed between the bridge deck and the CRCP to accommodate the longitudinal expansion and contraction of the bridge and pavement. A critical aspect of the system response is the longitudinal load transfer mechanism in the transition zone, which is governed by the restraint at the concrete pavement–base interface. This paper presents an experimental investigation of the concrete slab–base interaction through unit-cell direct shear tests and cyclic full-scale push-off tests. The load (shear) versus displacement behavior at the interface was evaluated for different interface materials (geotextiles, polyethylene sheets, and felt paper). Test results indicated double-sided textured linear low-density polyethylene sheets and felt paper, which presented coefficients of friction of around 0.4 and 0.7, respectively, were the most promising interface materials to be considered for the transition zone.

Practical Applications

Seamless bridges provide a structural system that eliminates joints that permit corrosion-causing agents that adversely impact the super and substructure components. In seamless bridge systems, the bridge deck connects directly to a transition slab that provides a link with conventional pavement systems. The transition slabs deform to dissipate the thermal movements of the bridge. A critical element in the system is a bond breaker that allows the transition slabs to slide relative to the base foundation element. Too large of a coefficient of friction results in excessively wide cracks in the transition slabs, while too low of a friction coefficient results in excessive lengths of the transition slab region. This paper documents experimental studies on the performance of bond breakers to meet the needs of seamless bridge systems. The research considers the behavior of a wide variety of bond breakers with common bases used in bridge applications and recommends the most promising materials. These recommendations are critical to the successful implementation of seamless bridge systems in practice. The paper presents the results of a two-phase experimental program to identify the best bond breakers for seamless bridge systems and quantifies their interface resistance (coefficients of friction).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation under research project No. 0-7011. Any opinions and findings presented in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the sponsor. The authors would like to express their gratitude to HDR and Clinton Best for their assistance in obtaining CSB mixtures and technical guidance on CSB construction, and to Martin Marietta Materials, Titan Environmental USA, and Solmax for providing the cement, spike HDPE, and textured LLDPE sheet samples, respectively. The Phase I and Phase II experimental programs were conducted in the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory and Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory at the University of Texas at Austin, respectively. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to the laboratory staff for their technical support.

References

AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ala, N. 2011. “Seamless bridge and roadway system for the US practice.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Ala, N., and A. Azizinamini. 2016a. “Proposed design provisions for a seamless bridge system: Cases of flexible and jointed pavements.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (2): 04015045.
Ala, N., and A. Azizinamini. 2016b. “Experimental study of seamless bridge transition system for US practice.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (2): 04015046.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for asphalt-saturated organic felt underlayment used in steep slope roofing. ASTM D4869-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for compressive strength of molded soil–cement cylinders. ASTM D1633-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard specification for plastic water vapor retarders used in contact with soil or granular fill under concrete slabs. ASTM E1745-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for moisture–density (unit weight) relations of soil–cement mixtures. ASTM D588-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Au, A., C. Lam, J. Au, and B. Tharmabala. 2013. “Eliminating deck joints using debonded link slabs: Research and field tests in Ontario.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (8): 768–778.
Burke Jr, M. P. 2009. Integral and semi-integral bridges. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cackler, T., T. Burnham, and D. Harrington. 2018. Performance assessment of nonwoven geotextile materials used as the separation layer for unbonded concrete overlays of existing concrete pavements in the US. Ames, IA: National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State Univ.
Caner, A., and P. Zia. 1998. “Behavior and design of link slabs for jointless bridge decks.” PCI J. 43 (3): 68–80.
Chan Suh, Y., S. Woo Lee, and M. Soo Kang. 2002. “Evaluation of subbase friction for typical Korean concrete pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1809 (1): 66–73.
Chia, W. S., B. F. McCullough, and N. H. Burns. 1986. Field evaluation of subbase friction characteristics. Austin, TX: Texas Dept. of Transportation.
Civjan, S. A., C. H. Bonczar, S. F. Breña, J. T. DeJong, and D. S. Crovo. 2007. “Integral abutment bridge behavior: Parametric analysis of a Massachusetts bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (1): 64–71.
Griffiths, S., G. Bowmaker, C. Bryce, and R. Bridge. 2005. “Design and construction of seamless pavement on Westlink M7, Sydney, Australia.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Concrete Pavements, 21–38. Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Concrete Pavements.
Ha, S., J. Yeon, M. C. Won, Y. S. Jung, and D. G. Zollinger. 2012. User’s guide for TxCRCP-ME design software: Volume I—user’s guide and volume II—Software architecture. Austin, TX: Texas Dept. of Transportation.
Jeong, J. H., J. Y. Park, J. S. Lim, and S. H. Kim. 2014. “Testing and modelling of friction characteristics between concrete slab and subbase layers.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 15 (1): 114–130.
Lee, S. W. 2000. “Characteristics of friction between concrete slab and base.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 4 (4): 265–275.
Li, S., B. Tian, K. Niu, Z. Sun, and W. Zhou. 2013. “Characteristics of base friction for concrete pavement structure in China: Experimental study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2367 (1): 107–112.
Maitra, S. R., K. S. Reddy, and L. S. Ramachandra. 2009. “Experimental evaluation of interface friction and study of its influence on concrete pavement response.” J. Transp. Eng. 135 (8): 563–571.
Mohamed, A. M. M. 2017. “Evaluation of soil–reinforcement composite interaction in geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Otto Rasmussen, R., and D. K. Rozycki. 2001. “Characterization and modeling of axial slab-support restraint.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1778 (1): 26–32.
Roesler, J. R., J. E. Hiller, and A. S. Brand. 2016. Continuously reinforced concrete pavement manual, guidelines for design, construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation. FHWA-HIF-16-026. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Stott, J. P. 1961. “Tests on materials for use in sliding layers under concrete road slabs.” Civ. Eng. 56 (663): 1297.
Thippeswamy, H. K., H. V. GangaRao, and J. M. Franco. 2002. “Performance evaluation of jointless bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (5): 276–289.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2014. Standard specifications for construction and maintenance of highways, streets and bridges. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2019. Pavement manual: Rigid pavement design. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
White, H. 2007. Integral abutment bridges: Comparison of current practice between European countries and the United States of America. Albany, NY: New York State Dept. of Transportation.
Wimsatt, A. J., B. F. McCullough, and N. H. Burns. 1987. Methods of analyzing and factors influencing frictional effects of subbases. Austin, TX: Texas Dept. of Transportation.
Wing, K. M., and M. J. Kowalsky. 2005. “Behavior, analysis, and design of an instrumented link slab bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 331–344.
Zhan, X., K. Liu, Y. B. Zhao, and H. Yan. 2021. “Tensile performance of SHCC road–bridge link slabs in fully jointless bridges.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021: 1–14.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 6June 2023

History

Received: Sep 23, 2022
Accepted: Feb 1, 2023
Published online: Mar 29, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd., Austin, TX 78758 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-224X. Email: [email protected]
Behdad Mofarraj Kouchaki, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301E. Dean Keeton St. ECJ 4.200, Austin, TX 78712-1700.
Jay Malviya
Structural Designer, Holmes US, 235 Montgomery St., STE 1250, San Francisco, CA 94104.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia, C. Jordi Girona 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-7262.
Todd Helwig, M.ASCE
Jewel McAlister Smith Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd., Austin, TX 78758.
Jorge G. Zornberg, F.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-1047
Brunswick-Abernathy Regents Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, University Station, C1792, Austin, TX 78712-0280. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-1047.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share